Skip to main content

Why a hot, sunny day could ruin your vacation

New York (CNN) — Passengers may not expect a hot, sunny summer day to be the reason their flight gets delayed or even cancelled. But heat waves can be hazardous for flying.

High temperatures affect aircraft performance, resulting in travel delays, weight restrictions, fuel stops and, in some cases, even cancellations.

“A hot summer day can impact the operation just like snow or ice,” according to Embry‑Riddle Aeronautical University professor Cary Grant, who spent decades flying as a pilot with United Airlines.

The reasoning comes down to the science of aerodynamics.

Airplanes rely on denser air to help the engine and wings generate lift for takeoff.

High temperatures cause air molecules to spread farther apart, making the air less dense or thinner. When the temperatures get very hot, takeoff becomes substantially more challenging.

“The engines require air to go through the engine and propel it back out. If there’s less air coming in the front, there’s less air going out the back,” Grant said. “The wings require air to go over the wings. If there’s less air going over the wings, it creates less lift.”

While the physics can be dense, it comes down to two options for airlines to ensure a safe departure: Either they need to use a longer runway to gain more speed, or they must reduce the weight of the aircraft.

But some airports do not have the space or budget to extend their runways, leaving airlines with the only other feasible solution to lighten the aircraft’s load.

“In some cases, airlines can reduce aircraft weight to safely take off by offloading cargo or passengers. They also could reduce the amount of fuel loaded to accommodate all passengers, in which case they may have to add a fuel stop to reach their intended destination,” the Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement to CNN.

But sometimes the heat is too severe to fly at all.

“While reducing weight can be an option, temperatures sometimes exceed the maximum temperatures the plane was subjected to during testing. When that happens, there is no data in the operations manual that would allow the plane to be flown,” the FAA said.

Not only can extreme heat affect aircraft performance, but it can also have effects on crew members and passengers.

“When we think about heat it affects the engines, it affects the airplane, but it also affects the people,” Grant said. “If you think about how well you perform when you’re hot, your performance goes down.”

Airport ground crews in hot climates can be exposed to oppressive heat, and airlines must protect their health.

“We also have a robust heat management plan in place for our employees to ensure they have adequate hydration and places to cool down,” Southwest Airlines said in a statement to CNN.

Inside the cabin, the airlines want to make it comfortable for their customers.

“That’s why flight attendants sometimes ask passengers to close their window shades as the plane pulls to the gate to help keep the interior as cool as possible,” Southwest added.

July was the hottest month on record for the contiguous US going back to 1895, according to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

Last month, American Airlines was forced to remove 32 passengers from a flight out of Las Vegas during an extreme heat wave, according to CNN affiliate KVVU.

“It’s either 32 people decide to alter their plans or all of us are going to alter our plans, because the plane literally cannot take off,” passenger Jared Guynes said he was told.

The problems caused by hot weather are becoming more common. In recent years, heat waves are increasingly hotter and more frequent, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

And that means passengers are frequently left with little choice but to be prepared for delays and cancellations in hot weather.

“I would say never be alarmed by it because the airline’s always looking out for safety. That’s their No. 1 priority,” Grant said. “But my best recommendation for everybody is to be flexible and look at it as an advantage to get something from the airline that you’re paying for.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Democrats intensify scrutiny of David Ellison amid Paramount–WBD legal battle

(CNN) — As Paramount pushes to settle the state antitrust lawsuit that has stymied its deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, Democratic lawmakers continue to rally opposition to the deal.On Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, sent a new letter to Paramount CEO David Ellison accusing him of “colluding” with President Trump and urging him to answer questions.A Paramount spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.The letter highlights Democrats’ concerns about Paramount taking control of Warner-owned CNN. It comes the same week that Paramount chief legal officer Makan Delrahim said of CNN that Ellison “wants to bring it back to news,” a comment that raised eyebrows given that the network has been a global news brand for 46 years.The letter, which was obtained first by CNN, also suggests that Paramount’s dealings with the Trump administration — a relationship Raskin has called “corrupt” — will be a priority for the Judiciary Committee if Democrats regain the House majority in the midterm elections.Raskin opened the missive by acknowledging that Paramount has not responded to his four previous inquiries in the past 12 months.But “now that you have vowed to break your long silence,” he wrote, citing Ellison’s op-ed in The New York Times last week, “I invite you to a transcribed interview to tell Congress and America your story and answer the Committee’s questions about your Donald Trump-enabled shopping spree to consolidate news organizations, movie studios, cable channels, and streaming services.”With Republicans in control of the House, Democrats like Raskin can’t compel Ellison to testify, so the interview demand is a way to amplify his concerns about the deal.The new letter cites reports of “political interference” at Paramount-owned CBS News, which the news division has disputed.“CBS’s own reporters have shared how, under your leadership, the newsroom has catered to President Trump’s political whims and dictates under the watchful eye of a MAGA minder,” Raskin wrote, apparently referring to the accounts of fired “60 Minutes” correspondents.Ellison wrote in the Times op-ed, “Great news organizations like CNN and CBS News are here to tell it straight down the middle. That requires newsrooms that reflect the whole world, not one side of it. And it requires independence. Our journalists will continue to answer to the facts and to all the people they serve — not to any party or cause.”Ellison’s op-ed made no mention of Trump, who has been a pivotal figure throughout the nearly year-long battle for control of Warner Bros. Discovery.Paramount sought a close relationship with Trump and his administration while seeking federal approval of the WBD merger.Ellison’s father Larry, the billionaire Oracle co-founder, has been a close ally of Trump’s for years. Trump has praised both father and son, calling them his “supporters” and expressing confidence in their plans for CBS. Trump has also been outspoken about his desire for CNN to come under new ownership, calling it “imperative.”Raskin’s letter cites an anonymously sourced report from the Wall Street Journal that “David Ellison offered assurances to Trump administration officials that if he bought Warner, he’d make sweeping changes to CNN.”Raskin wrote to Ellison, “You have eagerly shown the president that you are going to deliver on both counts as if you are controlling organs of state media.”The letter also indicated that a Democrat-led Judiciary Committee would probe the Justice Department’s mid-June approval of the Paramount merger, which many critics linked to Trump’s personal interest in the deal.Raskin said the committee would scrutinize whether federal agencies “are successfully promoting free competition and innovation—or whether they are using their governmental powers to distort the market and undermine freedom of speech and freedom of the press, in violation of the First Amendment.”Other Democratic lawmakers have also foreshadowed public hearings and probes about the matter and have supported the state attorneys general lawsuit seeking to stop Paramount’s expansion plan.Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in a social media post on Tuesday, “The Paramount–WBD merger isn’t about creating better entertainment. It’s about cutting costs & squeezing workers. Writers, actors, and crew will have fewer employers to work for, which means less bargaining power & lower wages. State AGs are stepping in to fight back.”Paramount has consistently said the deal is pro-competitive, pointing to the regulatory approvals from the Justice Department and other authorities around the world.But the deal is frozen in place due to the state antitrust lawsuit and a parallel lawsuit from the Writers Guild of America.Facing an uphill battle in court, Paramount agreed not to complete the merger until a trial is held or until June 1, 2027. A trial is slated to be held in March, though a settlement is possible before then.Speaking at a Politico conference on Tuesday, Delrahim said “we would be delighted to engage” in settlement talks “in order to repair the industry, create more jobs, bring more jobs and production back.”California Attorney General Rob Bonta said at the same conference that “we will be open to any proposals,” but “right now, we’re focused on litigation and going to trial.”Both men also addressed a report by Puck’s Matt Belloni that Ellison told Paramount’s leadership team that he intends to move the company out of California if the antitrust case isn’t settled by October 1. Ellison has notably not made this threat in public, and Paramount has declined to comment on the report.Delrahim said Paramount doesn’t want to leave the state, but the company has to ”look at the business environment” and “ultimately, you know, go to a place where you’re wanted.”Bonta, speaking earlier in the day, said the leave-California threat “is an attempt to blackmail the regulators who are daring to enforce the law fairly and firmly.”Delrahim said it is not a blackmail attempt, and argued that “this merger is actually going to be good — not only for California — it’ll be good for America.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story