Skip to main content

What does Trump mean when he says the US is ‘low-keying’ negotiations with Iran?

(CNN) — After Iran intensified its demands over the weekend before it would reopen the Strait of Hormuz, President Donald Trump didn’t threaten new strikes but instead indicated that he planned to choke Iran economically. “We are low-keying it,” he told Axios over the weekend. “We are only semi-negotiating with them. We are just watching Iran with its huge inflation and the fact they have no money.”

This broke with Trump’s usual rhetorical pattern in talking about Iran, in which the president generally declares that a conclusive deal with Iran is imminent, threatens to annihilate Iran if it doesn’t comply, then calls the attacks off at the last minute — only to do it all over again.

What, precisely, does it mean to “low-key” the events of a war? It’s not the first time the president has employed this peculiar turn of phrase, transforming a word typically used as an adjective or adverb into a verb. In early April, as Israel’s continued bombing of southern Lebanon threatened negotiations with Iran, Trump used it to describe a phone call with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. “I spoke with Bibi and he’s going to low-key it,” he told NBC News at the time. “I just think we have to be sort of a little more low-key.”

The modern sense of the word “low-key” has evolved over time. The earliest iteration of the word appears to be the adjective “low-keyed,” first recorded in 1786 to describe a voice or piece of music in a low musical key. Beginning around the early 1800s, “low-key” was also used to describe visual art, and later photography, that was marked by dark or muted colors. The English poet Peter Bayley used it in an 1803 poetry collection to describe a painting of Jesus. “It was originally painted in a low key, and the drapery of the Saviour, which was then white, formed the principal light,” he wrote.

It was around the mid-1900s that “low-key” came to signify subtlety or restraint. The word appeared in a 1941 Frederick Post story to illustrate filmmaker Orson Welles’ proclivity for melodrama: “Welles likes strong histrionics and has no patience with the prevailing style of underplaying everything in movies,” the article read. “In fact, he believes that low-key acting is used mostly because it’s the only way Hollywood knows of avoiding clashes in emotional continuity.”

This sense of “low-key” to mean understated might be one way to read Trump’s remarks. Trump saying the US is “low-keying it” could mean that the administration is taking a more subdued approach in the face of an emboldened Iran. US officials have indicated that they believe Iran’s leverage in the Strait of Hormuz would give way to the significant economic pain that the US stands to inflict.

Newer, slangy uses of “low-key” offer other interpretations.

“Low-key” took on additional meanings as it passed into Black culture, one being a sense of secrecy or discretion. Usher’s 2004 hit “Yeah!” depicts him trying to “keep it down on the low-key” lest his girlfriend find out what he’s up to at the club. Another is the adverbial sense, used as a mitigator to mean “somewhat” (“Commuting in this humid weather is low-key annoying”) or to mean “modest” or “low profile” (“She acts low-key, but she’s actually a big deal”). “Low-key” also functions as an interjection, as in “Low-key, what is even happening with the US and Iran?” (The hyphen is often dropped in informal, contemporary use.)

These uses of “low-key” eventually spread beyond Black English and were adopted by young people more widely throughout the 2010s and 2020s. Today, “low-key” is part of a Gen Z vernacular marked by deflection and ironic detachment, said Adam Aleksic, a linguist known online as Etymology Nerd. To say, “I low-key like Drake,” for instance, suggests that the speaker enjoys the musical stylings of the Canadian rapper but understands that it’s uncool to admit it. (To say, “I high-key like Drake,” meanwhile, is to unabashedly proclaim one’s affinity for the artist.)

Trump saying the US is “low-keying” talks with Iran is also a kind of hedging. (See also: His remark that “we are only semi-negotiating with them.”) To Aleksic, the president’s comments convey that he isn’t particularly worried about Iran holding steadfast to its demands. “To admit that they’re too concerned would be to make a geopolitical blunder,” he said. “Saying ‘low-key’ is a way of addressing to the public that he’s doing one thing and signaling to Iran that he’s doing another thing.”

Jamaal Muwwakkil, an assistant professor at the University of Washington who teaches anthropology and linguistics, notes that using the word “low-key” can also be a marker of youth or coolness. And at least on the surface, Trump’s use of “low-keying” might come off as an octogenarian repeating a bit of internet slang without fully understanding its context.

But Trump is known for taking liberties with language. When the war first started, Trump repeatedly referred to it as an “excursion,” a word typically used for a brief leisure trip. He also made repeated references to “nuclear dust,” a nontechnical term that belies the process of uranium enrichment. And earlier this month, he announced that “the perimeters of a deal” had been reached.

“There’s this way of playing with language that he does that still allows it to be communicative,” Muwwakkil added.

In that respect, Muwwakkil said, Trump’s use of “low-keying” allows him to evade more substantive questions about where negotiations stand. The US and Iran have each raised the bar to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, suggesting that they’re even further from a deal than before. The world’s most critical waterway remains functionally closed, despite the president insisting that the US retains total control of it. And the war that Trump initially said would last “four to five weeks” has now stretched on for months, with no clear end in sight. When the president says that the US is “low-keying” talks with Iran, he avoids committing to answers about the path forward.

“This is, I think, foregrounding that there’s going to be a marked lack of details again,” Muwwakkil said.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

New Colorado law expands school zones to 1,000 feet after 13-year-old was killed in crash

Click here for updates on this story    LITTLETON, Colorado (KCNC) -- There are new protections to make roads safer around schools and school zones. One law that went into effect on Wednesday is the Liam Stewart School Zone Act, which expands school zones to roads within 1,000 feet of a school. Liam was 13 years old when he was hit and killed by a car while riding his bike to school in Littleton back in 2023.For nearly three years, Liam's father, Josh Stewart, has been advocating for safer streets and changes since his son's death."After Liam's death, we made sure that the school route signs went up, showing kids where the safe ways to get to schools are," Josh told CBS Colorado. "We really are working with our city government, trying to make changes, not just for kids trying to get to school, but for anybody trying to get anywhere."It wasn't until he was driving in the area, that Josh noticed the signage was moved, and the school zone changed at Euclid Middle School, where Liam was biking to when he was hit in a roundabout.In a statement, the city of Littleton said, after research and an evaluation with consultants, in some cases, shortening school zones increases driver awareness and improves overall safety for drivers and students.Josh argues that the changes made the area "considerably less safe.""It felt very much the opposite of a change towards safety," Josh said. "The thing that hit the hardest is realizing that Liam had been killed in a school zone, and the changes to the school zone put his death just outside of the school zone."Josh's priority then became ensuring children have safe avenues to get to school. He began visiting school zones in other districts and communities and learning more about them. He found that, in Colorado, cities, counties, municipalities and Colorado Department of Transportation manage school zones."There were a lot of inconsistencies I found across cities and across counties, and school zones aren't the same anywhere, which creates confusion, and we needed to fix that," Josh said. "This is the first statewide law that actually puts a standard around a school zone for Colorado."Under the new law, school zones are now defined as roads within 1,000 feet of a school. School zones less than 200 feet must update their school zone to be compliant with the law. It also requires signs indicating there's a school zone, with traffic penalties doubled."That right there makes it enforceable. What I learned from police departments is that they have a hard time enforcing double penalties in school zones because most cities don't sign them correctly to be enforceable," said Josh, who added clear signage also gives prosecutors the ability to prosecute negligence in school zones if someone is injured, seriously hurt or killed.Schools with existing zones between 200 and 1,000 feet can keep their current boundaries but must follow the legal process in order to modify them. To reduce the size of a school zone, a public hearing must be held ensuring the community can provide feedback."It still gives a city the opportunity to go less than 1,000 feet, but they have to hold public engagements, and they have to involve the school districts, and they have to involve the people that utilize these areas," Josh said.Cities can also designate a "school street," and reduce the speed limit to as low as 10 mph. Governments can use automated vehicle identification systems to track traffic violations in a school zone. Districts and cities who also want to expand their school zone boundaries can raise funds for new signage.Stewart hopes the changes in law improves driver behavior in and around school zones."What good is a school zone that doesn't start until you can see the school? You really need to know that you're in an area that there's going to be a lot of students well before you get to the school," Josh said. "I think it also puts a reset on the people that are designing these school zones to really think about the people that are using school zones."Josh added that the law also sets a guideline on the changes communities can advocate for, a change he believes Liam would've supported."Liam would have been a sophomore in high school. He would have been driving this year," Josh said. "He cared for kids. He cared for his friends. He cared for others. And I think anything that he thought was going to make sure somebody was safer without asking for it would have been something that he would have wanted to have happen."Josh said the work is just beginning. Next is educating parents, principals and school boards on the changes."I'm happy that school districts and parents will have a legal standing when it comes to a school zone. Right now, if you feel like the school zone your child's school has is too small or unsafe, there's no legal recourse for you to do anything about it," Josh said. "This law gives a standard where now you can hold a city accountable for something that they need to bring up to maintenance."In the full statement from the city of Littleton, it told CBS Colorado, "Following the October 2023 death of Liam Stewart, the City Council established the Safer Streets initiative. As part of this program, city staff conducted a School Zone Safety Evaluation that involved 12 area schools. In that comprehensive third-party evaluation, consultants and staff considered national best practices and guidance as outlined by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), per the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). The MUTCD establishes national standards and research-backed guidance for the use of traffic control devices on streets, highways, and in school zones across the United States. It was determined that standardizing the distance of all school zones (to include, in some cases, shortening them in closer proximity to school properties) fosters increased driver awareness, thereby improving overall safety for drivers and students. The public can view the School Zone Safety Evaluation in its entirety at LittletonCo.Gov/SaferStreets under the 2024 tab. Since the completion of this study, city staff has been implementing the results."Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.
Read Next Story