Skip to main content

How OJ Simpson’s infamous Bronco chase captured a changing era of US sports coverage in the 1990s

(CNN) — Editor’s note: Watch CNN Original Series “Decades in Sports” on the CNN app. Across six episodes, the series explores the defining moments, athletes and cultural shifts that shaped sports over the past six decades, from the television revolution and Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, right up to the impact of social media on today’s biggest stars.

It was June 17, 1994, and Madison Square Garden was packed for Game 5 of the NBA Finals between the New York Knicks and Houston Rockets.

The series was hanging in the balance tied at two games apiece. The winner would move within one victory of lifting the Larry O’Brien Trophy that Michael Jordan and the Chicago Bulls had a stranglehold over for the previous three years.

It should have been one of the biggest sporting nights of the year, and it was – but not because of the game.

As Ian O’Connor, columnist at The Athletic, highlights in the series, “You have to understand (that) the Knicks hadn’t won a championship in more than two decades.

“And here they are, about to take a 3-2 lead in the NBA Finals over the Houston Rockets… and nobody is watching the game.”

That was because on the other side of the country, former NFL star running back OJ Simpson and his former teammate Al Cowlings, were being pursued by police in a slow-speed chase across Los Angeles.

Simpson had failed to turn himself into the Los Angeles Police Department earlier that day after being named a suspect in the murders of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, who had been found stabbed to death outside Brown Simpson’s home five days earlier.

What followed was a surreal 90-minute pursuit that became one of the most-watched television events in American history.

Simpson had once rushed for more than 2,000 yards in a single 14-game season, but this was by far the most-watched run of his life.

Thousands lined up on highway overpasses to catch a glimpse of the white Bronco, while television networks across the country interrupted their regular programming to broadcast the pursuit – NBC even partially interrupted its coverage of the NBA Finals, showing the chase alongside the game via split-screen.

In a way, they had no choice, as all eyes were now on the West Coast.

Stories beyond the scoreboard

The NBA Finals wasn’t the only major sporting event that took a backseat to the events in Los Angeles.

Ken Griffey Jr. was chasing Babe Ruth’s home run record, Arnold Palmer was playing his final round at the US Open, and the 1994 FIFA World Cup kicked off for the first time on US soil.

Yet, it was the images of a white Bronco trundling down a California freeway that captured the eyes of the nation.

As CNN Contributor Timothy Naftali says, “What we see in the 90s is tabloid television (and) a hunger for stories that we would describe as… the other side of the human experience.”

Americans were now becoming increasingly interested in seeing beyond the scoreboard – the personalities, controversies and scandals surrounding the biggest sports stars were beginning to spark almost as much interest and intrigue as their performances.

The attack on US figure skater Nancy Kerrigan in January 1994 – which led to record viewership for the Winter Olympics a month later – and Mike Tyson’s infamous ear bite on Evander Holyfield in June 1997 that triggered a global news frenzy were further examples of this.

Journalist John Heilemann describes the period as “wacky” in the series, as “sports is getting so big and so all-enveloping,” highlighting that “the glare of the media is so much brighter by the time you get to that timeframe that things start to get a little twisted in the 90s.”

It was an era where the lines between sports, celebrity and scandal became blurred, and the cameras were there to catch it all. It was an “explosive era of media coverage,” says Van Lathan, journalist and podcaster at The Ringer.

The celebrity athlete

The 1990s was also a decade which saw the explosion of 24-hour sports television, meaning athletes were being platformed in a way they had never been before, and their popularity skyrocketed.

The biggest sports stars were shifting into almost mainstream celebrities – and no one embodied this shift more than Simpson.

He was a Heisman Trophy winner, an NFL MVP who earned several All-Pro and Pro Bowl selections, before going on to star in several films and commercials, all while becoming one of the most recognizable media personalities in the country.

Long before the Bronco chase, his impact had been felt far beyond the football field.

As sports journalist and broadcaster Seth Davies highlights, what defined the 90s was the “growth of the entertainment media infrastructure around sports,” as “we were starting to get to know these athletes on a personal level, and we were thinking of these athletes as celebrities.”

Up until that point, Simpson was affectionately christened “the Juice.” LAPD detective Tom Lange even called him by that nickname during the Bronco chase while pleading with him to throw the gun he had in his possession out of the car.

But detective Lange was not alone, as during the broadcast handmade signs displaying messages of “Save the Juice” and “Go, OJ, Go!” – a reference to a famous Hertz commercial he had starred in years prior – were being displayed by hundreds of fans on the freeway overpasses.

And bear in mind, this was a man who had been officially declared a fugitive several hours earlier by the LAPD.

However, as Heilemann explains in the series, “the glorification of the athletes” at the time led to almost “parasocial relationships,” as fans were beginning to “have an unhealthy degree of connection to their stars.”

Those 90 minutes on the LA County freeways in June 1994 was one of the most powerful illustrations of that – 95 million Americans watched it all unfold with no scoreboard or idea when the final whistle would be blown.

But despite this, sports had never been bigger.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

La orden de Trump sobre las vacunas es contraproducente y está “mal en muchos sentidos”, dice senador republicano

El senador republicano Bill Cassidy, un crítico cada vez más duro del presidente Donald Trump, dijo este domingo que la orden del presidente de administrar por separado las vacunas contra el sarampión, las paperas y la rubéola está “mal en muchos sentidos” porque, entre otras cosas, obligaría a los niños a recibir más inyecciones.“Veámoslo simplemente desde la perspectiva de los padres”, dijo Cassidy, médico y presidente de la Comisión de Salud, Educación, Trabajo y Pensiones del Senado, durante una entrevista en “State of the Union” de CNN. “Ahora, en lugar de ir dos veces al médico para vacunar a su hijo, tienen que ir seis veces”.“En lugar de que mamá o papá falten al trabajo dos veces (…) para llevar a su hijo al médico, tienen que faltar al trabajo o tomarse vacaciones o días de permiso seis veces”, añadió. “Esto es inconveniente. Va a contribuir a una mayor pérdida de ingresos”.“La propuesta del presidente terminará haciendo que más niños se enfermen”, dijo Cassidy.Durante una aparición este domingo en “This Week” de ABC News, el senador por Louisiana dijo: “Por eso los índices de aprobación del presidente están bajando, porque se ha perdido de vista la asequibilidad para los padres, se ha perdido de vista la conveniencia para las familias estadounidenses y se ha perdido de vista aquello que está impulsando el aumento de los costos de la atención médica”.Cassidy se ha convertido en un crítico cada vez más abierto del presidente después de perder ante un rival en las primarias respaldado por Trump, con lo que se convirtió en el primer senador republicano en casi una década en perder la nominación de su partido para buscar la reelección.CNN se comunicó con la Casa Blanca para solicitar una reacción a las críticas de Cassidy.La orden de Trump establece que la vacuna combinada contra el sarampión, las paperas y la rubéola, conocida como MMR por sus siglas en inglés, “debe administrarse en tres vacunas separadas, una para cada enfermedad”, y que todas las vacunas infantiles deben aplicarse en consultas médicas distintas.Inmunólogos y expertos en vacunas afirman que no existe ninguna razón válida para hacerlo.“Nada malo puede ocurrir por lo que estamos haciendo”, dijo Trump el lunes durante declaraciones en la Oficina Oval. “Lo peor que podría pasar es que no pase nada. No vamos a perder nada”.El decreto supuso el golpe más reciente para Cassidy, quien el año pasado emitió un voto decisivo para confirmar a Robert F. Kennedy Jr. como secretario de Salud y Servicios Humanos, pese a sus profundas preocupaciones por las posturas antivacunas de Kennedy.Antes de esa votación de confirmación, Cassidy obtuvo una serie de compromisos de Kennedy, entre ellos que ambos mantendrían una “relación de trabajo colaborativa y estrecha sin precedentes” y que Kennedy no intentaría socavar las políticas de vacunación del Gobierno.Pero Kennedy comenzó a poner a prueba ese acuerdo pocos meses después, al reformar el principal panel asesor de vacunas del Gobierno y amplificar el escepticismo sobre políticas clave de vacunación, al tiempo que restaba importancia al que se ha convertido en el peor brote de sarampión en el país en décadas.Su relación, que ya era tensa, llegó a un punto de quiebre a finales del año pasado, tras el abrupto despido de quien entonces dirigía los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC) y el posterior impulso de Kennedy para reformar el calendario de vacunación infantil del país.Más tarde, aliados de Kennedy se sumaron a Trump para respaldar abiertamente a un rival de Cassidy en las primarias, quien logró arrebatarle la nominación del partido a principios de esta primavera.Desde entonces, Cassidy se ha mostrado mucho más dispuesto a criticar a Trump y Kennedy y se ha opuesto al presidente en asuntos clave como la guerra con Irán y su intento de crear un fondo contra la “instrumentalización”. La relación entre Cassidy y Kennedy es prácticamente inexistente, según personas cercanas a ambos, y los dos apenas han hablado en los últimos meses.Aun así, Cassidy ha insistido en que, pese a sentirse más libre para expresar sus opiniones, no pretende convertir sus últimos meses en el Senado en una campaña de revancha.Eso no le impidió arremeter este domingo contra la política más reciente del presidente, algo que también ha hecho en una serie de publicaciones en redes sociales.“Si no fuera tan potencialmente trágico, uno se echaría a reír ante un comentario así”, dijo Cassidy a Jake Tapper, de CNN, sobre la afirmación de Trump de que no ocurriría nada como consecuencia de lo que, según expertos, constituye una transformación drástica de la política de vacunación de Estados Unidos.“Como médico que ha visto a personas morir o enfermarse gravemente por enfermedades que pueden prevenirse con vacunas, esto podría reducir la protección que recibe un niño contra enfermedades que pueden ser mortales”, dijo Cassidy.Añadió que, si Trump busca mejorar la salud de los niños y al mismo tiempo ayudar a los padres con los costos, “esto es lo incorrecto”.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story