Skip to main content

What rising bond yields mean for mortgages and credit card rates

Houses with a ‘For Sale’ sign in a small new neighborhood in Gunnison, Colorado 6/18/20 (Nathan Bilow/Getty Images)

(NEW YORK) — U.S. Treasury yields soared in recent days as the Iran war stoked inflation fears, threatening to drive up borrowing costs for everything from mortgages to credit cards to auto loans.

The yields on 30-year bonds – the amount paid to a bondholder annually – touched their highest point since 2007. Ten-year Treasury yields peaked at about 4.69% on Tuesday, marking a roughly three-quarter percentage point jump from the start of the war on Feb. 28.

The yield on 10-year Treasuries retreated on Wednesday, registering at 4.58%. Still, yields exceed the level reached during a bond selloff in the aftermath of President Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs in April 2025.

Since bonds pay a given investor a fixed amount each year, the specter of inflation risks higher consumer prices that would eat away at those annual payouts. In this case, a global oil shock has pushed up energy prices which in turn has trickled into other costs, such as groceries.

As a result, bonds have become less attractive. When demand falls, bond yields rise.

“It’s really all about the Iran war and its inflationary impact,” Ted Rossman, a senior industry analyst at Bankrate, told ABC News.

High bond yields make borrowing more expensive for average Americans because Treasury rates influence the rates offered by lenders.

Long-term Treasury yields help set interest payments for mortgages, credit cards, car loans and just about any other type of borrowing, Patrice Carrington, a professor of real estate at New York University, told ABC News.

The reason for the rise in borrowing costs is that regulated lenders are required to hold reserve assets, often made up in part by U.S. Treasuries, Carrington added. When Treasury yields rise, it raises the costs incurred by banks holding Treasuries on their books. Lenders, in turn, offset those added expenses with higher borrowing costs.

“The bank will pass along that higher cost of capital to any consumer loan,” Carrington said.

The onset of this pain for consumers is exemplified by the housing market, where the average interest rate for a 30-year fixed mortgage stands at 6.72% as of Monday, Mortgage News Daily data showed. Mortgage rates have climbed three-quarters of a percentage point from pre-war levels.

“That’s a really big jump,” Rossman said.

Each percentage-point rise in a mortgage rate can impose thousands or tens of thousands of dollars in additional costs each year, depending on the price of the house, according to Rocket Mortgage.

Credit card rates, by contrast, have remained flat over the course of the Iran war, though at heightened levels, Rossman said.

The average credit card interest rate stands at 19.57%, just slightly below where it stood before the war began, Bankrate data showed. At the start of 2026, futures markets expected the Fed to likely cut interest rates at least once by the end of the year, which would put downward pressure on credit card rates.

As the Fed weathers a renewed bout of inflation, however, markets estimate about a 50% chance of interest rates remaining unchanged over the course of the year and a 37% chance of a rate hike, according to the CME FedWatch Tool, a measure of market sentiment. Markets peg the odds of a rate cut this year at less than 2%.

As a result, credit card rates “are staying higher for longer” than many observers anticipated, Rossman said.

Analysts differed in their recommendations for consumers weighing whether to move forward now with securing a loan or wait for a potential decline in interest rates.

Liu Lu, a professor at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, said mortgage rates are unlikely to decline substantially in the near-term, meaning borrowers who can afford a loan at current rates may as well take the plunge.

“I wouldn’t bet on trying to catch the opportune moment,” Lu told ABC News.

Carrington, on the other hand, counseled patience for loan seekers.

Eventually, the economy will falter and the Fed will cut interest rates, pushing down borrowing costs, according to Carrington.

“We’re long overdue for a downturn,” Carrington said. “I absolutely think borrowers should wait.”

In the meantime, the impact of elevated bond yields on consumers isn’t entirely negative. The trend means better returns for investors who place their money into financial instruments such as money market funds or high-interest savings accounts, which are historically safer investments than the stock market.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Target se disculpa por disfraz de payaso para niños de Halloween tras la polémica

Target se disculpó el lunes y anunció que había retirado de la venta un disfraz de Halloween que representaba a un payaso de circo que, según los críticos, evocaba la práctica de pintarse la cara de negro y los espectáculos de juglares.El producto, vendido como el “Disfraz de payaso de circo para niños que brilla bajo luz negra” para Halloween, provocó una fuerte reacción en las redes sociales, y algunos consumidores afirmaron que se parecía a una caricatura racista.“Como empresa, sabemos que nos equivocamos y lo lamentamos profundamente”, declaró Target en un comunicado. “El disfraz es ofensivo y nunca debió haber formado parte de nuestro catálogo. Ya no está a la venta”.Este es el último quebradero de cabeza para la imagen pública de la cadena minorista estadounidense, que intenta enderezar el rumbo tras un periodo de bajas ventas.La compañía también ha recibido críticas por la gestión de los productos de su Colección Orgullo 2023 y por los cambios en sus iniciativas de diversidad, equidad e inclusión tras el regreso del presidente Donald Trump a la Casa Blanca.Target declinó hacer comentarios sobre quién diseñó el producto —que se vendió bajo las marcas de temporada Hyde y EEK Boutique— o sobre el proceso por el cual se aprobó su venta.En su comunicado, Target afirmó que estaba “analizando detenidamente cómo ocurrió esto y qué cambios son necesarios”.Algunos compradores afroamericanos, que se sintieron marginados tras los retrocesos en materia de diversidad, equidad e inclusión (DEI) de Target en 2025, expresaron su decepción el lunes.Sheletta Brundidge, empresaria del área de Minneapolis, considera que el disfraz es una consecuencia indirecta de la decisión sobre DEI. “Redujeron la diversidad”, indicó, “así que, ¿quién está ahora para decir: “Esto está mal”?”.En su comunicado, Target reconoció que el disfraz era “especialmente hiriente para nuestros clientes, miembros del equipo y socios negros”.Aunque Hyde y EEK son marcas propiedad de Target, sus productos se han revendido en sitios web de minoristas como Walmart y Amazon, así como en la plataforma Etsy. Reuters no encontró el artículo en cuestión en dichos sitios.Una portavoz de Walmart declaró desconocer que se estuviera vendiendo. Amazon y Etsy no respondieron de inmediato a las solicitudes de comentarios.Target, que ha encadenado dos trimestres consecutivos con excelentes resultados, está empezando a ver los frutos de sus esfuerzos por bajar los precios y renovar su mercancía, y su nuevo director ejecutivo, Michael Fiddelke, ya ha recibido elogios de Wall Street.Pero la compañía, que no puede competir con Walmart y Costco en precio, tiene poco margen de error en lo que respecta a fallos de gestión o de imagen, declaró Brett Husslein, analista de Morningstar.“Ahora que Target empieza a recuperar terreno en la recuperación de su reputación de marca, este es precisamente el tipo de cosas que quieren evitar”, comentó, y añadió que cualquier obstáculo, ya sea de índole visual, administrativa o macroeconómica, “podría provocar mayores pérdidas de cuota de mercado”.Las acciones de Target subieron un 2,7 % en la sesión de la tarde.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story