Skip to main content

Can hackers pull your fingerprints from photos online? Experts explain.

One of the latest culprits of online panic has arrived in the form of a peace sign selfie.

Social media posts claiming that hackers can extract fingerprints from photo subjects flashing peace signs online and enhance them using artificial intelligence have garnered thousands of likes and sparked anxiety for some.

“Just end AI already!” wrote one Instagram user, whose comment received more than 16,000 likes. “It’s clearly a threat to humanity and not here to help regular people.” 

Another Instagram user lamented that they will have to change how they take their selfies.

Experts say that’s probably not necessary. While it is possible for fingerprints to be pulled from a photo, the risk is low for the average person.

“You have a better chance of being hit by a car tomorrow than this happening to you in your lifetime,” said Justin Cappos, a New York University professor and cybersecurity expert whose research has been adopted by companies like Google and Palantir.

Many of the social media posts appear to have stemmed from an April segment on a Chinese television show featuring an expert who showed how taking a peace sign selfie with your fingerprints visible within a few feet of the camera could allow cybercriminals to digitally extract them. If hackers are successful in extracting a fingerprint, they could potentially use it to breach sensitive accounts that use fingerprints for access. Unlike passwords, biometric data can’t be changed.

“This sounds like the stuff out of spy novels or ‘Mission Impossible,'” said Vyas Sekar, an electrical and computer engineering professor at Carnegie Mellon University. “In theory, it’s possible, especially if people are posting high-resolution images.” 

There have been some cases. In 2014, a hacker reportedly claimed to have cloned a fingerprint of European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, then Germany’s defense minister, using close-up photos taken at a press event. That same year, a team of security researchers at the cryptocurrency exchange, Kraken, were able to construct a fingerprint from a photo of one marked on a surface with the assistance of Photoshop, a printer and glue. 

But, even if a hacker were to obtain your fingerprint, to do anything with it, they would need access to the physical scanner your fingerprint unlocks — like on a laptop or a thumbprint pad at a bank.

A hacker also would need to be “fairly determined” and likely choose a “high-value target” that renders a fingerprint valuable, such as someone with access to a high-security facility, Sekar said.

For most people, there’s a higher likelihood of being targeted through a phishing scam like an email containing links to malware or fraudulent websites to extract personal information, Cappos said. 

“I don’t think cyber criminals have started to try to weaponize it at any scale,” he said of extracting fingerprints. “Ten years from now, who knows if the landscape has shifted and cyber criminals are using this as an attack vector or something. But definitely, where we are today, this is not going to happen.”

Woman says tenant changed locks, used fake sale agreement and kept her out for a year

Click here for updates on this story    OKLAHOMA CITY (KOCO) -- A woman who rented out a room inside her home in exchange for work being done on her property is now warning others about squatters' rights after the tenant kept her out of her home for more than a year.Traci Bates said there is some relief in sight after the tenant changed the locks and kicked her out. A judge just sided with her earlier Monday on a default judgment, but she has been going back-and-forth with the case for more than a year."I feel bullied, pushed into a corner. I feel like I had no rights, especially in the beginning," Bates said.Bates said this happened at her late father's home after she agreed to rent out one of his rooms to a mutual friend."Asked him if he would like to exchange for rent to help me clean up the house, you know, do some remodeling, some small jobs, just some minor things like hauling off some trash from the backyard or whatever. Fixing a fence, repairing it," Bates said.After just three weeks, things took a turn."He changed the locks to the house. I show up to go to get something because all my clothes are there. All my dad's belongings, everything are still in the house," Bates said.She said she hasn't been able to get it back since. Bates said he actually called the police on her, but they couldn't do much because it was a civil matter.Bates said he produced a fake sales agreement, claiming she sold the house to him for $13,000."There's no proof. That's not how you're buying a property," Bates said.A police report filed by Bates accused him of fraud for that agreement, saying she never signed it. It points to a letter from the secretary of state, acknowledging that the notary stamp he used was reported missing around the time that the agreement was supposedly made."This isn't just a problem in Oklahoma. You see this problem all over the country," attorney Noble McIntyre said.McIntyre, who is not tied to the case, said the situation is sort of a civil court loophole."If you had somebody that was very, very wealthy that had all the resources in the world, they could push this much more aggressively. But the average person doesn't have that kind of money. So, they get caught in these situations where they're a law-abiding citizen. They own the property. They're doing everything right. They're doing everything right. But the law is treating them like the bad person. It's ridiculous," McIntyre said.The property assessor's website still lists Bates' family trust as the owners, but the man has since tried countersuing for everything from breach of contract to intentional infliction of emotional distress.KOCO went to the home Monday to try and speak with him about the situation, but no one answered.But just hours after the interview with her Monday, Bates got a notice that the judge granted a default judgment, meaning, soon, she finally gets her house back." Oh, my goodness! I'm so excited," Bates said. "This is such a big release. I'm in tears because of it. I didn't think this day would come."There are a couple of things that still need to happen. Her attorney will have to bring that notice to the sheriff's office, giving the man 48 hours to move out.Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.
Read Next Story