Skip to main content

Will Your Student Loan Company Choose Your Degree for You?

If you’re planning to begin graduate school this year, there’s suddenly a much greater chance you’ll need to take out private student loans to help cover the costs.

But how are lenders going to decide whether you’re worth the risk? They may start trying to predict your future.

A wave of new graduate student borrowers is expected to flood the private lending market starting this year after the Trump administration placed caps on the amount of federal loans those students can borrow. The limits would likely affect more than a quarter of graduate school borrowers, researchers estimate.

But this is no ordinary group of borrowers. They present a blend of risk and opportunity that has private lenders both “salivating” and scratching their heads.

Consider the typical graduate student reaching out to a private lender. They are likely already saddled with federal student debt, assuming they maxed out those loans first. Many will have thin credit history or low FICO scores. Yet they’re actively investing in their future, in many cases chasing a degree that could lead to high earnings.

In many ways, they’re a great unknown. Because the federal government previously allowed graduate students to borrow as much as they needed for school, they rarely had any reason to seek private loans, which have fewer protections, tougher qualifying standards and often higher interest rates. Likewise, lenders had little incentive to adjust their traditional underwriting criteria to accommodate a tiny sliver of the market.

We’re left with an awkward match: Lenders who are used to evaluating past and current financial data, and students whose greatest attribute may be their potential.

Now, lenders are debating how to capture this new market without taking on excessive risk or opening themselves up to legal trouble. And those grad students are about to come calling.

“It’s going to be a bit of a s— show,” says Jeannie Tarkenton, founder and CEO of Funding U, a private lender that provides undergraduate outcomes-based loans, which weigh factors such as a student’s academic performance and major. She says she’s heard from some large lenders that “are just salivating to come after this market.”

[Read: Best Student Loans for Graduate School]

The Borrowers Who Will Need Private Loans

For years, graduate students have been able to borrow up to the cost of college attendance through federal Grad PLUS loans, regardless of what program they’re studying or its price tag. While that opened up access to many students, it also resulted in ballooning debt. Graduate student loans account for about half of the $1.7 trillion outstanding federal student loan balance.

In an attempt to tackle student debt and force colleges to lower costs, President Donald Trump axed the Grad PLUS program and imposed limits on the amount students can borrow for grad school. The caps, ushered in as part of an extensive federal student loan overhaul included in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, go into effect starting July 1.

Under the new limits, graduate students can borrow $20,500 annually up to a maximum of $100,000 total. Those pursuing certain “professional” degrees, such as medicine and law, can borrow $50,000 per year and $200,000 in aggregate.

About 28% of graduate borrowers exceed those limits, according to a report published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. On average, those students would need to borrow an additional $21,700 after hitting the caps, the study’s authors found.

“In the graduate student space, these loan caps are so aggressive that they’re really going to affect a lot of borrowers,” says Jordan Matsudaira, a professor of economics and public policy at American University and one of the authors of the Philadelphia Fed report.

Matsudaira says that as much as $12 billion in annual graduate borrowing could shift from federal to private, according to a separate analysis he conducted with the team he leads at the PEER Center, a research hub based at American University. That’s roughly one-third of all graduate borrowing. His research team released a new tool this month that allows the public to search how the graduate caps will impact various schools, states and programs.

Why Grad Students May Struggle to Get Loans

Unless you can find a cosigner with a strong financial profile, getting a student loan for grad school may be a challenge.

The authors of the Philadelphia Fed study also analyzed credit data, and they found that about four in 10 of the borrowers who would need private student loans don’t have credit scores that would qualify them. (Most private lenders require credit scores of 670 or higher.)

Another study by the advocacy group Protect Borrowers similarly found that 40% of Americans wouldn’t qualify for private student loans.

Of course, these studies indicate that about three in five borrowers would likely qualify for the loan they need, although maybe with less favorable terms than they would have received from the government. Private lenders will happily accommodate many of these borrowers, as well as those with a creditworthy cosigner.

The question is how they attempt to address the students who don’t meet their current standards for lending. If they want that business, private lenders have essentially two choices: Relax their current requirements or figure out a new formula — perhaps one that predicts just how financially successful you will be.

[Read: Best Private Student Loans.]

Want a Loan? Pick the Right Degree

Some lenders already consider the graduate degree you’re pursuing, at least at a basic level. Many of the major players offer specific loans for medical students or law students, for example. But factors like credit score and debt-to-income ratio are still overwhelmingly what determine your eligibility.

Over the past decade, a few student loan companies have introduced products called outcomes-based loans, which heavily weigh factors that may indicate a borrower’s future earnings. These lenders say they may consider historic earnings for graduates of the program you’re entering, previous academic performance, how much progress you’ve made toward your degree and more.

“This is definitely the direction the industry is moving,” says Ken Ruggiero, founder and CEO of Ascent Funding, a private lender that provides both traditional and outcomes-based student loans to graduate students as well as undergrads. “The traditional model relies on credit scores and cosigners, which reflect past financial history, not future earning potential. That creates a clear gap. The shift is less about if and more about how quickly lenders adapt.”

Tarkenton, the Funding U CEO, says her company isn’t in the grad school market, but “we are watching it very closely.”

“We’re watching for where we can play in that field and where we can do it profitably and responsibly,” Tarkenton says. “There will be a role for us there.”

Lenders now have much greater access to earnings data and success rates of graduates from various college programs than they did even a decade ago. If more lenders start plugging that data into their underwriting formulas, it could create a scenario where the degree you choose could determine whether you get approved. Students in costly but less lucrative fields could struggle to get loans.

“The reality is that some of this the private sector will not be able to finance,” says Scott Buchanan, executive director of the Student Loan Servicing Alliance, a nonprofit trade association whose members service the majority of federal and private student loans. “There are certain programs of study where private lenders are going to say, ‘The amount you’re borrowing relative to the earned income that you will accrue above and beyond what you would have had, it’s not great ROI.'”

But Buchanan says private lenders must contend with several challenges, which is why many are moving cautiously.

First, they want to know more about the federal loans a grad student already has, Buchanan says. Lenders can see if a prospective borrower has federal student loans, but they can’t identify which type of loans those are. Additionally, many borrowers weren’t required to make any monthly payments on their loans during post-pandemic pauses, which makes it hard for lenders to determine a borrower’s on-time payment history.

There are also some legal landmines to navigate. While college programs’ outcomes data can be useful in making lending decisions, the practice has gotten loan companies in hot water before. For example, if a lender favors students at some colleges or programs over those from others, that may disproportionately affect certain demographics. The result could cause lenders to run afoul of discrimination laws.

“It’s going to be a slow learning process,” says Buchanan. “From an underwriting perspective, I think people are going to be looking at: Are there other attributes that I can get beyond just their credit file that I can really use to make big decisions about lending? I think underwriting will evolve, but I don’t think it will happen overnight.”

[Read: Best Student Loan Refinance Lenders.]

New Players and New Ideas

Because private loans have typically made up less than 10% of all student borrowing, the market has been relatively limited to about 15 major players along with various local institutions. But observers expect new companies, particularly fintechs, to emerge as demand for private loans increases.

Existing private lenders have spent much of the past year in discussions with colleges, lobbying for spots on universities’ preferred lender lists that are distributed to families and also brainstorming other ways to accommodate heightened demand. Some universities, particularly those with large endowments, are exploring risk-sharing deals with lenders where the school would take on some of the exposure to loans.

Experts anticipate more financing ideas to emerge in the next few years, although perhaps not in time for this year’s grad students.

“I think you’ll see some experimentation,” says Matsudaira. “But it will mostly be small and around the margins, and we’ll kind of see how it shakes out over time.”

More from U.S. News

This Type of Borrower Gets the Lowest Rate on a Private Student Loan

Want to Major in Theater? Don’t Expect a Student Loan

Trump Is Capping Grad Student Loans. Connecticut Has a Backup Plan.

Will Your Student Loan Company Choose Your Degree for You? originally appeared on usnews.com

Trump’s address is likely to cast new cloud over midterm elections

(CNN) — President Donald Trump has passed up multiple chances to explain to Americans how his latest escalation will win the war in Iran or how he’ll alleviate their perpetually high costs for groceries, housing and fuel.Now he’s planning to anchor a national address Thursday evening on a personal fixation about the past — his false claim that he won the 2020 election.Critics fear this is all part of a quickening effort to buckle trust in voting systems and to create a pretext to use federal powers to sway November’s midterm elections. It would not be the first time that this president — who convention states should seek to bolster American democracy — has instead undermined it.“It doesn’t get bigger, because without free and fair elections, you don’t have a country,” the president said Wednesday as he previewed his speech. “We’ll be discussing other things too, but it’s going to be a very big announcement.”Trump’s rising drumbeat of warnings is broadening unease that he’s not just recycling claims about the 2020 election that were debunked by multiple courts, state Republicans and even his first-term administration. Trump, as he has in the past, seems to be building a fallback narrative if the Republican Party fares poorly in November and to portray any election that he doesn’t win, as, by definition, unfair.No one outside the White House knows what the president will say on Thursday. But there’s no credible sign yet that he has compelling new evidence of voter fraud that would contradict an overwhelming body of evidence that the 2020 election was fair or countless academic studies finding that major irregularities are very rare in US elections.But Trump’s speech may confirm a familiar pattern. In 2016, 2020, and 2024, as voting neared, he stepped up efforts to cast doubt on the fairness of elections. In 2020, this morphed into active election interference after he refused to concede to Joe Biden and sought to overturn the result without evidence. His campaign culminated in a riot by his supporters intended to thwart the certification of the president-elect’s win, during which police officers were beaten and the US Capitol was desecrated.In one of the first acts of his second term, Trump pardoned or commuted sentences for hundreds convicted in connection with January 6, 2021, sending a message that election violence or attempts to subvert democracy on his behalf were acceptable and above the law.Alarm bells are ringing again, partly because of the role of Trump’s interim director of national intelligence, Bill Pulte, whom the president implied was sent to the top spy agency to find evidence about “rigged elections.” The FBI has meanwhile been investigating 2020 elections in Georgia, a state Trump lost, after seizing boxes of election materials. That election was deemed free and fair multiple times by GOP state officials following forensic audits.Nationwide, the administration has been demanding voter rolls, raising fears it intends to infringe the constitutional mandate that states, not the federal government, oversee elections. Trump is also making every domestic priority subordinate to his pressure on Republicans to pass the “SAVE America Act,” which, while containing reforms on requiring voter ID — which many citizens support — also threatens to make voting harder, curtail registration and narrow the franchise for minority voters. It could also give Trump more power to interfere in national elections.In the past, US intelligence agencies have concluded that foreign states and actors have tried to influence US elections. But pro-democracy groups fear that Trump’s team will use such evidence out of context to suggest there was active and successful interference to hurt Trump.Ben Berwick, who leads the Election Law and Litigation Team for Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan group, expects the president to recycle his repeatedly debunked claims about the 2020 election on Wednesday evening. “I think there’s no doubt that a major piece of what is happening is really an intent to sow doubt about the 2026 election,” he said.Administration officials insist their only goal is to secure elections. “The work that we’re doing is to make sure that we have fair and honest elections,” Trump’s nominee for attorney general, Todd Blanche, said in his confirmation hearing Wednesday. Blanche said the goal is to ensure “that the only people voting are the people who are eligible to vote and that they’re only voting once.” Still, one reason some voters may be having doubts about the integrity of US democracy is that Trump and his supporters have spent so much time trashing it.Trump officials know the price for entry to his inner circle — accepting the false orthodoxy that he won in 2020. The latest official to dodge an unequivocal statement that Biden was rightfully elected was Jay Clayton, during his confirmation hearing Wednesday to be director of national intelligence. “I believe he had the most electoral votes,” Clayton said of Biden.When officials adopt such formulations they are ignoring facts and evidence, which raises questions about how they’d act if the president seeks again to overturn the result of a democratic election.The US government’s own election security agencies under the Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council concluded during Trump’s first administration that the 2020 election was “the most secure in American history” and that “there is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.”Republicans are frustrated Trump won’t speak about what matters to voters Trump’s refusal to move on infuriates many Republicans, even if most are loath to speak out publicly against a president who still commands the grassroots MAGA base. Republican Sen. John Cornyn, however, has a measure of freedom after losing his primary in Texas to a Trump-endorsed rival. “I, frankly, am more concerned about the upcoming midterm elections than I am … what happened in 2020, and obviously election integrity is very important. But I personally don’t see any point in relitigating an election that occurred six years ago,” Cornyn said.But Trump finds it impossible to drive a consistent electoral message. He rarely mounts an effective campaign around a domestic policy bill that handed many Americans higher tax refunds and temporarily reduced taxes on tips and overtime. Nor does he spend much time touting efforts to make prescription drugs more affordable through his TrumpRX website. When the White House schedules a trip to discuss affordability — the key 2026 election issue — Trump often deliberately ditches the script. He’d rather talk about his construction of an architectural legacy in the White House complex and around DC.Concern that he may seek an illegitimate way to boost Republicans in the midterms is also rising because a clutch of gathering political crises threaten to dampen Republicans’ prospects. The stakes are huge: If Democrats win back one chamber of Congress, they will have the power to subject the president’s second term and personal financial arrangements to unprecedented oversight.The unpopular Iran war is raging again, confounding Trump’s claims that he won it within days of its February launch and renewing the risk of soaring gasoline prices that anger voters. Several recent deaths linked to immigration raids by federal agents are reminding the country how much it dislikes one of Trump’s cornerstone policies. And while he mocks the idea that millions of Americans are struggling to afford the basics of daily life, he’s added $2 billion in personal wealth since returning to office.The latest polling reflects Trump’s worsening political position. A Reuters/Ipsos poll completed Sunday found 79% of respondents think US military involvement in the war will “go on for an extended period of time,” up from 65% in late March. A PBS/NPR/Marist poll in June found only 33% of Americans approve of Trump’s handling of the economy. If immigration recaptures the headlines, that might also be bad news for Trump. A Marquette Law School poll in May showed voters had an unfavorable view of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency by 61%-36%.Why the 2020 election fixation may alienate voters Trump has made no secret of his admiration for strongman leaders. His opponents fear he may take a page from the playbook of authoritarians who erode democratic societies when their popularity wanes.Sen. Jon Ossoff, a Georgia Democrat whose 2020 election has been the source of rumors on conservative media sites in relation to Trump’s speech, hit on this potential political motivation for Trump’s speech this week. “Privately, most elected Republicans in this building think the president has lost it and is dooming them to dismal losses this fall,” Ossoff told reporters Tuesday.Ossoff also had a heated exchange with Clayton over the administration’s new election probe in the hearing on Wednesday. His keenness to engage on this issue implies that he sees it as a losing one for his Trump-backed opponent. “Mike Collins launched his general election campaign doubling down on his 2020 election denials. Now he not only has to defend doubling health insurance premiums for more than a million Georgians, he has to defend these conspiracy theories about the 2020 election that Georgia voters have rejected time and time again,” Ossoff said.On one level, Trump’s address may come to be seen as symptomatic of his tendency to pursue his own narrow interests in a second term that appears rather remote from the concerns of millions of voters.On another, it is likely to fuel fresh questions about how Trump would respond to another GOP electoral loss after spending years arguing his last defeat was illegitimate.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story