Skip to main content

Clayton faces questions about election integrity, vows to enhance trust in DNI

▶ Watch Video: Highlights from Jay Clayton’s confirmation hearing for director of national intelligence

Washington — Jay Clayton assured senators Wednesday that if he’s confirmed as director of national intelligence, he’ll be “mission-focused and team-oriented” in his approach and will work to strengthen coordination between the intelligence community and the American public. 

Clayton said in his opening statement for his Senate confirmation hearing that as DNI, he would focus on “enhancing the trust of the American people in the ODNI.” Citing his tenure as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Clayton said that the job has given him “significant national security experience,” including on matters involving foreign terrorist organizations, counter-espionage, money laundering and bribery and the abuse of communications platforms “to create and sow distrust.” 

He told senators he’s acted as the principal liaison with senior officials at the Treasury, State and Defense departments and advised officials on various matters in his former capacity as head of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Clayton’s testimony came after President Trump abruptly canceled plans to move forward with his nomination to the post last month. In June, Mr. Trump pushed Senate Republicans to cancel his own nominee’s hearing, saying Clayton’s nomination should not move forward until the Senate approved a replacement for him in his current role as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. Mr. Trump also suggested that the nomination process was moving too quickly and would prevent his controversial pick for acting intelligence chief, Bill Pulte, from temporarily taking the helm. 

Mr. Trump’s selection of Pulte, a housing official, as acting director roiled the Senate last month, and led Democrats to refuse to agree to an extension of a warrantless surveillance program under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Senate Republicans had been moving quickly to confirm Clayton with the hope of breaking a logjam on the surveillance program a few days after it expired. But the president dashed those plans when he pushed for the mid-June hearing to be canceled. 

Soon afterward, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton announced that the hearing had been postponed. The Arkansas Republican called it “regrettable that the president has directed Jay Clayton not to appear at his confirmation hearing.”

As Clayton appeared Wednesday for his belated confirmation hearing, Section 702 remained lapsed, and Pulte has been the acting DNI since June 19. 

In his opening statement, Cotton praised Clayton, calling him a “seasoned professional in both government and private practice” and someone who’s “operated with morality, decency and integrity.” The Arkansas Republican also expressed his view that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence should be pared down, saying, “the right number of staff at the ODNI would number in the dozens, maybe a couple hundreds at the maximum, but certainly not the thousands of recent years.” 

Cotton said, that “Congress intended the ODNI to be a lean and efficient organization to keep bureaucratic intelligence agencies at bay,” and now, 20 years later, “the ODNI has unfortunately become yet another bloated agency that incentivizes bureaucratic make-work as opposed to genuine intelligence work.”

The chairman also asked Clayton whether he had been involved in anything pertaining to an address the president plans to deliver Thursday night, which could relate to intelligence concerning allegations of election fraud. Clayton replied that he was “not involved.” When asked by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the vice chairman, about the outcome of the 2020 election, Clayton said “I’m not an election denier.”

“Joe Biden was certified as the president of the United States,” he added.

But Democrats continued to press Clayton on election integrity and his view of the outcome of the 2020 election during the hearing. In a notable exchange with independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with Democrats, Clayton said, “The government processes for gathering, aggregating and providing data need to be improved greatly.” He added that “the audit trail that we have available for our elections in a number of places is not the kind of audit trail that you would expect in something that is this important.”

Pressed by King on whether he thinks the U.S. has a problem with voter fraud, Clayton said, “I don’t think we can say definitively whether there is or is not until we have better processes.”

“I would love for the American people to have incredible confidence in the integrity of our elections,” Clayton said.

The top intelligence post became open after former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in May that she would resign due to her husband’s cancer diagnosis. The next week, Mr. Trump announced Pulte as acting director. And after intense pushback over the pick, and pressure from Senate Republicans to select a long-term director, Mr. Trump announced Clayton would be his permanent pick for the role on June 11 — hours before the warrantless surveillance authority was set to expire. 

Clayton is well regarded by Republicans and Democrats and leads the U.S. Attorney’s Office in one of the highest-profile and most prestigious jurisdictions in the country. He had a lengthy career at the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, which is representing the president in his appeal of his criminal conviction for hiding a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels, as well as his appeal in a civil fraud lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon pressed Clayton on about subpoenas he issued to three New York Times journalists last week after they reported that the new Air Force One, which was donated by Qatar, does not have all of the advanced security features possessed by the older planes. The Times said that the journalists were ordered to testify before a Manhattan federal grand jury on Wednesday, the same day as Clayton’s confirmation hearing.  

Clayton said the subpoenas were “in connection with an ongoing national security investigation,” but he offered to speak more to the committee about the approach to limiting “to the greatest extent possible, any intrusion into the operation of the free press.”

“I am absolutely committed to and respect our First Amendment and the role of the press,” Clayton said. 

Ohio Rep. running for reelection comes face-to-face in court with the senator whose daughter he’s accused of abusing

Cleveland (CNN) — The senior US senator from Ohio sat with his daughter on a wooden bench in the hallway of the Cuyahoga County courthouse Wednesday, awaiting their turn as a judge in the room next door considered other domestic relations cases, then waiting again as that same judge swiftly declared a break in their case.Bernie Moreno had, for months, declined to wade publicly into the messy custody dispute that had consumed his family and threatened to upend the politics in his state. Now he sat in the thick of it, waiting to hear updates to a series of questions in the case, including whether a judge would grant a restraining order that his daughter’s lawyer had sought against his ex-son-in-law, the congressman Max Miller. Once the proceeding began, he moved to the wooden benches inside amid the press and other family members.Moreno’s daughter, Emily Moreno, was once married to Miller and has accused her now her-ex husband  of abuse, including an incident in which she says he held a gun to her. Miller has denied the assertions, saying his ex-wife is manipulative and suffers from mental illness. Her lawyer denies that.Their case might have been like any of the other domestic matters that went before Judge Debra Boros in the green-carpeted courtroom – except that Miller is also fighting for his political future in a reelection that has drawn national attention. Democrats are bullish they could flip the solidly red district, in part due to people like Moreno and Ohio’s other Republican senator – Jon Husted, who is also on the ballot in November – urging Miller to drop out.As the Morenos chatted on the bench, Miller walked by. The father and daughter bowed their heads.At issue Wednesday was a request not entirely at the heart of the matter.  Andrew Zashin, the lawyer for Emily Moreno, was seeking a restraining order, alleging that Miller grabbed him and another attorney’s bag last month after a hearing in their long-running legal battle. The attorney, filing on Emily Moreno’s behalf, said that it was the second instance in which the Congressman accosted his ex-wife’s legal team outside of court, something Miller’s team has denied.Ultimately the parties agreed to a mutual restraining order: Miller cannot speak to Emily Moreno’s lawyers outside of the court proceedings, and Emily Moreno cannot speak to Miller’s lawyers out of court proceedings.Both sides claimed victory.“What really happened here is their client left in a worse position than when she woke up this morning. When she woke up this morning, she didn’t have a restraining order prohibiting her from having any contact with counsel here,” Miller’s lawyer Larry Zukerman said, alleging that Emily Moreno “verbally attacked my co-counsel.”Emily Moreno’s lawyers deny that.“If that were the case, why didn’t they file something. Just more spin,” Zashin said, adding that he got the restraining order his team had sought.There was also a number of other matters to resolve, including whether an order would be issued in the case to keep court transcripts and depositions from being publicly available, and whether Miller’s private security would have to testify in the case. The judge punted both of those issues for a decision later.Boros was direct with those in the courtroom Wednesday, reminding all parties on two occasions that despite the emotions in the case, there was no excuse to violate court orders – an apparent nod to how the ordinary custody place is playing out in the national spotlight.Attention in the case intensified this month as more media outlets began reporting on allegations that had been part of court filings for months, and Miller faced increasing calls to drop his reelection bid ahead of a key deadline. President Donald Trump even privately told some allies that he didn’t believe Miller can win the race, given the accusations, one source familiar with the conversations previously told CNN.Miller, though, has remained defiant, insisting he would keep running even as the date for party leaders to replace him on the ballot passed. He previously told CNN that Trump had called him and relayed it would be a “tough race.” But Miller insisted he felt good about the decision to stay in.“My daughter is going to grow up one day, and she’s going to see all of this, and she’s not going to see that her father caved to political and social media pressures for something that he never did,” Miller said.After the court hearing on Wednesday, Miller’s attorney blasted the frenzy that has developed around the case, arguing it was unlike most of what he had seen in his time as an attorney.“They are making a political circus out of this,” Zukerman told CNN.The focus on Miller’s political and legal troubles, however, are far from over.After Miller asked the House Ethics Committee for an investigation that he said would clear his name, the committee announced it is “reviewing allegations that Representative Max Miller may have engaged in domestic violence and abuse or illegal drug use.”Miller, who worked as a White House staffer and served in the Marine Corps Reserve before joining Congress in 2023, admitted to last using illegal drugs “several years ago.” He denied currently using drugs but said he takes testosterone replacement therapy in a CNN interview earlier this month.Miller is also still contending with the fallout from his posting a link on social media to hundreds of messages, videos and images involving his ex-wife. While he framed the move as a bid to air out the facts and defend his daughter, the Dropbox folder that Miller shared with his nearly 60,000 followers included sensitive and unredacted details of his own family, including one image that depicted his toddler daughter nude. The photo was taken in the context of an inquiry into an injury the 2-year-old had suffered.Miller’s attorney Aaron Minc took responsibility for the disclosure publicly, and Miller called it “awful,” though he disputed the characterization of it as “shockingly reckless.”“My attorney took full responsibility,” Miller said. “There was never any intent to do that.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story