Skip to main content

Book excerpt: ‘Mighty Real: A History of LGBTQ Music, 1969-2000’ by Barry Walters

mighty-real-cover-viking-1280.jpg

Viking

We may receive an affiliate commission from anything you buy from this article.

In his new book, “Mighty Real: A History of LGBTQ Music, 1969-2000” (published by Viking), Barry Walters, a writer for such publications as Rolling Stone and Spin, explores how LGBTQ songwriters, musicians, execs and fans reshaped pop culture in the late 20th century, as queer messages in music became less coded.

Read an excerpt below about the influence of singer-songwriter Elton John, and don’t miss Barry Walters on “CBS Sunday Morning” July 19!


Prefer to listen? Audible has a 30-day free trial available right now.


Chapter Nine

Elton John

“It’s a little bit funny, this feeling inside/I’m not one of those who can easily hide” goes the opening of Elton John’s introductory 1970 hit “Your Song,” but hide Sir Elton initially did. Forget for a moment everything you know about his trademark garishness and contemplate his first few album jackets. There’s lots of beige and denim—little gaiety. For much of his early ’70s catalog, the songs within were also earth‑toned, yet rarely autobiographical. Even when paying tribute to Americana in 1970’s conceptual country album Tumbleweed Connection, his sidekick lyricist and fellow Englishman Bernie Taupin imparts mythic, even gothic otherworldliness to the Old West and bygone South. Conjuring detailed imaginary worlds through compositionally rich and sumptuously symphonic talents rarely exceeded in pop, the piano man makes their reveries seem conversely real because he serves them with surreal levels of feeling. The bounty of Taupin’s wordy poesy and the fulsomeness of Gus Dudgeon’s production pull each album further into an extroversion rare for singer‑songwriters. As word spread of Elton’s showmanship, his presentation grew far larger than the personal life he avoided discussing.

Aside from “Razor Face” on 1971’s Madman Across the Water, which offers love to a grizzled and quite possibly gay elder gent who’s “looking for a place to lay down,” someone who “needs a young man to walk him around,” there isn’t much tangible queerness to Elton’s earliest records. Tentative steps to a pop‑art presentation are taken on 1972’s Honky Château, and its singles proved relatable to LGBTQ people. “Rocket Man” is sung by an astronaut removed from ordinary existence. When society kept most of us closeted, its axial line “I’m not the man that they think I am at home” voiced our secrets by proxy. “Honky Cat” tells the story of an outland lad who, like many of us, finds salvation in the big city’s bright lights. Don’t Shoot Me I’m Only the Piano Player furthered this evolution in 1973. Sung from one brother to another, “Daniel” was the closest we got to a ubiquitous ’70s same‑sex love song. It’s that same year’s subsequent Goodbye Yellow Brick Road that flicked the switch from sepia to Technicolor for good. Rather than merely paraphrasing old‑time boogie‑woogie, as he did on Don’t Shoot‘s kitschy “Crocodile Rock,” Elton becomes a genuine rocker here, yet simultaneously show tune‑y—a combo that would influence queer rock musicals like Hedwig and the Angry Inch, as well as theatrically inclined LGBTQ rockers like Scissor Sisters. For the first time, Elton consistently captures the exuberance of his piano-pounding, Little Richard–inspired concerts, which chafed against his early earnestness. Recorded with the working title “Silent Movies and Talking Pictures,” Goodbye serves as his musical coming out—a prelude to his personal one in Rolling Stone, first as bisexual in 1976, then as gay in 1988.

You can see that shift in Goodbye‘s artwork. Clad in a pink‑satin bomber jacket, Elton abandons the monochromatic drabness of ordinary existence and follows the bluebird of happiness into the dawning of a far‑brighter, Hollywood‑inspired reverie over the rainbow. He’s not forgoing The Wizard of Oz‘s yellow brick road, as the title suggests, but stepping right onto it in glittery, crimson platform shoes—the ’70s male equivalent of Dorothy’s ruby-red slippers. Its symbolism couldn’t be clearer: The musician flees the drab reality he was born into as Reg Dwight, his birth name, and trades it for the emerging LGBTQ dream of a multicolor utopia he could only reach as Elton John. He’s even wearing rose‑colored glasses.

You can hear this transition in the music, too, right in the opening medley. A dirgelike overture, “Funeral for a Friend” can be heard as a eulogy for Elton’s former closeted self, summing up the seriousness of his previous albums before slamming into “Love Lies Bleeding.” This stately swell of rock ‘n’ roll shifts Elton away from a softy singer‑songwriter into a genre‑crossing genuine rocker.

The third of six consecutive chart‑topping albums, Goodbye marks when Elton attained the cultural centrality of the Rolling Stones, whose muck he mimics on “Dirty Little Girl.” More unexpected is the specter of Slade—glam’s butchest best‑selling louts—on the double LP’s shout‑along lead single, “Saturday Night’s Alright for Fighting,” and even Alice Cooper on “All the Girls Love Alice,” which eulogizes a well‑bred but licentious sixteen‑year‑old lesbian.

The latter song’s illustration in Goodbye‘s triple‑gatefold sleeve further draws from The Killing of Sister George, a 1968 film that also features a queer Alice. Like Elton’s 1974 hit “The Bitch Is Back,” which set a precedent for the b‑word’s popularity in pop but bypasses its usual misogyny (because the singer calls himself a bitch and owns it), Sister George isn’t remotely PC. Its lesbians live cruel, mutually destructive lives, and the song goes even further to suggest—as did many other LGBTQ movies of the era—that if you act on queer passions, you’ll wind up dead. Still, a catchy, hard‑rocking, lesbian-themed tune on a number one album was a breakthrough that spoke to LGBTQ listeners hungry for any likeness of our lives. Although Taupin’s lyric shows little understanding of gay experience, Elton’s music feels firsthand. Punctuated by pregnant pauses and peaking in a vortex of stabbing guitars, pounding piano, zip‑zapping synths, and ricocheting sound effects, it’s Elton’s sexiest song. “If I give you my number, will you promise to call me?/Wait till my husband’s away,” he pleads from the perspective of Alice’s female admirers. Here was a likely gay superstar singing about same‑sex relations with first‑person pronouns—and it’s hot. When lesbians had no mainstream voice, this spoke volumes. I played this track obsessively at age twelve while reading the lyrics and studying the illustration to figure out what they could mean—about Elton, and me.

Goodbye set the musician’s compositional identity. Even in its most contrasting  moments, Elton sounds more like himself here than on any other album. His choice of chords and the notes he accentuates are as intrinsic to his sonic stamp as the jumps in his voice from baritone to falsetto, especially on the ascending title track. He fought against the single release of his most Elton‑y song ever, “Bennie and the Jets,” because he didn’t believe it would be successful. Instead, it became, for decades, his biggest US hit. His exaltation of an electric‑booted, mohair‑suited singer who empowers fans to fight their parents’ outdated morality couldn’t be more glam. Given the masculine moniker and female pronouns, Bennie—spelled “Benny” on the UK single—might even be a guy Elton calls “she” in the arch gay way before vamping girlishly. Its slow and funky groove made “Bennie” an R&B radio hit, set a precedent for 1975’s Philly soul tribute “Philadelphia Freedom,” and helped land Elton on Soul Train.

Aretha gave her approval even earlier: Her 1970 gospel rendition of Elton’s “Border Song” charted higher than his own. But Elton’s connection to outsiders goes deeper than his R&B skills. Goodbye pays tribute to Hollywood through Marilyn Monroe in Goodbye‘s original “Candle in the Wind.” He rerecorded the song in 1997 as a tribute to Diana, Princess of Wales, and it became the second‑best‑selling single of all time. Giving Taupin’s archetypes troubled souls, Elton situates both heroines in a lonely place beyond the status quo that’s akin to ours. In his rarely straightforward music, you can hear the allied rhythms of their challenging lives.

Identifying with the glamorous and gutsy extremes of Goodbye, Elton broke from the middle‑of‑the‑road crooner he was initially perceived to be. Although his queerness wasn’t quite explicit yet, it was now thoroughly implicit. Even with Taupin’s speaking for him lyrically, there’s hardly a moment when this superstar seems straight in any sense of the word. Goodbye is where he truly transcends reality—the ultimate, if unspoken, goal of all minorities, and women as well. The dreams Elton John dared to dream really did come true.

     
From “Mighty Real” by Barry Walters, published by Viking, an imprint of Penguin Publishing Group, a division of Penguin Random House, LLC. Copyright © 2026 by Barry Walters.


Get the book here:

“Mighty Real” by Barry Walters

Buy locally from Bookshop.org


For more info:

Netanyahu calculates upsetting Trump is his least-bad option

(CNN) — On tricky issues, Netanyahu’s preference is to kick the can down the road. If he must take a position, he likes to include a twist of ambiguity, some wiggle room, just in case things get hairy later. Not this time, though, on the subject of US President Donald Trump’s roadmap for progressing the Gaza ceasefire agreement.“I wish to be precise: Israel does not accept the 15-point document,” Netanyahu said during opening remarks at Sunday’s weekly Israeli Cabinet meeting.In fact, he went on to say it twice.“I have heard people saying: ‘You didn’t say it.’ So here I am saying it again: Israel does not accept the 15-point document.”Clunk.Potentially a risky move because it could draw the ire of Trump.The US president – more desperate than ever for a win, as his Iran folly looks increasingly like handing him an L – reinvested in Gaza 10 days ago, declaring that his Board of Peace had reached a “historic agreement” with Hamas for its complete disarmament. The board’s top envoy, Nickolay Mladenov, went on to explain carefully on X that decommissioning would need to take place “in lockstep” with Israeli troop withdrawal, suggesting a phased process by which the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) would pull back in stages from positions inside Gaza, as Hamas turned in its arms.Any lingering hope that Netanyahu could be convinced to take part in such an endeavor now looks for the birds.“The IDF will not carry out any withdrawal until Hamas is disarmed. And when I say the disarming of Hamas, it means heavy weaponry, lighter weaponry, all weaponry. And we are talking about genuine disarmament, not fictitious disarmament,” the Israeli leader said Sunday.As of Sunday afternoon, Trump was still keeping his own counsel, beyond a Truth Social post quoting former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying she supported his Gaza plan. Mladenov meanwhile went on Israel’s Channel 12 Sunday evening, appearing to suggest that some sort of phased process might still be the plan, but also seeming to make clear Hamas would need to make the first move.“Nobody is required to do anything, least of all Israel, before we actually have verified steps on the ground. If there is verified decommissioning of weapons, that they are taken away from the factions and stored and ultimately rendered unusable, Israel then withdraws from Gaza,” Mladenov said.Speaking to votersOf course, there are skeptics everywhere in this arena, not least concerning the two main protagonists. Both Israel and Hamas have a shared interest in making sure the other side gets the blame for any failure.So, Hamas’s response to Netanyahu’s remarks was quite sober and measured. It said it remained committed to the roadmap, adding that it expected the Board of Peace to “exert pressure” on Netanyahu to abide by it.In truth, there are plenty who doubt Hamas ever intends to give up all its weapons, which serve as the plainest manifestation of its leadership position in the Palestinian resistance and act as a guarantee of its own survival in the face of any internal instability inside Gaza. The group has made plenty of enemies during its almost 20 years in charge of the enclave.But regardless of any lack of confidence in Hamas’ true intentions, in Mladenov’s faith in the ability to verify weapons decommissioning, or indeed Netanyahu’s own willingness to order any troop withdrawals, why poke Trump so publicly in the eye? Surely, Netanyahu, the master strategist, as his many acolytes regard him, could have done it with a bit more finesse?The reason – unsurprisingly perhaps – is Israel’s general election. It is less than 12 weeks away, and the polls suggest he remains in trouble. It was time – unequivocally – to speak to the voters.All Israeli prime ministers must build a governing coalition made up of several parties. Netanyahu, as others have remarked, likes to build his next coalition ahead of the election rather than after it.When the counting is over, he will need his far-right allies to join him if he has any chance of remaining in charge, so he was stung by their very public criticism of the roadmap, as well as calls to reverse a previous Israeli Cabinet decision to approve the deployment of an International Stabilization Force for Gaza, which was meant to oversee security in a small pilot project in the territory. Netanyahu had quietly approved reconstruction work could begin in the pilot area, Army radio reported Sunday, which just looked like further weakness.And yet, it would be a mistake to see this only as pandering to the far-right. The vast majority of Israeli voters, while still favorable toward Trump, believe the US president is profoundly mistaken if he believes Israel should have its freedom to do what it likes in Gaza curtailed in any way.None of Netanyahu’s main challengers, for instance, is likely to pick up Mladenov’s attempt to appeal to Israel’s self-interest during his Sunday TV interview, when he said that only full implementation of the Board of Peace’s plan could guarantee there would never be another mass attack like the one in 2023 on Israeli communities living next to Gaza.“If we end up with arguments about this and that, and delaying tactics, I can assure you that the only alternative then is another process of rearming of Hamas and increasing the risk of another October 7th,” the senior envoy said.Truly, it would be a surprise if Gadi Eisenkott, Naftali Bennett, or many other would-be Israeli prime ministers believed there were many votes on that platform.A US Board of Peace official meanwhile sought to play up Israel’s military restraint in recent days in Gaza, as well as a change in targeting policy.“We are seeing co-operation behind the scenes,” the official offered.Cold comfort for Gaza’s two million residents, who remain shut out of the conversation and all but powerless to determine their fate.Eugenia Yosef and Jennifer Hansler contributed to this report.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story