Skip to main content

White House to meet with top AI companies ahead of first big regulation push

(CNN) — The White House will meet with representatives from several top AI companies on Tuesday to discuss a new framework for the government to review frontier AI models before they launch, multiple sources familiar with the invitation told CNN.

The meeting is a critical step toward broader AI regulation amid growing calls from both AI companies and Washington for more control over the pace of AI development. Though the framework was laid out as part of an executive order signed by President Donald Trump in June, the gathering comes just days after OpenAI and Anthropic both reported incidents of AI agents going rogue and hacking into other companies’ systems.

The new system is meant to give the government access to the most advanced AI models up to 30 days before they’re released publicly, according to the executive order. The government has emphasized that participation from the industry is voluntary, although the administration has taken steps in recent months to prevent or delay the release of advanced AI models for safety reasons.

“The voluntary framework outlined in the June 2nd executive order is complete. Discussions with industry about next steps are underway,” a White House official told CNN on Monday.

Among the companies attending Tuesday are OpenAI, Anthropic, Google and Meta, according to multiple sources familiar with the situation. Anthropic, Google and Meta declined to comment on the meeting. OpenAI pointed CNN to a blog post posted Monday by Chief Global Affairs Officer Chris Lehane, reiterating calls for national AI standards established through Congress.

“The Administration’s expected action this week on frontier AI could be an important step toward closing the gap between innovation and governance: a clear, credible, national framework for evaluating the most advanced AI systems, with defined criteria, timelines, and a process that allows them to be deployed safely and quickly,” Lehane wrote.

The details of the framework will not be released publicly and many of the standards set within it will be classified, the June executive order states.

Major AI companies worked closely with the White House to draft the executive order and framework, but there has been much uncertainty over the final details, according to multiple sources familiar with the discussions.

That includes how the administration will define frontier AI models and whether open weight AI models – or AI models that can be downloaded to one’s computer and customized – will be part of it.

It’s also unclear which entity within the administration will lead the review. The administration has not designated a person or organization within the White House to lead outreach with the AI companies, multiple sources within the AI companies involved in the talks told CNN. National Cyber Director Sean Cairncross, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick are among those who have been heading up the initiative.

However, administration officials have said that multiple branches of the government will need to be involved since the impact of AI is so wide-reaching.

There’s also some confusion about the administration’s approach to evaluating and working with certain AI companies, namely Anthropic. The Pentagon designated Anthropic as a “supply chain risk” earlier this year after a disagreement over safety guardrails in the AI company’s models which the military had wanted to use.

The designation, which had never been used before on an American company, means the military or organizations working with them cannot use Anthropic’s products.

While Anthropic and the Pentagon have been arguing over that designation in court, the White House has been working directly with Anthropic on the executive order and its latest model releases in ways that have been described as positive and productive. President Trump even told Axios in June that he no longer views Anthropic as a national security threat and that they’ve “behaved very responsibly.”

Calls for more AI regulation have ramped up in recent days after OpenAI and Anthropic disclosed their AI agents had independently hacked into other companies during routine cybersecurity testing. More than 1,200 of the top staffers at the biggest AI companies, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei , signed an open letter last week calling on the US government to create tools to slow down the development of advanced AI models so that safety and security measures can catch up.

“We may have to pace the rate of AI development to give ourselves enough time for society to harden around these new capability levels,” OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said on the “Invest Like the Best” podcast released last week.

Meanwhile the European Union’s AI Act went into effect on August 2, which means the European Commission can demand to review AI models before they’re released. The act also requires companies to adhere to transparency and documentation obligations for advanced AI models or risk fines of up to 7 percent of a company’s annual gross revenue.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Orange County father facing child endangerment charges for 2025 e-motorcycle crash involving 12-year-old son

Click here for updates on this story    ORANGE COUNTY, California (KCAL, KCBS) -- An Orange County father is facing child endangerment charges for a crash that left his 12-year-old son with significant injuries last year while he was riding an e-motorcycle.The crash happened on July 20, 2025, when Richard John Eyssallenne's son, now 13, ran a red light and was hit by a car while he was illegally riding an e-motorcycle that was unlawfully modified. Prosecutors say that he should have been at least 16 with a driver's license to ride the vehicle, which is classified as an e-motorcycle and not an e-bicycle. During court on Eyssallenne's preliminary hearing on Tuesday, prosecutors shared jarring dash camera video of the crash, which shows the boy speeding through an intersection before colliding with a car and getting thrown into the air. The collision left him with a fractured skull and broken leg. Eyssallenne now faces criminal charges of felony child endangerment and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The Orange County District Attorney's Office alleges that he helped his son unlawfully modify the e-motorcycle to make it go faster. The bike in question is a 2024 Talaria XXX, which prosecutors say exceeds the maximum output of 750 watts. Instead, its peak output is somewhere around 5,000 watts, they said when filing charges in March. Along with the power modifications, authorities also found that the manufacturer's pedals with motorcycle pegs had been modified and were not fully operable and that the manufacturer-installed governor that limited the bike to 20 miles per hour had been rerouted to a key switch. During Tuesday's hearing, Orange County Sheriff's Department Deputy Kiana Lewis testified. She was one of the first on scene when the crash happened in 2025. When asked if she contacted Child Protective Services in connection with the case, Lewis said she did. "I felt that based off of all the information that I had, that they needed to be involved, because the same e-bike was involved in two separate incidences and it brought to my attention that maybe there wasn't sound decision making," Lewis said. Prosecutors also said that Eyssallenne took his 12-year-old and 10-year-old sons to an e-bike safety presentation in early 2025, less than a month after the boy involved in the crash was cited for illegally riding the e-motorcycle. Eyssallnene has pleaded not guilty to all charges and if convicted, he could face up to six years in prison, according to the DA's Office. On Wednesday, the boy, now 13, is expected to take the stand as a witness for the defense, despite a warning from a public defender that he could incriminate himself.Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.
Read Next Story