Skip to main content

Rep. Max Miller faces growing calls to resign from Senate Republicans

(CNN) — Embattled GOP Rep. Max Miller is facing growing calls from Senate Republicans to resign or end his reelection bid – but has so far vowed to remain in the race as he denies abuse allegations from his ex-wife.

Sen. Jon Husted, an Ohio Republican, said on Thursday – after sidestepping questions on the matter for days – that Miller should end his campaign and leave Congress.

“I believe Max would be making the right decision to step aside as a candidate and resign from Congress to focus on what is in the best interest of his daughter. Years from now, I believe he will look back and know it was the right choice for her,” Husted posted on X.

Pressed later on why he took so long to call on Miller to resign, Husted said: “That speaks for itself.”

Miller, meanwhile, has denied any wrongdoing and vowed to stay in his reelection race.

“I’m going to continue to push. I am going to win this race,” Miller told CNN’s Jake Tapper on “The Lead” earlier this week.

While publicly Miller continues to be defiant that he won’t abandon his bid for reelection, an intense push to get him out of the race is still underway by party officials, who believe he could now imperil the GOP’s chances in the district, according to a source familiar with the matter.

Ohio’s 7th Congressional District is solidly Republican with Trump winning there by 11 points in 2024.

So far, the efforts haven’t been successful, but the slew of statements calling for him to get out are expected to continue, the source told CNN.

The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday that Miller plans to lend his campaign $1 million dollars. “I am invested in this election in every way and I will invest the resources into my campaign to win,” Miller said in a statement to the Journal.

“I am in this for the long haul. I know there are some people that are concerned about my ability to win this race right now, but I don’t share that,” Miller told the Journal.

Over the weekend, Ohio GOP Sen. Bernie Moreno – Miller’s former father-in-law – said that Miller “should not serve” in Congress, calling him “a danger to my daughter.”

“He should not serve in the House of Representatives,” Moreno said on X.

Sen. Katie Britt, an Alabama Republican, backed up Moreno, telling CNN “we should stand with Bernie” when asked if senators need to call for Miller to step aside.

“My heart is broken for his granddaughter and his daughter. Their safety is what’s most important and we should stand with Bernie,” she told CNN.

Speaking to reporters earlier this week, Sen. Moreno suggested that Miller had withheld a blue bunny from his daughter – the senator’s granddaughter – saying that at one point “Max would not hand over the little blue bunny, literally held it hostage for 48 hours.

“This girl is crying at night because she can’t sleep without her little blue bunny,” he said.

In the interview with Tapper on Tuesday, Miller denied that, saying, “This is nothing more than an individual who’s being politically vindictive.”

On Wednesday, Miller posted on X a message to Sen. Moreno to “stop the lies.”

Montana GOP Sen. Tim Sheehy said on X Thursday, responding to a post by a reporter regarding the blue bunny, “Max should step aside and seek help. Staying in this race makes it far more likely we lose this seat and hand Democrats a majority to impeach President Trump.”

Another Republican – GOP Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota – said he would stay out of the matter.

Asked by CNN if Miller should step down or stop running given how open Moreno has been about the ordeal, Rounds replied, “I think if Senator Moreno has made it very clear that it’s a very sensitive family member, and I’ll let him do it. I’m not following it, and I don’t have any more information than anybody else has. I will stay out of it.”

Rounds emphasized, “It’s one thing to be accused. I’ll let those individuals who are investigating it take the lead.”

This story has been updated with additional details.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Trump did many of the things Republicans criticize Fauci for

(CNN) — After years of criticism, Republicans are bringing the heat in their longstanding efforts to target former health official Dr. Anthony Fauci.A Senate committee voted Thursday along party lines to hold him in contempt of Congress after he repeatedly invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination at a hearing last week. The Justice Department must now decide whether to charge Fauci, which seems quite possible given how politicized the department has become under President Donald Trump.But targeting Fauci — some six years after the Covid pandemic began — is also a selective exercise for Republicans.And that’s because many of the offenses he stands accused of could potentially be lodged at the man who ran the first 10 months of the government’s Covid response from the most powerful perch: Trump.At the hearing last week, Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Rand Paul jumped right into his allegations against Fauci, the former head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.“Publicly, Anthony Fauci promoted the theory that the virus arose naturally,” the Kentucky Republican said, “while privately he was well aware of a mountain of evidence suggesting the virus originated in the lab.”But if saying different things privately and publicly about Covid and failing to heed the evidence you’ve received is such a stark offense, Paul might want to have a gander at Trump’s track record.Back in September 2020, Bob Woodward reported that Trump had done much the same thing early in the pandemic. CNN’s timeline from back then lays it bare.Trump told Woodward on February 7, 2020, that Covid was “more deadly than even your strenuous flus.” But later that month, he likened the virus to the flu and even said the flu had a higher fatality rate, adding that “the risk to the American people remains very low.”Trump went on to acknowledge on March 19 that he had decided to minimize the virus in his public comments.“I wanted to always play it down,” he said. “I still like playing it down, because I don’t want to create a panic.”Woodward’s book also detailed some massive warning signs Trump received from his aides very early on, even as he would go on to repeatedly downplay the virus in public. As early as January 28, Trump’s deputy national security adviser said the virus could be as bad as the influenza pandemic of 1918, which killed as many as 50 million people, Woodward reported.Last week, Paul was asked on MS NOW whether he was also concerned about these issues with Trump.He didn’t directly answer the question, instead suggesting Fauci’s bigger offense was overseeing funding of foreign labs that do dangerous research. Paul and others have speculated the US-funded “gain-of-function” research might have contributed to the coronavirus outbreak, though it’s never been proven.But it’s worth noting that under the first Trump administration in 2017, an Obama-era moratorium on funding gain-of-function research was lifted.Republicans have criticized Fauci for invoking the Fifth Amendment at his hearing last week, with Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri saying that “no honest person pleads the Fifth.” But Trump in a 2022 civil case also invoked the Fifth hundreds of times.(Fauci’s invocation of the Fifth is somewhat different, in that he was pardoned by outgoing President Joe Biden in January 2025. But experts told CNN that Fauci still might have had some potential criminal liability outside the bounds of that pardon. Fauci also claimed Paul would try to get him to commit perjury.)Republicans have also suggested Fauci committed perjury in his prior testimony about gain-of-function research. Trump not only struggles mightily to tell the truth publicly — which Republicans are loath to hold him accountable for — but a federal judge in 2022 found Trump signed legal documents containing voter fraud claims that he knew were false.Some on the right have sharply criticized Fauci for the creation of Covid vaccines that they contend were dangerous and untested and possibly even more dangerous than Covid (which is false). But of course, that vaccine was created as part of a program, Operation Warp Speed, that was launched by Trump.And finally, many Republicans have blamed Fauci for overzealous Covid lockdowns. But there was also a time when Trump supported shutting down society. In fact, early in the pandemic, the president criticized Republican Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp for trying to open up too quickly in the spring of 2020.Not all of these examples are apples-to-apples. Fauci’s duties differed from Trump’s, and there was more of an onus on him to get the science right, given his expertise. He also advocated lockdowns much later into the pandemic than Trump did.But to the extent the nation’s Covid response went poorly six years ago, it would seem important to ask whether the political folks in charge of running it also had something to do with it.If the vaccine was so dangerous, for example, it would stand to reason people would be scrutinizing the decisions of Trump and others in his first administration in forging it and getting it approved, besides just Fauci.And if early Covid guidance is under the microscope, it seems weird to ignore the many contradictions and false and even bizarre statements about the virus (remember the bleach?) coming from Trump at a time when Americans were making life-and-death decisions about what they should do.But a true, broad, apolitical review of the Covid response apparently just isn’t in the cards.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story