Skip to main content

These Are the Cheapest Restaurants to Feed a Family

Dining out can be expensive, and food prices are escalating in many cases.

According to the April U.S. Department of Agriculture’s 2026 Food Price Outlook report, food-away-from-home prices were predicted to increase 3.6%

It’s costly enough when you’re only treating yourself, but when you’re also taking the kids, the check can be daunting. Rather than foregoing restaurant meals entirely, find ways to treat your family in a financially healthy way.

Here’s how a party of four can eat dinner out affordably (prices are accurate at the time of publication).

[These Are the 10 Cheapest Grocery Stores in the U.S.]

Fast Food

Quick-service restaurants — places where you give your order to a cashier or on a terminal (inside or via the drive-through) — are popular for a reason. They’re not just fast — they tend to be significantly less expensive than their more formal counterparts.

Here are the average prices for five popular dinner items in 2026. Costs may be higher or lower in your area.

1. Burgers

Burgers, whether basic or dressed up with cheese and other add-ons, are a popular restaurant staple. They can also be wildly expensive. Ordering a gourmet burger at a sit-down restaurant can easily set diners back by $15 to $20. For a party of four, that could cost up to $80.

While not as swanky, fast food eateries that specialize in burgers can be far more financially appealing. Here are some prices for their signature burgers:

McDonald’s: The Big Mac’s typical price is $5.91, so it will be $23.64 for four.

In-N-Out: The Double-Double has an average price of $5.90, or $23.60 for four.

Burger King: The Whopper is currently about $7.79, so expect to pay around $31.16 for four.

2. Chicken

Sure, you can go to a nice restaurant and order the chicken, but chances are it won’t be an inexpensive entree. The average price of a boneless chicken press is $4.72 per pound, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.

For example, order the honey-pecan fried chicken with mashed sweet potatoes and vegetables at Savannah, Georgia’s famous (for a reason) Pirates’ House, and it will be $25 each, or $100 for four people.

Not feasible? Some well-priced fast food alternatives are:

Popeye’s: This New Orleans-style eatery is currently featuring a Family Meal Steal that includes nine pieces of chicken or tenders, one large side, and four biscuits for $20.

KFC: The average price for a chicken meal consisting of eight pieces of chicken with two large sides and four biscuits is $33.99.

Chick-fil-A: The Chick-fil-A chicken sandwich meal, which includes a chicken sandwich, fries and a beverage is averaging $10.79. That comes out to $43.16 for a family of four.

[READ: Cheap Foods to Buy When You’re Broke.]

3. Tacos and Burritos

While tacos and burritos are popular, prices can be steep depending on where you go. San Francisco taqueria La Vaca Birria charges $17 for a super burrito plus chips. It’s big and filled with high-quality ingredients, but the total would be $68 when quadrupled.

Fast food alternatives may not be as authentic, but they are certainly a lot lighter on the wallet.

Taco Bell: A burrito supreme is $5.69, so four of them would be $22.76.

Chipotle Mexican Grill: A chicken burrito is around $10.40, which means four would be $41.60.

Jack in the Box: It would be very hard to beat the price of this restaurant’s version of tacos. You may be able to get two of them for $1.49, which means that eight tacos will only cost $5.96. Twenty tacos would be $14.90.

4. Pizza

There are wide variances in the price of a large pizza depending on location, toppings and how fancy the restaurant is.

Deals at local pizzerias can be exceptional. For example, Union Park Pizza in Boston offers a pepperoni pie big enough for a hungry family of four for just $27.

Can you do better with a fast food chain? In some cases, yes, but just a bit.

Pizza Hut: The average price for a large pepperoni pan pizza from Pizza Hut is $23.05.

Domino’s: This fast-food pizzeria sells an extra-large pepperoni pizza for around $19.99.

Papa John’s: This chain is currently offering a large, one-topping pizza for takeout for just $9.99.

5. Sandwiches

Although sandwiches make for satisfying and affordable meals, costs are climbing. While communities often love independent corner delis, you might find lower prices at some popular quick-service restaurants.

Here’s how a few popular sandwich chains compare on price:

Jimmy John’s: A “Turkey Tom” is $7.99, so it would be $31.96 for four.

Subway: If you’re looking for a more complete meal, Subway’s $6.99 “deal of the day” includes a 6-inch sub, chips or two cookies and a small drink. For $27.96, you’ll feed four.

Jersey Mike’s: “Mike’s Hot Italian” is just $8.95, so four of them would be $35.80.

Casual Chains

There are some terrific and affordable sit-down chains if you want to go into a restaurant with the family and be served at the table.

At the following places, you can feed a family of four for less than $50 (not including tax and tip).

Golden Corral: This restaurant offers a buffet with such items as fried chicken, pot roast and meatloaf. Four meals can be as low as $63.96.

Chili’s: This chain’s “3 For Me” deal offers a variety of entrées, as well as an appetizer and a beverage, starting at $10.99. The total for four would be $43.96.

Texas Roadhouse: Several of this chain’s family meals, which serve three to four people, cost less than $50. For example, you can get two pounds of pulled pork with BBQ sauce plus a family-sized salad, two large sides and 12 rolls with butter for $44.99.

Applebee’s: This chain is currently offering a $9.99 meal deal. You get a choice between a burger, bacon cheeseburger or chicken sandwich, along with fries and a drink. Total price for four: $39.96.

Cracker Barrel: Family meals that serve five include entrées like the Chicken n’ Dumplins Family Meal, served with two classic sides and buttermilk biscuits. You’ll pay only $49.99, and since this meal serves five, you’ll likely have leftovers.

How to Find More Budget-Friendly Dining Options

There are ways to keep your family restaurant budget down when you’re eating out.

“Always be on the lookout for a coupon or special promotion,” says Melissa Cid, a Miami-Fort Lauderdale-based consumer savings expert for ShopHer Media. “Sign up for restaurant reward programs for coupons and the ability to earn free food.”

[READ: Best Restaurant Apps That Get You Free Food.]

Many programs will give you an appetizer, dessert or entrée just for signing up. Others may notify you of what they offer for national food “holidays,” like National Taco Day, and give you free food on your birthday. And don’t forget to look for promo codes that can grant you complimentary items and buy-one-get-one deals.

If you’re a regular at an eatery, it pays to download the company’s app so you can access free or discounted items.

Don’t forget local, independently owned restaurants, though. You can take the family out for a meal and support these small businesses by keeping an eye out for promotions they offer through sites like Groupon. You may score a meal for between 25% to 50% off the normal price.

Last, artificial intelligence can help point you in the right direction. You can type a clear, specific prompt into a tool like ChatGPT — for instance, asking for “affordable local restaurants offering [type of dish] in [city],” or “budget-friendly options for [service or item] near me.” AI can then generate a list of possibilities, making it easier to discover good deals without hours of searching.

More from U.S. News

Eggs Are Crazy Expensive Right Now — Here’s What You Can Do

How Much Should I Spend on Groceries?

How to Save Money on Groceries When You Live in a Food Desert

These Are the Cheapest Restaurants to Feed a Family originally appeared on usnews.com

Update 04/29/25: This story was published at an earlier date and has been updated with new information.

Trump se niega a descartar una declaración de emergencia de seguridad nacional para controlar las elecciones de 2026

El presidente Donald Trump se negó en una nueva entrevista a descartar la posibilidad de declarar una emergencia de seguridad nacional para tratar de ejercer un mayor control sobre las elecciones intermedias de 2026.Es la advertencia más reciente de que Trump podría intentar interferir en las elecciones no solo al afirmar, sin fundamento, que hubo fraude electoral y cuestionar los resultados después de la votación, como hizo en 2020, lo que provocó un violento disturbio en el Capitolio de Estados Unidos, sino también al tratar de asumir unilateralmente el control antes de que se emitan los votos.En la entrevista, Wayne Allyn Root, de Real America’s Voice, planteó a Trump un escenario de ese tipo. Lo propuso como alternativa, dado que el Senado no ha logrado aprobar el proyecto de ley electoral que Trump considera prioritario, conocido como la “Ley SAVE America”.“Si nunca logran aprobar la ‘Ley SAVE America’, tienes derecho a declarar una emergencia de seguridad nacional para las elecciones”, dijo Root. Añadió que “si declaras una emergencia de seguridad nacional como presidente de Estados Unidos, no pueden impugnarla. Solo puede ser revocada mediante una votación de dos tercios de ambas cámaras del Congreso. Así que, si lo haces el próximo mes, tendremos identificación con foto, prueba de ciudadanía (para el registro electoral) y un límite al voto por correo”.Fue en ese momento cuando Trump interrumpió a Root y sugirió, de manera ambigua, que esa opción efectivamente estaba sobre la mesa.“Permítanme decir simplemente que han sucedido cosas más extrañas, ¿de acuerdo?”, dijo Trump. “Lo dejaré así”.A pesar de los comentarios de Root, no está claro en absoluto que una maniobra de ese tipo pudiera funcionar. Y CNN pidió a la Casa Blanca más detalles sobre lo que quiso decir el presidente.Trump suele responder a situaciones hipotéticas negándose a descartarlas, sin importar cuán extrema pueda ser la propuesta. Por lo tanto, es posible interpretar demasiado sus palabras.Pero, como ha señalado Jake Tapper, de CNN, hay numerosas señales de que Trump al menos aspira a intentar ejercer un mayor control sobre las elecciones. Y estos métodos suelen estar claramente orientados a ayudar a los republicanos.Una de las principales señales es la amenaza del Gobierno de lograr que el Servicio Postal de Estados Unidos no entregue las papeletas de voto por correo de los estados que no cumplan con su exigencia de entregar sus listas de votantes. Incluso muchos estados republicanos han rechazado esta solicitud, alegando preocupaciones por la privacidad.Los demócratas tienen muchas más probabilidades de utilizar el voto por correo, una modalidad que Trump ha vinculado, sin fundamento, con un fraude generalizado. Por lo tanto, limitarlo podría beneficiar considerablemente a los republicanos.(Los tribunales federales han bloqueado este decreto de Trump, y el Gobierno apeló recientemente ante la Corte Suprema).Trump también se ha esforzado mucho para intentar sustentar sus afirmaciones, todavía sin fundamento, sobre un fraude generalizado. Eso incluye que el Gobierno incautara las papeletas de 2020 en el distrito de Fulton, Georgia, y el reciente discurso de Trump en horario estelar sobre la seguridad electoral, que algunos interpretaron como una declaración de intenciones, un pretexto para una participación federal más directa en las elecciones, que son administradas por los estados.Ty Cobb, quien se desempeñó como abogado de la Casa Blanca durante el primer mandato de Trump, dijo que interpretó el discurso del mes pasado como una “base para que declare una emergencia”.Y Trump ha dicho ocasionalmente cosas, como lo hizo en la nueva entrevista, que sugieren que le gustaría asumir el control de las elecciones en Estados Unidos.En febrero, instó a su partido a “tomar el control de la votación en al menos 15 lugares” y añadió: “Los republicanos deberían nacionalizar la votación”.The Washington Post también informó en marzo que activistas pro-Trump estaban haciendo circular un posible decreto que afirmaba que la interferencia china en las elecciones de 2020 le otorgaba a Trump facultades de emergencia sobre las elecciones de 2026. Y el discurso de Trump en horario estelar se centró en China, pese a las pruebas poco sólidas.El intenso interés de Trump en la “Ley SAVE America”, que nunca pareció tener posibilidades de ser aprobada, pero que Trump ha dicho que es fundamental, también podría interpretarse como parte de un intento por construir los argumentos para una medida más drástica.Sin embargo, no está claro en absoluto que Trump pudiera asumir por sí mismo el control de las elecciones, como plantea Root.Como informaron Marshall Cohen y Michael Williams, de CNN, en febrero, la Constitución dificulta que Trump pueda realmente “nacionalizar” las elecciones. Los tribunales han respaldado abrumadoramente el principio de que los estados están a cargo de las elecciones.Por lo general, los presidentes tienen mayor autoridad para actuar unilateralmente cuando está involucrada la seguridad nacional, de ahí la importancia de invocar a China, pero algunos expertos dudan de que el intento de Trump pueda superar el escrutinio legal.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story