Skip to main content

Trump’s Patriot Games are billed as a youth sports contest. They’re also a test of patriotic branding

(CNN) — The premise sounds almost fictional: one boy and one girl from every state, territory and some tribal nations, flown to a private campus in Ohio to compete in a televised athletic contest called the Patriot Games — a Trump-backed youth competition with obstacle courses, patriotic testimonials and inevitable comparisons to The Hunger Games.

Except unlike the dystopian book and movie franchise where kids are pitted in a televised battle of survival, the stakes in the Patriot Games won’t be life and death. The male and female winners will each receive $125,000 in college scholarship money.

For 16-year-old Tylee Herrmann, the pitch was simple. In her video application, she gave her age, her school in Arizona and her reason for wanting to compete: she wanted to help “bring patriotism back to the US.”

“I feel like a lot of times right now, we feel disunified,” Herrmann, the Cherokee Nation representative, said in an interview with CNN. “I think we need something to bring us all together, because we’re the United States of America, and we need to be a little more united.”

However, Herrmann says she’s already experiencing how controversial the Patriot Games can be.

“There’s definitely been a number of people that just stopped talking to me,” said Herrmann, referring to her decision to compete in the games.

“I have a significant number of people that I know say that they hate the country because they hate the government,” Herrmann said, adding that “patriotism doesn’t belong to a political party.”

Hear more from the contestants on the latest episode of CNN’s ‘One Thing’ podcast.

Streaming live over the weekend on ESPN with a primetime special airing on ABC Aug. 13, the Patriot Games are the latest example of the Trump administration elevating the politics of athleticism and toughness in celebration of America’s 250th birthday.

They come amid a long summer of spectacles put on by Freedom 250, the President Donald Trump-backed group that organized the UFC fight night on the White House lawn featuring a military flyover, plus the Great American State Fair on the National Mall and the immense July 4th fireworks display in Washington, DC.

Last year, Trump vowed that the games would feature “the greatest high school athletes.” However, the event appears to be shaping up to be more of a highly produced display of youth patriotism than athletic excellence.

CNN interviewed five Patriot Games competitors and reviewed numerous application videos posted online to YouTube and other platforms that showed students showing off skills such as backflips and parkour training.

Yet, athletic ability wasn’t the sole factor considered for participation in the competition, and those selected appear to have largely similar backgrounds. Contestants were asked to film a video answering a series of prompts about why they wanted to compete and to explain how sports have shaped their identity. They were also asked to list places outside their home state where they had a “meaningful personal, family, cultural, military, or community connection,” according to the application.

Applicants were required to list their biological sex. When announcing the games last year, Trump pledged that at the games, “there will be no men playing in women’s sports.”

Contestants ages 14 to 17 include children of active-duty military and JROTC participants, as well as homeschooled students. Of the kids featured in the Freedom 250 Instagram page, many attend private Christian schools. They also appear to be overwhelmingly White; the application for the Games did not ask to specify race.

Some students were chosen to represent states where they don’t reside. The pick for Puerto Rico is a young man from Texas. New Jersey’s ambassador attends a private Christian school in Texas. The female competitor for Massachusetts, 16-year-old Bobbi Vickers, attends school in California.

Vickers said she was initially surprised not to be representing California.

“I get a bunch of questions like, why are you representing Massachusetts and not your home state?” she told CNN. “But I think it’s really cool because a lot of my family is from there and my favorite basketball team is actually the Boston Celtics.”

Herrmann said she applied as both an Arizonan and as a citizen of the Cherokee tribe. She said the Freedom 250 organizers did a background check and verified with the Cherokee tribe that she’s a member.

In videos posted to Instagram, many of the competitors touted their Christian faith and thanked Trump personally for the opportunity, while others have posted about their interest in athletic pursuits like basketball, lacrosse or weightlifting at the gym.

One student representing North Carolina is a member of a local chapter of Club America, a high school program launched by Turning Point USA – the organization founded by the late activist Charlie Kirk. In an interview with conservative YouTube personality Adam Francisco, the student was asked about WNBA player Sophie Cunningham’s comments about barring transgender women from women’s sports. The video, posted to Instagram, was captioned, “High school athletes get it, why doesn’t the left?”

Freedom 250 spokeswoman Danielle Alvarez touted the games as a celebration of “America’s next generation of leaders, competitors and champions” in a statement. “Freedom 250 is proud to bring Americans together through unforgettable signature events — from the Freedom Trucks and July 4 celebrations to the 2026 Patriot Games — that celebrate our country and inspire the next generation.”

Trump’s affinity for sports

Trump first teased the Patriot Games during his bid for a second term in 2023. In a campaign video, he outlined plans for America’s 250th birthday and declared that “major sporting contests for high school athletes” would allow young people from “every state to show off the best of American skill, sportsmanship, and competitive spirit.”

Sports have featured heavily in Trump’s second term. He became the first sitting president to attend a Super Bowl in person in 2025, and has appeared at the NBA finals, US Open, Daytona 500, and the World Cup Final. Trump was also instrumental in expediting plans for the Freedom 250 IndyCar street race in downtown Washington, DC, later this month.

“He has done more than any president that I can think of to try to graft sports onto his own identity,” said Michael L. Butterworth, director of the Center for Sports Communication & Media at The University of Texas at Austin.

The games are set to take place at the SPIRE Academy, a boarding school and sports training facility in Geneva, Ohio, which hosted a Trump campaign rally in 2016. According to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt and the Freedom 250 Instagram account, Trump plans on visiting the games’ finale on Tuesday. They are one of two contests backed by the administration aimed at promoting patriotism in young Americans – a demographic that has largely soured on Trump and the country. According to a June 2026 Gallup poll, just 14% of adults aged 18 to 34 said they were “extremely proud” to be an American.

The first contest was the Presidential 1776 Award in June, where high-school aged finalists answered questions about American history and government for a chance to win a scholarship worth up to $150,000. The broadcast drew 1.63 million live viewers on CBS, the Department of Education  said last month. 

But that contest has since become mired in controversy.

The family of Aangad Singh, a 15-year-old from Connecticut has publicly cast doubt on the results, telling NOTUS last month  they believe some of his answers were incorrectly scored and that he should have been one of the three winners. Along with Democratic lawmakers from the House and Senate, they’ve asked the Education Department to provide more information about the scoring.

Democratic Sen. Chris Murphy released a video last week where he alleged that Singh, who is the son of Indian immigrants, was sidelined to uplift contestants who better aligned with Trump’s agenda. All three of the finalists were White, and one identified as a Trump supporter in an interview with CNN.

“How do you justify running a merit-based competition based upon how much you know about American history, and then denying a kid a place in the winner’s circle, perhaps simply because his parents are immigrants,” Murphy asked.

In a statement to CNN, the Education Department said that all contestants had agreed that judges — fellows from the James Madison Memorial Fellowship Foundation — “would judge the competition in good faith with full discretion over scoring.”

“They also understood that in the live competition, the judges would have to exercise their best judgment and deliberate in real time. It was a fierce and close competition, and Mr. Singh was an outstanding competitor,” the agency said.

‘That’s kind of a gamble for me’

Competitors for the Patriot Games were told that there would be a points-based system, awarding athletes who finish with the best marks in each round the most. Some of the students who spoke to CNN expressed confusion about how individuals would be scored during the team events, such as dodgeball.

“I don’t know how that’s going to work, that’s kind of a gamble for me,” said 17-year-old Liam Nies from Ohio. “No two teams are equal, so it’s really if you get the better team or you don’t.”

In an interview with CNN, Nies said that he heard about the Patriot Games from “Granny Bibbins,” Instagram influencer Arleta Kay Didier, who promotes traditional values and says in her bio that she’s hoping to “inspire the next generation of Moms.”

Tatum Palmer from Oregon told CNN she also learned of the games from Didier, while Missouri’s Madison Glise said she was encouraged to apply by her mother, a member of the Air Force, after everyone at her military base received an email about them.

Part of Nies’s application was showing off his ability to do a backflip – he does one a day and posts a video on Instagram about it. He spent much of his childhood living in Belgium before moving back to the US for middle school.

He said his perception of America as a kid in Belgium was “big cowboys everywhere and just hillbillies.” Now, “I have a different view on America,” Nies said. “I think I’m just more noticeable of the opportunities that we have here.”

Dozens of video applications posted to YouTube show various reasons why young people wanted to participate. An applicant from South Carolina detailed her experience as a stage 4 cancer survivor and her love for swimming and track. A New York track and volleyball athlete said he wanted to ease college tuition costs for himself and his twin brother. A 14-year-old, wearing a black “Freedom” t-shirt popularized by Kirk, said he wanted to participate to “show everyone why Oklahoma is the real red state.”

For Herrmann, the games could help her go to her dream school: Liberty University, an evangelical Christian school in Lynchburg, Virginia. She wants to get her master’s in business by the time she turns 20. Her goal is to work in government one day – maybe even an elected position like a congressman or a senator.

“If it happens, I would love to be the president,” she said.

CNN’s David Rind contributed to this report.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Las vacunas contra el cáncer podrían transformar el tratamiento y la prevención, pero la desinformación amenaza su potencial

Por primera vez, una vacuna de ARNm contra el cáncer ha tenido éxito en un ensayo clínico en fase avanzada, un avance significativo que podría transformar la manera en que se trata el cáncer. El 19 de agosto de 2026, Moderna y Merck anunciaron que su vacuna personalizada, intismeran autogene, logró reducir la recurrencia del melanoma, un cáncer de piel, al combinarse con el medicamento de inmunoterapia Keytruda. Aunque estos resultados podrían abrir la puerta a una ola de vacunas contra el cáncer, la desinformación sobre la tecnología de ARNm que circula desde la pandemia podría frenar su impulso antes de que llegue a los pacientes.El progreso hacia el desarrollo de vacunas para tratar el cáncer lleva años gestándose. Desde principios de la década de 2000, se han realizado más de 120 ensayos clínicos prometedores que evalúan el uso de vacunas de ARNm para tratar varios tipos de cáncer, como el melanoma y los cánceres cerebral, de mama, de pulmón y de próstata.Al mismo tiempo, la desinformación sobre el llamado cáncer turbo comenzó a propagarse ampliamente en las redes sociales, y los principales medios de comunicación informaron por primera vez sobre ello a finales de 2022. El cáncer turbo se refiere a la afirmación falsa de que las vacunas de ARNm contra el covid-19 causan cánceres inusualmente agresivos.Como investigador de comunicación en salud que monitorea las conversaciones en internet relacionadas con el cáncer, he visto la rapidez con la que puede propagarse la nueva desinformación y el impacto que puede tener en las decisiones de salud de las personas. En el caso de las vacunas de ARNm contra el cáncer, esta narrativa falsa podría socavar la confianza pública en una herramienta importante que podría ayudar a prevenir o tratar el cáncer en el futuro.La mayoría de las personas probablemente oyó hablar por primera vez de la tecnología de ARNm a través de las vacunas contra el covid-19, pero los científicos llevan décadas estudiándola.Las vacunas de ARNm funcionan mediante la transmisión de instrucciones que inducen a las células del cuerpo a producir proteínas específicas. Este proceso enseña al sistema inmunitario a reconocer y atacar esas proteínas. En la investigación del cáncer, los científicos pueden diseñar vacunas muy específicas que entrenan al sistema inmunitario para detectar células tumorales y eliminarlas con mayor eficacia sin dañar las células sanas.Un ejemplo de este potencial proviene de estudios sobre el glioblastoma, un tumor cerebral agresivo con pocos tratamientos eficaces. Los investigadores han descubierto que una vacuna personalizada de ARNm puede activar rápidamente el sistema inmunitario de las personas contra este tipo de cáncer cerebral y mejorar la supervivencia.Cada vez hay más pruebas de que las vacunas de ARNm pueden transformar la manera en que los investigadores aprovechan el sistema inmunitario para tratar el cáncer. Sin embargo, incluso los avances médicos más prometedores solo pueden mejorar la salud si las personas están dispuestas a utilizarlos.“Cáncer turbo” es un término que suelen utilizar los activistas antivacunas, quienes afirman —sin pruebas creíbles— que las vacunas de ARNm contra el covid-19 están causando cánceres inusualmente agresivos.Esta narrativa imprecisa se ha filtrado en las noticias de los medios tradicionales. En septiembre de 2025, un controvertido cardiólogo británico afirmó que la vacuna contra el covid-19 contribuyó a los recientes diagnósticos de cáncer en la familia real, lo que generó una reacción negativa inmediata de la comunidad médica. Aunque es poco común, algunas figuras públicas y profesionales de la salud han afirmado que las vacunas podrían causar cáncer pese a las abundantes pruebas que contradicen esa afirmación, a menudo mediante una interpretación errónea o una tergiversación de estudios.La desinformación sobre la salud puede describirse como afirmaciones falsas o engañosas relacionadas con la salud que se comparten con el público y que no están respaldadas por evidencia científica, se basan en historias personales no verificadas o son opiniones presentadas como hechos. Por ejemplo, al hacer un seguimiento de las conversaciones sobre la vacuna contra el VPH en las plataformas de redes sociales, mi equipo y yo descubrimos que los temores sobre su seguridad, la desconfianza hacia las autoridades y las afirmaciones conspirativas estaban muy extendidos en internet.La desinformación sobre las vacunas se aceleró durante la pandemia de covid-19, lo que causó lo que los investigadores denominan una infodemia: la rápida propagación de información sobre la salud, tanto verdadera como falsa, durante una crisis de salud pública. La infodemia de covid-19 dificultó que las personas encontraran orientación confiable e influyó en las actitudes del público hacia las vacunas.El “cáncer turbo” refleja muchos de los mismos patrones y narrativas que la infodemia de covid-19.En un estudio de escucha social, que consiste en monitorear sistemáticamente las conversaciones en internet sobre distintos temas, mi equipo y yo observamos innumerables publicaciones sobre el cáncer turbo desde julio de 2023 hasta principios de 2026. Muchas publicaciones se basan en anécdotas emocionalmente convincentes, interpretaciones erróneas de estudios con animales, el uso indebido de informes sobre eventos adversos y mitos reciclados según los cuales las vacunas alteran el ADN humano. Algunas publicaciones también vinculan el aumento de las tasas de cáncer entre los adultos más jóvenes con la vacuna contra el covid-19. Sin embargo, estudios de grandes poblaciones no han hallado un mayor riesgo de cáncer después de la vacunación.Ninguna de estas afirmaciones sobre el cáncer turbo está respaldada por evidencia confiable. Pero en las redes sociales, la repetición, las historias personales y un lenguaje que suena científico pueden hacer que la desinformación parezca legítima y ayudar a que se propague rápidamente.A primera vista, afirmaciones extravagantes como la del cáncer turbo pueden parecer fáciles de descartar. Sin embargo, las investigaciones muestran que pueden tener consecuencias en el mundo real, y la desinformación relacionada con el cáncer puede ser especialmente grave.La información inexacta sobre el tratamiento del cáncer es común en internet, y los investigadores han demostrado que influye en las decisiones de los pacientes. Cuando los pacientes recurren a métodos no comprobados en lugar de las terapias recomendadas, su riesgo de muerte puede aumentar considerablemente.Los profesionales clínicos ya observan los efectos de la desinformación en la atención habitual. Los oncólogos afirman que tienen que abordar mitos o información engañosa que los pacientes han encontrado, aunque los investigadores aún desconocen qué tan frecuentes son estas conversaciones en la atención oncológica.La tecnología de ARNm está entrando en una fase decisiva de su desarrollo. El progreso científico se está acelerando, pero la comprensión del público no ha avanzado al mismo ritmo. La exposición reiterada a afirmaciones engañosas puede erosionar con el tiempo la confianza en la tecnología de ARNm, lo que incrementa la probabilidad de que algunos pacientes rechacen las terapias de ARNm en el futuro.Si narrativas engañosas como la del cáncer turbo siguen propagándose, podrían complicar el futuro despliegue de las vacunas de ARNm y limitar sus beneficios para salvar vidas.Una vez que la desinformación se arraiga en la percepción del público, puede ser difícil cambiar su rumbo.Las investigaciones han demostrado sistemáticamente que una comunicación proactiva, transparente y persuasiva puede contrarrestar la desinformación. También muestran que, una vez perdida, la confianza es difícil de recuperar.Las innovaciones médicas pueden salvar vidas, pero solo si la comunicación se mantiene al día. Esto implica monitorear las tendencias emergentes de desinformación en las redes sociales, abordar las inquietudes de manera temprana, dotar a los profesionales clínicos de herramientas para mantener conversaciones eficaces con los pacientes y diseñar mensajes de salud pública que fomenten la comprensión de las nuevas tecnologías médicas antes de que se introduzcan ampliamente en la práctica clínica.La innovación científica por sí sola no basta para mejorar la salud. Garantizar que el público pueda evaluar innovaciones médicas como las vacunas de ARNm contra el cáncer con base en la evidencia, en lugar de hacerlo a partir de desinformación viral, forma parte del desafío científico.El futuro de la atención oncológica no depende únicamente de los descubrimientos científicos, sino también de la comprensión y la confianza del público.Republicado bajo una licencia Creative Commons de The Conversation.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story