Skip to main content

The $100,000 H-1B visa fee is impacting the U.S.’s ability to attract global talent

▶ Watch Video: How Trump’s change to H-1B visas is impacting workers with aspirations to come to the U.S.

Hyderabad, India — The city of Hyderabad has been called the Silicon Valley of India.

“Google, Facebook, and all the other bigger companies are here,” Rajesh Jaknalli, who has worked for a U.S. tech company in Hyderabad for about 10 years, told CBS News.

“This place is actually called High Tech City, but because of the many companies that we have, the term ‘Cyberabad’ has come,” Jaknalli explained.

Jaknalli says he has worked here with one goal, to get an opportunity to one day move to the U.S.

“Our dream was to perform, give you 100%, and then probably, we’ll get a chance to move to the U.S.,” Jaknalli said.

But in September 2025, the Trump administration announced that it would require that a $100,000 fee be added to new applications for H-1B visas for skilled foreign workers. The White House argued the move would protect American jobs.

Prior to this, H-1B visas had ranged in cost from anywhere between $1,700 and $4,500.

Hameed Abdul thought his Amazon job in Hyderabad would eventually take him to the U.S., but that outlook has changed.

“I got this news, and I was really devastated,” Abdul said. “…It’s not beneficial for any employer, to be honest. Nobody’s going to hire you and give $100,000,” said Abdul, who disclosed that the fee means he has “decided to move to Canada.”

Xavier Fernandes, who founded the immigration agency Y-Axis, says the H-1B visa created a pipeline of tech talent that eventually fueled America’s IT sector.

“It’s definitely America’s loss,” Fernandes said of the fee. “…Many CEOs are from Hyderabad. It’s just a breeding ground of tech.”

According to numbers from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, more than 70% of H-1B visa holders in 2024 were Indian.
 
“Indians are the new oil, coal, or gas, it’s brain power to run the modern day industries,” Fernandes said.

Pressed on whether he believes that same “brain power” exists in the U.S., Fernandes responded: “That kind of talent you can’t manufacture. It’s not a thing that you can get it locally.”

It’s something even President Trump admitted to in an interview on Fox News last November, telling host Laura Ingraham that “you also do have to bring in talent.”

When Ingraham countered that the U.S. has “plenty of talented people here,” Mr. Trump responded, “No you don’t…You don’t have certain talents, and people have to learn.”

Fernandes believes the new policy “definitely” threatens the trajectory of U.S. innovation.

“Many Indians will stay back and build in India,” Fernandes said.

Countries like Canada, China and Australia are now scrambling to lure skilled foreign workers by making their visa processes easier.

“I’m currently applying to Australia,” Jaknalli said. “The process is pretty straightforward there.”

Trump declines to rule out declaring a national security emergency to control the 2026 election

(CNN) — President Donald Trump in a new interview declined to rule out declaring a national security emergency as a means to try to assert more control over the 2026 midterm elections.It’s merely the latest warning sign that Trump could try to mess with the election not just by baselessly claiming voter fraud and challenging the results afterward — as he did in 2020, leading to a violent riot at the US Capitol — but by trying to unilaterally take control before votes are cast.In the interview, Wayne Allyn Root of Real America’s Voice pitched such a scenario to Trump. He suggested it as an alternative, given the Senate has failed to pass Trump’s coveted elections bill, known as the “SAVE America Act.”“If they never get the SAVE America Act done, you have the right to declare a national security emergency for elections,” Root said. He added that “if you declare a national security emergency as the president of the United States, they can’t challenge it. It can only be overturned by a two-thirds vote by both houses of Congress. So if you do this in the next month, we will get photo ID, proof of citizenship (for voter registration) and a limit to mail-in ballots.”It’s at this point that Trump cut Root off and coyly suggested such an option was indeed in play.“Let me just say that stranger things have happened, OK?” Trump said. “I’ll leave it at that.”Despite Root’s comments, it’s far from clear such a gambit would even work. And CNN has asked the White House for more detail on what the president meant.Trump often responds to hypotheticals by declining to rule them out — no matter how extreme the proposal might be. So it’s possible to read too much into this.But as CNN’s Jake Tapper has noted, there are plenty of signals that Trump at least aspires to try to exert more control over elections. And these methods often appear transparently geared toward helping Republicans.A major one is the administration’s threat to have the US Postal Service not deliver mail ballots for states that don’t comply with its demand that they hand over their voter lists. This is a request that even many red states have rejected, citing privacy concerns.Democrats are much more likely to use mail ballots, which Trump has baselessly connected to widespread fraud. So curtailing them could greatly help Republicans.(Federal courts have blocked this Trump executive order, and the administration recently appealed to the Supreme Court.)Trump has also gone to great lengths to try to substantiate his still-baseless claims of widespread fraud. That includes the administration seizing 2020 ballots in Fulton County, Georgia, and Trump’s recent primetime address about election security that some read as a statement of intent — a pretext for more direct federal involvement in elections, which are run by states.Ty Cobb, who served as White House counsel in Trump’s first term, said he interpreted the speech last month as a “predicate that he needs to declare an emergency.”And Trump has occasionally said things, like he did in the new interview, suggesting he would like to take control of US elections.Back in February, he urged his party to “take over the voting in at least 15 places,” adding: “The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.”The Washington Post also reported in March that pro-Trump activists were circulating a potential executive order that claimed Chinese interference in the 2020 election gave Trump emergency authorities over the 2026 election. And Trump’s primetime address focused on China, despite the tenuous evidence.Trump’s intense focus on the “SAVE America Act,” which has never appeared to have a chance to pass but Trump has said is vital, could also be read as part of building the case for more drastic action.But whether Trump could take over elections himself, as Root posits, is far from certain.As CNN’s Marshall Cohen and Michael Williams reported in February, the Constitution makes it difficult for Trump to truly “nationalize” elections. Courts have overwhelmingly upheld the principle that states are in charge of elections.Presidents generally have more authority to act unilaterally when national security is involved — hence the significance of invoking China — but some experts are skeptical that Trump’s effort would pass legal muster.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story