Skip to main content

Investigations into Epstein’s mysterious New Mexico ranch add pressure on the Justice Department

(CNN) — Investigations into alleged crimes that took place at Jeffrey Epstein’s former New Mexico ranch appear to be ramping up, adding even more pressure to the Justice Department and its acting attorney general, Todd Blanche, over how they handled matters related to the late child sex offender.

New Mexico’s Attorney General Raúl Torrez filed a lawsuit Wednesday over what Torrez described as the DOJ’s “hiding information about Epstein and his co-conspirators” and “stonewalling” the state’s investigation. The suit came on the same day that the state’s so-called “Truth Commission” – led by four members of the state’s House of Representatives – released an interim report vowing to “uncover the truth so many for too long were blind to.”

“New Mexico is one of few jurisdictions that still may have an opportunity to hold Epstein’s associates accountable or otherwise provide some sense of justice to survivors,” Torrez wrote in Wednesday’s lawsuit. He added: “Federal inaction does not merely stall the investigation; it prolongs and compounds the suffering of survivors.”

The Truth Commission’s interim report released Wednesday said that “all records that the DOJ are withholding subject to the EFTA (Epstein Files Transparency Act) should be released.”

Both Torrez’s lawsuit and the commission’s report add to the drumbeat of criticism over the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein case – at a moment when Blanche, the agency’s point person on all things Epstein, is working to mollify senators and secure his confirmation to be President Trump’s next attorney general.

Blanche’s nomination passed a key hurdle Tuesday as it advanced out of a committee for a full Senate vote, but he can now only lose two GOP votes to win confirmation.

The Justice Department, in a statement to CNN, said that it is not required to share the unredacted files and that victims’ privacy outweighs the request.

New Mexico has provided no lawful basis to justify such sweeping disclosures,” a Justice Department spokesperson said.

When CNN asked Torrez to respond to that statement in a press conference Wednesday, he said: “To pretend that they cannot modify a protective order or to pretend that they are suddenly concerned with survivors’ rights and interests when they have failed to demonstrate that in the past – I think that that doesn’t have any real credibility.”

Appearing on CNN with Jake Tapper later in the day, Torrez pushed back on Blanche’s comments during a July Senate confirmation hearing, in which he said, “we’re continuing to work” with the New Mexico Justice Department.

“The truth is they’ve never cooperated with us,” Torrez said.

A group of survivors applauded Torrez’s efforts late Wednesday, saying in a statement:

“The DOJ’s argument that it won’t hand over files in order to protect survivors’ identities is laughable, when the DOJ has already revealed their names and personal information. By holding onto these files, Todd Blanche’s DOJ is simply continuing to protect abusers,” the statement from survivors said.

Signs of tension between parallel probes

Updates from both the attorney general’s office and the Truth Commission coming on the same day also raise questions about potential conflicts and tension between the two bodies ostensibly working toward the shared goal of investigating Epstein’s Zorro Ranch. The commission’s interim report says that it is “currently engaged in negotiations” with the New Mexico’s DOJ about an agreement on information-sharing, and that the panel is proposing that the two entities “coordinate and collaborate when conducting interviews and depositions of victims, witnesses, and other persons.”

However, the report notes: “At this time, the Commission and NMDOJ have been unable to reach an agreement.”

In recent conversations with CNN, Epstein survivors have expressed confusion about the two parallel investigations and whether the two bodies are working in tandem.

Congress forced the DOJ to release millions of files related to Epstein with the passage of a bipartisan bill late last year, but the released files include heavy and, in some cases, bungled redactions – which resulted in revealing victims’ information – prompting even more criticism from lawmakers and survivors. DOJ’s internal watchdog is reviewing the redaction process.

Last month, in a scathing letter to Blanche, Torrez accused the DOJ of withholding access to un-redacted files and argued that the lack of cooperation is preventing the state from bringing justice to survivors.

Among the trove of files related to Epstein that the DOJ released earlier this year was an unverified allegation in a 2019 email to a local radio host that “somewhere in the hills outside the Zorro, two foreign girls were buried on orders of Jeffrey and Madam G.” According to Wednesday’s lawsuit, the files released by the DOJ included “over 13,000 references to Zorro Ranch and 5,000 references to New Mexico as locations where victims were trafficked, groomed, and assaulted.”

The Truth Commission’s interim report does not draw any conclusions or make investigative recommendations, emphasizing that the panel’s work is ongoing. The bulk of the 119-page report is based on Epstein files already released by the Justice Department. The panel said it is still actively soliciting information and tips from survivors, witnesses and other members of the public, and that it may attempt to obtain sworn testimony from certain witnesses.

The report also lays out several broad areas of interest for the commission beyond Epstein’s alleged abuse of girls and women at Zorro Ranch. They include “Epstein’s interest in eugenics and transhumanism, as well as reports that he facilitated forced impregnation and non-consensual medical procedures,” according to the report – a reminder that the Zorro Ranch has been the source of conspiracy theories and speculation.

For example, the report references an alleged tip that the FBI received in 2019 that said “two dead bodies” were buried at the ranch. “That information, through testimony of former Attorney General Hector Balderas, revealed that tip was never provided to his office at the time it was given to the FBI,” the report says. “The validity of the claim is unknown, nor is its source known.”

To date, the commission has issued subpoenas to 20 institutions or agencies – half of which have been in “full compliance,” according to Wednesday’s report, resulting in over 100,000 records.

Some Epstein survivors, including Chauntae Davies and the late Virginia Giuffre, have said the Zorro Ranch was one of the places where they were sexually assaulted. Another Epstein survivor, Rachel Benavidez, spoke at the Truth Commission’s hearing on Wednesday and said Epstein victims were tired of waiting for accountability.

In February, Torrez reopened the state’s criminal investigation into the property, which he said closed in 2019 at the request of federal prosecutors.

The same month, the state’s legislature passed a measure to create the Truth Commission to also investigate Zorro Ranch. Since then, the commission has since held several public meetings and issued multiple subpoenas, including to several US attorneys offices, as well as the offices of Torrez and Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, for information.

On Wednesday, the commission announced several additional subpoenas, including to the Ten Thousand Waves Spa in Santa Fe, which is referenced in the Epstein files.

This story has been updated.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Trump needs to get tough on China to get tough on Iran’s economy. He’s been reluctant to do that

(CNN) — The Trump administration appears to have landed on a fallback strategy in the Iran war after military strikes and negotiations failed to deliver victory: threats of harsh economic sanctions.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called them the “toughest sanctions in history,” which will “collapse this regime.” He’s even called it an “economic D-Day” for Iran, comparing it to the historic invasion of Nazi-occupied France during World War II.There’s just one problem: Making good on those tough words requires not just getting tough on Iran, but also getting tough on China, which is Tehran’s No. 1 trading partner.And Trump and his administration have proved quite reluctant to do that.When Bessent rolled out the economic strategy Monday, he didn’t name specific countries that would be punished — or lay out timelines — if they don’t cut ties. And the announcement notably did not include secondary sanctions on the large Chinese banks that facilitate Beijing’s purchases from Iran.China buys as much as 90% of Iran’s oil. Economic analysts have told CNN that targeting these banks and Chinese companies would be crucial to exacting a major toll on Iran’s economy.But not for the first time in recent days, Bessent punted on exactly what would be done on that front. He suggested messages were being sent — saying “no one is above the reach of US sanctions” — but didn’t detail what will happen with China.“If they facilitate transactions and are part of the ecosystem that turns Iranian oil into money, into repression, they will be targeted,” Bessent said. “We find that the best way to engage with countries is through quiet diplomacy.”He added: “So when the hammer of US Treasury actions falls upon them, they will have no one to blame but themselves.”But you could be forgiven for thinking this might be lots of sound and fury signifying relatively little.That’s because not only has the administration regularly backed off the threats it’s made in the Iran war, but it has a track record of treading gently around China, whose leader, Xi Jinping, is set to visit the White House next month.While Trump has made a big show about getting tough on China over the years, he backed off his trade war with Beijing in October, agreeing to a one-year truce. That followed shortly after Beijing upped its leverage by restricting access to critical rare-earth minerals and halting purchases of American soybeans.Trump last year also ignored federal law to help save the Chinese-owned video app TikTok, despite his first administration having labeled it a grave national security threat because of its ability to spy on Americans.Fast forward to Trump’s visit to China in May, and rather than pressing Xi publicly on a potential invasion of Taiwan, Trump made some major Taiwan-related rhetorical concessions.He also backed off his previous promises to get China to free Jimmy Lai, a former Hong Kong media tycoon who criticized the Chinese Community Party, as well as to ban Beijing from buying American farmland and to “aggressively” revoke Chinese student visas.By July, Trump delivered a primetime address in which he claimed China effectively interfered in the 2020 US election (which is not what the evidence actually showed). But rather than punish China for this seemingly major purported provocation, Trump downplayed the need for retaliation.The president seemed to prefer to use China to try to substantiate his still-baseless claims of stolen elections, without going to the trouble of holding the alleged thief accountable.And even in the context of the Iran war, Trump has been gentle with China.He has repeatedly shrugged off the idea that Beijing is helping Iran. And on his way back from China in May, he said he was considering lifting sanctions on Chinese companies that buy Iranian oil.Trump at the time was trying to secure a deal with Iran. But it’s telling that he’s been willing to telegraph potential carrots involving China, even as his administration is reluctant to publicly threaten to use the stick against it. In the latter case, it prefers “quiet diplomacy.”Also telling would seem to be Bessent’s comments Monday when CNN asked why the major secondary sanctions he previewed didn’t start immediately.“Well, we are giving everyone the opportunity to remedy bad behavior,” he said. “Why would I want to blow up the global financial system?”The administration appears well aware that getting tough on Iran would entail going after China — a risk that it might decide isn’t worth it.There’s an argument to be made that these topics are best addressed next month, during Xi’s state visit to Washington.But such pomp and circumstance can drain Trump of his resolve to get tough (as seen during his May visit to China) — and that’s if he even wants to get tough on China right now.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story