Skip to main content

Su viaje para ver un partido de Argentina terminó en una detención de ICE: “Se siente horrible porque no somos criminales”

Iliana Noeli Lick dice que siente que “todavía la pesadilla no se ha terminado”. La ciudadana argentina de 30 años, quien trabaja como niñera en Filadelfia, Pensilvania, acaba de salir libre bajo fianza tras pasar casi un mes detenida por el Servicio de Control de Inmigración y Aduanas (ICE, por sus siglas en inglés).

Originaria de Buenos Aires, Lick dijo en entrevista con CNN que ICE la detuvo el sábado 11 de julio por la mañana en el Aeropuerto Internacional de Filadelfia, cuando se disponía a tomar un vuelo en compañía de amistades para viajar a Kansas City con el fin de presenciar el partido que en esa fecha disputó la selección nacional de su país con el equipo de Suiza, dentro de los cuartos de final del Mundial de Fútbol.

“Lo que nos pasó fue bastante traumático”, dijo Lick al describir la experiencia de estar en detención de ICE, junto a otras mujeres inmigrantes de distintas nacionalidades.

Lick dijo que todo empezó cuando una mujer en uniforme la abordó mientras hacía la fila de seguridad en el aeropuerto de Filadelfia.

“Ella no estaba identificada. Nunca me dijo que era ICE, pero al momento entendí la situación y básicamente no podía creer que me estuviera sucediendo. Como que uno ve las noticias y las historias en las redes sociales y… nunca creí que me iba a suceder a mí”, reconoció.

Lick dice que entre lo más traumático que vivió se encuentra su detención en una cárcel común. “Tuvimos que usar el uniforme rayado blanco y negro como se ve en las películas. Nos esposaron las manos y nos encadenaron de los tobillos y alrededor de la cintura con las manos esposadas atadas a las cadenas sin poder caminar y soportando el dolor de las cadenas en los tobillos”, describió.

“Se siente horrible porque no somos criminales. Y, ¿por qué tuvimos que pasar por todo ese proceso al igual que una persona que cometió un crimen si no somos criminales?”, preguntó.

Según la mujer, desde el 11 de julio que fue detenida hasta el 10 de agosto que fue liberada, estuvo bajo custodia en cuatro lugares distintos, incluyendo una cárcel de Pensilvania en donde inmigrantes como ella estuvieron detenidos con la población carcelaria común, “básicamente como si fuésemos criminales”, dijo. De Pensilvania la trasladaron a Luisiana y luego Texas, para finalmente llegar a un centro de detención en Nuevo México, agregó.

En un comunicado enviado a CNN antes de que Lick saliera libre bajo fianza, el Departamento de Seguridad Nacional (DHS) describió a la mujer como “una inmigrante indocumentada de Argentina”, detenida el 11 de julio “durante un operativo de arresto selectivo en el Aeropuerto Internacional de Filadelfia”.

El comunicado añade que Lick “ingresó a Estados Unidos el 17 de marzo de 2023 y permaneció en el país más allá del plazo permitido por su visa. Lick permanecerá bajo custodia del ICE en espera del resultado de su proceso migratorio. Cabe aclarar que la autorización de trabajo o una solicitud pendiente NO otorgan estatus legal en Estados Unidos”.

Sin embargo, Lick niega que haya permanecido en el país más allá del tiempo permitido por su visa.

“Eso no es cierto”, sostuvo. “Yo vine con una visa de turismo. Luego solicité una extensión de visa. Esperé la respuesta de USCIS (Servicios de Ciudadanía e Inmigración de Estados Unidos) y fue aprobada, y durante ese proceso uno está legal en el país hasta la aprobación del caso, algo que sucedió. Y luego solicité una visa de asilo y me dieron un permiso de trabajo y número de seguro social”, detalló.

Las detenciones realizadas por ICE en los aeropuertos estadounidenses, como ocurrió con Lick, están generando alarma entre abogados de inmigración, quienes afirman que se están produciendo con mayor frecuencia, citando una serie de incidentes en los que los pasajeros han sido detenidos abruptamente por agentes mientras viajaban.

La agencia federal, encargada del arresto y la deportación de inmigrantes indocumentados, sigue bajo presión para cumplir con la agenda de deportaciones del presidente Donald Trump. Esto incluye alcanzar la meta del Gobierno de realizar alrededor de 2.000 arrestos diarios.

Los arrestos en aeropuertos forman parte de un esfuerzo más amplio de los agentes de ICE para utilizar diversas tácticas de control migratorio con el fin de aumentar las detenciones, incluyendo, más recientemente, el enfoque en personas con visas vencidas que se encuentran de viaje.

Lick dice que ha sido muy difícil para ella entender la crueldad con la que piensa que fue tratada, especialmente considerando que se presentó a todas sus citas y pagó todas las cuotas que las autoridades requirieron.

“Teníamos que tomar agua de la llave de la canilla que estaba directamente conectada con el inodoro que compartíamos las 12 personas que estábamos ahí”, afirmó Lick al describir la experiencia que vivió en uno de los centros de detención.

“En (la Prisión del Condado de) Cambria (en Pensilvania), dormíamos con las luces prendidas. Eran faroles gigantes (…) y había ruidos porque constantemente entraban y salían los oficiales”, agregó.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Luigi Mangione pleads guilty in federal case, admits to shooting Brian Thompson

▶ Watch Video: Luigi Mangione admits to murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO in federal court Luigi Mangione entered a guilty plea in his federal case at a court appearance in Manhattan Friday morning, admitting to the judge that he shot and killed UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson outside a Midtown hotel in 2024.Mangione, 28, faced both federal and state trials in New York for the deadly shooting. He had previously pleaded not guilty in both cases.Sentencing in the federal case will take place on Dec. 18, with Mangione facing a maximum possible sentence of life in prison.His state trial is currently set to begin in September. Mangione's defense team has filed for state charges to be dismissed under New York's double jeopardy law, and the Manhattan district attorney's office said they're prepared to fight that move for dismissal. What happened in courtThompson's family arrived in the courtroom at around 10:50 a.m. The hearing, which had been set to start at 11 a.m., got started a bit late. The courtroom had filled with members of the press and the public. Mangione entered the court at around 11:10 a.m. with his feet shackled and his hands behind his back. He was wearing tan prison clothing with a white T-shirt underneath. Just before 11:15 a.m., Mangione's defense team told the judge Mangione "is prepared to plead guilty to the indictment at this time." The judge asked Mangione if that was correct. "Yes," Mangione told the judge. The judge asked Mangione a series of questions about his background and use of medications and drugs. The judge then found Mangione to be fully competent to enter the plea.The judge told Mangione that the maximum possible sentence is life in prison followed by supervised release. The judge added that there's no parole in the federal system, although good behavior and other programs can impact how long he will spend in prison. He will be required to serve 85% of the sentence, the judge said.The judge pointed out that there's no plea agreement between the defense and prosecution, and Mangione's defense attorney said that's correct.Mangione's admission in courtMangione then told the court in his own words what he did.He told the court that he had for years endured severe pain for a broken back, had navigated the health insurance system and witnessed others going through similar experiences. He told the court he learned about the UnitedHealthcare annual investor conference in New York even though it wasn't publicized, and traveled to it. He told the court he posed as an investor and "emailed UnitedHealthcare leadership" to find out more information about the conference."Unlike my previous interactions with insurers, I received an immediate response within an hour," Mangione said.He told the court he used a 3D printer to make parts of the gun, and traveled to New York with the gun, silencer, and magazine with "the intent to shoot Brian Thompson.""On the morning of December 4, 2024, I shot Mr. Thompson in Manhattan and he died," Mangione said. "When I did so, I understood that my actions would place him in fear of death or serious bodily injury. I knew what I was doing was illegal."Prosecutors then spoke in court, reviewing the evidence against Mangione. They pointed to video capturing the shooting, as well as Mangione fleeing the scene on the bicycle, his arrest in Altoona, Pennsylvania, the recovered pistol and shell casings, as well as DNA found at the crime scene. Prosecutors said entries in Mangione's notebook expressed his desire to kill a healthcare executive."Mr. Mangione, how do you now plead to counts one and two of the indictment?" the judge asked."Guilty," Mangione said."I will accept your guilty plea," the judge said.About the chargesMangione initially faced four federal charges in Thompson's killing. Two of those charges against him, one of which brought the possibility of the death penalty — murder through use of a firearm and an additional firearms charge — were dismissed earlier this year, and federal prosecutors said they would not appeal that decision.That left federal stalking charges against him, which brought the possibility of life in prison without the possibility of parole.Jury selection in the federal case had been set to begin in January.Speculation about a possible plea deal had been rampant since Tuesday, when prosecutors and Mangione's defense team sent a letter to the court requesting a Friday conference regarding the federal case.Luigi Mangione's state trial and double jeopardy concernsMangione's attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo spoke after Mangione entered his guilty plea to the federal charges."Despite this being a single isolated event, Mr. Mangione has been unfairly treated since the outset in every way, and has successfully fought off terrorism charges and the death penalty, while also fighting at the same time two simultaneous prosecutions in two jurisdictions who are trying to punish him twice for the exact conduct," Agnifilo said. "New York law does not permit a person to be prosecuted and punished twice for the exact same crime under a statute that covers successive prosecutions, it's also known as the double jeopardy law."Today's guilty plea triggers this statute, and we just filed our motion in state court explaining why the state charges must be dismissed under New York's double jeopardy protections," Agnifilo said.Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's office released a statement saying they're going to fight to keep their prosecution going."Since December 2024, the Manhattan D.A.'s Office has been tirelessly preparing to pursue a trial conviction in New York State Supreme Court for the alleged cold-blooded murder of Brian Thompson. We are encouraged that Mr. Thompson's family received a measure of accountability today.  While federal sentencing is pending, we are prepared to litigate the defense motions. The Manhattan D.A.'s Office remains committed to seeking justice for Mr. Thompson and his family," a spokesperson for the Manhattan DA's office said.Mangione's state trial is set to begin in September.The state case, in which he faces second-degree murder charges, among others, also carries with it the possibility of life in prison.Double jeopardy refers to a law stating "a person may not be twice prosecuted for the same offense," although there are a number of exceptions. "They have a live argument. There is a vigorous double jeopardy statute in New York state. It's very liberal. New York state does not let you retry somebody for the same activity. But there's an argument here that the federal stalking charges are different than the New York state intentional murder charge. They have different elements. They have a different focus. I think that's going to be a live legal argument and I'm interested to see how that plays out," legal expert Rich Schoenstein said. Schoenstein said he thinks a decision on whether or not the murder charge can move forward needs to be made before the trial gets started, which means either a series of briefings before the trial gets underway as scheduled in September, "or the judge is going to have to push back jury selection a little bit."So why plead guilty now?"Pleading guilty is a possible inroad to a lighter sentence by the judge," Schoenstein said. "Also, there's been a lot of speculation that he might prefer to stay in a federal prison rather than a state prison, so he wants to make sure that he's found guilty of the federal charges."Schoenstein said Mangione's legal team is hoping that the guilty plea will derail the state case entirely.Thompson family reactsIn court, members of Thompson's family wiped away tears as Mangione detailed how he killed the UnitedHealthcare CEO.The family released a statement following the guilty plea, reading:"Today's guilty plea marks an important step toward justice for Brian and for our family. While nothing will ease the pain of losing him, we are grateful that the federal justice system has held the person responsible for this heinous act accountable. Now we look to the court to ensure that sentencing reflects the severity of this crime. We remain mindful that additional proceedings in New York and Pennsylvania are still to come, and we will continue to seek the justice Brian deserves.""Brian Thompson's life was cut short by an act of violence that devastated everyone who knew and loved him. We are grateful to law enforcement for bringing Brian's murderer to justice, and our thoughts remain with Brian's family and loved ones during this difficult time," UnitedHealthcare said in a statement.Mangione was never a UnitedHealthcare member. Top law enforcement officials on the guilty plea"The defendant committed this murder in an attempt to draw public attention to his dislike of certain business, but we live in a civilized society governed by the rule of law. We debate, we disagree, we protest. We do not commit murder," U.S. Attorney Jamie McDonald said. "No grievance, political belief, or ideological cause can ever justify murder. There can be no celebrity in assassination. Any person who celebrates, encourages, or excuses actions like these is fundamentally wrong."McDonald pointed out that while Mangione pleaded guilty, "our office does not have a plea agreement with him," adding "we are free to seek the maximum penalty under the law.""This is an important moment of accountability," NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch said.Tisch lauded the NYPD's efforts to track down Mangione, calling it "an enormous investigative effort."Mangione has amassed a large following since his arrest. An online fundraiser has raised more than $1.5 million for his legal fees. "And to those who idolize Luigi Mangione, I say this. Violence is not a cause, murder is not a message, and a killer is certainly not a hero," Tisch said.Evidence in the Luigi Mangione caseSchoenstein said the plea isn't surprising considering the substantial evidence against Mangione.Key evidence seized during Mangione's Pennsylvania arrest had been expected to be admitted in the federal trial, including a 3D-printed handgun, loaded magazine, a notebook and more.Thompson, 50, was killed on Dec. 4, 2024, as he arrived at a hotel for UnitedHealth Group's annual investor conference. The killing  of the husband and father of two was caught on surveillance video, which showed Thompson being shot in the back as he walked down the street. Police say the words "delay," "deny" and "depose" were written on the ammunition, echoing a phrase used to describe how insurers avoid paying claims.Thompson's killing set off a frantic multistate manhunt that ended with Mangione's arrest at a McDonald's in Altoona, Pennsylvania, five days later.
Read Next Story