Skip to main content

Clayton faces questions about election integrity, vows to enhance trust in DNI

▶ Watch Video: Highlights from Jay Clayton’s confirmation hearing for director of national intelligence

Washington — Jay Clayton assured senators Wednesday that if he’s confirmed as director of national intelligence, he’ll be “mission-focused and team-oriented” in his approach and will work to strengthen coordination between the intelligence community and the American public. 

Clayton said in his opening statement for his Senate confirmation hearing that as DNI, he would focus on “enhancing the trust of the American people in the ODNI.” Citing his tenure as the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, Clayton said that the job has given him “significant national security experience,” including on matters involving foreign terrorist organizations, counter-espionage, money laundering and bribery and the abuse of communications platforms “to create and sow distrust.” 

He told senators he’s acted as the principal liaison with senior officials at the Treasury, State and Defense departments and advised officials on various matters in his former capacity as head of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Clayton’s testimony came after President Trump abruptly canceled plans to move forward with his nomination to the post last month. In June, Mr. Trump pushed Senate Republicans to cancel his own nominee’s hearing, saying Clayton’s nomination should not move forward until the Senate approved a replacement for him in his current role as U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York. Mr. Trump also suggested that the nomination process was moving too quickly and would prevent his controversial pick for acting intelligence chief, Bill Pulte, from temporarily taking the helm. 

Mr. Trump’s selection of Pulte, a housing official, as acting director roiled the Senate last month, and led Democrats to refuse to agree to an extension of a warrantless surveillance program under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Senate Republicans had been moving quickly to confirm Clayton with the hope of breaking a logjam on the surveillance program a few days after it expired. But the president dashed those plans when he pushed for the mid-June hearing to be canceled. 

Soon afterward, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton announced that the hearing had been postponed. The Arkansas Republican called it “regrettable that the president has directed Jay Clayton not to appear at his confirmation hearing.”

As Clayton appeared Wednesday for his belated confirmation hearing, Section 702 remained lapsed, and Pulte has been the acting DNI since June 19. 

In his opening statement, Cotton praised Clayton, calling him a “seasoned professional in both government and private practice” and someone who’s “operated with morality, decency and integrity.” The Arkansas Republican also expressed his view that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence should be pared down, saying, “the right number of staff at the ODNI would number in the dozens, maybe a couple hundreds at the maximum, but certainly not the thousands of recent years.” 

Cotton said, that “Congress intended the ODNI to be a lean and efficient organization to keep bureaucratic intelligence agencies at bay,” and now, 20 years later, “the ODNI has unfortunately become yet another bloated agency that incentivizes bureaucratic make-work as opposed to genuine intelligence work.”

The chairman also asked Clayton whether he had been involved in anything pertaining to an address the president plans to deliver Thursday night, which could relate to intelligence concerning allegations of election fraud. Clayton replied that he was “not involved.” When asked by Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the vice chairman, about the outcome of the 2020 election, Clayton said “I’m not an election denier.”

“Joe Biden was certified as the president of the United States,” he added.

But Democrats continued to press Clayton on election integrity and his view of the outcome of the 2020 election during the hearing. In a notable exchange with independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with Democrats, Clayton said, “The government processes for gathering, aggregating and providing data need to be improved greatly.” He added that “the audit trail that we have available for our elections in a number of places is not the kind of audit trail that you would expect in something that is this important.”

Pressed by King on whether he thinks the U.S. has a problem with voter fraud, Clayton said, “I don’t think we can say definitively whether there is or is not until we have better processes.”

“I would love for the American people to have incredible confidence in the integrity of our elections,” Clayton said.

The top intelligence post became open after former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said in May that she would resign due to her husband’s cancer diagnosis. The next week, Mr. Trump announced Pulte as acting director. And after intense pushback over the pick, and pressure from Senate Republicans to select a long-term director, Mr. Trump announced Clayton would be his permanent pick for the role on June 11 — hours before the warrantless surveillance authority was set to expire. 

Clayton is well regarded by Republicans and Democrats and leads the U.S. Attorney’s Office in one of the highest-profile and most prestigious jurisdictions in the country. He had a lengthy career at the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, which is representing the president in his appeal of his criminal conviction for hiding a $130,000 payment to adult film star Stormy Daniels, as well as his appeal in a civil fraud lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon pressed Clayton on about subpoenas he issued to three New York Times journalists last week after they reported that the new Air Force One, which was donated by Qatar, does not have all of the advanced security features possessed by the older planes. The Times said that the journalists were ordered to testify before a Manhattan federal grand jury on Wednesday, the same day as Clayton’s confirmation hearing.  

Clayton said the subpoenas were “in connection with an ongoing national security investigation,” but he offered to speak more to the committee about the approach to limiting “to the greatest extent possible, any intrusion into the operation of the free press.”

“I am absolutely committed to and respect our First Amendment and the role of the press,” Clayton said. 

JD Vance and the Trump team keep moving the goalposts on Iran

(CNN) — One of the Trump administration’s biggest problems in extracting itself from the Iran war is the list of very absolutist goals that President Donald Trump and his team laid out.The goals have included complete Iranian surrender, regime change, Iran never getting a nuclear weapon and ending Tehran’s support for its Middle East proxy groups like Hezbollah.As the war — now in its sixth month — has dragged on, this list of goals has conspicuously shifted and been pared back. And Vice President JD Vance appears to have pared it back recently in a remarkable way, offering the latest indication that the administration might be preparing to settle for less — maybe even a lot less.Appearing on Fox News on Thursday, Vance was asked how the war might end. And he laid out two goals.“It’s ensuring that the Gulf countries continue to send oil and gas to the world economy so that we have energy price stability,” he said, adding: “That’s goal number one: Keep oil and gas cheap for Americans all over our country.“And then, obviously, goal number two is ensure that Iran never gets a nuclear weapon.”This is not the administration’s old list of goals — and the order Vance placed them in is striking.When asked about Vance’s comments on Friday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt maintained that “both goals are equally as important to the president.”The administration has almost always characterized Iran never getting a nuclear weapon as the overriding concern.And even if the goals are truly equal in the administration’s mind, including oil and gas prices at all — and not other items — is a notable shift.In fact, Trump explicitly rejected this as a goal back in May. When asked if he considered Americans’ financial situation when trying to resolve the war, Trump responded, “Not even a little bit.” He signaled that denuclearization was so important that he didn’t factor in anything else.(Trump echoed that line on Friday, saying he would “never apologize” for Americans paying a little more for gas, given the stakes in Iran.)I wrote in March about how the administration frequently listed four goals for the war — but how the four goals frequently differed depending upon who was speaking.Some lists included ending funding for proxy groups, for example, while others did not. Some mentioned destroying Iran’s missile infrastructure, while others omitted that. Some mentioned getting rid of Iran’s air force and navy, but others only mentioned the navy.It was like the administration was workshopping the list in real time.But the key point here is that none of those lists included keeping oil and gas prices low in the United States.And given the Strait of Hormuz was open before the war started, that particular goal could just be read as a return to the pre-war status quo — with denuclearization being the only goal that would represent a new achievement.Indeed, the new emphasis on low gas prices from some in the administration seems like the latest sign of relaxing the goals to prepare for a conclusion to the war that comes up well shy of Trump’s initial aims.By May, it became clear the administration was no longer going to emphasize certain goals.By June, the Trump administration entered into a memorandum of understanding with Iran that barely mentioned previously central US goals.And for the last two-plus months, Trump has been saying things that sounded a lot like he might scale back his nuclear demands.While the administration previously emphasized Iran turning over its enriched uranium, Trump’s spoken about how perhaps enough damage was done to its nuclear program and its nuclear materials are buried too far underground to be accessed. The president has also talked about how the US government could simply monitor from space to make sure Iran didn’t try to retrieve them.He’s even claimed that Iran was already denuclearized.In other words, Trump sounded a lot like a guy who knew he might not be able to cow Iran into accepting a really restrictive nuclear deal.His administration talking about energy prices as “goal number one” — even if Trump isn’t — would fit neatly with this progression away from the hard-and-fast goals that the administration set out to achieve.If a return to the pre-war status quo really is “goal number one” right now, that says a lot about how little this war has accomplished.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story