Skip to main content

A new blood test may predict Alzheimer’s risk but should be used carefully

(CNN) — Cognitively healthy older adults with high levels of a biomarker called p-tau217 in their blood had an estimated 38% greater chance of developing early signs of dementia over five years, a new study found. Over 10 years, the risk was 78% higher, although the data was not as robust.

“What this tells me is that we really can use p-tau217 blood tests in future to be able to understand somebody’s individual risk of cognitive impairment,” said lead study author Rachel Buckley, an associate professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School.

Traditionally, diagnosing Alzheimer’s required expensive and invasive procedures like PET scans or spinal taps. However, blood tests that measure levels of phosphorylated tau 217, or p-tau217, “strongly predict” the buildup of sticky beta-amyloid plaques in the brain, Buckley said.

The amyloid plaques, which trigger inflammation and damage communication between neurons, can collect in the brain decades before memory loss or cognitive decline — even when people are in their 30s and 40s.

As beta-amyloid levels rise in the brain, tangles of proteins called tau begin gathering inside brain cells, causing neurons to collapse and die. In some diseases such as frontal lobe dementia, which damages executive function instead of memory, tangles can accumulate without the presence of amyloid.

Not everyone with high levels of amyloid will progress to dementia, just as having tau in the brain does not dictate cognitive impairment later in life, Buckley said.

“However, if an early stage of tau is combined with very elevated levels of amyloid, amyloid appears to be the match that lights the fire for the spread of disease across the brain,” she said. “What we think the p-tau217 test can show us is the moment when amyloid is starting to cause this sort of wildfire.”

Such tests are not recommended for cognitively healthy people, but specialists can use them in people with signs of mild cognitive impairment or more advanced dementia.

“Hopefully, p-tau217 tests can one day function like tests that measure your risk of developing diabetes or having a heart attack — but this test would be for your risk for Alzheimer’s disease and dementia,” said Buckley, who also investigates memory disorders at the Mass General Brigham Neuroscience Institute in Boston.

How blood tests will be used

Insights from Alzheimer’s blood tests are invaluable, but results should not be the sole method of identifying disease risk, said Alzheimer’s prevention researcher Dr. Richard Isaacson, director of research at the Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Florida. He was not involved in the study.

“Never would I order a p-tau217 test in isolation. Why? For one, it tells you only one small part of what is most often a complicated biological picture,” said Isaacson, who runs multiple blood and cognitive tests on his patients to double-check p-tau217 results.

“Also, ordering a single test increases the chance of a less meaningful result, like a false positive,” he said. “If someone has a cold, if someone has kidney dysfunction, it can skew results.”

Instead of just using p-tau217 and amyloid blood tests for diagnosis, Isaacson runs them to look for clues on how people are responding to treatment and lifestyle changes, he said.

“In our lab, we are exploring using these tests as a real-time metric, like an engine light,” Isaacson said. “If you have one or two copies of APOE4 and APOE4 protein levels are high, you can put the right fuel in the car — nutrition, exercise, stress management and the rest — and do preventive maintenance to lower your proteins.”

Personalized lifestyle interventions such as an improved diet, exercise, sleep, socialization and more — combined with the management of insulin, cholesterol and other risk factors — have reduced amyloid and tau levels in patients dedicated to improving their health.

“Research is now showing up to 45% of dementia cases can be prevented with lifestyle interventions such as exercise, diet, social engagement, cognitive training, and management, vascular and metabolic risk factors,” said Laura Nisenbaum, interim chief science officer at the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation, which funds Alzheimer’s research.

“The blood test, in and of itself, is not the diagnosis,” Nisenbaum said. “Blood tests are used in combination with cognitive testing, for example, and ruling out other causes of the cognitive impairment.”

Blood tests need additional study

The study results, scheduled to be simultaneously presented Wednesday at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference and published in the journal JAMA, reanalyzed the results of six observational and clinical trials conducted in Australia, North America and Japan. Nearly 2,700 older adults without symptoms of cognitive decline underwent PET brain scans and p-tau217 tests at the start of the studies and were followed for up to 21 years.

Higher p-tau217 levels on the original tests were significantly associated with cognitive impairment — a risk that grew over time.

The blood test results were also significant independent of a person’s brain scan or known genetic risk factors such as APOE4, the study found. Having one copy of the APOE4 variant may double or triple the chance of developing Alzheimer’s, while having two copies may raise risk by tenfold or more.

However, the research is in its early stages and needs to be repeated in larger studies that include people from “all walks of life with different levels of sickness,” Buckley said.

A separate study presented Tuesday at the Alzheimer’s Association conference analyzed how both specialists and primary care doctors used p-tau217 tests to diagnose and manage 1,300 patients with signs of dementia. The test measured both beta-amyloid and p-tau217.

Primary care clinicians used the test to change a diagnosis in 30% of their patients. In patients with positive results, primary care doctors were less likely to diagnose Alzheimer’s at the time of the visit, preferring to refer patients with worrisome results to specialists for further examination.

Dementia experts, however, changed their diagnosis in about 20% of patients and were over 50% more likely to make an immediate Alzheimer’s diagnosis without additional investigation when the p-tau217 test was positive, the study found.

“We’re at the early stages of having doctors understanding how to utilize these tests and how to move forward,” said Nisenbaum of the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation.

“We know patients and families want the diagnosis, and while these tests are not perfect, these blood tests in combination with cognitive testing may fill a key gap in the field.”

All the new research is exciting but is still a first step, Buckley said.

“We don’t recommend that people go out and ask to get a p-tau217 blood test,” she said, “but in the very near future, I hope that that story will change.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Dr. Anthony Fauci pleads the Fifth to avoid Senate questions about Covid pandemic

(CNN) — Dr. Anthony Fauci, who led the US government response to the Covid-19 pandemic, invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, refusing to testify Wednesday just minutes into a Capitol Hill hearing that Republicans outwardly hoped would undermine the scientist and open him to claims of perjury.Appearing before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee after being subpoenaed by Sen. Rand Paul, Fauci cited what he characterized as the Republican chairman’s “obvious obsession with calling for my prosecution” as his reason for refusing to speak.The move is sure to infuriate Fauci’s Republican critics, who will have been deprived of a public forum in which to relitigate his alleged mishandling of the Covid-19 response and conspiracies about the origins of the virus.But in his opening statement, Fauci asserted that “the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something, anything, that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, ‘behind bars.’”Fauci, the face of American infectious disease research dating back to the HIV/AIDs crisis, has appeared more than 250 times before Congress, and this is the first he’s invoked the Fifth Amendment.The 85-year-old former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has previously appeared before lawmakers to deny, under oath, allegations brought by Sen. Paul of obscuring the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic and controversial infectious disease research.Pressure from Paul and others led President Joe Biden to preemptively pardon Fauci during his last days in office, shielding Fauci from charges pertaining to any comments made in previous years.But he faced a new threat after Paul became chairman of a major Senate committee: that Republican senators and others, including US Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., would endeavor to find new ways to pursue perjury charges against him.“A pardon that protects a person from criminal prosecution doesn’t rewrite history. It does not erase documents. It does not convert a misleading statement to a truthful one, and it does not prevent Congress from establishing what happened,” Paul said in his opening remarks, referencing his allegations that Fauci had misrepresented the pandemic’s origins and deleted internal correspondence.Paul and Kennedy made clear ahead of the hearing that they hoped Fauci, who retired in 2022, would perjure himself in comments about the origins of Covid-19, shutdown measures and scientific research funded by NIAID.“There are many things that (Fauci) said that we know are lies, and Rand Paul presumably is going to ask him about those things, and if he lies again, then he could be subject to perjury prosecution,” Kennedy told Fox News on Monday night.President Donald Trump also weighed in ahead of the hearing on Wednesday, saying in a social media post that Fauci “made too many bad calls.” The president added that he “didn’t let (Fauci) shut the Country down” during the pandemic.Fauci’s refusal to answer questions also comes days after another House Republican referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the Justice Department for possible prosecution, suggesting he’d made false statements in his own committee testimony, which took place behind closed doors. Like Fauci, Smith has also come under intense scrutiny by Trump allies, who were angered by his investigation into the president’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.Paul contends that the National Institutes of Health funded viral research in Wuhan, China, that made more virulent and contagious strains of coronavirus. Known as gain-of-function research, these types of studies are often used to better understand how viruses spread and how to treat them.Fauci has denied through the years that the NIH ever funded studies related to the coronavirus that created the 2020 pandemic. Federal reviews of the outbreak have been inconclusive about its source, but there is no evidence the virus was engineered and leaked from a virology lab.Yet Fauci and Paul have regularly sparred in congressional hearings about whether NIH funded gain-of-function research in China. Fauci maintains that by the government definition of the gain-of-function research, the agency did not fund studies overseas.It has remained a critical point for Paul, and a fiery debate between the two in multiple congressional hearings.“The NIH and NIAID categorically has not funded gain-of-function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute,” Fauci told Paul in a tense hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee in May 2021.Asked again that July by Paul about gain-of-function research, Fauci said: “If anybody is lying here, senator, it is you.”Ahead of this week’s hearing, Paul released 1,100 pages of Fauci’s diary as NIAID director, spanning from late 2019, when Covid-19 began spreading in China, to his retirement in in December 2022. The diary entries show his growing concern about the pandemic, internal conflicts with administration officials and his documentation of his rising fame.Kennedy revealed in a Fox interview Monday night that he had handed those files to Paul after an eight-month search.Fauci referenced the release of his diary as further evidence of Paul’s crusade against him, calling it a move “aimed at embarrassing and intimidating me.”He concluded his remarks saying: “Although it pains me to do so because of the respect that I have for the legislative branch of government and my decades long record of cooperating with Congress, under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the 5th Amendment of the Constitution to refrain from answering your questions.”The committee’s highest ranking Democrat, Sen. Gary Peters from Michigan, lamented that Paul was focusing on Fauci at the cost of the committee’s other priorities.“Instead of focusing on the national security challenges that we are facing in our country right now, today’s hearing looks backwards, revisiting questions this committee has already examined,” Peters said in his remarks prior to Fauci invoking the 5th amendment. “Rather than building on that work to strengthen our preparedness against future disasters, we are instead relitigating the past.”CNN’s Alison Main contributed to this report.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story