Skip to main content

FBI agents told to stand down on ICE assault probes; DOJ denies policy shift

▶ Watch Video: Trump border czar says “I think body cameras are the way to go” after deadly ICE shootings

FBI agents around the country received guidance last week that they will no longer participate in investigations of assaults on immigration agents, including incidents that culminate in an immigration agent opening fire, emails reviewed by CBS News show. 

Instead, an arm of Immigration and Customs Enforcement called Homeland Security Investigations will handle the probes.

Justice Department and Homeland Security Department officials deny such a policy change is taking place.

But in the emails reviewed by CBS News, FBI officials and HSI special agents in field offices were advised that the FBI would be deferring on all assault on federal officer inquiries involving DHS agents to HSI. In one email sent to FBI field offices, agents in each office were asked to compile a list of existing investigations involving assaults on federal officers from DHS.

HSI and ICE are overseen by the Department of Homeland Security, meaning the immigration enforcement agency would effectively be investigating incidents involving its own agents. 

The FBI has historically served as the lead law enforcement agency to investigate assaults against federal agents. The bureau also handles highly specialized color-of-law civil rights investigations, such as when civilians are killed by police. Several high-profile fatal shootings by immigration agents over the last 18 months have involved elements of both, with DHS alleging agents were assaulted before they discharged their firearms.

Unlike the FBI, HSI is not typically tasked with investigating officer-involved shootings and is not structured or equipped to handle core elements of such cases, including ballistics analysis, forensic processing, firearm examinations, video review and large-scale witness canvassing, CBS News has previously reported. HSI typically handles a wide variety of cross-border crimes, ranging from human trafficking and cybercrime to art smuggling.

The change was first reported by The New York Times.

Sources familiar with the matter told CBS News that the directive was issued on Thursday to leaders in various FBI field offices. 

Both DHS and the Justice Department publicly have denied that any such change is taking place, with each agency posting on X that the changes reported in the media on how assault investigations involving DHS agents would be investigated were “false.”

The FBI “will continue to investigate in accordance with agency policy,” the Justice Department wrote on X. “This administration has been clear, anyone who assaults law enforcement will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

A Justice Department official told CBS News on Monday morning that the FBI was unaware of any such guidance being distributed to field offices. 

Later on Monday evening, however, CBS News reviewed an additional email that was addressed on Thursday to HSI agents in one of its field offices, one source with knowledge of the matter said.

According to the email reviewed by CBS News, the new guidance will impact all assault investigations, from minor cases involving assaults on DHS employees, all the way up to agent-involved shootings. The abrupt shift prompted hours-long calls with FBI special agents in charge, U.S. attorneys, HSI leaders, and the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general’s office, the email shows.

In the email, a local HSI official also expressed concerns about the need for more training and resources to handle some of the serious cases.

The FBI will still provide resources and assistance upon request, according to both the email and a different source with direct knowledge of the new policy. The email said that HSI would still have strong support from its local partners to work through the policy changes being directed out of Washington.

Several sources familiar with the matter confirmed the policy shift was communicated to FBI field offices last week, with one source adding that the change was reiterated again on Monday — even after both DOJ and DHS publicly denied any such change was taking place.

Spokespeople for the Justice Department, the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to additional follow-up questions from CBS News.

The new policy shift comes on the heels of fatal shootings by federal immigration officers in Texas and Maine earlier this month, and raises questions about what role the FBI will play — if any — on color-of-law civil rights investigations.

On July 7, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer shot and killed a Mexican national in Houston who had lived in the U.S. for decades. Days later, an ICE officer shot and killed a Colombian man in Biddeford, Maine.

The Justice Department, the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to questions from CBS News about how this policy shift may impact the investigations in Texas and Maine.

The FBI earlier this year surged resources in Minnesota to investigate alleged assaults on immigration officers who were carrying out enforcement operations in Minneapolis. Some of those cases were later dismissed after prosecutors reviewed the evidence. 

The issue became a flashpoint after a fatal encounter between an ICE officer and Renee Good. The Justice Department pressured the FBI and prosecutors to treat the investigation as an assault on a federal officer as opposed to a civil rights investigation into her killing, prompting several prosecutors and an FBI agent to resign.

When HSI was tasked with leading the federal investigation into the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis in January, with the help of the FBI, the decision raised questions among current and former federal law enforcement officials. 

After concerns were raised, the FBI and the Civil Rights Division were ordered to take the lead on the probe. That investigation remains ongoing.

Darline Graham ganará la segunda vuelta por el escaño en el Senado de su difunto hermano en Carolina del Sur, proyecta CNN

La senadora Darline Graham ganará la segunda vuelta republicana de la elección especial al Senado en Carolina del Sur, proyecta CNN. Graham reemplazará a su difunto hermano, el senador Lindsey Graham, en la papeleta de las elecciones generales.Darline Graham, recién llegada a la política, fue designada por el gobernador Henry McMaster para completar el mandato de su hermano después de que este muriera repentinamente en julio.Graham contó con el apoyo del presidente Donald Trump, quien la respaldó para cumplir un mandato completo en el Senado antes de que ella siquiera anunciara su intención de postularse. Trump también hizo campaña junto a ella antes de la segunda vuelta. Graham quedó en primer lugar en unas primarias especiales celebradas a principios de este mes, pero obtuvo apenas cerca de un tercio de los votos, por lo que tuvo que disputar una segunda vuelta contra el representante Ralph Norman.Algunos republicanos han expresado malestar ante la impresión de que se estaba allanando el camino para que Graham heredara el escaño por encima de candidatos con más experiencia. En noviembre, será la favorita frente a Annie Andrews, médica y candidata demócrata al Senado, en un estado sólidamente republicano.Tras una “segunda vuelta de primarias muy reñida”, el Partido Republicano de Carolina del Sur felicitó a la senadora Darline Graham.“Como hemos dicho a lo largo de este proceso, este fue un momento histórico para Carolina del Sur, y los votantes de nuestras primarias republicanas se lo tomaron en serio y estuvieron a la altura del desafío”, dijo en un comunicado el presidente estatal del partido, Drew McKissick.McKissick pidió al partido cerrar filas en torno a Graham y centrar su atención en noviembre.La victoria de la senadora Graham supone otro triunfo para Invest in Tomorrow Coalition —Coalición para Invertir en el Futuro—, un comité independiente de campaña centrado en las energías limpias.El grupo destinó US$ 1 millón a hacer campaña contra su rival, el representante Ralph Norman, por considerar que se opone a la industria de las energías renovables. El comité independiente de campaña ayudó anteriormente a derrotar al representante Andy Ogles, republicano de Tennessee, en sus primarias y también gastó dinero contra el representante Chip Roy, republicano de Texas, durante su fallida campaña para fiscal general de Texas.“Nos gustaría dar una cálida bienvenida a Ralph Norman, quien se une a sus colegas Chip Roy y Andy Ogles en el club de congresistas que sacrificaron sus carreras por lanzar unos cuantos golpes bajos contra la industria energética nacional de Estados Unidos”, afirmó en un comunicado Tom Mattzie, presidente del comité independiente de campaña.Annie Andrews, la candidata demócrata al Senado de Estados Unidos por Carolina del Sur, desafió a la senadora Darline Graham a participar en al menos tres debates televisados después de que Graham ganara este martes por la noche la candidatura republicana.Andrews, pediatra, enfrenta un panorama difícil en un estado que no elige a un demócrata para un cargo de elección estatal desde 2006. Sin embargo, dijo que los votantes merecen conocer mejor las posiciones de Graham, una recién llegada a la política que tuvo tropiezos durante el debate de la segunda vuelta de las primarias frente al representante Ralph Norman.“Ningún nombramiento, respaldo o vínculo familiar le da a nadie el derecho de ocupar durante seis años un escaño en el Senado de Estados Unidos”, dijo Andrews en un comunicado. “Este escaño pertenece al pueblo de Carolina del Sur”.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story