Skip to main content

Artist Derrick Adams’ depictions of Black joy

▶ Watch Video: Artist Derrick Adams’ depictions of Black joy

Few can fill a blank canvas like Derrick Adams. At 56, Adams is widely regarded as one of the most important artists of his generation, known for capturing themes of Black life in America in vibrant, kaleidoscopic style.

derrick-adams-easy-street-900.jpg
Derrick Adams’ “Easy Street,” a 2025 acrylic and fabric collage on wood panel, part of the exhibition “Derrick Adams: View Master,” at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston. 

© Derrick Adams

He is by no means a minimalist. “Sometimes there’s opportunities to be very minimal and still be impactful,” he said. “And there’s times where density is really important, if you’re trying to create an immersive experience. There are so many different ways that I communicate.

“Using color is not because I like colorful things. It’s really, like, color is more to activate a certain psychological response from the audience based on our association with certain colors, even sometimes when they don’t even know why they’re gravitating towards things.”

Born and raised in Baltimore, Maryland, Adams moved to New York for college, and to pursue a career as an artist. It wasn’t long before he gained attention internationally for his signature style. Today, that palette drenches the interiors (and even exterior) of Boston’s Institute of Contemporary Art, home to a mid-career retrospective of his work.

derrick-adams-installation.jpg
An installation view of “Derrick Adams: View Master,” at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston. 

Photo by Mel Taing; Courtesy of Derrick Adams/ICA Boston

Throughout the space are joyous scenes of everyday life and leisure, like a work from his signature “Floater” series. “We study, like, the chaise lounge, and the figures in Renaissance laying on the chaise lounge,” he said. “I was like, ‘How could you do it in American pop style?’ It would be more fun.”

derrick-adams-floater-painting.jpg
A painting from Derrick Adams’ “Floater” series, at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston.

CBS News

His art shows Black life in all its complexities. “And undisturbed,” he said. “It’s really more about what happens when you leave a Black person alone to do the things that we do.”

It’s also an attempt to capture something even more elusive in art: Black joy.

Adams said, “If you see my work, you’re going to see things that may remind you of times where you are in spaces where you feel safe and normal and human. I think the difference between the idea of Black joy and joy is that, if there’s two people going out to jog in the morning, one person is gonna be assured that if something does happen, there will be ramifications if it does happen. But the other person? Through history and understanding, many things could happen to them jogging. They could be arrested for something that they did not do, or anything. [Killed], yes. But the difference between the two is, a person who has the most to lose will still put on their headphones and jog. And that’s Black joy, huh? Because you still do it!”

Asked if he has gotten feedback from people saying his work is “too light,” Adams replied, “All the time. There may be people who may feel that by showing this other aspect of Black culture, that it diminishes the reality of what some people may face in that people may forget about the trauma of what’s happening by getting lost in this particular narrative.

“We occupy multiple spaces. And if anything, I’m letting people know that you deserve this,” he continued. “And if you care to respond to things in a kind of editorial way or a journalistic way as an artist, that’s important for artists to feel compelled to do that. But I think that artists – definitely artists of color – should still be able to speak on things that they feel they want people to know about them as an individual or as a group.”

derrick-adams-style-variation-35.jpg
Derrick Adams’ “Style Variation 35” (2020), from the exhibition “Derrick Adams: View Master.” 

© Derrick Adams

That vision has led critics to call Adams one the leading painters of Black contemporary life, credited with expanding the possibilities of American art.

But Derrick Adams insists his focus is not on legacy – simply making sure his art continues to radiate joy.

“I always say this thing like, when I’m gone and people — I’m not morbid! But I always think about the idea of art,” he said. “Everyone is gonna go at some point. I’m either gonna end up in a museum collection or on ‘[Antique] Roadshow.’ I’ve seen good stuff on there! You know, the idea of good art, it’s gonna end up somewhere. I think that people never throw away things that they feel are needed.”

derrick-adams-painting-1280.jpg

CBS News

For more info:

     
Story produced by Sara Kugel. Editor: Chad Cardin. 

Judge dismisses charges against billionaire Adani, but sharply criticizes DOJ

▶ Watch Video: Todd Blanche to be sworn in as attorney general after narrow Senate confirmation A federal judge on Monday dismissed the criminal fraud charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and several of his co-defendants, after politically appointed leaders in the Justice Department decided to kill the case in May.But in an unusual twist, U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis for the Eastern District of New York refused to dismiss two of the counts against five other co-defendants, saying the Justice Department had failed to provide him with a sufficient reason for doing so.In a scathing 47-page ruling, Garaufis took aim at Trent McCotter, the principal associate deputy attorney general, who he said bears sole responsibility for trying to dismiss the case."The irregularities in the decision to dismiss the indictment are concerning," Garaufis wrote. "On the current record, McCotter appears to have eschewed the professional opinions of innumerable officials from various federal offices and replaced them with his singular judgment. The fact that McCotter came to this decision largely in collaboration with defense counsel, and seemingly without input from the FBI and SEC agents who investigated the alleged misconduct, or the attorneys from the Department, SEC, and U.S. Attorney's Office who brought the case, appears to be highly unusual."The high-profile foreign bribery case against Adani was brought at the tail end of former President Joe Biden's tenure, and it managed to survive even after President Trump ordered the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission to conduct a review into all of their pending foreign bribery cases.But after Adani retained Bob Giuffra and Jamie McDonald of Sullivan & Cromwell, the Justice Department in May moved to dismiss the case entirely.McCotter made the determination after he and other government officials met with McDonald, Giuffra and Andrew DeFilippis of Sullivan & Cromwell, sources previously told CBS News. McDonald has since been nominated by Mr. Trump to serve as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.In one of these meetings at the Justice Department about the Adani case, Giuffra made a presentation that disputed evidence of the alleged bribery scheme, according to sources familiar with the matter and records reviewed by CBS News. One slide touted how one of Adani's companies is "powering India's progress," and another slide said the Trump administration "would not have brought the case."If prosecutors were to drop the charges, Giuffra also said at the meeting, Adani would be willing to invest $10 billion in the American economy, sources told CBS News.Adani is one of the wealthiest people in India, and is widely seen as an ally of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He leads the Adani Group, a massive conglomerate that owns airports, seaports, power plants and other assets.Adani said in a social media post after the charges against him were dismissed: "I welcome the US court's decision with humility and deep respect for the judicial process. Throughout this challenging period, our faith in truth, fairness and the rule of law remained unwavering. My deepest gratitude to those who never lost faith in us, in the system and in India's capacity for justice."CBS News has reached out to Adani's lawyer for comment.A spokesperson for the Justice Department declined to comment beyond the letter McCotter submitted to the court about the case, in which he said he made the decision to dismiss the charges "after conducting numerous meetings with defense counsel" and reviewing "hundreds of pages of materials."Judges have some discretion to review motions to dismiss charges, but it is unusual for them to extensively question the government's rationale for tossing out indictments.The decision to dismiss the Adani case has raised eyebrows and sparked questions from the judge. Two career prosecutors who were involved in the case withdrew from the matter after the motion to dismiss was filed. Additionally, politically appointed officials —  the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York and McCotter—  were the only signatories on the motion to dismiss.McCotter initially pushed back when Garaufis first started raising questions about the motion to dismiss the case, prompting the judge to order Adani last month to provide answers to the court on whether there was any sort of quid pro quo arrangement. Adani ultimately told the judge no such arrangement existed.In his ruling Monday, Garaufis said that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a) requires the government to "set forth the basis for its motion to dismiss," which should include its reasons and underlying factual basis for doing so."It is evident throughout McCotter's musings on 'judicial inquisitions,' the 'separation of powers,' and 'prosecutorial discretion' that he would like the court to have no role in reviewing this motion," Garaufis wrote."However, the rule's legislative history and relevant case law confirm that rule 48(a) was enacted to ensure the court's limited, but key, role in scrutinizing the government's decision to dismiss charges once a grand jury returns an indictment."He criticized McCotter for failing to provide adequate reasons for dismissing the obstruction and foreign bribery counts, noting he was "unpersuaded" by McCotter's "unsworn statements regarding hypothetical concerns of 'diplomatic strife' and 'waste[d] resources,' or his unsubstantiated claim that 'India can better manage its internal systems than can prosecutors in Brooklyn and Washington.'"The judge did accept some of the Justice Department's arguments for dismissing the charges against Adani, saying it was "conceivable that the anti-bribery language used in the financial documents is so generic and vague that it would raise legal risks to the prosecution."But he was angered by McCotter's contention that the case was brought by the Biden-era Justice Department as a name-and-shame exercise."McCotter appears to be accusing officials across four different government offices of bringing a detailed 54-page, 5-count indictment out of spite," he wrote. "However, he has not provided a scintilla of evidence to suggest that the timing of the unsealing of the indictment, or the charging decisions, in this case was politically motivated. McCotter's baseless assertion is unbecoming of his office."He gave the Justice Department an Aug. 31 deadline to advise on its reasons for seeking to dismiss the two counts against the five remaining co-defendants. He also ordered attorneys for the remaining defendants to inform the court that they consent to the dismissal.
Read Next Story