Skip to main content

Sen. Moreno says ex-son-in-law Max Miller shouldn’t serve in Congress

▶ Watch Video: Ohio senator says former son-in-law shouldn’t be in Congress amid abuse claims

Washington — GOP Sen. Bernie Moreno of Ohio said on Sunday that his former son-in-law, Rep. Max Miller, shouldn’t serve in Congress amid swirling abuse claims, as Miller vowed to stay in the race for another term and strongly denied all allegations of misconduct. 

“If there are any basic standards of character required to hold elected office, Max Miller fails them,” Moreno said in a post on X. “He should not serve in the House of Representatives.”

Miller’s reelection campaign has been plagued in recent weeks by allegations of abuse against his ex-wife — the senator’s daughter Emily Moreno — and their child that have emerged in legal filings. The second-term Ohio Republican responded to the accusations in a livestream on X earlier Sunday, in which he said allegations that he abused his daughter or his ex-wife were false.

The statements came after Miller’s ex-wife asked a court to issue a restraining order last week blocking the Ohio Republican from contacting her lawyer. Emily Moreno alleged in court filings that Miller has repeatedly had physical and verbal altercations with her attorney amid an ongoing custody fight over their young daughter. Miller and Moreno, who were married between 2022 and 2025, have court-ordered restraining orders against each other.

The restraining order request followed months of allegations leveled by Emily Moreno against Miller. In court papers and police reports, she has accused Miller of throwing her against a wall during a February custody exchange and causing their daughter to suffer a clavicle fracture and handprint-shaped bruise. She also alleged that Miller threw hot water at her in 2024 and pointed a gun at her last year. 

Miller has called the allegations untrue and pointed to the fact that he still has joint custody of his daughter, while accusing his ex-wife of defaming him and abusing their child herself. In Sunday’s livestream, he cast doubt on the timing of the allegations against him, suggesting that they were made to sway the custody fight. He argued his ex-wife has engaged in a pattern of reporting “serious and destructive allegations with absolutely no evidence.”

He also released documents that he argued would clear him of allegations that he injured his child or abused his former wife, saying: “These are incredibly serious criminal accusations, and if these accusations were true, I would be in jail.” He pointed to an April letter from county investigators closing a probe into whether he physically abused his daughter in February, calling it “unsubstantiated.”

A spokesman for Emily Moreno, Stefan Mychajliw, called Miller’s livestream “shameful” and “lie-filled.”

“There is a documented trove of evidence that Miller has a history of violent and dangerous behavior and no amount of victim shaming will change that,” Mychajliw said in a statement. “Miller can lie and spin on X, but he cannot do so under oath in a court of law. We are confident that justice will prevail in court.”

In his post on X Sunday, shortly after Miller’s video, Sen. Bernie Moreno called the last two years “pure hell” for his family. And while he noted that he hoped to keep the matter private, Moreno said: “Max Miller’s increasingly erratic and dangerous behavior has made that impossible.”

Moreno claimed that Miller “needs serious psychological help” and called him a “danger to my daughter.”

“I believe Max Miller needs to seek professional help to end the clear pattern of abuse he has left in his wake,” Moreno posted. “I believe he should not be free to continue endangering others until he does.”

Miller responded to his former father-in-law on X, saying: “If my daughter said the same thing to me, I personally wouldn’t wait two years before holding him accountable.”

“You know this isn’t true and the only reason you are speaking out now is to hide from your own media circus,” Miller said. “This is all political.”

New Zealand has a new official language — English

(CNN) — Lawmakers in New Zealand have passed a bill to make English one of the country’s official languages.The move was widely ridiculed in the Pacific Rim nation, where English is already widely used, including in courts and parliament.The English Language Bill states that the addition of English as an official language, alongside Māori and the country’s sign language, will not mean any new rules are needed for it to continue being used in legal, political and government settings or documents.More than 95% of New Zealand’s population — or almost 4.8 million people — spoke English as of 2023, according to government data. Just 4.3% spoke Māori and 0.5% used sign language.‘Just stupid’The bill — campaigned for by the nationalist New Zealand First party, part of the coalition government — passed its third reading in the House of Representatives on Thursday.In a video of a speech from that reading that has been viewed more than six million times on Instagram, Tamatha Paul, a member of New Zealand’s left-wing opposition Green party, condemned the move as a waste of time, saying the “snowflake” government “see te reo Māori (the Māori language) and they shiver in their boots.”Māori was the main language spoken in New Zealand before the country became a British colony in 1840. It was made an official language in the 1980s, when many programs were launched to revive it.Paul added that the Māori language has protected status “because it was beaten out of Māori systematically. We had to march our asses to parliament demanding that the indigenous first language of this country be recognized and not beaten out of the mouths of its native speakers.”She then pointed out that English is not even a formal official language in England. “Even they know that it’s just stupid.” English is a de facto official language in England, although the 1730 Proceedings in Courts of Justice Act requires English to be used in courtrooms and court documents, according to the UK government website.The opposition Labour Party voted through the bill, despite members’ misgivings. During the debate, Labour MP Camilla Belich mockingly mused, “I wondered if they might want to legislate for the changing of the seasons?”In a report presented to the House in June, the country’s Justice Committee said it received written submissions from 1,601 people and groups regarding the bill, and almost two-thirds of these opposed it.According to the report, opponents of the move argued that making English an official language would be “an unnecessary use of resources,” create “unnecessary division within society,” and would be “undermining the two other official languages” and their legislation, which gave those minority languages stronger rights and supported their use in legal proceedings. ‘Not trivial’Those in support of the bill said the legislation would clarify the long-accepted status of English and, since the bill would not introduce any new rights for the language, would cause little harm.Casey Costello, a member of the New Zealand First party, was among those who defended the move in parliament during the third reading.She said the purpose of the “short, straightforward bill” is to “recognize in legislation what has long been assumed in New Zealand. Namely, that English is an official language of our country.”“Despite what has been claimed across this House, this bill is important and far from the claimed ‘waste of time,’” Costello added, before going on to say, “It is not trivial, unnecessary or a distraction to this House in a democracy to deliver for those who elected us to this House.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story