Skip to main content

Trump calls Rep. Max Miller to express concerns over his reelection bid amid domestic abuse allegations, sources say

Rep. Max Miller (R-OH) leaves a House Republican Caucus meeting on Capitol Hill on Nov. 19, 2024, in Washington, D.C. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — President Donald Trump called Rep. Max Miller on Monday and raised concerns about his reelection bid following domestic abuse allegations, two sources tell ABC News.

Police reports obtained by ABC News show that Miller’s ex-wife, Emily Moreno, the daughter of Sen. Bernie Moreno, alleged multiple incidents of physical violence during their marriage and divorce proceedings. Miller, a Republican seeking another term representing Ohio’s 7th Congressional District, has denied the allegations.

During his phone conversation with Trump, Miller denied the allegations to the president and showed no interest in leaving the race, sources said.

Miller’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the phone call. The White House didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

On Monday, prior to the phone call, Trump called Miller a “good person” and said he was going to “let the families figure that out” when asked about the allegations.

Miller, a former Trump White House aide, was married to Emily Moreno from 2022 to 2024 and the two have one child, a 2-year-old daughter. The couple married at Trump’s Bedminster, New Jersey, club at a ceremony that included a toast by Trump.

The police reports obtained by ABC News also show Emily Moreno told the police that her daughter received physical injuries while in Miller’s care. Miller denies abusing his wife or daughter. He was never charged with a crime and the Department of Children and Family Services did not find evidence to substantiate allegations of child abuse, according to records released in court filings.

Miller faces a Wednesday deadline to drop out in order to be replaced on the ballot.

He is facing growing scrutiny — including from his former father-in-law, who said on Monday that Miller “should not serve in the House” — and is lashing out on social media at senators who support him stepping aside.

According to report by Politico, those Republican senators include Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia and Sen. Roger Marshall of Kansas.

Miller responded on social media late on Monday, specifically addressing Capito, who told Politico she supports Moreno’s position.

Miller replied, “@SenCapito here’s the facts: 1. Every accusation that has been thrown my way has been found unsubstantiated by the court system as well as mine and my ex-wife’s court appointed mediator (who is a psychologist and mandatory reporter). Let me know if you want me to read the rest of the files to you.”

He did not address Marshall’s comments to Politico. Marshall told the news outlet that Miller “should resign. He should quit.”

A lawyer for former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham separately announced on social media on Monday evening that he has “filed for a Temporary Restraining Order against Cong. Max Miller (R-OH) on behalf of former Trump Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham.”

Grisham is currently suing Miller over violations of the terms of a confidential settlement related to his defamation case against her. She alleged that he abused her during their romantic relationship during the first Trump administration. Miller has denied her allegations of abuse.

The White House declined to comment last week on allegations of abuse by Miller toward Grisham or Moreno.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Trump wants South Korea to defend itself. His overtures to Kim Jong Un could delay that

By CNN
(CNN) — By suddenly scaling down war games with South Korea, US President Donald Trump risks working against his own stated goal of having Seoul assume more responsibility for its own defense.The annual Ulchi Freedom Shield exercises, involving tens of thousands of troops, have been cut in half at Washington’s request, after Trump said last weekend that the exercises antagonized his friend, North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Un, while also costing the US a lot of money.These exercises “send a signal that is totally inappropriate and hostile,” Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday in what appeared to be an attempt to appease the reclusive Kim, who Trump is eager to meet with again.The “hostile” part is hard to reconcile with the defensive nature of the exercises and is strikingly similar to how North Korea’s state media have described the drills. Washington and Seoul have said repeatedly they are about deterrence and defense, not about taking territory north of the demilitarized zone that has divided the Koreas since the armistice struck in 1953.Contained within the military exercises is training to give South Korea something it hasn’t had since the Korean War began in 1950: wartime operational control of the combined South Korea-US forces on the peninsula, analysts point out.It’s a key goal for both countries. Once Seoul shows it can take on that burden, Washington can take a backseat in any future conflict, providing some firepower but letting South Korea assume most of the responsibility and cost of its defense.The current control set-up came about shortly after the start of the Korean War, when South Korea turned command of its forces over to Washington, which – vastly better equipped and more experienced – was more suited to dealing with the communist threat at the dividing line.Control of South Korean troops was assumed by United Nations Command, and in 1978, by the Combined Forces Command (CFC), which has always been led by an American general.The CFC gave peacetime operational control of South Korean forces to Seoul in 1994, but wartime control has remained with Washington. Calls for change and timelines to accomplish it have been pushed back several times since, leaving in place a status quo that is no longer needed.Over the past several years, South Korea has emerged as a world-class military power – not quite on the level of the US or China, but certainly capable of defending itself against North Korea.Citing that ability, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung on Tuesday used the launch of this year’s exercises to try to bring new momentum to a campaign promise he made in 2025 to bring wartime operational control back into Seoul’s hands by 2030.“From the aspect of weapons systems and military strength, our capabilities to defend ourselves is already among the top few in the world. It’s not an exaggeration to say that we are more than capable,” Lee said Tuesday.But Trump has thrown a spanner into the works.The plan was to use the Ulchi Freedom Shield drills to assess systems so Seoul could assume wartime operational control, Yu Ji-hoon, a research fellow at the Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, wrote in The Diplomat.“A major last-minute change could therefore affect more than readiness; it could complicate an alliance project that Washington itself has long encouraged,” Yu wrote.“Curtailing (the exercises), especially without prior discussion, makes burden-sharing harder to implement, even as Washington demands more of it,” he said.Lee Jeong-kyu, a visiting research fellow at South Korea’s Sejong Institute, wrote earlier this year of momentum building for more South Korean control, with it laid out in black and white in the US National Defense Strategy released in January.The document was “a clear signal of intent to strengthen alliance burden-sharing that is expected to provide grounds for accelerating the conditions for (operational control) transfer,” Lee wrote.With his deference to North Korea’s Kim, Trump has put a nuclear-armed adversary of the US above a treaty ally that wants to do what Trump has asked of it.That keeps US forces tied up with responsibilities on the peninsula at a time when they could be sorely needed in a place like Iran or possible future conflicts, both in Asia and around the world. And it means future defense budgets can’t factor in cost savings in Korea when demand for new weapons is only growing.South Korea has long been a close American ally; since the end of the Korean War the two nations have had a mutual defense treaty primarily designed to protect the South from North Korea.But Trump’s touted personal relationship with North Korea’s Kim –– who has significantly expanded his country’s military capabilities since Trump’s first term and is now believed to have dozens of nuclear warheads –– has tested the long-standing partnership.For its part, North Korea has not responded positively to Trump’s new olive branch.Before news of the curtailment broke Wednesday morning, North Korean state media KCNA called the exercises “the most immediate and open threat” to Pyongyang, and regional security.Trump’s sudden involvement appears to be forcing a rethink wider than just the exercises, with Seoul’s military chiefs saying Wednesday the two sides would now need to discuss “combined defense posture going forward.”For Trump, already weakened on the world stage by the ongoing war with Iran, it’s another own goal, analysts said.“The cost savings from downsizing drills are marginal, while the diplomatic benefits for relations with North Korea are doubtful,” said Leif-Eric Easley, a professor at Ewha University in Seoul.Just what Trump might want to achieve by meeting again with Kim is opaque. He failed in his first term to strong-arm the North Korean leader into giving up his nuclear ambitions, which have only grown. Meanwhile, Kim has moved closer to Russia and China.Trump might see it as “unthreatening and respectful” to himself, but North Korea has become a much stronger military power in the near-decade since Trump first took office.“Scaling (the drills) back can damage alliance coordination, slow the process of South Korea taking on greater responsibility for its own defense, and weaken deterrence against possible conflicts in Asia,” Easley said.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story

Related Stories

Latest News
What we know about the controversial border security project in Big Bend National Park
58 seconds ago

What we know about the controversial border security project in Big Bend National Park

"Será mejor que me traten como un testigo hostil", dice asociado de Suge Knight en el juicio por el asesinato de Tupac Shakur

Americans have more money. They’re done eating and shopping at places that suck

La reina Camila afirma que fue "difícil" mantener en secreto el diagnóstico de cáncer del rey Carlos III

Sen. Dan Sullivan, Mary Peltola advance in Alaska Senate primary