Skip to main content

New Jersey works to destroy firefighting foam laced with cancer-linked PFAS

▶ Watch Video: Fire departments work to get rid of cancer-linked foam extinguisher: “It was like sitting on a bomb”

Burlington County, New Jersey — Hundreds of New Jersey fire departments are getting rid of foam proven to put out flames. Why?

“It was like sitting on a bomb,” Jacobstown Volunteer Fire Chief Robert Gancarz told CBS News. “How am I going to get rid of this?”
 
Jacobstown’s fire station had used a firefighting foam called aqueous film-forming foam, or AFFF, since the mid-1980s. Gancarz eagerly got rid of all 580 gallons of it.

“The very tools I am using can cause health problems,” Gancarz said. “They can kill you.”

AFFF is also laced with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, commonly called “forever chemicals.” Studies link AFFF exposure to higher cancer rates among firefighters.

 New Jersey is one of more than a dozen states that are working to collect, remove and destroy all of their AFFF. The state has so far collected more than 150,000 gallons from fire stations. All of it has been trucked to Revive Environmental, an Ohio company that specializes in PFAS destruction.

“We process it directly through our super critical water reactors,” said Rick Gillespie, CEO of Revive Environmental. “And what comes out of those reactors is clean water.”

But for decades, firefighters’ protective equipment also contained PFAS.
 
“It was in the gear and everything,” 76-year-old “Boots” Gancarz, Robert Gancarz’s father, said. “I had that every time you put it on and went to a call.”

Boots Gancarz fought fires all his adult life. In 2024, doctors told him he had colon cancer. 

“I’m going to beat this,” Boots Gancarz said. “They ain’t shoveling dirt in my face yet.”

Robert Gancarz showed CBS News his department’s new PFAS-free foam. It is made with soybeans.

“We have to use a little bit more of this product, but it can still put the fire out,” Robert Gancarz said. 
 
He has been blood-tested and his results showed PFAS levels higher than those of the average American.

Asked if he is worried about a possible cancer diagnosis for himself, Robert Gancarz responded, “It’s definitely a scary, scary thing to think about.”

Beach town mayor worries social media trend could lead to shark attack

▶ Watch Video: Some fishers lure sharks into shallow waters, causing concern in New Jersey With the end of summer rapidly approaching, people are getting in as much beach time as they can. But the mayor of a New Jersey beach town is worried a social media trend could be setting up a potential shark attack."It's not illegal to fish here. It's not illegal to fish for shark, but it is bringing in predators, they're looking for food and there's a lot of swimmers here," Bay Head Mayor Bill Curtis said, explaining his unease about videos showing people attracting sharks toward shore so they can take photos with them.In one viral video, a group of people is seen pulling an 8-foot-long bull shark onto the beach itself before snapping some photos.Curtis worries the bait used to reel in these apex predators is taking them dangerously close to the beach and unsuspecting swimmers."Putting food in the water there for the fish to go after is just luring them closer to shore," he said.To catch sharks, some anglers paddle out to deeper waters, drop the bait and then pull in the sharks from reels on the beach. A CBS News crew went out on a boat with Captain John Schaible, who took them about 100 yards from shore. There, in 15-foot-deep water, is where many shark fishermen drop their bait."They are just having fun," Schaible said of the people posting their encounters with the sharks on social media. "They're not killing them. They're maybe taking a couple pictures with them and letting them go."Schaible said he doesn't think what they're doing is dangerous, but the mayor disagrees."Common sense and consideration for everybody," Curtis said. "Everybody can coexist, just be a little careful with what you are doing."
Read Next Story