Skip to main content

‘Why are we even considering this?’: Families fight parole of convicted Sirloin Stockade killer

Click here for updates on this story

    OKLAHOMA CITY (KOCO) — Almost 50 years after six people were murdered at an Oklahoma City restaurant, one of the women convicted of the crime asked to be released from prison Monday.

The Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board discussed whether Verna Stafford, who is now 73, should be free. The families of the people killed nearly five decades ago delivered a clear message to the board: keep her behind bars.

They said their pain and their fight are far from over.

One by one, the victims’ relatives stepped to the podium, recounting the horror of the Sirloin Stockade murders and the pain they still carry nearly 50 years later. Prosecutors joined their call, urging the board to deny Stafford parole.

“Why are we even considering this?” said Erin Salsman, who is related to David Salsman.

Verna is serving two life sentences for her role in the murders.

Six restaurant employees were forced into a meat freezer and shot. Five died at the scene, and the sixth later died at a hospital.

Stafford recently passed the first stage of the parole process, but the families of those killed said the pain has never gone away.

“The generational curse that has been passed down from these murders—it runs deep for all of us,” Elizabeth Payne, family of Anthony Tew, said.

The board emphasized that the hearing is part of Stafford’s due process.

“We’re not here to debate this. The fact is some people may see it as if she were moved to her second life sentence, it would spare the victims from coming in every three years. That’s one position. It’s not necessarily the position the board will allow,” Robert Reavis, a member of the Oklahoma Pardon and Parole Board, said.

But the families said they are going to make sure she stays behind bars.

“We write letters every three years to keep her in prison, and we will keep doing that,” said Elizabeth Payne. “We understand that she’s serving two life sentences and that this parole is for the one life sentence. However, we also understand that if they, for over on the first life sentence, there is not a guarantee of 15 years before she could be released again.”

Stafford is expected to appear before the board on Tuesday. The board will then make its decision.

Family members of those killed said they will be in attendance.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

DOJ office says Trump’s outside advisers can be shielded by executive privilege

President Trump's outside advisers — individuals who are not employed by the federal government — may now be protected from future congressional and legal investigations, according to a new opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel. In a 21-page opinion published Monday evening, the Office of Legal Counsel told the White House that the president can move to extend executive privilege, the right of the president to contain confidential communications within the executive branch, to advisers who do not work for the White House, but who provide him with direct advice. The new opinion says that executive privilege can apply to private advisers of the president if the communications "relate to official presidential decisionmaking," are confidential, and involve conversations between the president and his direct team of advisers. The opinion, which is not binding, comes months before a contentious midterm election that could result in Democrats winning one or both houses in Congress. If that were to happen, a barrage of investigations could follow and may expand the number of individuals potentially protected from future testimony or investigation.Executive privilege is often asserted by the president in conversations with executive branch staff, like lawyers who work for the White House, but the new step could protect Mr. Trump's outside legal counsel and other advisers from divulging information in future congressional investigations or legal proceedings. "At bottom, the purpose of executive privilege is to protect the government's decisionmaking processes," the opinion said. It was signed by Assistant Attorney General T. Elliot Gaiser, who leads the Office of Legal Counsel. "The need for presidential confidentiality applies to communications with private advisers just as it does with government officials. A President might determine that a private adviser has unique insight or experience, and that full knowledge about a contemplated decision cannot be obtained through consultation with only government employees," the opinion continued.This is not the first OLC opinion by Mr. Trump's Justice Department that has broken with historical precedent.In April, Gaiser authored an opinion that said the federal law enacted in the wake of the Watergate scandal that requires the president to preserve certain documents and turn them over to the National Archives at the end of his administration is unconstitutional, and that Mr. Trump does not need to comply with it. Weeks after the opinion was published, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. ordered White House staff and President Trump's top advisers to comply with the law after a government oversight group and the American Historical Association sued to invalidate the opinion. The opinion could also shield outside Trump adviser and lawyer Boris Epshteyn, who was recently subpoenaed by the American Bar Association in a lawsuit filed last year related to the White House's alleged "intimidation policy" against major law firms that resulted in executive orders targeting four firms and deals made with several others. The American Bar Association is seeking communications between Epshteyn and the White House, and the DOJ has moved to quash the subpoena, arguing Epshteyn "provided the President with privileged and confidential advice in connection with the Executive Orders at issue."
Read Next Story