Skip to main content

US military has used up nearly 80% of key missile interceptors as commanders warn stockpiles ‘dangerously low,’ sources say

(CNN) — The US military has exhausted nearly 80% of its interceptors for a key missile defense system as senior US military commanders are warning that the Pentagon’s munitions stockpile is “dangerously low,” according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

Stockpiles of key air defense systems have been particularly depleted during the war with Iran. The US military has burned through nearly four-fifths of its THAAD missile inventory compared to pre-war numbers and roughly half of its Patriot interceptors since the start of the war, according to two sources familiar with the latest inventory report. The disclosure of the low THAAD inventory has not been previously reported.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimates the United States had around 2,200 Patriots (of the platform’s two most-modernized variants) and 452 THAAD missiles in its stockpile before the Iran war started.

Gulf countries have also raised fresh concerns about how a shortage of air defense systems could impact their ability to ward off potential Iranian retaliation if President Donald Trump decides to escalate the ongoing conflict.

Several of those countries rely on US air defense systems and have acknowledged the stockpile shortage could hinder their own ability to intercept incoming Iranian missile and drone attacks – particularly if they are targeted in response to any American escalation, multiple officials said.

The stockpile issue was raised again prior to the president’s decision last weekend to cancel new strikes on Iran, marking at least the second time in recent weeks that Trump’s senior military advisers have specifically voiced concerns about the dwindling number of key US munitions during discussions about potentially escalating the conflict with Iran.

The US Army has also used “virtually all” of its highly accurate long-range, surface-to-air weapons during the conflict, according to the source familiar with recent internal Pentagon reports. Reuters first reported the specific concerns about US stockpiles of long-range strategic missiles.

Weekend strikes called off

The recent warnings about munitions shortages — coupled with other intelligence presented to Trump about the potential negative effects of striking Iran’s critical infrastructure, including energy-related targets, and concerns voiced by Gulf countries — have been compelling enough to convince some of Trump’s most hawkish advisers there were was reason to call off planned operations over the weekend, the sources said.

Trump on Friday was planning to move forward with massive strikes, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth received the final “go ahead” order on Friday, according to a senior Trump official.

But Trump decided to back off after talking with Middle East allies on Saturday, who told him they were afraid of Iranian retaliation, specifically retaliatory attacks on their energy infrastructure, according to the official. Trump agreed to hear them, and Iran, out. He subsequently told Hegseth to stand down, for now, but is not taking the planned strikes off the table for a future date.

“America’s military is the most powerful in the world and has everything it needs to execute at the time and place of the President’s choosing,” Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement to CNN.

“We have executed multiple successful operations across combatant commands while ensuring the U.S. military possesses a deep arsenal of capabilities to protect our people and our interests,” he added.

White House spokesperson Anna Kelly told CNN that the US military “has more than enough munitions, ammo, and stockpiles to serve all of President Trump’s strategic goals and beyond.”

“Operation Epic Fury has exposed what happens when you mess with the United States. Even still, the President has urged our defense contractors to constantly produce more made-in-America weapons, which are the best in the world,” Kelly added.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Dan Caine similarly raised the stockpile issue during another White House meeting late last month where military options for escalating the conflict were discussed, CNN previously reported. The potential for massive civilian casualties inside Iran if the US resumed major combat operations was also raised, another person familiar with the matter said.

But the persistent concerns about stockpile estimates provided to CNN underline the seriousness of the shortages and call into question the US’ ability to carry out strikes against Iran for an extended period.

The stockpile shortage could also impact the American military’s ability to fight a potential future war with China, Russia or even North Korea, experts have told CNN.

‘Tit-for-tat will never end this.’

“The lack of interceptors means that conventional attacks can backfire if the suicide drones start making it through in-masse,” one of the sources familiar with the stockpile concerns said. “Tit-for-tat will never end this.”

The long-range missiles that have been primarily used up during the war with Iran are known as Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), the sources noted.

The US’ stockpile of Tomahawk missiles also remains significantly depleted, as close to half of those weapons have been used during the war, one of the sources said.

CNN reported in April that the US military had used nearly 30% of its Tomahawks during the early stages of the war.

On Monday, Trump called Iranian leadership “unbelievably duplicitous” on social media after Tehran contradicted his claim that negotiations would resume.

He later insisted that this is Iran’s “last chance” to sign a deal, but he also said he has no time constraints on negotiations because he’s not seeking reelection.

The early phase of the Iran conflict, dubbed Operation Epic Fury, saw the US military expend thousands of key missiles used for long-range precision strikes and to defend against enemy air and missile attacks, according to analysts and previous CNN reporting.

Replenishment rates are low for key missiles, analysts tell CNN — according to current fiscal year delivery schedules, the Pentagon is receiving roughly 15 new Tomahawks and 20 new Patriot missiles per month. The Center for Strategic and International Studies estimated it would take three or more years to rebuild THAAD inventories to pre-Iran war levels.

The Defense Department has accelerated its efforts to expand interceptor missile production in recent months, including two deals inked this week to boost Patriot and THAAD rocket motor manufacturing, but a spokesperson declined to answer questions about when the expansion will lead to results.

Analysts say it could take years to fully replenish the US stockpile of high-end munitions, like Patriot missiles, due to the lead time for producing those weapons.

Other missile inventories, such as those for the Precision Strike Missile and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile, will be quicker to rebound and should reach their pre-war level by mid-to-late 2027, according to analysis from the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

CNN’s Davis Winkie contributed reporting.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

FBI not conducting civil rights probe into ICE shooting in Maine, sources say

▶ Watch Video: Trump border czar says "I think body cameras are the way to go" after deadly ICE shootings The FBI is not conducting a civil rights investigation into the shooting death of a Colombian man in Maine who was killed by a federal immigration officer in July, several sources told CBS News, though the shooting took place under circumstances that have raised questions about the use of force.The deadly encounter between an ICE officer and Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero on July 13 in Biddeford, Maine, is the latest in a growing string of clashes between civilians and ICE agents as they carry out immigration enforcement surges across the country. Other shootings involving federal immigration officers that have garnered national attention include the killings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, and the shooting death of Lorenzo Salgado Araujo in Houston.In the Maine incident, the Department of Homeland Security has said that the agent discharged his weapon because he feared for "public safety" after Guerrero allegedly tried to flee in his vehicle from the officers. The shooting was captured on surveillance videos in the Biddeford neighborhood, and a witness told CBS News he heard Guerrero say "I tried to stop" as he was pulled from the car. Border czar Tom Homan has also since publicly acknowledged the agent may not have been properly vetted, after the Associated Press revealed his identity and reported he has a history of abusive and violent behavior.Maine shooting investigationGiven the high-profile nature of the shooting, which was widely covered by news outlets, and the questions surrounding the officer's decision to open fire multiple times, civil rights legal experts say the FBI and the Civil Rights Division would usually take the lead on conducting a criminal civil rights investigation in a case like this one."I would expect that if things were operating as they traditionally have, that this would be a case where the FBI would be investigating," said Sam Trepel, a former federal civil rights prosecutor who is now the Rule of Law Program Director at States United Democracy Center. "The FBI is the federal agency that has the most experience and the most expertise in investigating potential civil rights violations, which would include deadly shootings by federal agents."A spokesperson for the FBI Boston field office, which has jurisdiction over criminal investigations in Maine, referred all questions to the DHS inspector general's office and the Maine attorney general's office.When the shooting occurred, the FBI initially responded to the scene to investigate it as a possible assault on a federal officer case. Lawmakers at the time, including Senators Susan Collins and Angus King of Maine, issued statements saying they understood the FBI was investigating and urged the bureau to cooperate with state and local authorities.But in a statement to CBS News, a Justice Department official clarified that since then, the DHS Office of the Inspector General and the Maine attorney general's office are leading the investigation."Per any officer-involved-shooting, DHS IG took the lead, and FBI would offer assistance," the official said."Should evidence present itself during the course of an investigation, DOJ will evaluate and act accordingly. The U.S. takes seriously any referral of a civil rights violation, and we will work with law enforcement and OIGs to properly and fully review credible allegations of violations of civil rights law," the official added.A spokesperson for the Maine attorney general's office declined to comment, saying the office had no information about investigations by other agencies.The Maine attorney general's office, which is also investigating the shooting, interviewed Guerrero's partner and the mother of their young daughter, Karolina Rojas Alvarez, about a week after the July 13 incident, according to her attorney Ben Gideon.Gideon added that no one from the FBI, DHS or any other federal government agency has contacted him or his client to date. "I'm not aware of the FBI or any federal agency having boots on the ground in Maine to conduct any investigation into this matter whatsoever," he added.A Justice Department spokesperson said, "DHS is taking the lead on finding the facts of what happened here, and the department will respond to the circumstances as facts develop as part of DHS investigation. And FBI will of course support DHS in any way necessary to finding out the facts of this incident."DHS is able to lead an incident investigation through one or a combination of several of its offices, depending on the purpose of the investigation. Its Office of the Inspector General can investigate criminal or administrative misconduct by DHS employees. Its Office of Professional Responsibility can conduct an internal employee misconduct and policy investigation. Homeland Security Investigations can investigate an alleged assault on ICE officers or other federal crimes.But only the FBI's civil rights agents would ordinarily investigate whether a federal officer violated §242, depriving individuals of their constitutional rights.According to DHS, Guerrero was not the intended target of the operation, though his vehicle had four visible bullet holes in the driver's side of the windshield.Law enforcement sources confirmed to CBS News that ICE officers were not wearing body cameras at the time of his death, and subsequently, ICE required at least one activated body camera during vehicle stops. DHS' public explanation does not specify exactly whom the officer believed Guerrero was endangering or how.A DHS OIG spokesperson declined to confirm the existence of an investigation, but said investigating DHS officer-involved shootings is part of its normal practice."DHS OIG routinely reviews allegations involving DHS employees or contractors who, while acting under color of their official authority, are alleged to have deprived an individual of any Constitutional right or liberty," a spokesperson said.A spokesperson for DHS referred all questions about the investigation to the FBI.It is customary for the DHS inspector general's office to review use of force cases involving agency personnel. It has the authority to conduct both criminal and administrative investigations and it can make referrals to U.S. attorney offices. Recently, it helped investigate a criminal case in the Western District of Texas against a Customs and Border Protection agent indicted in July for allegedly using unreasonable force when he put someone into a choke hold during an August 2021 incident.But that case was also investigated by the FBI, in addition to the inspector general's office and the CBP Office of Professional Responsibility.This is not the first time the FBI has been absent from investigating a high-profile ICE related shooting that has raised questions about whether the victims' civil rights were violated.After Renee Good was shot and killed by ICE officer Jonathan Ross in January, the Civil Rights Division was ordered to stand down from assigning prosecutors to help investigate. The FBI, meanwhile, was ordered to treat the investigation as an assault on a federal officer case, rather than a civil rights case, prompting local prosecutors and an FBI official to resign in protest.That same month, two CBP officers shot and killed Alex Pretti. Initially, DHS took the lead in investigating the case, as then-DHS Secretary Kristi Noem publicly accused Pretti of "domestic terrorism." After a public outcry, Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche agreed to open a criminal civil rights inquiry into Pretti's death. That investigation remains ongoing.The FBI doesn't investigate every officer-involved shooting, but has historically become involved in cases where the shooting results in death and the incident receives national attention.Under the Justice Department manual, the ICE shooting case in Maine would likely be deemed to be a matter in the national public interest because it involves allegations of a color-of-law violation — one that involves a government official acting in an official capacity — that resulted in death.Such a designation typically leads the Civil Rights Division's criminal section to take a more direct role in managing the case and coordinating with the local U.S. attorney's office. In such cases, the FBI typically conducts the investigation, and the bureau has squads that are specialized to handle civil rights criminal cases.Although such investigations often do not necessarily lead to criminal charges, the threshold for opening a case is relatively low."In any universe that I ever operated in before now, something that is this high of a profile where there is a clear public concern around what happened, the Civil Rights Division and the FBI would be the lead of it," said Kristy Parker, a former deputy chief in the Civil Rights criminal section who is now counsel at Protect Democracy, a nonprofit anti-authoritarian group.The Civil Rights Division's criminal section has handled some of the nation's most high-profile color-of-law cases involving excessive force by police. Those include the killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis Police officers and the prosecution of the Louisville Police officers involved in Breonna Taylor's shooting death.Trepel said the FBI's absence from the investigation in Maine is "detrimental to public trust" and "very concerning because it says that maybe this review will not be as comprehensive or independent as it has been in the past, and that federal officers won't be held accountable for their actions." 
Read Next Story