Skip to main content

5 Alternative Investments Every Investor Should Consider in 2026

The biggest contributors to performance aren’t always the obvious ones.

Backup quarterbacks have accounted for roughly 16% of Super Bowl wins since 1967. Doug Williams, a backup for the Washington Redskins (now Commanders), started just twice in the 1987 season before throwing four touchdown passes in a Super Bowl rout of the Denver Broncos.

Investing can work the same way.

[Sign up for stock news with our Invested newsletter.]

Most portfolios are anchored in stocks and bonds. That’s a sound foundation, but it may not be enough going forward. Return expectations in the coming years for traditional asset classes have moderated. In its new “Capital Market Assumptions” report, T. Rowe Price projects five-year returns of 6.8% for global stocks and 3.1% for global bonds. By comparison, the firm is more optimistic about parts of the alternatives market, including private real estate (8.9%), private credit (9.2%) and private equity (9.8%).

Jeffrey Rosenberg, senior portfolio manager at BlackRock Systematic Fixed Income, comments, “A well-constructed allocation should also include diversifying liquid alternatives, especially strategies designed to generate return streams that are less dependent on traditional stock and bond market direction.”

For investors building portfolios with a long-term view, alternative investments are worth a closer look:

— Private credit.

— Private equity.

— Real assets.

— Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs).

— Digital assets.

Private Credit

When banks pulled back from lending after the 2008 financial crisis, private lenders stepped in and never left. Today, private credit is a multitrillion-dollar market, generating income by lending directly to businesses, often with yields in the 8% to 12% range.

The appeal is straightforward: Most loans are floating-rate, so income can rise alongside interest rates, unlike traditional bonds.

That said, the asset class has faced scrutiny. Early this year, rising defaults, liquidity concerns and redemption pressures made headlines. Bill LeBoeuf, managing director and senior portfolio manager at Compound Planning, suggests, “The headlines are really punishing private credit, but fund sponsors and industry veterans are adamant that underwriting and valuations are intact, and despite several high-profile defaults, the vast majority of credits in the top funds are good.”

The takeaway: Private credit is a sponsor-driven space. Manager selection matters as much as the asset class itself.

Private Equity

Private equity remains an appealing option for investors willing to trade liquidity for return potential.

Rather than investing in public markets, private equity funds acquire, improve and eventually sell businesses, typically over a five-to-10-year period. Returns are driven by operational improvements, growth initiatives and disciplined exits.

There are trade-offs, though. Capital is locked up for years, performance varies widely by manager and timing matters. Still, for investors with a long-term horizon, private equity offers return potential that can be difficult to replicate in public markets.

Doug Krupa, partner and head of global wealth solutions in the Americas for KKR, adds, “Private markets can be more tax-efficient than many investors realize. Strategies like private equity and infrastructure are oriented around long-term value creation, and the tax code rewards that patience.”

Real Assets

Not everything valuable trades on an exchange.

Infrastructure assets, like roads, pipelines, data centers and farmland, can generate income while helping preserve purchasing power. Many infrastructure investments have revenues tied to inflation through contracts or regulated pricing.

Farmland adds a dual benefit of land appreciation and crop income, and it has historically served as a reliable inflation hedge.

These are long-duration investments. They require patience, but for investors seeking stability and income tied to real-world assets, they can play a meaningful role.

[Read: 7 Best Infrastructure ETFs to Buy in 2026]

Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs)

For real estate investors, capital gains taxes can be a bigger hurdle than the market itself.

A 1031 exchange allows investors to defer capital gains taxes, but the 45-day identification window can sometimes make finding a replacement property a challenge. Delaware Statutory Trusts (DSTs) provide an alternative by allowing investors to exchange into fractional ownership of institutional-quality real estate.

Under IRS Revenue Ruling 2004-86, DSTs qualify as like-kind property. Investors can defer taxes, access larger assets — such as multifamily, industrial or necessity retail — and avoid day-to-day management responsibilities.

The trade-offs include illiquidity, long holding periods (typically five to seven years) and accredited-investor requirements. For the right investor, however, DSTs can be an efficient planning tool.

Digital Assets

Ignoring digital assets in 2026 is no longer a conservative decision. It’s an incomplete one.

The approval of spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs has made access easier and more regulated, lowering barriers for many investors. Bitcoin’s fixed supply continues to support its scarcity-driven narrative, and institutional adoption has followed.

Volatility remains the key risk. Drawdowns of 50% or more have occurred multiple times in recent years.

For most investors, this is a question of sizing, not conviction. A 1% to 3% allocation can provide exposure without dominating overall portfolio risk.

Access Matters: Public vs. Private Opportunities

Not every alternative investment is available to every investor, and that’s by design.

Many private market investments, including private equity, private credit funds and DSTs, are typically limited to accredited investors. These opportunities often involve higher minimums, less liquidity and longer holding periods.

Access, however, has expanded recently. Publicly traded real estate investment trusts, interval funds, non-traded business development companies and spot cryptocurrency ETFs now provide broader exposure to alternative strategies. At the same time, newer platforms offering fractional ownership in farmland, art and other real assets have lowered minimum investment thresholds.

The trade-off is structure. Public vehicles generally offer greater liquidity and transparency but may not fully replicate the return profile of private investments.

Putting It All Together

Doug Williams wasn’t the headline going into Super Bowl XXII, but he changed the outcome of the game and was named MVP.

Alternative investments can play a similar role in a portfolio. They’re not always the centerpiece, but in the right environment, they can drive results in ways traditional assets may not.

“The key consideration is not simply whether an alternative investment offers attractive long-term return potential, but whether the liquidity profile, time horizon and portfolio role are well matched to the investor’s broader objectives and constraints,” says BlackRock’s Rosenberg.

In 2026, building a resilient portfolio means expanding your toolkit — whether that’s generating income through private credit, deferring taxes through a DST or adding inflation protection through real assets.

While the opportunity set is broader — and more accessible — than it has ever been, the key is being intentional about how alternative investments fit into your overall plan.

More from U.S. News

7 Best Long-Term ETFs to Buy and Hold

10 Inverse ETFs That Gain in a Bear Market

Recession 2026: What to Watch and How to Prepare

5 Alternative Investments Every Investor Should Consider in 2026 originally appeared on usnews.com

Update 04/28/26: This story was previously published at an earlier date and has been updated with new information.

Trump se niega a descartar una declaración de emergencia de seguridad nacional para controlar las elecciones de 2026

El presidente Donald Trump se negó en una nueva entrevista a descartar la posibilidad de declarar una emergencia de seguridad nacional para tratar de ejercer un mayor control sobre las elecciones intermedias de 2026.Es la advertencia más reciente de que Trump podría intentar interferir en las elecciones no solo al afirmar, sin fundamento, que hubo fraude electoral y cuestionar los resultados después de la votación, como hizo en 2020, lo que provocó un violento disturbio en el Capitolio de Estados Unidos, sino también al tratar de asumir unilateralmente el control antes de que se emitan los votos.En la entrevista, Wayne Allyn Root, de Real America’s Voice, planteó a Trump un escenario de ese tipo. Lo propuso como alternativa, dado que el Senado no ha logrado aprobar el proyecto de ley electoral que Trump considera prioritario, conocido como la “Ley SAVE America”.“Si nunca logran aprobar la ‘Ley SAVE America’, tienes derecho a declarar una emergencia de seguridad nacional para las elecciones”, dijo Root. Añadió que “si declaras una emergencia de seguridad nacional como presidente de Estados Unidos, no pueden impugnarla. Solo puede ser revocada mediante una votación de dos tercios de ambas cámaras del Congreso. Así que, si lo haces el próximo mes, tendremos identificación con foto, prueba de ciudadanía (para el registro electoral) y un límite al voto por correo”.Fue en ese momento cuando Trump interrumpió a Root y sugirió, de manera ambigua, que esa opción efectivamente estaba sobre la mesa.“Permítanme decir simplemente que han sucedido cosas más extrañas, ¿de acuerdo?”, dijo Trump. “Lo dejaré así”.A pesar de los comentarios de Root, no está claro en absoluto que una maniobra de ese tipo pudiera funcionar. Y CNN pidió a la Casa Blanca más detalles sobre lo que quiso decir el presidente.Trump suele responder a situaciones hipotéticas negándose a descartarlas, sin importar cuán extrema pueda ser la propuesta. Por lo tanto, es posible interpretar demasiado sus palabras.Pero, como ha señalado Jake Tapper, de CNN, hay numerosas señales de que Trump al menos aspira a intentar ejercer un mayor control sobre las elecciones. Y estos métodos suelen estar claramente orientados a ayudar a los republicanos.Una de las principales señales es la amenaza del Gobierno de lograr que el Servicio Postal de Estados Unidos no entregue las papeletas de voto por correo de los estados que no cumplan con su exigencia de entregar sus listas de votantes. Incluso muchos estados republicanos han rechazado esta solicitud, alegando preocupaciones por la privacidad.Los demócratas tienen muchas más probabilidades de utilizar el voto por correo, una modalidad que Trump ha vinculado, sin fundamento, con un fraude generalizado. Por lo tanto, limitarlo podría beneficiar considerablemente a los republicanos.(Los tribunales federales han bloqueado este decreto de Trump, y el Gobierno apeló recientemente ante la Corte Suprema).Trump también se ha esforzado mucho para intentar sustentar sus afirmaciones, todavía sin fundamento, sobre un fraude generalizado. Eso incluye que el Gobierno incautara las papeletas de 2020 en el distrito de Fulton, Georgia, y el reciente discurso de Trump en horario estelar sobre la seguridad electoral, que algunos interpretaron como una declaración de intenciones, un pretexto para una participación federal más directa en las elecciones, que son administradas por los estados.Ty Cobb, quien se desempeñó como abogado de la Casa Blanca durante el primer mandato de Trump, dijo que interpretó el discurso del mes pasado como una “base para que declare una emergencia”.Y Trump ha dicho ocasionalmente cosas, como lo hizo en la nueva entrevista, que sugieren que le gustaría asumir el control de las elecciones en Estados Unidos.En febrero, instó a su partido a “tomar el control de la votación en al menos 15 lugares” y añadió: “Los republicanos deberían nacionalizar la votación”.The Washington Post también informó en marzo que activistas pro-Trump estaban haciendo circular un posible decreto que afirmaba que la interferencia china en las elecciones de 2020 le otorgaba a Trump facultades de emergencia sobre las elecciones de 2026. Y el discurso de Trump en horario estelar se centró en China, pese a las pruebas poco sólidas.El intenso interés de Trump en la “Ley SAVE America”, que nunca pareció tener posibilidades de ser aprobada, pero que Trump ha dicho que es fundamental, también podría interpretarse como parte de un intento por construir los argumentos para una medida más drástica.Sin embargo, no está claro en absoluto que Trump pudiera asumir por sí mismo el control de las elecciones, como plantea Root.Como informaron Marshall Cohen y Michael Williams, de CNN, en febrero, la Constitución dificulta que Trump pueda realmente “nacionalizar” las elecciones. Los tribunales han respaldado abrumadoramente el principio de que los estados están a cargo de las elecciones.Por lo general, los presidentes tienen mayor autoridad para actuar unilateralmente cuando está involucrada la seguridad nacional, de ahí la importancia de invocar a China, pero algunos expertos dudan de que el intento de Trump pueda superar el escrutinio legal.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story