Skip to main content

Council handpicked by Trump to gut review process of historic-preservation projects

▶ Watch Video: Trump’s monumental reimagining of Washington, D.C.

A federal advisory council filled with Trump appointees is poised to gut a federal review process that assesses the impact of new projects on historical properties before they are approved and remove the requirement for public comment, according to multiple sources.  

The Advisory Council for Historic Preservation is voting this week on a measure to slash the role of states, tribes and the public in Section 106 reviews under the National Historic Preservation Act. Twenty of the 24 members of the council are Trump administration appointees. The council does not currently have a chairman, who must be nominated by the president and Senate-confirmed, and one appointee appears to have stepped down in June. Three of the members are ex-officio representatives of national preservation organizations.

Section 106 is a 60-year-old law that says federal agencies “must consider the effects on historic properties of any project they propose to carry out.” If a project could affect a historic property, a review process takes place, where the council, relevant parties and the public can weigh in on the project before it moves forward. 

The issue is of interest to President Trump, since the president has several construction projects underway in the region. The ballroom addition to the East Wing of the White House is not governed by the rule, since it is on White House grounds. But the president’s plans for a triumphal arch to be built near Arlington National Cemetery are currently undergoing a Section 106 review, and the nonprofit National Trust for Historic Preservation says it’s worried the review has been too hurried.

“We are deeply concerned about the limited nature of the consultation, the rushed timeline, the exclusion of many parties (including the National Trust) from the consultation process, and the failure to consider less harmful alternatives,” said Rob Nieweg, senior vice president of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, in testimony before the National Capital Planning Commission earlier this month. 

Experts warn that the changes, which would take effect after a final rule is passed and would impact future projects, could expand the federal government’s power to build or renovate historic sites with less oversight. 

The review process currently requires the Advisory Council for Historic Preservation to consult with state preservation officials and Tribal Historic Preservation officers.

Under the proposal, which was reviewed by CBS News, the definition of a historic property would be changed, and the State Historic Preservation Officers’ review would be optional, rather than mandatory. Public comment would also no longer be required. 

The changes would also limit the ability of Indian tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations to protest projects that may affect their land.

In a letter obtained by CBS News, the National Trust for Historic Preservation said it opposes the moves by the council to change Section 106, arguing it will “eviscerate the preservation of our shared civic and cultural heritage in the United States,” and says the group will take legal action to press for the withdrawal of the proposal. 

“If implemented, federal agencies will no longer be required to avoid or minimize damage to our nation’s historic sites and landscapes, or seek public input on federal projects that would impact historic places,” Brent Leggs, CEO of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, said in a statement.

The National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers, which sits on the advisory council, said the proposed changes would fundamentally weaken the role of Tribal Nations in the review process and undermine the protection of sacred places.  

Ira Matt, the association’s executive director of Indigenous Diplomacy and Federal Relations, called the proposal “an affront to Tribal sovereignty.” 

“Any effort to diminish our voice or disregard the places, traditions, and practices we hold sacred is egregious and represents a violation of the federal government’s trust and treaty responsibilities that is neither morally nor ethically defensible,” Matt said.

The National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers also objected to the proposed changes. 

“It is baffling that during our semiquincentennial the very agency charged with overseeing Section 106 appears to be trying to relive that history, deliberately mislead its own members about what it is doing, and making it easier to destroy our historic places,” Erik Hein, the group’s executive director, said in a statement to CBS News.

The White House and Interior Department declined to comment. 

Conspiracies around Nolan Wells’ death have led to threats against those he was with that day, attorneys say

By CNN
(CNN) — On July 4, a group of friends boarded boats and set out from Ocean Springs, Mississippi, to celebrate the holiday on nearby Horn Island.It was a trip many had been looking forward to all year, their attorneys would later tell CNN. But it would end in tragedy after Nolan Wells never made it home.In the weeks since Wells’ body was discovered along the shoreline of the barrier island, questions around his manner of death have fueled conjecture and fractured a once tight-knit community.Attorneys representing Warren Hudson, Jax Pitalo and Morgan Seymour say despite cooperating with investigators, their clients have effectively become pariahs in their hometown and have been subjected to death threats and defamation.And, they said, the allegations they were somehow involved in their friend’s death have made it even harder as they try to find ways to grieve the young man they’ve known since middle school.“The biggest tragedy of this entire thing is that Nolan unfortunately lost his life and nobody knows definitively what happened,” their attorney, Tyler Cox, said, adding all three of his clients have been questioned by authorities in the case.“These guys haven’t been able to mourn the loss of their friend and brother Nolan Wells,” Cox told CNN Wednesday.“They left the island at 4:30 pm … So, we don’t know what happened to Nolan after 4:30,” he said. “We want to know just as much as anybody.”A tow call ignites controversyCox estimates there were hundreds of boats and thousands of people on the island that day. Wells and his friends arrived just before 11 am, he said.The last time Warren Hudson saw Wells was around 3 pm, his attorneys say.“They had this little comedic moment because at the time Nolan was kind of holding and cradling a girl that he had met on the island,” Cox said. “You know him being one of Nolan’s best friends, Warren kind of gave him kind of a chuckle, like, ‘Oh, I see you with this girl.’ You know, ‘Hope everything goes well for you.’”But an hour later, the attorneys told CNN, the group began noticing problems with the bilge pump on one of their boats, the Triton. The water in the hull was rising so quickly it almost covered the battery, and Cox said his clients began to panic and shout to their friends it was time to leave.What happened next has become the subject of conspiracy and scrutiny.Cox said there has been an assumption Wells was left “on this deserted, remote island with no access to a phone or no access to anyone else to help him.”But he was far from alone, the attorney said – and Wells was not the only person who didn’t make the return trip with the group of friends.“That’s just how it is here. You can always find another ride off the island, and again, there were 2,000 other people there, so he wasn’t left alone by any means,” Cox said.He also acknowledged many people find it suspicious his clients were in possession of Wells’ phone, but, he said, it’s common practice to drop anchor 50 feet offshore and swim to the island.“I don’t know anything more corrosive to a cell phone than salt water,” he said. “When they left, not only was Nolan’s phone on the boat, so was five other people’s … and everyone collected the phones after” they got back.Everyone, of course, except for Nolan. A Wells family friend later tracked the device to his friend’s home, and Elmore Wonsley, Nolan’s father, has said he arrived later in the night to collect his son’s car and keys.Edward Paltzik, a defamation attorney who also represents the three men, said in recent days edited audio of the emergency tow call his clients made that day has turned a tragic case into a circus.“The Sea Tow call — and the hundreds of versions of it now circulating — is a red herring. It’s distracting people from what matters,” Paltzik said.At the end of the day, he added, any audio portraying his clients in a false light is defamatory, and they plan to pursue all legal claims.A video purporting to contain audio of the Triton’s call has gone viral after the creator who posted it claimed to have cleaned up the background noise and allegedly revealed incriminating statements.CNN has obtained and reviewed the same audio but found it to be inconclusive.“We’re winnowing it down to the worst of the worst – the worst of the worst offenders who have said the worst things, who have the largest platforms, who have caused the most damage,” Paltzik said. “It’s going to be a lengthy process.”A tragedy compounded by grief and threatsIn the weeks since the case became national news, the attorneys say their clients have been subjected to a barrage of threats – both at home and online.“Some of them can’t even go back to school because of the threats. Their families have had threats. Some of them can’t even go home,” Cox said.Two of the men were accosted at a local restaurant, and they’ve also been refused service in town, Cox said. Some of the alleged threats were deemed serious enough three people were charged with crimes, The Associated Press reported. The suspects — who allegedly threatened witnesses and officials connected to the investigation — do not appear to have any connection to the families in Mississippi.But Cox stressed his clients only have two feelings toward Nolan Wells’ family: Empathy and sympathy.“If there’s anybody out there that is targeting or harassing the Wells/Wonsley family, that needs to stop immediately and they need to apologize for doing it,” Paltzik said.“I want to be clear. It’s not them versus us. Never has been, and I’ll tell you, never will be.”Cox rejected any claims his clients were somehow motivated to treat Wells differently because of his race.“All the old people in Mississippi may have thought something a long time ago, but not these young men,” he said. “I think they completely regret even going out to the island that day.”But, despite all the rumors and conspiracies, Paltzik said two things can be true:“Nolan’s death is an incomprehensible tragedy – incomprehensible,” he said. “But for us to be where we are today – where we have other folks receiving death threats, other folks receiving hate, and folks being defamed – I think that magnifies the tragedy.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story

Related Stories

Latest News
Who could replace Karoline Leavitt as White House press secretary?
19 minutes ago

Who could replace Karoline Leavitt as White House press secretary?

Por qué funcionarios decidieron sacar a Trump de Turquía en un camión de catering y un avión secreto

Democratic senators demand answers about conditions aboard USS Abraham Lincoln

Kennedy Center board votes to restore Trump's name on building

Texas has held off a major screwworm outbreak, but ranchers urged to stay alert