Skip to main content

College students’ killings latest case to rely on ChatGPT as evidence

▶ Watch Video: Florida investigates OpenAI over ChatGPT’s alleged role in college shooting

The brutal killings of University of South Florida graduate students Nahida Bristy and Zamil Limon, allegedly plotted in part using ChatGPT, is the latest example of a suspect using an artificial intelligence tool as research prior to committing a crime.

Hisham Abugharbieh, 26, the roommate of Limon, was arrested over the weekend and charged with two counts of premeditated murder. Limon’s body was found on the Howard Frankland Bridge in St. Petersburg. Human remains were found Monday in the search for Bristy, but they have not been officially identified. Bristy’s family told CBS News that police said she is also likely dead.

Abugharbieh allegedly used ChatGPT extensively in the days leading up to the crime, according to court documents released Sunday. Among the questions he allegedly asked in the days leading up to the pair’s disappearance was how to dispose of a body.

Among those questions, on April 13: What would happen if someone was “put in a black garbage bag and thrown in dumpster.” The AI chatbot responded that it sounded dangerous, prompting Abugharbieh to allegedly ask, “How would they find out.”

zamil-limon-nahida-bristy-usf-split.jpg
Zamil Limon and Nahida Bristy, both 27, were last seen in the Tampa area on April 16, the University of South Florida Police Department said.

Families of Zamil Limon and Nahida Bristy

On April 15, the day before the doctoral students went missing, Abugharbieh allegedly asked ChatGPT, “Can a VIN number on a car be changed?” and, “Can you keep a gun at home with out a license,” according to court documents. On the same night his phone pinged near the location where Limon’s body was found, the suspect asked ChatGPT if cars are “checked at the Hillsborough River state park.”

A spokesperson for OpenAI, the developers of ChatGPT, said in a statement to CBS News: “This is a terrible crime, and our thoughts are with everyone affected. We’re looking into these reports and will do whatever we can to support law enforcement in their investigation.”

Abugharbieh was held without bond following an initial court appearance on Tuesday. He has yet to enter a plea.

Florida opens investigation into ChatGPT

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier announced last week that his office had launched a criminal investigation into OpenAI after reviewing conversation logs between ChatGPT and a Florida State University student who opened fire on the campus in April 2025. The shooting killed two people and left several others injured. 

“My prosecutors have looked at this and they’ve told me if it was a person on the other end of that screen, we would be charging them with murder,” Uthmeier said during a news conference on April 21, saying the AI tool offered “significant advice” to suspect Phoenix Ikner.

An OpenAI spokesperson said the company identified an account believed to be associated with Ikner and shared it with law enforcement. The company added ChatGPT “did not encourage or promote illegal or harmful activity” and the bot provided responses to questions with information found in public sources on the internet. 

“Last year’s mass shooting at Florida State University was a tragedy, but ChatGPT is not responsible for this terrible crime,” OpenAI said in its statement.

Dr. Jill Schiefelbein, an AI strategist and professor at the Muma College of Business at the University of South Florida, said if politics are taken out of it, the investigation could lead to solutions on issues such as what is a reasonable time for a technology to report someone who violates their terms and conditions. 

“I wouldn’t blame the technology any more than I would blame a vehicle that gets into an accident by a human driver,” she told CBS News. “It’s how these tools are used, whether it’s a firearm, whether it’s a vehicle, whether it’s a tool that helps you retrieve information, it’s the user intent behind it that’s the issue.”

“Does that mean I believe that there shouldn’t be stricter guardrails in place? Absolutely not,” she said.

While OpenAI rejected any responsibility for the Florida State University shooting, the company has not been silent on all crimes involving the AI tool.

Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, issued an apology last week to a community in British Columbia where eight people were killed by a teen who had previously exhibited concerning behavior on ChatGPT. Jesse Van Rootselaar, 18, allegedly opened fire on Feb. 10 at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School, killing a teacher and five students, before dying from a self-inflicted gunshot, police said. Van Rootselaar had earlier killed her mother and 11-year-old half-brother at their home.

“The pain your community has endured is unimaginable,” Altman wrote in a letter shared on social media by British Columbia Premier David Eby. “I have been thinking of you often over the past few months.”

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman attends the 12th annual Breakthrough Prize Awards in Santa Monica, California, on April 18, 2026.

Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images

Altman wrote in the letter, dated April 23, that Van Rootselaar’s ChatGPT account had been banned in June 2025. The account was flagged by automated abuse detection tools and human investigators who identify potential misuses of ChatGPT for violent activities, OpenAI told CBS News in February. OpenAI said the account was then banned for violating its usage policies. 

OpenAI said the company had weighed whether to flag the account to law enforcement, but had determined at the time it did not pose an imminent and credible risk of serious physical harm to others, so it failed to meet the threshold for referral.

Altman wrote in his letter that OpenAI will remain focused on preventative efforts “to help ensure something like this never happens again.”

“I want to express my deepest condolences to the entire community,” he said. “No one should ever have to endure a tragedy like this.”

Trump will need China for his new economic war against Iran. Good luck getting Xi on side

Beijing (CNN) — When US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent unveiled “Operation Economic Outcast,” threatening damaging new sanctions on countries that refuse to stop doing business with Iran, he didn’t name the one country that could decide its success or failure: China.The world’s second largest economy has long been a critical economic lifeline for Tehran, buying up the vast majority of its oil exports – worth an estimated tens of billions in US dollars last year – in addition to other trade.Bringing it on board with the White House’s latest effort to subdue an Iranian leadership stubbornly defiant after almost six months of war, however, is an extremely tall order.Beijing flatly rejects what it calls “unilateral” US sanctions and has long defended its right to regular trade with partners like Iran and Russia. It also surmises that Washington would be wary of triggering a broader economic confrontation that would hurt both countries, right ahead of the US midterms.On Tuesday, following Bessent’s presser, China’s Foreign Ministry vowed to “take all necessary measures” to safeguard its “own legitimate rights and interests” in the face of US sanctions threats.“Economic warfare and maximum pressure will not help resolve the issue; they will only further intensify tensions and conflicts, create spillover risks, disrupt the global economic and financial order,” ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said.Bessent’s threat also comes ahead of a highly anticipated visit by Chinese leader Xi Jinping to the US next month, where the two sides could make progress on extending a critical trade truce set to expire later this fall.Trump earlier said that he did not ask Xi “for any favors” on Iran during a May meeting between the two – a statement, which, if correct, will likely smell to Beijing of American desperation to end the conflict.What’s left now is a careful calculus for both countries in how they navigate what Bessent has said will be a period of “quiet diplomacy” – or privately issuing ultimatums to Iran’s economic partners, which the Treasury chief did not specifically name during his press conference.Chinese analysts suggest limited space for Washington’s demands: “China is unlikely to accept a situation in which Washington determines what Chinese companies can legally trade with third countries,” said Zhao Long, director of the Institute for International Strategic and Security Studies at the Shanghai Institutes for International Studies.“That would establish a precedent that US secondary sanctions can effectively determine China’s commercial relations with third countries,” he said.What Washington could doChina imports Iranian oil using a shadowy system that’s by design insulated from the US dollar system – and sanctions.Private, so-called teapot refineries, purchase and process US-sanctioned Iranian crude, relying on a network of ports, financial institutions and tankers that are often similarly firewalled from international exposure. China hasn’t recorded these purchases officially in years, since after the US re-imposed sanctions on Iran when the first Trump administration backed out of the Obama-era Iranian nuclear deal.But pressure points do exist, analysts say.“When you look at the upstream ownership of these entities, you’ll find many are directly or indirectly held by major Chinese state-owned entities that are heavily integrated into the US dollar system,” said Max Meizlish, a senior research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies think tank in Washington.“By sanctioning their subsidiaries, the US can apply pressure on the parents to divest at risk of being deemed as providing direct or indirect support to sanctioned entities,” he said.Bessent earlier this year said Washington has sent warnings to two unnamed Chinese banks about their role in Iran-linked transactions. When asked on Monday during his press conference what measures the US would take against non-compliant Chinese banks and shipping firms, he said “no one is above” facing US sanctions.Despite the tough talk, Beijing has seen the US threaten – and then back off – sweeping sanctions before. And it also knows Washington is acutely aware of China’s significant economic leverage over the US, especially in the form of its grip on the global supply of strategically critical rare earths.“If Washington crossed that threshold (of sanctioning major Chinese banks), Beijing would almost certainly respond, and the political atmosphere for a summit (between Trump and Xi) would deteriorate sharply,” said Sun Chenghao, a senior fellow at Tsinghua University’s Center for International Security and Strategy in Beijing.Such a move might not automatically cancel their meeting, but it would “shift the summit from stabilization toward damage control,” he said.Summit considerationsBoth sides will be weighing up the impact of escalation to that summit, expected to be the first state visit by Xi to the US in 11 years.While Beijing will not want to be seen to be cooperating with a sanctions regime it opposes, there are careful maneuvers it could take – such as quietly reducing oil purchases or elevating its political messaging to Tehran and efforts to encourage restraint.Chinese purchases of Iranian oil have already declined sharply compared to last year as the US blockade has constrained Iranian crude exports.Chinese analysts have also in recent weeks suggested there are overlaps between the interests of Washington and Beijing, especially in terms of seeing trade flows restored in the Strait of Hormuz, which has been choked by the conflict, and restoring broader regional stability, also conductive to trade.And Beijing has in recent days re-upped its messaging urging restraint and normal operations around the Strait.In a joint statement following a meeting with Jordanian King Abdullah II in Beijing on Monday, Xi called for the restoration of “normal passage” through the Strait and a “comprehensive solution” to the conflict.Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Miao Deyu said last week while hosting Iranian officials in Beijing that China was “actively committed to promoting peace talks.”Even still, Beijing has shown itself wary of playing a direct mediator role in the conflict, preferring a position where it protects its own economic interests – and plays up its image as a stable power that supports regional peace, in contrast to Washington’s vacillations.Any cooperation with the US in restoring regional peace “should not be reduced to ‘doing Trump a favor,’” said Zhao in Shanghai.“Beijing is willing to contribute to ending the crisis, but it is not willing to become an instrument of Washington’s maximum-pressure strategy.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story