Skip to main content

What scientists will be looking for as government UFO files are released

▶ Watch Video: New UFO files released by U.S. government

The Pentagon has begun the long-anticipated release of government files related to what it calls “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena” — UFOs or any potential signs of alien life. On Friday, May 8, it started posting declassified documents, photos and videos that it said “have long fueled justified speculation,” after President Trump called for their release earlier this year.

Questions about what the federal government may know about extraterrestrial life in the cosmos — or possibly even here on Earth — have long inspired imaginations, sci-fi literature and blockbuster films, not to mention decades of conspiracy theories.

Mr. Trump posted on social media on Feb. 19 that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and other agency heads should “begin the process of identifying and releasing Government files related to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.”

His announcement came after former President Obama told a podcaster who asked about aliens, “They’re real, but I haven’t seen them.” He later clarified that he never saw evidence during his time in the White House and just meant that “statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there.” Mr. Trump told reporters he isn’t sure if aliens exist but suggested his predecessor may have been referring to “classified information.”

With the release, the American public could learn what, if anything, the government has documented about the unexplained sightings, such as one seen in a video made public last year by a member of Congress showing a U.S. missile striking an unidentified glowing orb in the sky and appearing to bounce off it. 

Photo from Pentagon's UFO files
The Pentagon released this photo of what it called an “Unresolved UAP Report” from U.S. Indo-Pacific Command in 2024 showing a “UAP that resembles a football-shaped body near Japan.”

Image released by Pentagon

There were more than 750 new UAP sightings between May 2023 and June 2024, according to a government report. While these instances may currently be unexplained, experts said one benefit of releasing the files may be that scientists, analyzing the data, can help provide factual explanations.

Sean Kirkpatrick, former top government UFO investigator

Sean Kirkpatrick, the first director of the U.S. Department of Defense’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), which investigates unidentified flying objects, says people expecting to see evidence of alien life here on Earth may be disappointed.

“There are going to be unsatisfied people,” he told CBS News.

“You’re going to have a bunch of people who are going to continue to cry conspiracy, they’re going to say there’s a cover-up,” Kirkpatrick said. He views Mr. Trump’s order as a “distraction for the administration.”

Kirkpatrick, a physicist who led AARO from July 2022 to Dec. 1, 2023, was tasked with investigating unidentified flying objects and other unidentified aerial or anomalous phenomena. 

What he found ranged from “hazing” in the Air Force to what he called “deceptions” designed to hide secret defense programs. Kirkpatrick said his office “had to stand up anything they could declassify,” but proof of extraterrestrial life wasn’t there.

“Nothing would have made me happier in that job but to have discovered alien technology and rolled it out,” said Kirkpatrick. “I don’t expect to see anything new.”

Kirkpatrick believes there’s likely life out in the universe somewhere, but “the probability that extraterrestrial intelligent life is here is little to none.”

Federica Bianco, NASA study team

Federica Bianco, an associate professor at the University of Delaware’s astronomy and physics department, echoed Kirkpatrick’s perspective. 

“The probability that we are the only life form or even the only technical society in the universe is negligibly small,” Bianco said.

Bianco was part of NASA’s independent team studying unidentified anomalous phenomena.

“As a scientist and a member of the NASA UAP panel, I haven’t seen anything that indicates that we have observed phenomena that violate the laws of physics and require an alien society visiting us to be explained,” Bianco said.

Neil deGrasse Tyson, astrophysicist 

Neil deGrasse Tyson, the director of the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History’s Rose Center for Earth and Space, knows what he’ll look for in the files: 

“An actual alien. If one is presented, then no documents are necessary at all,” Tyson told CBS News. 

Tyson said the files may help illuminate “that most people who look at the sky (day or night) are unfamiliar with optical, climactic, and astronomical phenomena. When that’s the case, a person is prone to report mysterious and unidentified objects.”

“The urge to have immediate answers drives many people to explain what they see as visiting space aliens from across the galaxy,” Tyson said. “I call this, ‘aliens of our ignorance.'”

He noted that in the age of the internet and social media, it would be hard now to hide a visit from otherworldly creatures.

“Billions of photos and a million hours of video are uploaded daily to the internet, and none of them contain images of actual aliens,” Tyson said. “The implicit assumption is that the government (somehow) has access to visiting aliens that no one else in the world with a smart phone has. And that the government has successfully kept it a secret among hundreds and possibly thousands of people. All the while, forgetting Benjamin Franklin’s edict, ‘Three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead.'”

Tyson wrote about what it would take for aliens to reach Earth in his upcoming book, “Take Me To Your Leader: Perspectives on Your First Alien Encounter.”

“In science, skepticism is foundational to our profession, so we uphold standards of evidence that some interpret as disinterest or even denial. Don’t take it personally, it’s how any and all objective truths have ever been established in this world,” Tyson writes in the prologue to the book, which is scheduled for publication in May.

Shelley Wright, observational and experimental astrophysicist

Dr. Shelley Wright, an observational and experimental astrophysicist at the University of California San Diego, said scientific inquiry into unidentified anomalous phenomena and other life forms often creates a “giggle factor” among people. 

Wright, who also served on NASA’s independent study team, said she believes there needs to be more scientific inquiry around this topic and the public has a deep curiosity to know more. She said often people ask her, “Are we alone out here?”

As a scientist, Wright said she is always looking for “life in the universe” and is humbled by how big the universe and our galaxy is. She noted, “The possibility of other alien life existing is likely, but it doesn’t mean it’s near us.” 

Regardless, she said she’s “excited” for the document release but doesn’t expect to find much after her experience on the independent study team, which only viewed unclassified documents.

Wright said she expects most of the documents to be heavily redacted due to the sensitivity of the surveillance equipment used by the military responsible for sighting many of the UAPs. She said that releasing information could encroach on national security. 

However, she added that the administration could declassify security and surveillance documents from decades ago, allowing scientists to study the material with new technologies that weren’t available when the data was originally collected. This decision, she said, could protect national security and allow scientists to understand more about what was captured by surveillance. 

Janna Levin, professor of physics and astronomy

The universe is vast and contains countless other planets, but in our solar system, scientists have long determined Earth is the only planet teeming with life. 

CBS News contributor Dr. Janna Levin, a professor of physics and astronomy at Barnard College of Columbia University, said that even as we learn more about the universe, “life still seems rare.” That’s why astronomers are “very excited” about the prospect that the released documents may hold clues. 

She said astronomers aren’t really looking for the little green men of 20th-century sci-fi, but instead are excited about potential evidence of microbes. These are the tiny particles astronomers are looking for because microbes were responsible for starting life on Earth. “Let’s just get life started,” she said. 

Levin said it’s possible microbes from other planets might have been carried here via a natural object that plunged to Earth. 

She said she’d like to keep “an open mind” about what might be in the documents. 

“If there is anything in them, it would be really thrilling,” Levin said. But she cautioned: “If there are claims of actual technologies from other civilizations — I don’t think anyone is actually expecting that, scientifically. I think if you’re expecting that, you’re going to be disappointed.”  

Avi Loeb, theoretical physicist

Harvard theoretical physicist Avi Loeb, a prominent researcher of anomalous phenomena, said the key is to study the documents from the vantage of known physics. 

Loeb told CBS News that he spoke with members of Congress last week and told them he hopes they’ll look to scientists like himself when they examine the files. He said that in most instances of unidentified phenomena, “something mundane might explain the data.”

He pointed to footage aired before Congress last summer that purported to show a missile being fired at what a congressman referred to as an “orb” off the coast of Yemen in 2024.

Loeb said when he examined the footage, he concluded there was a simple explanation.

“I said, ‘No, it’s not anomalous, it was just a drone,” Loeb recalled.

When Loeb gets the chance to examine the files, he’ll be searching for the unexplainable.

“There might well be a few incidents out of hundreds that would really be anomalous, and that’s what I’m looking for,” he said. 

Loeb said there’s a “fundamental question” to examining each incident with seeming anomalous data: “Are the objects we see as anomalous operating under the fundamental abilities of humans?”

If not, he’s intrigued. An object that appears to defy physics could be extraterrestrial, he said.

Loeb leads the Galileo Project, which searches for artifacts from extraterrestrial civilizations near Earth. He has written about why much of the currently classified material may be of no interest to him: Some information may have been kept from the public to avoid exposing sophisticated military sensors and systems to adversarial nations, or because officials believe certain unidentified objects were manufactured by those adversaries.

“I am not interested in technologies manufactured by humans on Earth. The history of terrestrial technology does not interest me,” Loeb wrote. “I am far more curious about whether a more advanced civilization exists in interstellar space.”

Julián Álvarez fue silbado y se fue sin saludar a la afición: ¿qué sigue en la novela del argentino?

No fue un domingo cualquiera para Julián Álvarez. En realidad, no lo ha sido ningún día desde aquella frase que pronunció durante la Copa del Mundo: “lo mejor para todos es una transferencia”, cuando se hablaba de un fuerte interés del FC Barcelona por contratarlo. El fichaje no se hizo —porque el Atlético de Madrid no quiso negociar— y aquellas siete palabras, pronunciadas a un océano de distancia de España, le ganaron la enemistad de toda la afición del Atlético de Madrid, el club que pagó por él más de US$ 87 millones hace dos temporadas.La afición le hizo pagar esas palabras este domingo, en la primera vez que el delantero argentino pisó el estadio Metropolitano, cuando ingresó en el segundo tiempo de un partido que el Colchonero empataba 1-1. Pero ni la urgencia del resultado ni la necesidad por los goles de Álvarez —acaso su mejor centroatacante— para revertirlo le hicieron olvidar a las gradas rojiblancas las palabras del número 9, que recibió una silbatina generalizada al momento de ingresar al campo (ya había sido reprobado por el estadio durante el calentamiento).Álvarez no tuvo un buen ingreso y, aunque su equipo acabó rescatando un empate con 10 jugadores cerca del final, el goleador argentino se llevó la imagen final, sin participar del tradicional saludo que hace el Atlético, dando la vuelta al campo para agradecer a la afición. El delantero se fue a los vestuarios en soledad. Un gesto que, como dice el dicho, vale más que mil palabras.“Me comentaba la gente del club, que el club decidió que él no se acerque a saludar con sus compañeros a la gente. La decisión no fue de Julián Alvarez, fue del club, que tomó la decisión de alejarlo y separarlo para que se vaya hacia el vestuario”, dijo su director técnico, Diego Simeone, tras el juego.Queda exactamente una semana del mercado de fichajes en Europa, por lo que la presencia de Julián Álvarez en el Atlético de Madrid sigue estando en el aire para el resto de la temporada. El problema es que la reacción de la afición este domingo parece mostrar un punto de no retorno en la relación con el futbolista, que tampoco ha salido a expresar una disculpa o una explicación a sus dichos durante el Mundial.Un problema aún mayor es que, pese al deseo de ser transferido que tiene el jugador, el club no tiene ninguna intención de desprenderse de él y, conforme van pasando los días, el mercado se va achicando, porque al conocer las altas demandas de la directiva del Colchonero, los interesados salen a buscar alternativas, apurados por la fecha límite del 1 de septiembre.Por supuesto, el Atleti, a medida que pasan las horas, tiene cada vez menos deseos de abrirle la puerta de salida, porque se quedaría con muy poco tiempo para salir a buscarle un reemplazo al futbolista estrella que tiene la plantilla. Hallar un sustituto para el jugador que marcó 49 goles y dio 17 asistencias en 107 partidos con el club supondría muchos millones arriba de la mesa, posiblemente teniendo que pagar un valor más alto que de lo que dicta el mercado.Los destinos para Julián Álvarez son muy pocos. El Atleti ya dejó claro que no va a negociar con clubes españoles, porque no quiere reforzar a la competencia. Fuera de España, solo se conoció el interés del Arsenal y uno más pequeño del PSG. Ninguno prosperó, en parte por el deseo del jugador de vestirse de blaugrana.Los Gunners, campeones de la Premier League y subcampeones de la Champions League, podrían hacer el intento, a pesar de que en el ataque ya tienen muchas alternativas. Por eso se había barajado la idea de que los londinenses pusieran dinero y algún futbolista —como Viktor Gyökeres, por ejemplo— en la mesa de negociación, algo que le cerraría a la directiva española, ya que el jugador se iría a otra liga y tendría garantizado un nombre de reemplazo. Sin embargo, si la idea no prosperó es porque o no hubo acuerdo por el monto de dinero, o porque el futbolista no tiene grandes deseos de volver a una liga de la cual ya se fue —jugó en el Manchester City de 2022 a 2024—.La posibilidad de los parisinos se mencionó mucho al comienzo del mercado de fichajes, pero fue perdiendo fuerza con el correr de los días. Mucho más desde que los bicampeones de Europa se hicieron con los servicios de Ferran Torres, el héroe de la final del Mundial 2026, que ya empezó a pagar la confianza de Luis Enrique con goles, marcando un doblete en su presentación, también este domingo.Entonces, el futuro de Julián Álvarez parece estar entre tres destinos: quedarse en el Atlético, ya sea para revertir la situación o para esperar la ventana de transferencias de enero; reflotar la idea de volver a la Premier League, pero con la camiseta del Arsenal —un equipo que quizás tampoco seduce tanto por el estilo de juego que tienen los dirigidos por Arteta—; o que el FC Barcelona finalmente abra la chequera y ponga muchísimos millones arriba de la mesa, 500 millones de euros, para ser exactos, que es su cláusula de recisión. Una cifra jamás pagada por un futbolista, y por mucha diferencia.“Primero, juntos siempre somos más fuertes. Eso siempre nos caracterizó siendo el Atlético de Madrid distinto al resto. Julián es un jugador nuestro”, dijo Giuliano Simeone —autor del empate 2-2— a la prensa tras el partido.“Tenemos que estar todos juntos tirando para el mismo lado, porque, si no, nos vamos a dividir y eso no es bueno. Julián es jugador nuestro y vamos a apoyarlo siempre”, agregó el mediocampista.Su padre, el entrenador del equipo, también defendió a Julián Álvarez, pero con un poco más de cautela.“No estoy para dar consejos. Tengo que centrarme en mi trabajo, que es deportivamente hacer lo mejor para el Atlético de Madrid. Si el Atlético de Madrid quiere ganar algún título necesitamos estar juntos, tener delanteros importantes y para eso necesitamos trabajar en consecuencia todos de lo que necesitamos”, dijo en la rueda de prensa.“Creo que fui bastante claro. Necesitamos estar juntos. Cuando estuvimos juntos siempre hemos podido hacer cosas importantes”.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story