Skip to main content

Takeaways from Tuesday primaries: Trump endorsement only goes so far

Democratic Congressional candidate Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz speaks with voter Camille Edwards as she campaigns outside of the Kings Point Clubhouse polling station, August 18, 2026, in Tamarac, Florida. Joe Raedle/Getty Images

(WASHINGTON) — Several high-profile primary races Tuesday tested how much President Donald Trump’s endorsement can do for a scandal-marred candidate, showed the impact of Republicans’ mid-decade redistricting and highlighted the continued battle between established Democratic candidates and progressive challengers.

Here are takeaways from Tuesday’s primaries:

Trump endorsement can’t lift Mills

Embattled and scandal-ridden Republican Rep. Cory Mills lost his reelection bid in Florida Tuesday, defeated by challenger Ryan Elijah, a former TV news anchor and NFL sideline reporter.

Mills faces a House Ethics Committee investigation; a judge issued a restraining order against him last year after he was accused by his former girlfriend of threatening to distribute sexually explicit videos of her; and in July, ABC News reported that the embattled congressman was also under investigation by the Department of Justice, in part about his finances. Mills has denied the allegations.

Mills’ loss suggests that Republicans have limits when it comes to how long they can stand behind a candidate carrying too much baggage. Despite the scandals that have followed him, Mills still retained Trump’s endorsement.

Putting aside differences before November

Republican Rep. Byron Donalds unsurprisingly secured his party’s nomination in the gubernatorial race in Florida. Donalds’ campaign has received immense support among Republicans and Trump’s endorsement.

Donalds now faces the task of uniting his party after what was a bruising primary. Donalds said he received congratulatory calls from his competitors, Paul Renner and James Fishback. In his victory speech, Donalds called for Florida Republicans to come together.

“But tonight the primary is over. Tonight we put aside our differences. Tonight we are one united Republican Party,” Donalds said.

Wasserman Schultz promises representation matters

Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz won her primary in Florida’s historically Black 20th Congressional District that was redrawn this year by the Republican-controlled legislature.

Her decision to run in the district drew criticism from her four Black opponents and other Black Democrats who have already been impacted by Republican redistricting efforts in southern states.

In her victory speech, Wasserman Schultz referenced redistricting Republicans hope will improve their chances of retaining the House in November. She promised the redrawn majority-minority district that increasing representation is among her top priorities.

“This is such a difficult and fraught time in our country. There is so much at stake in this moment, and I want people to know that representation matters. It matters, and I will fight to make sure that representation counts again,” she said Tuesday evening.
Moskowitz fends off challenge from DSA candidate

In the Democratic primary for Florida’s 25th District, two-term incumbent Rep. Jared Moskowitz, who was also running in a redrawn district, fended off a challenge from Democratic Socialists of America candidate Oliver Larkin.

The race highlighted how support for Israel is becoming prominent issue in this year’s election as more Democrats have become less supportive. Moskowitz has been a staunch supporter of Israel while Larkin has called for the U.S. to cut off aid.

The race was a continuation of established Democratic candidates facing challenges from progressives, as seen in the Senate race in Michigan.

Moskowitz now faces a competitive general election in November, as his seat is one Republicans see as a top pickup opportunity.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

El Departamento de Justicia intenta desvincular a Todd Blanche de la acusación contra Comey por la supuesta amenaza “8647”

El Departamento de Justicia declaró en un documento judicial que sus altos mandos no participaron en la decisión de imputar penalmente al exdirector del FBI, James Comey, por publicar en redes sociales en 2025 una fotografía de conchas marinas dispuestas formando el número “8647”.La fotografía generó controversia, ya que el número 86 suele referirse a desechar o deshacerse de algo, y Donald Trump es el presidente número 47. Los fiscales afirman que la publicación constituye una amenaza contra la vida de Trump, algo que Comey ha negado.Para desvincular al secretario de Justicia, Todd Blanche, de la toma de decisiones, el documento presentado el martes por la noche indica que fue Ellis Boyle, fiscal federal del distrito este de Carolina del Norte, quien impulsó la acusación contra uno de los principales opositores de Trump. Al revelar el enfoque de Boyle, el Departamento de Justicia espera convencer a un juez de que Comey no fue blanco de una venganza por parte de los fiscales debido a la animosidad del presidente hacia él.“Comey intenta presentar la decisión de acusarlo como resultado de una directiva del Presidente o del secretario de Justicia. Eso es simplemente falso”, escribieron los fiscales en la presentación judicial ante el tribunal federal del este de Carolina del Norte el martes. “El Fiscal Federal Boyle investigó el asunto al asumir su cargo y tomó la decisión sin ninguna influencia del secretario de Justicia, y mucho menos del Presidente”.Sin embargo, el Departamento de Justicia afirma en la presentación que Boyle le comunicó al secretario de Justicia que los fiscales solicitarían la acusación contra Comey por la publicación de la concha marina el día antes de que un jurado investigador la aprobara esta primavera.“De hecho, Boyle ni siquiera discutió la decisión de presentar cargos con el secretario de Justicia hasta el día anterior a presentar el caso ante el jurado investigadir, y lo hizo entonces para que el secretario de Justicia estuviera al tanto de la posible publicidad relacionada con la acusación, tal como lo estipula el Manual de Justicia”, escribieron los fiscales.Blanche —quien en ese momento era la número dos del Departamento de Justicia, como secretario de Justicia adjunto— y el Director del FBI, Kash Patel, apoyaron públicamente la acusación de Boyle contra Comey en Carolina del Norte, y ambos ofrecieron declaraciones a la prensa el día de la acusación en Washington junto a Boyle.La acusación por el caso de las conchas marinas en abril representó la segunda vez que Comey fue acusado por este Departamento de Justicia. Un caso anterior, en el que se le acusaba de mentir al Congreso, fue desestimado por un juez el año pasado después de que los procedimientos judiciales revelaran irregularidades en el enfoque del fiscal federal con sede en Virginia.Comey ha argumentado que ambos casos fueron el resultado de una actuación injusta del Departamento de Justicia para complacer los deseos políticos del presidente.Esta noticia está en desarrollo y será actualizada.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story