Skip to main content

Child cancer cases in Orange County community elicit strong concerns, demand for federal investigation

CA: COMMUNITY DEMANDS PROBE INTO CHILD CANCER CASES

Click here for updates on this story

    ORANGE COUNTY, California (KCAL, KCBS) — Hundreds of Orange County residents and some lawmakers filled the halls of a community meeting on Tuesday evening as they voiced their concerns over an extremely rare childhood cancer that several children have been diagnosed with in recent years.

Last week, Orange County Supervisor Katrina Foley wrote a letter to California’s Department of Public Health Director Dr. Erica Pan, asking that they expedite their ongoing review of the reported Ewing sarcoma cases in the Ladera Ranch neighborhood.

“Ladera Ranch families have reported six children diagnosed with Ewing sarcoma, an exceptionally rare cancer that most often affects children and young adults,” Foley’s office said in a statement after her letter was sent. “The number of reported diagnoses in a community of approximately 26,000 residents has raised serious concerns among families and residents.”

Some community members have raised concerns about an herbicide used in their community as a potential cause, including Brian Dalton, whose daughter Lily spent most of her time in Ladera Ranch throughout high school with her boyfriend and his family.

“Spent a lot of nights, weekends and summers in Ladera Ranch, and we also lived six miles away,” Dalton said.

Lily died in January of a rare soft tissue cancer that had been diagnosed a few years earlier. Doctors told him that her tumor had an Ewing sarcoma gene fusion.

“This is so rare that there has to be something, and if it’s not pesticides, then what is it?” he said.

During Tuesday night’s meeting, Dalton offered an emotionally charged plea to the crowd, hopeful that some sort of answers could help others from having to deal with the same thing they’ve had to.

“I don’t want another family planning a funeral instead of a future,” Dalton said. “I don’t want another father standing where I stand today.”

Foley said that the Orange County Health Care Agency asked the California Cancer Registry to evaluate concerns in Ladera Ranch in 2024, but no discernible pattern of cases was discovered at that time. After renewed concerns from the community, they again asked CCR, UCI’s Cancer Center and the Orange County Agricultural Commissioner to revisit the issue.

The results of that assessment are still pending.

“Ladera Ranch families deserve answers, transparency, and urgency from the state,” Foley said in a statement. “We do not yet know what caused these cancers, but that uncertainty demands a comprehensive review of every credible factor, including possible environmental exposures, along with direct communication and the public release of the findings.”

The California Cancer Registry tells CBS LA that the purpose of their assessment is to determine whether the number of cancers diagnosed in the area appears higher than expected based on population-based cancer registry data.

A spokesperson for the California Department of Public Health says that because Ewing sarcoma is so rare, small numbers can make statistical interpretation difficult, and that they cannot determine if an environmental exposure caused the cancers. Ewing sarcoma typically affects 200 to 250 children throughout the U.S. annually, according to the American Cancer Society.

During Tuesday night’s meeting, the Ladera Ranch Civic Council, which is made up of community members, presented a special agenda item titled “Community Health Concerns,” where they spoke about banning toxic herbicides in their neighborhoods.

Another parent at the meeting, Lisa Edgerton, held a sign showing her son’s steps to recovery after battling the same soft tissue cancer as Lily Dalton. He was diagnosed in 2015, when he was just 15 years old.

“I needed to come and make sure that we remembered that there were more cases, back 10 years ago,” Edgerton said.

Orange County-based oncologist and the physician in chief at City of Hope, Edward Kim, who is not involved in the study, says that sometimes cancer cases like this are happenstance.

“Sometimes it is just by chance that a certain location, over a certain amount of time, has a higher number of cases, but it may still fall within the norm of the cases described through the country,” Kim said.

Logan Spector, an epidemiologist who studies the causes of childhood cancers, and Ewing sarcoma in particular, says that he has already been contacted by some Ladera Ranch families over the concerns.

“There are environmental causes of some childhood cancers; Ewing sarcoma is not really one of them,” Spector said. “The other thing about Ewing sarcoma is the strongest risk factor is actually the ancestry of a child.”

U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli has also raised concerns, penning a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency to “conduct an appropriate investigation to determine if there are any environmental factors causing this cancer cluster” and to see if any federal environmental laws are implicated.

State Assemblymember Kate Sanchez on Monday addressed the topic as well, stating that she formally called on Gov. Newsom to launch a “coordinated, state-led investigation” into the cancer cases.

“This is bigger than any one agency. It requires California to bring together state, local and federal partners under one unified effort to investigate every reasonable environmental factor, follow the evidence where it leads, and keep the public informed every step of the way,” Sanchez said.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

South Carolina to hold first 2028 Democratic presidential primary

▶ Watch Video: Democrats expected to approve South Carolina as first primary in 2028, but other states pushing back Democrats on Saturday approved a new presidential nominating calendar for 2028, cementing South Carolina's place as the first official Democratic primary state, as the party looks to elevate states that better reflect its diverse coalition of voters.The vote came during the Democratic National Committee's summer meeting in Austin, where members signed off on a schedule that begins with South Carolina on Jan. 22, followed by Nevada on Feb. 1. New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan and Virginia round out the early-state lineup throughout February, all voting before Super Tuesday.The new calendar goes into effect amid a tug-of-war within the progressive and establishment wings of the party. It also continues a shift away from a tradition that for half a century gave states that are predominantly composed of White voters — Iowa and New Hampshire — outsized influence at the start of the nominating process. Strategists say the new calendar gives greater influence to Black and Latino voters, who make up key parts of the Democratic coalition. "If you're not strong with Latino voters or if you're not strong with Black voters, you know you can only get so far in this calendar," CBS News contributor and Democratic strategist Chuck Rocha said, adding that the schedule shows Black voters "the respect that they're due."Not everyone in the party is on board. Democratic leaders in Iowa and New Hampshire — previously the first and second states to hold primary contests, respectively — excoriated the new map as soon as the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee recommended it, arguing that it diminishes the role of states that have long taken on the responsibility of shaping the presidential nomination battlefield. "New Hampshire's First in the Nation primary is a tested proving ground in a closely contested swing state that forges better candidates and better presidents — and despite what DNC insiders say, that hasn't changed," New Hampshire's U.S. congressional delegation said in a statement. "As a state with highly engaged voters, we put candidates through their paces and thoroughly vet them. And our small size means that actually meeting and talking to voters takes precedence over super PACs or mega-donor-fueled campaigns."Momentum for South Carolina's ascension in the calendar traces back to 2020, when a victory there shifted momentum in the presidential primary that year to Joe Biden after he performed poorly in Iowa, New Hampshire and, to a lesser extent, Nevada. Under pressure from Biden and his allies, the DNC moved South Carolina's primary to first for the 2024 calendar. That cycle, New Hampshire defied the DNC's revised schedule and held its primary before South Carolina, citing a state law that mandates it hold the first primary. In response, the party stripped the contest of its sanctioned status. DNC Chair Ken Martin has signaled that if New Hampshire jumps ahead again in 2028, punishment will be more severe. "This is a calendar this party is actually going to protect," Martin told reporters after the DNC's Rules and Bylaws Committee met last month to propose a new schedule. The new calendar could impact the ideological battle within the Democratic Party between establishment moderates and more progressive candidates, including far-left democratic socialists. With no obvious 2028 front-runner, the newly approved schedule gives South Carolina, Nevada and the other four early states disproportionate influence over which faction can build early momentum in the 2028 presidential primaries. Among the states granted early slots, only Nevada and New Mexico offer clear advantages to progressives. Michigan has shown openness this cycle to progressives, with the primary victory of Abdul El-Sayed in the Senate race, but historically has elected more moderate candidates. New Hampshire voters have over time shown an openness to outsiders, but they typically have a more independent streak rather than a steep ideological lean. Progressives face an uphill battle in South Carolina, which has fewer of the White voters with college degrees who tend to support further-left candidates, and Virginia, which has long favored more moderate candidates. The decision to elevate states with large Black and Hispanic populations also comes as Democrats fight to stop the GOP from gaining ground with those two groups in general elections. President Trump won 48% of the Hispanic vote in 2024, up 12 points from four years earlier, and he won 15% of Black voters, almost double his share in 2020, according to the Pew Research Center. His share of non-Hispanic White voters remained stable, at 55%.
Read Next Story