Skip to main content

Kenyan court blocks opening of U.S. Ebola quarantine center on air base

▶ Watch Video: Trump administration building Ebola quarantine facility in Kenya

A Kenyan High Court judge on Friday temporarily blocked a Trump administration attempt to set up an Ebola quarantine facility on an air base in the East African country. White House officials said earlier this week that a 50-bed facility would be operational from Friday for American citizens exposed to or infected by the virus.

The non-profit Katiba Institute, whose mission is to defend Kenya’s constitution, filed the restraining application Thursday, citing a lack of transparency and public participation and arguing that “constitutional recklessness” had implications for “grave public health.” 

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has identified six known strains of Ebola, four of which cause significant illness in humans. The most lethal Zaire strain has a mortality rate of up to 90%, according to the World Health Organization, while the Bundibugyo strain — behind an ongoing outbreak centered in the Democratic Republic of Congo — has a mortality rate between 30-50%. 

DRCONGO-HEALTH-EBOLA
A man hangs an Ebola awareness banner in the Kigonze camp in Bunia, in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, May 28, 2026.

Glody MURHABAZI/AFP/Getty

Trump administration officials said the facility on the Laikipia Air Base, about 124 miles from Kenya’s capital Nairobi, was being designed to provide access to high-quality care for Americans who need to quickly get out of Congo and quarantine without the risks of a lengthy trip back to the U.S.

Another administration official said the government was planning for a facility that would serve “asymptomatic individuals” who may have been exposed to Ebola, in cooperation with the Kenyan government.

As of Thursday, the U.S. was not aware of any exposed Americans who were to be transported to the center, senior administration officials told CBS News.

The Kenyan court said Friday that “a conservatory order is hereby issued restraining the respondents from establishing … any Ebola exposure, quarantine, isolation or treatment facility in Kenya.”

Another organization, the Law Society of Kenya, has also filed a constitutional petition against the proposed Ebola quarantine center, but there was no immediate ruling on that Friday.

“Kenya appears to have been selected as an alternative containment site, thereby externalizing infectious disease risk management to the Republic’s territory,” Katiba said in its legal challenge.  

The Kenyan government has 48 hours to respond to the petition.

Kenya’s health ministry has said it’s open to working with other governments, including the United States, but has not spoken in any detail about the proposed U.S. quarantine facility.

cbsn-fusion-trump-administration-building-ebola-quarantine-facility-kenya-thumbnail.jpg

On Thursday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Kenyan President William Ruto by phone, and a State Department spokesperson later said Washington would provide $13.5 million toward the African country’s Ebola defense operations.

The current Ebola outbreak, focused in Congo’s conflict-plagued Ituri Province on the border with Uganda and South Sudan, is believed to have killed at least 220 people and infected more than 900 others. 

Uganda has confirmed seven Ebola cases, but with a lag time in confirming infections due to the virus’ long gestation period and slow public health reporting in the region, health experts fear there could be a surge in cases confirmed in the weeks ahead.

Secretive terrorist removal court set for first hearing in Afghan woman’s case

(CNN) — The Trump administration is testing a secretive, never-before-used deportation court for alleged alien terrorists with a case concerning the Afghan mother of a convicted terrorist, with the Justice Department accusing the Texas-based woman of having ISIS sympathies.The Alien Terrorist Removal Court will have its first ever hearing Thursday at 11 a.m.ET, court documents made public Wednesday night revealed. The Justice Department is asking the court — which has lain dormant since it was created 30 years ago — to deport Nazira Haji Zada, whose son was convicted last year for an ISIS-aligned terrorist plot targeting the 2024 Election, according to the filings.Zada herself has no criminal history, the court filings said. But DOJ described her in an unclassified summary of the case as having “worked to indoctrinate her children with ISIS ideology and have them pledge loyalty to ISIS.”“The underlying information is classified because disclosure would enable terrorists and terrorist organizations to avoid preventative or detection measures or would reveal FBI or other U.S. Intelligence Community sources and methods by which such information is obtained,” the DOJ said in the unclassified summary.Thursday’s court proceeding, an initial status hearing that will be held at the federal courthouse in DC, will be public. But many details about the DOJ’s case will be withheld from public view and even from the woman targeted in the proceedings. That highly-limited view that the alleged terrorist will have about the case against her— under procedures set forth in the 1996 law that created the court — has prompted some legal observers to question the court’s constitutionality.The judges who sit on the ATRC fall under the judicial branch, making them more independent arbiters than the executive branch immigration judges that typically preside over deportation proceedings. The ATRC is made up of five US district court judges, and its chief judge, Joan Ericksen, is reviewing the current case.The documents unsealed Wednesday provide additional details about how the proceedings have unfolded so far and include the judge’s order granting the DOJ’s initial application for the case to move forward in the court. In the order, she noted that, at that initial phase, the DOJ only had to clear a bar of probable cause. For the next phase — when the judge holds the removal hearing in the case — the DOJ will face a higher bar of evidence, the preponderance of the evidence standard. That standard is still lower than the beyond-reasonable-doubt standard in criminal cases.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story