(CNN) — More than three days after US President Donald Trump unveiled an agreement to disarm Hamas as the next phase of his Gaza peace plan, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has still not said publicly whether he accepts it.
Instead, the Israeli leader’s silence was accompanied by a sharp increase in airstrikes over the weekend which killed 28 people in the enclave – the deadliest toll in weeks – even though the agreement specifically called for a halt to attacks.
While Trump, the mediators and other Arab countries had initially celebrated what they billed as a significant breakthrough, Netanyahu’s position was relayed through unnamed “Israeli officials,” foreign spokesmen and political allies, who insisted Israel had not signed on to the deal, and did not intend to withdraw from Gaza before Hamas is fully disarmed. His far-right allies were more vocal, demanding the prime minister convene the Cabinet to reject the plan and halt its implementation altogether.
By Sunday evening, Israeli strikes on Gaza appeared to have eased, and had not resumed 24 hours later, but the escalation drew a sharp rebuke from Nickolay Mladenov, the chief envoy for Trump’s Board of Peace. Mladenov wrote Sunday on X that the weekend’s violence had “killed civilians and destroyed medical supplies,” warning it was undermining “intense efforts” to advance the disarmament framework,” and noting that “both parties” carry obligations under the White House-brokered ceasefire agreement of October 2025. Behind the scenes, two sources familiar with the matter said the rebuke reflected “anger” among the US and the international mediators who demanded Israel halt its strikes in Gaza.
Hours after the tweet, Mladenov arrived in Israel on Monday to meet Netanyahu, alongside Aryeh Lightstone, a senior US adviser to the Board of Peace.
The meeting was “constructive and detailed,” according to a Board of Peace readout on X. It said that while the goal of full decommissioning of weapons and a transition to civilian government in Gaza was “not in question” by Israel or the Board, the process for getting there was “still being worked out.”
A source familiar with the meeting said the two envoys had also pressed Netanyahu to stop Israeli attacks.
Any hope that the meeting might prompt a public softening appeared unfounded when an Israeli official issued a statement after the meeting stressing that “Israel will not withdraw from the current line in the Gaza Strip and will continue to thwart any threat to our civilians and soldiers.”
The statement reiterated Israel’s refusal to pull troops back to the original demarcation line defined by the October 2025 ceasefire agreement, which the Israeli military has since pushed farther into Gaza. Hamas has said it will only follow through with its promise of disarmament if Israel withdraws from the additional territory.
While Netanyahu remains quiet, his political allies are not – underscoring the political sensitivity of Trump’s Gaza plan fewer than three months before Israel’s October elections.
The stakes escalated Monday with a formal letter to Netanyahu from far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and Settlements Minister Orit Strouk, urging the prime minister to immediately convene the security cabinet and block the entry of the international stabilization force (ISF) into Gaza – a deployment approved by the same Cabinet just last week, and meant to oversee security in a pilot zone in the territory
A lawmaker from Netanyahu’s own Likud party was particularly blunt. “You can wrap tomorrow’s fish with this agreement; it has no meaning. Not a single soldier will move from Beit Hanoun or Khan Younis,” Amit Halevi said in an interview, making reference to two towns inside Gaza.
The timing of Israel’s general election is significant and Israeli sources assess Netanyahu will not withdraw from any territory before the vote. One source said Netanyahu is highly skeptical that Hamas intends to disarm and believes instead that group is using the framework to buy time and avert another Israeli military campaign. “He is wary of confronting Trump directly and is instead hoping Hamas fails to comply – a scenario which he hopes will grant Israel legitimacy for renewed military action.”
Netanyahu, who has traditionally seen Trump as a valuable campaign asset, is walking a fineline. A senior US administration official said Thursday that Trump would be “very, very disappointed” if Israel didn’t comply with the new agreement. A diplomatic source said the plan’s future depends largely on how much pressure Trump is willing to put on Netanyahu, arguing that “the only party that can move him (Netanyahu), or stop him, is the United States.”
Michael Milstein, a senior researcher at Tel Aviv University’s Dayan Center and a former senior official in Israeli military intelligence, said the weekend’s toll was no accident and was likely sending one of two signals “It is an Israeli attempt to say that we are moving forward despite the restrictions … or it reflects a fear that the gate is about to close soon, so let’s clean out the bank,” he said.
Milstein also agreed the key factor now is Trump.
“If he presses Netanyahu to accept withdrawal terms before the election, that would amount to a political blow.”
Milstein said he expects Netanyahu to choose delaying tactics rather than outright rejection.
“As long as there is no clear roadmap forward, with timetables and commitments to practical things, it is better for him to remain silent and move the discussion to after the elections,” he said.
But with his right-wing allies clamoring for rejection, that silence might be hard for the Israeli leader to sustain.
CNN’s Jeremy Diamond contributed to this report.
The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.