Skip to main content

Norway Terror Attacks Fast Facts

(CNN) — Here’s a look at the terror attacks in Norway on July 22, 2011. Eight people died in a bombing in Oslo and another 69 people died on nearby Utoya island. This was the deadliest attack in Norway since World War II.

The Perpetrator

Anders Behring Breivik

Pronounced: AHn-ders BRAY-vick

Norwegian

No military background or training.

Described as a right-wing Christian extremist, with a hatred of Muslims.

Reportedly the author of a 1,500 page manifesto, called “2083: A European Declaration of Independence,” critical of Muslim immigration and European liberalism.

He registered a farm in Rena, in eastern Norway, which allowed him access to large amounts of fertilizer.

Other Facts

The people killed on Utoya island (Pronounced: Oo-TOY-ah) were attending a Labour Party youth camp. Most of the 700 campers ranged in age from 16 to 22, some as young as 13.

Norway does not have the death penalty.

Timeline

July 22, 2011 – At approximately 3:26 p.m., a fertilizer bomb explodes outside the building housing the office of Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. Eight people are killed in the bombing.
– After the bombing, Breivik takes a short ferry ride to Utoya island, approximately 20 miles from Oslo.
– Breivik, who was wearing a police uniform, opens fire on young adults at a Labour Party youth camp. He roams the grounds of the island, killing campers trying to escape.
– At approximately 6:27 p.m., Breivik is taken into custody by members of an elite Norwegian police unit.

July 25, 2011 – Breivik attends his first court hearing, which is closed.
– His request to wear a uniform to court is denied.
– He is prevented from reading from his manifesto during the court hearing.
– Breivik claims to be working with two other cells of terrorists.
– Two court psychiatrists are assigned to the case.
– He is ordered to be held for eight weeks until his next court hearing. The first four weeks of detention will be in solitary confinement. He will not be allowed contact with anyone except his lawyer. He also will not be allowed mail or news.

August 19, 2011 – The families of the victims visit Utoya island.

August 19, 2011 – A judge rules that Breivik should be held in solitary confinement for another four weeks.

September 19, 2011 – A judge rules that Breivik will remain in solitary confinement for another four weeks.

November 14, 2011 – More than 500 people attend Breivik’s first court hearing, which is open to the public. Breivik is not allowed to deliver a speech he prepared, and the judge orders him held in custody for another 12 weeks.

November 29, 2011 – Police announce that Breivik is insane, stating that psychiatrists have found him paranoid and schizophrenic. They say that he suffers from “grandiose delusions.”

January 13, 2012 – Judge Wenche Elizabeth Arntzen announces that the court wants a second opinion from psychiatrists concerning Breivik’s sanity.

February 10, 2012 – A Norwegian court orders Breivik undergo psychiatric monitoring as experts seek to determine his mental state ahead of a trial.

March 7, 2012 – Breivik is formally charged with committing acts of terror and voluntary homicide.

April 10, 2012 – Two psychiatric experts release their findings, which the judge uses to deem Breivik sane at the time of the crimes. The experts’ findings state that during the commission of the crimes Breivik was not psychotic, not suffering from any psychiatric condition and is not mentally challenged.

April 16, 2012 – Trial begins.

June 21, 2012 – A spokesperson for the Norwegian Prosecutor’s office confirms that prosecutors have asked that Breivik be transferred to a psychiatric institution, as they believe he is ill.

June 22, 2012 – On the last day of his trial, Breivik addresses the court and describes his actions as “barbaric.

August 13, 2012 – An independent report finds that the terror attack could have been avoided. The report cites slow reaction times by police and security forces, under-staffing and the failure of leadership.

August 24, 2012 – Breivik is judged sane and sentenced to 21 years in prison. Twenty-one years is the maximum possible sentence, but it could be extended if he is still considered a threat to society.

March 15, 2016 – Breivik appears for the first day of his lawsuit against the Norwegian state, alleging his human rights have been violated during his incarceration.

April 20, 2016 – Breivik wins part of his lawsuit against the state over his solitary confinement in prison. The Oslo district court announces that Breivik’s treatment in prison violates Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, prohibiting “inhuman or degrading treatment,” and rules that his conditions must be eased.

March 1, 2017 – An appeals court overturns the lower court ruling that Breivik’s jail conditions have been inhuman.

June 8, 2017 – Norway’s Supreme Court says that it will not hear Breivik’s case over prison conditions.

June 9, 2017 – Breivik’s lawyer confirms that Breivik legally changed his name to Fjotolf Hansen.

June 21, 2018 – The European Court of Human Rights rejects Breivik’s appeal that the conditions of his imprisonment, largely in isolation, are violating his human rights. The decision is final, the court says.

February 1, 2022 – Breivik’s request for parole is denied. He is denied parole again on December 4, 2024.

February 15, 2024 – The Oslo District Court rules that holding Breivik in isolation does not violate his human rights. Breivik claims his living conditions are inhumane.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Gobierno de Trump abre los hábitats de especies en peligro a la urbanización y revierte 50 años de legislación ambiental

El Gobierno de Trump revirtió este viernes décadas de una ley ambiental de larga data que protegía a las especies en peligro de extinción, abriendo hábitats sensibles de esas especies protegidas a la perforación, la minería, la agricultura y el desarrollo inmobiliario.El cambio, finalizado por los Departamentos del Interior y de Comercio, redefine qué constituye “daño” a las especies en peligro de extinción y a sus hábitats bajo la Ley de Especies en Peligro de Extinción (ESA, por sus siglas en inglés) de 1973. Esa ley había prohibido durante años la “modificación o degradación del hábitat” porque podía dañar o matar a animales en peligro al afectar su capacidad para reproducirse y encontrar alimento o refugio. Esa definición de daño fue ratificada por la Corte Suprema de Estados Unidos en un fallo de 1995.El Gobierno de Trump calificó la definición anterior de daño como “obsoleta” en un comunicado emitido este viernes, al argumentar que su medida “devuelve la interpretación de la ESA a su texto real y a su intención original, lo que pondrá fin a años de extralimitación federal”.El secretario del Interior, Doug Burgum, dijo en un comunicado que el enfoque de la ley había “convertido la actividad rutinaria en una trampa regulatoria, elevó los costos que afectaron la vida de las personas y amplió la autoridad federal más allá de lo que el Congreso pretendía”.“Durante años, las agencias federales abusaron de la ESA para obstaculizar el uso legal de la tierra y perjudicar a las familias y empresas estadounidenses”, añadió Burgum, al calificar la acción del Gobierno como una medida de “sentido común” que “sigue el estatuto que el Congreso realmente aprobó”.El secretario de Comercio, Howard Lutnick, añadió en un comunicado que la nueva norma beneficiaría a los pescadores que sufrieron “regulaciones excesivamente amplias y onerosas”.Un funcionario del Departamento del Interior dijo que la norma se publicará en el Registro Federal a principios de la próxima semana.Grupos ambientalistas denunciaron la medida y dijeron que planeaban impugnar el cambio en los tribunales de manera inminente.“Por primera vez, un Gobierno presidencial afirma que las especies protegidas por la Ley de Especies en Peligro de Extinción no deberían estar a salvo de la modificación del hábitat que destruye donde viven, crían a sus crías o buscan alimento”, dijo en un comunicado la abogada de Earthjustice Kristen Boyles. “No hay respaldo para la norma del Gobierno de Trump: no hay respaldo científico, no hay respaldo legal, no hay respaldo público”.Los Departamentos del Interior y de Comercio insistieron en que aún se aplicarían protecciones “centrales” más limitadas para las especies en peligro, y añadieron que su definición de esa ley ambiental fundamental impediría “acciones que lesionen o maten directamente a la fauna silvestre incluida en la lista”.Sin embargo, los grupos ambientalistas impugnarán esa definición más estrecha, al señalar el caso de la Corte Suprema de 1995, que ratificó la definición más amplia de daño, incluida la destrucción del hábitat. Pero si las impugnaciones legales a la reversión del Gobierno de Trump llegan nuevamente a la Corte Suprema, los ambientalistas se enfrentarán a un tribunal mucho más conservador.“La pérdida de hábitat es la causa número uno de extinción”, dijo en un comunicado Gib Brogan, director senior de campañas en Oceana. “Cuando se eliminan las protecciones del hábitat, se elimina una de las salvaguardas más importantes de la ley”.El Gobierno de Trump ha intentado recortar la Ley de Especies en Peligro de Extinción a lo largo del primer y segundo mandato del presidente Donald Trump, con distintos niveles de éxito.A principios de este año, varios altos funcionarios de Trump, incluido Burgum, votaron para desmantelar regulaciones de larga data de la Ley de Especies en Peligro de Extinción en el golfo de México para la críticamente amenazada ballena de Rice, al eximir toda la perforación de petróleo y gas de la ley federal.Y el año pasado, los Departamentos del Interior y de Comercio propusieron restablecer normas del primer Gobierno de Trump que eliminaron salvaguardas para plantas y animales amenazados por el desarrollo humano y por el calentamiento del planeta. No obstante, algunos de esos cambios fueron anulados recientemente en un tribunal federal.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story