Skip to main content

Birx says Fauci hearing shows there’s still anger over handling of COVID

▶ Watch Video: Dr. Deborah Birx on combative Fauci hearing: “We have to have a better way forward than this”

The former White House coordinator of the COVID Task Force says the contentious Senate hearing that put Dr. Anthony Fauci and his diary under scrutiny shows there is still “persistent anger” over the government’s handling of the pandemic.

In an interview on CBS News’ “The Takeout,” Dr. Deborah Birx said she thought Democratic Sen. John Fetterman, who was Pennsylvania’s lieutenant governor during the pandemic, “got it the most right for all of us.” He wondered, she said, “Did I get the balance right between saving lives and preserving people’s livelihoods?” 

“That is a very deep question, and I think what you heard today is still persistent anger over that question not being answered adequately for most Americans,” Birx told CBS News chief Washington correspondent Major Garrett.

“We’ve got to get to that answer, and we have to have a better way forward than this,” Birx said.

And Fauci, she said, is probably at the center of questions about this because he served during both the Trump and Biden administrations, and people on the left and right still harbor deep disagreements about how each side addressed COVID.

Six years after the pandemic, one of the enduring questions is whether the coronavirus originated in an animal in a wet market in Wuhan, China, or emerged from a lab there. Senators asked Fauci repeatedly about this Wednesday, but he invoked the Fifth Amendment in response to all questions during the hearing.  

Republican Sen. Rand Paul, who heads the Senate Homeland Security Committee, subpoenaed Fauci to appear before the committee as part of the panel’s investigation into the origins of the coronavirus.

Paul backs the theory that the virus emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China, rather than spilling over from animals to humans naturally in a wet market in that city, and he has long accused Fauci and other top health officials of downplaying the possibility of a lab leak and misleading the public.

Fauci has denied that he rejected or downplayed the lab leak theory, insisting that he always kept an open mind about the origins of the coronavirus, though he has asserted at times that the evidence suggests a natural spillover was more likely. 

Fauci said during his opening statement Wednesday that he planned to assert the Fifth Amendment, arguing that Paul has an “obvious obsession with calling for my prosecution” and has made “slanderous comments” about him. He then invoked the Fifth Amendment for several hours as Paul and other Republicans criticized him and Democrats defended him.

Birx didn’t express an opinion, but she did say that it’s an important question because “we do need additional guardrails” and “additional policy around these issues.” 

“We all know that there have been lab accidents,” she said, adding, “I’m hoping that going forward, we really look at these and have good policies that protect the lab workers, that protect the American public, and really get us ready with trust with the American people.” 

She also told Garrett, “All of us need to be quite honest with ourselves,” not only about how information about the coronavirus evolved, but also how countermeasures “should have also evolved.”

Birx pointed out that early in the pandemic, “We didn’t have enough testing out there. We couldn’t stop the spread in any way. Hospitals were being overrun. We didn’t have a supply chain that matched the need.” The first few months “were a crisis,” she said. 

Then, additional therapies like monoclonal antibodies and remdesivir enabled the government to “pull back on some of the mitigation,” Birx said.

“But because it was an election year, there were states that persisted in their very tight mitigations, and others that showed us a way that you could open K-12 and higher ed,” Birx said. Tests “really prevented spread,” she said. 

She called for a dialogue to figure out “how are we going to do this next time?” Birx said she wants to figure out, how will the U.S. prevent spread, keep schools open, keep businesses open? 

“There’s a way to do it,” she said. “And then we have that roadmap, but we need to get that down in real concrete terms, and have both the right and the left agree that that’s the best way forward.”

Garrett also asked Birx about Fauci’s diaries and the idea that he appeared “captivated by his rising international fame.”

She told him, “Well, have you been to his office, you can see that he has a lot of photos of his dealing with high-level influencers and presidents. That is something that means something to him.” But she added, “I don’t think that that clouded his judgment on what he was trying to do for the American people.
We all are human, and I hope we step back and allow Dr. Fauci that humanness, at the same time, holding Dr. Fauci, myself and others accountable to really make this a better response next time.” 

Acting CDC director says Fauci ‘abused the place of power’ during pandemic

▶ Watch Video: Extended Interview: NIH director Jay Bhattacharya on Fauci hearing, COVID-19 origins, more One of the Trump administration's top health officials, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, is accusing Dr. Anthony Fauci, the longtime former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, of an abuse of power during the COVID-19 pandemic. "He frankly abused the place of power that he had been given both by the media and by powerful politicians," Bhattacharya told CBS News chief correspondent Matt Gutman in an interview Wednesday. Bhattacharya currently serves as both director of the National Institutes of Health and acting director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Bhattacharya alleged that Fauci's "primary abuse" during the pandemic was that he "shut down scientific debate" and "denigrated scientists that disagreed with him, including myself and many, many others, simply for the sin of disagreeing with him."During the pandemic, Bhattacharya, then a professor at the Stanford University School of Medicine, was publicly critical of the federal government's response and was vocal in his opposition to lockdowns and mask mandates.In the interview, Bhattacharya took issue with Fauci's leading role during the pandemic. "You know, he was the head of a research institute, he wasn't the head of public health, yet he acted as if he were the head of public health in this country," he said.When it was noted the first Trump administration had informally elevated Fauci into that role at the pandemic's onset, Bhattacharya countered that it was "absolutely imperative" that Fauci "convey clearly what is known and what is not known, that you don't step beyond the role that you actually have based on the expertise that you have." The accusations Wednesday came hours after Fauci's appearance before the Senate Homeland Security Committee under subpoena.After reading an opening statement, Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment rights on all questions, saying he did so because the chairman, Republican Sen. Rand Paul, was attempting "to get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, quote, 'behind bars,' unquote." Over the weekend, Paul, a longtime Fauci critic, released a trove of more than 1,000 pages of diary entries that Fauci wrote during his time as NIAID director during the pandemic. After nearly four decades in the post, Fauci retired in 2022. Bhattacharya said he supported the release of Fauci's journal entries and noted they had been "kept on government servers.""They reflect somebody who had a tremendous impact on the lives of every single person in the country, and in fact in the world," the acting CDC director said. "I think it's in the public interest for those notes to be released."Bhattacharya argued there was a contradiction between Fauci's public statements during the pandemic and his journal entries. "The way he was thinking in private regarding all of the advice he was giving to tremendously powerful people, and what he showed in public, were very different," Bhattacharya said. As an example, Bhattacharya pointed to Fauci's recommendation in early 2020 that schools be closed. "He was making decisions about closing schools, in my view, against what the actual evidence was saying at the time," Bhattacharya said. "... He conveyed a certainty that it turns out in his diary he didn't even feel himself."As the federal government's top infectious disease expert, Fauci didn't have any direct power to impose restrictions or close schools, but his words carried weight with federal, state and local officials.In a June 2024 interview with "CBS Mornings," Fauci said he believed the initial school closures were "the right thing," but agreed that keeping schools shuttered "for a year was not a good idea." "If you go back and look at the YouTube, I kept on saying, 'Close the bars, open the schools. Open the schools as quickly and as safely as you possibly can,'" he said.COVID origins controversyRegarding the debate over COVID's possible origins, Bhattacharya said he believes it likely originated in a lab in Wuhan, China. It is an issue that has been studied extensively with no clear consensus, and many scientists believe the evidence suggests a natural spillover of the virus from animals to humans is more likely."We don't know for certain, but it seems really quite likely, given the evidence that I've seen, that it originated in a Chinese lab," Bhattacharya said.Asked whether he thought Fauci lied to the American people about COVID and its origins, Bhattacharya said, "I think that Dr. Fauci's role in the COVID origins is much more complicated than he led on in his public statements earlier. Lie, I'll leave for other people to say one way or the other."Fauci has long insisted he kept an open mind on research into the virus' origins and denied downplaying it or misleading the public.
Read Next Story