Skip to main content

Republican senators vow Fauci contempt vote after hearing on COVID-19 origins

Former NIH Director Anthony Fauci testifies to Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on July 29, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

(WASHINGTON) — Republican senators vowed to vote next week on holding Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he declined to answer a barrage of questions at a hearing Wednesday about his role in handling the COVID-19 pandemic. 

Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment during the hearing before the Senate’s Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee (HSGAC).

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., the committee chairman who has led investigations into Fauci, said after the hearing that he wanted courts to assess whether Fauci could plead the Fifth Amendment given he was pre-emptively pardoned by President Joe Biden out of fear of political prosecution.

Paul has long accused Fauci of deceiving Americans about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fauci said in his opening statement that he would refrain from answering questions under the advice of his attorneys. “It pains me to do so because of the respect that I have for the legislative branch of government and my decades-long record of cooperating with Congress,” he said.

Fauci said he testified before or briefed congressional committees over 200 times in his 38 years as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

“Given Sen. Paul’s obvious obsession with calling for my prosecution, his repeated slanderous comments about me, and recently his publicly releasing my unredacted personal diary aimed at embarrassing and intimidating me, the only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this Committee is to get me to say something, anything that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, ‘behind bars,'” Fauci said.

Paul focused his questioning on Fauci’s personal journal entries between December 2019 and December 2022, as well as the origins of COVID-19, but Fauci declined to answer the questions.

Over the weekend, Paul released a tranche of Fauci’s journal entries — a more than 1,100-page document — revealing his inner thoughts about the origins of COVID, a detailed log of events within the White House situation and press briefing rooms, and his myriad media appearances about the response to COVID-19 and other health outbreaks.

One of Fauci’s attorneys, David Schertler, who was sitting next to him, attempted to speak several times after Paul’s questioning was over, but the senator shut him down, saying the attorney wasn’t recognized.

“You were told not to sit at the table, you insist on sitting at the table, and we told you you would not be recognized,” Paul said to the attorney. “You are not invited here for testimony, sir. … Would you behave this way in a courtroom? No, ’cause the judge would put you in jail. I can’t do that today, but I can have you escorted from the premises.”

After about another minute, Paul called for security and Capitol Police had Schertler escorted from the room.

Republicans on the committee hammered Fauci over entries in his journal that they claim show he contradicted himself and sought personal fame. 

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., sounding incredulous, said that Fauci lied to his own diary when Fauci wrote that he was never shown a March 2020 re-opening plan sent to governors by President Donald Trump. 

“So I’m just simply asking you: Is that true? Did you literally lie to your own diary? Did you know of that letter sent out to governors about reopening county by county?” Johnson said.

Fauci again invoked his Fifth Amendment rights.

Other Republican senators, including James Lankford of Oklahoma, asked Fauci about the theory that the COVID-19 virus originated in a laboratory, but the doctor declined to answer questions.

In a December 2024 letter to the staff director for the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Schertler said Fauci has never characterized the lab-leak theory as a conspiracy theory but that the discussion around the lab-leak theory has been “rife” with conspiracy theories.

Democrats on the committee defended Fauci’s right to plead the Fifth and thanked him for his years of service. They used their time to condemn the hearing as a fishing expedition — and one that distracted the committee from more pressing public health concerns like the current U.S. measles outbreak and affordable health care.

“That’s what I wish we were trying to address in a bipartisan way,” Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., said. “But instead we are here in an attempt to entrap you, because you had a distinguished career trying to put Americans’ public health first.”

Ranking member Sen. Gary Peters, D-Mich., decried the hearing as counterproductive, saying the attacks on Fauci would deter others from engaging in the work necessary to protect from public health crises. 

“I think today’s hearing, unfortunately, does real damage,” Peters said. “It’s tempting to turn one person into the scapegoat for a crisis that hundreds of officials across both the Trump and the Biden administration were responsible for handling.”

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., referred to the pandemic as some of the “darkest days or times in our history” and said Republicans were attempting to “rebrand” Fauci as a “villain.”

“Dr. Fauci is just one part of this larger campaign against science and facts — a campaign that has made Americans less safe,” Blumenthal said. “It is shameful that a dedicated public servant like Dr. Fauci has experienced persistent threats to his life since the pandemic because of the lies that are told about him.”

ABC News’ Sony Salzman contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

Duane Davis said he’d never told anyone the story. Jurors just heard him walk police through the night Tupac was killed

Las Vegas (CNN) — Earlier this week, the defense attorney representing Duane Davis said during opening statements that his client’s public statements were “bullsh*t” — but an interview with police aired in court and Davis’ own memoir seem to tell a remarkably consistent story.Davis, who is accused of orchestrating Tupac Shakur’s murder during a September 1996 visit to Las Vegas, spent a majority of court Thursday listening to a younger version of himself recount the events leading up to the shooting and the killing itself during a 2008 recorded interview with law enforcement. His version of events in the recording sounds strikingly similar to the account published in Davis’ 2019 memoir, “Compton Street Legend.”The hours-long interview — part of a proffer agreement related to drug charges — was at times filled with jovial back-and-forth between Davis, his attorney and investigators, with the former South Side Compton Crip recounting some of the highest points of his power and influence.“Nothing you say today will be used against you,” Greg Kading, who was a Los Angeles Police Department detective, told Davis in the recording.But prosecutors say Davis’ decision to write his book and speak openly about his story in interviews effectively negated the deal, and the judge in his trial agreed to allow the recording to be played to the jury.After the notorious fight between Davis’ nephew, Orlando Anderson, and people associated with Death Row Records – Shakur’s label that was co-founded by Marion “Suge” Knight – at the MGM Grand, Davis and his crew headed to Knight’s Las Vegas Club 662, staying there briefly before giving up on finding their targets, Davis said in the recorded interview.While driving after a liquor store pickup, Davis recounts hearing fans yell on the street, “Tupac! Tupac! Tupac!” and seeing the rapper hanging out the window of a car while waving, he said in the recording.The jury was listening intently and looking at the screen as the story of the shooting unfolded, more engaged after already listening to hours of the recording.Davis’ car did a U-turn to go back around and drive up to the car Shakur and Knight were in, Davis said. Terrence Brown was driving, with Davis in the passenger’s seat, while Deandre Smith was on the left passenger side and Anderson, also known as “Baby Lane,” was on the right passenger side, Davis told investigators.The driver pulled up on the passenger side of Shakur’s car, and Davis told investigators, “If we would have been on my side, I would have blast.” But since the car was on the other side, Davis said he handed the gun to Smith in the back seat.Davis said Knight looked over at him during the shooting, and the investigator asks him why.“I don’t f**king know,” Davis said in the recording, adding he had known Knight since they were 7 or 8 years old. Davis thought Knight was killed in the shooting because a bullet struck him in the back of the head, he said in the recording.Shakur apparently tried to jump in the backseat while Knight was ducking out of the way, Davis continued. He estimated that about six bullets were shot.As the recording played, with Davis recounting seeing the ambulance that was carrying the rapper, Shakur’s sister clenched her left hand against her mouth. A family friend moved to put their arm around her.After they made their getaway, Davis’ group dumped their car at the nearby Carriage House, leaving the gun on a tire, Davis said in the recording, and went back the next day to pick it up.Investigators questioned why the group left the gun with the car, saying it didn’t make any sense, and Davis retorts in the recording, “You want the truth, or you want me to tell you a lie? … Okay, we left a f**king gun on the car, dude.”“Doesn’t it feel good, man, to get it off your chest?”“I ain’t never told nobody that story,” Davis said in the recording after detailing his plan to go after Shakur.“Doesn’t it feel good, man, to get it off your chest?” one officer says.“Oprah’s going to be, like, ‘Mr. Davis, we really appreciate it,’” Los Angeles Police Department detective Daryn Dupree, who testified in court Wednesday, jokes.“…and then he’ll be like, ‘Read my book,’” another officer chimes in.The recorded interview shared in court Thursday and Davis’ book contain two major differences: how the gun got in the back seat, and who instigated the shooting.In Davis’ book, he wrote that when his crew went to the liquor store, he took the gun and “tossed it in the backseat.” Later, when Davis’ car pulled up to their opponents, and he locked eyes with Knight, Davis says “Tupac made an erratic move and began to reach down beneath his seat.”“Pac pulled out a strap, and that’s when the fireworks started. One of my guys from the back seat grabbed the Glock and started bustin’ back,” the book reads.In the police recording, he said he handed the gun to Deandre Smith, and that Anderson “leaned over on the window, he rolled down the window, popped.” Davis doesn’t mention to police whether Shakur fired or had a gun.The recording revealed more than just details about the night of the shooting, with Davis going into the inner dynamics of the South Side Crips and the gangsters associated with Death Row Records, including allegations that Sean “Diddy” Combs offered Davis a million dollars to kill Shakur and Knight. CNN has reached out to Combs’ representatives for comment on the alleged bounty.Court will continue Friday morning and prosecutors are expected to play another recording from 2009.CNN’s Alea Motwane and Josh Campbell contributed to this report.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story