Skip to main content

E. Jean Carroll receives $5M from Trump in abuse, defamation case

▶ Watch Video: Supreme Court rejects Trump’s appeal in E. Jean Carroll sexual abuse case

Three years after a jury concluded President Trump should pay $5 million in damages to the writer E. Jean Carroll for sexual abuse and defamation, she has at last been paid.

For Carroll, it’s a wait that began long before her federal civil lawsuit went to trial in 2023. The writer first went public with her story in 2019, accusing Mr. Trump of assaulting her in a department store dressing room three decades ago. The jury unanimously concluded a preponderance of evidence supported her claim.

Court records show Carroll received $5.62 million, including interest. 

Carroll sent a triumphant email to readers of her Substack blog Tuesday, writing “The Eagle Has Landed,” thanking more than a dozen current and former members of her legal team. She also included a line directed at one of Mr. Trump’s former attorneys, who for years led his defense in Carroll’s cases.

“And . . . a special, special thanks to Alina Habba Esq.! I could not have done it without you,” Carroll wrote.

Carroll’s lead attorney, Roberta Kaplan, hailed the writer’s victory in a statement to CBS News.

“Three years ago, a unanimous nine-person jury found President Trump liable for sexually assaulting and defaming E. Jean Carroll,” Kaplan said. “Today, we are pleased to report that she has received the damages payment the jury awarded her as a result of that verdict.”

The money had been held in a court-controlled bank account, but the Supreme Court cleared the way for Carroll to be paid when it decided on June 29 against hearing Mr. Trump’s appeal. 

That day, Carroll celebrated her win in a brief note on her blog, writing in all capital letters, “WE WON!”

“THIS WIN IS FOR EVERY WOMAN IN THE WORLD!” Carroll wrote.

In the days since, her lawyer and Mr. Trump’s have engaged in a bitter tit-for-tat as she sought to speed up disbursement of the funds, and he sought to indefinitely delay payment. Mr. Trump asked the Supreme Court to reconsider its rejection of his appeal. Carroll’s attorney Roberta Kaplan called the move, “gamesmanship,” while asking the trial judge to hurry release of the funds from a court-controlled bank account.

The unanimous federal jury found that, more likely than not, Mr. Trump forcibly inserted his fingers into Carroll after a chance meeting while shopping at a New York City Bergdorf Goodman. What started as a pleasant walk through the store — Carroll helping Mr. Trump choose a present for another woman — turned violent in a changing room, she alleged. 

Mr. Trump did not attend the 2023 civil trial, and his attorneys called no witnesses before the jury awarded Carroll $5 million. The six men and three women of the jury deliberated for under three hours.

Carroll’s lawsuit made claims of sexual abuse, defamation and rape, as defined by New York’s penal code. The jury found Mr. Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, but rejected the rape claim. The state’s statute requires proof of forceful penetration involving the attacker’s genitals.

The judge later wrote that New York’s law is out of touch with federal standards and a “modern” understanding of rape. In post-trial rulings he wrote that Carroll’s assertion that Trump raped her was “substantially true.”

Carroll’s attorneys argued that her allegations fit a pattern, or “modus operandi,” for Mr. Trump. Two other women called as witnesses described Mr. Trump suddenly turning casual confrontations into acts of alleged sexual misconduct. The jurors were also shown an “Access Hollywood” video clip, first made famous during Mr. Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, in which Trump could be heard describing himself grabbing women’s genitals.

For Carroll, age 82, the jury’s award closes one chapter of a long campaign she has waged to hold Mr. Trump accountable for the alleged abuse, while she awaits closure from another trial.

Mr. Trump has consistently denied Carroll’s allegations and has also appealed a separate federal jury’s January 2024 verdict finding him liable for making further defamatory statements against Carroll. That jury awarded her another $83 million

Lawyers for Mr. Trump have indicated they will also bring that case to the Supreme Court.

Abdul El-Sayed distances himself from left-wing influencer after comments about American Jews

(CNN) — Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed sought to distance himself Monday from Hasan Piker after the left-wing streamer and activist suggested to his Twitch viewers last week that American Jews’ support of Israel will make antisemitism worse and invite violence.El-Sayed, who is facing Republican former Rep. Mike Rogers in a critical race in the battle for the Senate majority this November, has appeared with Piker several times on the campaign trail, telling reporters he wanted to court the streamer’s massive young audience even though he disagreed with some of Piker’s views. The two walked into an event in Detroit together on the eve of El-Sayed’s narrow primary win over Rep. Haley Stevens and were photographed the same day together at a pool party with progressive influencers and House candidates.But after months of campaigning alongside Piker, El-Sayed said in a Monday statement specifically addressing Piker’s comments that “nobody speaks for this campaign besides me and my campaign spokespeople.”“I believe all Americans deserve the right to advocate for what they believe without fear of violence. This is particularly true for communities that have been intimidated for their beliefs in the past,” El-Sayed said.“My commitment to Jewish safety is the same as my commitment to the safety of my own daughters,” he added, repeating a sentiment he’s frequently espoused on the campaign trail. “Antisemitism is a scourge, and we need to address it in all its forms. And I stand against any rhetoric that puts the community at risk.”El-Sayed also sought to downplay the significance of the pro-Palestinian influencer to his campaign, as he accused “politicians and pundits” of trying “to make this race about a Twitch streamer.”Piker drew bipartisan backlash after he said last week, “If Jews in America keep putting this idea out there that they are singularly invested in Israel, eventually someone’s going to come around and take action — not against the state of Israel, mind you, but against American Jews.”He defended his remarks on X on Sunday evening as criticism of the conflation of support for Israel with American Jews. “Falsely tying Israel to Jewish people IS increasing antisemitism,” he argued, adding, “this isn’t a call for violence.”While El-Sayed is an outspoken critic of the Israeli government himself, his effort to distance himself from Piker comes as he vies to broaden his support after a bruising Democratic primary and as Rogers seeks to pick up disappointed Stevens voters.Describing Piker as El-Sayed’s “running mate,” Rogers in a social media post cast the streamer’s comments as “more calls for violence coming out of the El-Sayed campaign.”“If Abdul El-Sayed had any courage at all, he would call this out and disavow Hasan Piker once and for all,” he said. “We’re waiting, Abdul…”Michigan Democratic Rep. Hillary Scholten, who supported Stevens in the primary and has not endorsed El-Sayed, also condemned Piker’s remarks.“Piker is a hack who thrives on hate, shock and awe because he lacks substance,” she said. “It’s dangerous for everyone. We should all be calling out this disgusting rhetoric so it loses its grip on our politics once and for all.”The left-wing influencer made the comments last week during a livestream, as he discussed the refusal of state Sen. Jeremy Moss, the Democratic nominee for Stevens’ seat, to endorse El-Sayed.Piker appeared to reference an audio clip that has circulated online in recent weeks that purportedly features Moss, who is Jewish, saying that making sure the US continues supporting Israel is the only purpose of his House campaign. The lawmaker has denied making the remarks, saying in a statement that the clip is “manipulated and unsourced audio with things I never did and never would say.”Piker said: “I don’t know how people don’t recognize how dangerous this predicament is, how dangerous this is for Jews.”“You’re running around basically tying your entire identity to a country that inevitably will be seen as basically Jewish ISIS, and you’re saying, as Jews, this is all we care about,” he said. “You’re making antisemitism worse.”Moss said in a statement Monday that while he and El-Sayed have been having an ongoing conversation about Jewish and Arab safety in the US and abroad, there is still work to be done to unite the Democratic ticket in Michigan.“But provocateurs are exploiting this moment to create further divisions,” he warned. “I will not be lectured by a California podcaster about what Oakland County, Michigan’s Jewish community should and shouldn’t believe. And we certainly won’t be gaslit that we’re responsible for the antisemitic harm upon us.”Piker’s views reflect growing opposition to US support for Israel, particularly among progressives, in response to Israel’s war in Gaza and the ensuing humanitarian crisis in the Palestinian enclave following Hamas’ October 2023 attack.But the streamer also has a long history of incendiary remarks — including saying in 2019 that the United States “deserved 9/11,” a comment from which he backtracked days later.Earlier this month on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” El-Sayed said Piker’s comment about 9/11 was “dumb,” but also cast highlighting it now as playing “gotcha politics.”“I want to be held accountable for what I say and what I do, rather than this idea that we’re so stuck in cancel culture that all of us agreed was a bad idea back in 2020, but we seem to want to bring back,” El-Sayed said in that interview.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story