Skip to main content

Furious Trump is considering removing Pirro over Reflecting Pool filing, sources say

(CNN) — President Donald Trump is considering removing Jeanine Pirro, the US attorney for the District of Columbia, over a Justice Department conclusion that problems with the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool stemmed from a flawed renovation rather than vandalism, two people familiar with his thinking told CNN.

The president is “furious” with Pirro, one of the sources said, telling CNN that he fumed about her all weekend. They added that based on his criticisms of her, they find it “highly likely she’s removed from her job.”

The other source, a senior administration official, said Trump was “blindsided” by Pirro’s court filing: “The president did not know beforehand that she was going to do that.”

CNN has reached out to Pirro’s office and the Justice Department for comment. The White House directed CNN to the president’s prior comments on the filing and did not comment on the substance of the reporting.

“Frankly, I think she choked, because the judge was really vicious. Instead of going after the people that did it, the judge went after her and went after her department, and I guess she choked,” Trump said during an unrelated Oval Office event Monday.

“I was disappointed in Jeanine Pirro. Really disappointed in Jeanine Pirro,” he added. “She folded like an umbrella.”

The Justice Department acknowledged in a court filing on Friday that the president’s $14 million renovation of the Reflecting Pool was “hasty and botched” and said it was dropping the criminal case against former Olympian David Hearn, who was accused of vandalizing the landmark. Hearn previously pleaded not guilty to the felony charge in DC’s Superior Court.

Trump and Pirro, a former Fox News host and longtime ally of the president, spoke by phone on Saturday about the court filing. Their conversation “wasn’t pretty,” said one of the sources, who was read out on the call.

Pirro told Trump it was the career officials in her office that were responsible for the filing, another source said. A longtime prosecutor who oversees prosecutions in DC Superior Court signed the court filing asking to dismiss the case on Friday.

In addition to the Saturday call, Pirro has spoken with Trump multiple times about the situation.

Trump on Saturday publicly criticized the move, posting to Truth Social: “I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on the Reflecting Pool. I don’t know what she was thinking? To me, it was a pure case of VANDALISM.”

Pirro argued in her filing that the Department of Interior, led by Secretary Doug Burgum, “provided less than fulsome information at the outset of this case.”

“Had DOI been forthcoming with the information clearly in its possession, the government would not have sought a grand jury indictment,” it read.

Despite those accusations, the president is not angry with Burgum, the sources said, and he continues to believe that vandals are responsible for the damage to the Reflecting Pool. Burgum dismissed Pirro’s argument in a social media post on Saturday, saying, “The evidence is clear, vandals have repeatedly caused damage to the Reflecting Pool.”

However, internal communications CNN received through FOIA requests between the National Park Service — which oversaw the project under the Department of Interior — and DC Water from March through last month make no mention of any vandalism as the department was planning to drain the pool.

Trump had said the pool would need to be drained to make repairs caused by the alleged vandalism — yet an email from NPS acknowledged as early as July 1 that the pool would need to be drained due to algae. The agency also weighed whether to dye the pool water; in the past, the water has been dyed black to help reflect better.

Hearn has legal options that could unearth more embarrassing details on how his case was handled. The judge hasn’t officially dismissed Hearn’s charges as of Monday afternoon, and his lawyers are expected to file a response to Pirro’s request to dismiss the case this week.

“Nothing is off the table,” said Michael R. Bromwich, an attorney representing Hearn.

Among his options: referring the prosecutors involved to a bar disciplinary authority; asking inspectors general to look at the conduct of the Justice Department and Interior Department; filing lawsuits; seeking more of the grand jury record documenting the prosecutors’ presentation of the indictment; and asking the judge to dismiss the case so it cannot be brought again. Pirro’s office has so far sought only to dismiss Hearn’s charge without prejudice, meaning prosecutors wouldn’t be barred from attempting to revive the case later.

This story has been updated with additional context and reporting.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Capital One dice que cerró cientos de cuentas de la Organización Trump por preocupaciones de lavado de dinero

Capital One cerró cientos de cuentas de la Organización Trump en 2021 “por razones de prevención de lavado de dinero”, reveló el banco por primera vez en una presentación judicial el viernes por la noche.El presidente Donald Trump ha sostenido que a sus empresas se les “cerraron cuentas bancarias” por razones políticas, y la Organización Trump demandó a Capital One en un tribunal federal de Florida el año pasado, alegando “considerables daños financieros” por la pérdida de las cuentas.La presentación más reciente de Capital One en el caso ante el Tribunal de Distrito de Estados Unidos para el Distrito Sur de Florida reitera la negativa del prestamista a cualquier motivación política, afirmando que “los cierres fueron el resultado de meses de análisis” por parte de un equipo “con décadas de experiencia en aplicación de la ley”.Los abogados de Capital One buscan que el caso sea desestimado, afirmando que la demanda de la Organización Trump se basa en acusaciones vagas y sin sustento de discriminación política.Un portavoz de la Organización Trump dijo a CNN en un correo electrónico que “el intento a posteriori de Capital One de justificar el cierre de cuentas bancarias relacionadas con Trump es completamente infundado”. El portavoz reiteró la afirmación de la Organización Trump de que el banco “fabricó” una justificación para cerrar las cuentas después del ataque del 6 de enero de 2021 al Capitolio de Estados Unidos, en lo que “fue claramente una decisión con motivación política”.La Casa Blanca no respondió a una solicitud de comentarios el lunes.El banco dijo que había identificado “patrones de transacciones” que desencadenaron la revisión, la cual solo se hizo pública debido a la demanda de la Organización Trump. La presentación no ofreció detalles sobre la revisión y no acusó a la organización de ninguna irregularidad específica.Capital One dijo que permitió a los titulares de las cuentas varios meses para encontrar nuevos servicios bancarios.El caso es una de varias demandas que Trump o sus aliados han presentado desde su regreso a la Casa Blanca. El presidente en enero demandó a JPMorgan Chase y a su CEO, Jamie Dimon, por reclamaciones similares de “cierre de cuentas bancarias”, las cuales el banco y Dimon han negado.“Debanking” es un término paraguas para cuando un banco rechaza a un cliente, lo cual puede ocurrir por diversas razones. Los estadounidenses no tienen un derecho legal a una cuenta bancaria, y los prestamistas a menudo rechazan a personas o empresas para cumplir con normas y regulaciones diseñadas para proteger el sistema financiero.Pero más recientemente, el término ha sido utilizado por grupos conservadores y empresas de criptomonedas que afirman ser víctimas. Trump firmó hace un año una orden ejecutiva destinada a castigar a los bancos por restringir servicios a clientes en función de sus creencias políticas o religiosas.Los bancos están obligados por ley a seguir estrictos protocolos contra el lavado de dinero y a menudo cuentan con vastos sistemas de monitoreo para señalar cualquier actividad potencialmente fraudulenta. No es inusual que esos sistemas desencadenen una revisión, según expertos bancarios, aunque la decisión de cerrar cuentas como resultado no es una que se tome a la ligera.Los representantes de Capital One no respondieron de inmediato a una solicitud de comentarios el lunes.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story