Skip to main content

GOP lawmaker gave female staffers lavish gifts of jewelry, vacations and guns, ethics report finds

(CNN) — The bipartisan House Ethics Committee said Monday it has found “substantial evidence” that GOP Rep. Chuck Edwards repeatedly made unwanted advances toward two of his female staffers and is recommending that the full House vote to punish him on the floor.

The panel determined “there was substantial reason to believe Representative Edwards violated House Rules related to sexual harassment and hostile workplaces.”

The extraordinary statement, which is the result of a months-long investigation, marks the first time the panel has recommended the House censure one of its own members since 2010.

A censure resolution is one of the most severe forms of punishment in the House, though does not remove a member from the House and carries no explicit penalties beyond a public admonition.

The congressman denied that his behavior was “intended as a sexual or romantic advance,” according to the committee’s report, which also said that it found no evidence that Edwards, 65, “engaged in sexual activity” with the women.

Both women had worked for Edwards when he was a state senator and continued to work for him when he took office in the House of Representatives. The first woman was still in college at that time and worked in the congressional office for around three years. The second woman was in her early 20s when she started work in the congressional office and continued working there for around two and a half years.

Paul Shumaker, a spokesperson and strategist for the Edwards campaign, said in a statement the panel’s findings “completely exonerate Representative Edwards under the House rules governing sexual misconduct or harassment” and that its conclusion showed the congressman “did not violate federal sexual harassment law.”

Edwards, who is running for reelection in North Carolina’s 11th district, “looks forward to having his name cleared and will work to ensure that the full light of day is brought on this process,” the spokesman added.

The 25-page ethics committee report states that Edwards repeatedly acted inappropriately by “personal texts late in the evenings” and buying lavish gifts for the staffers. The purchases included jewelry worth over $1,000, as well as “designer purses, guns, shoes, flowers, a laptop and cell phone, KitchenAid mixer, robotic vacuum, vacations, tickets to performances, and one-on-one dinners.”

The congressman brought one of the staffers on a trip to New York City where he’d planned a helicopter ride, dinner, and Broadway show to celebrate his birthday. At another point, he paid for one of the women to go to New York City with a friend and bought them tickets to see “Hamilton” after she’d “gone through a breakup.”

For the same woman, Edwards also purchased spa treatments and skipped House votes one night to go to her home and decorate a Christmas tree with her. He later wrote the same woman a poem that he read aloud at her going away party when she left his office “during which he cried.”

In one instance, Edwards arranged for a birthday serenade at the woman’s party and arranged for the singer to say it was “from a special someone.” Afterwards, the woman told her friend that she did not believe the congressman viewed her as “just a daughter figure” and that she was “scared lowkey.”

“The Committee found that Representative Edwards engaged in persistent unprofessional and inappropriate conduct towards two young female staffers,” the committee said, summing up its findings.

The women, who were not identified in the report, told the committee that they “attempted to communicate” that they were uncomfortable with his behavior, but that they were “put in an untenable position by virtue of his status as their boss and a Member of Congress.”

Edwards contended that that his relationships with the women were “professional boss-subordinate relationships” and “friendships,” the panel said. But the committee found that he had intentionally deleted some messages to these women that were “particularly inappropriate” — a finding they said was central to their investigation.

“Representative Edwards acknowledged at least some of the behavior at issue could be viewed as inappropriate. However, he has not acknowledged or taken responsibility for the harm he caused,” the report said.

“A Member of Congress should not single out a staffer and isolate them from other staff, make frequent comments regarding that person’s appearance and weight, send messages in the middle of the night, text staff deeply personal and seemingly romantic thoughts, intrude on personal occasions without invitation, pay for personal vacations, and spend thousands of dollars on gifts for staffers.”

“That Representative Edwards did all these things to two young staffers, repeatedly over a sustained period, was beyond inappropriate,” it said.

The House is currently on recess for the month of August with members back in their home districts, so September is likely the earliest a censure effort could be taken up.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Ariana Grande’s body is in the news again

(CNN) — On Sunday, Ariana Grande announced that she “will be taking a step back from visibility,” suspending her future appearances after her current summer tour ends. The pop star had just released the music video for her latest single, “Petal,” which showed her always petite frame ridged with shadows of the bones of her chest. Fans, critics and consumers of celebrity news responded with a chorus of dismay or alarm.The announcement, delivered by her representative in an exclusive to People magazine, is unlikely to stop the discourse about her thinness and health, which has been going on in one form or another since the singer, now 33 years old, was a teenager — and, for other people in the public eye, far longer than that.A representative for Grande declined to offer further comment.No one outside Ariana Grande’s personal circle knows the reason, if any, that she appears to have lost weight. Her health is private; her image is visible everywhere. The space between those two premises is filled with speculation, and with arguments about whether it’s right or wrong to speculate.What is the audience’s business? What is it culpable for? It’s been 43 years now since the platinum-selling singer Karen Carpenter died at the age of 32 of heart failure brought on by anorexia and bulimia. Fans by the thousands had watched her dwindle away over the years.“Just how delicate she was became painfully clear by the mid-’70s, when audiences watched her wither away before their eyes,” James Gavin wrote for the New York Times in 2010 as he reviewed the biography “Little Girl Blue: The Life of Karen Carpenter” by Randy L. Schmidt. “Karen suffered from what were then mysterious eating disorders, anorexia nervosa and bulimia, and she was slowly starving herself to death.”“I don’t think her illness was handled properly,” her brother and bandmate Richard Carpenter said in a CBS interview in 2022, while promoting the book “Carpenters: The Musical Legacy,” which he had coauthored. Richard Carpenter, who developed an addiction to Quaaludes under the strain of stardom, said he had made peace with his past except when it comes to his sister’s death.But then it’s only been six years since the press and public got caught up in a frenzy of gossip and guesswork about Chadwick Boseman’s appearance in an April 2020 Instagram video for Jackie Robinson Day — focusing not on the charitable initiative the Black Panther star was announcing, but on how suddenly skinny he looked. Had he lost weight for a role? Was he on drugs? Was he ill?All was answered months later when Boseman died at the age of 43 and it was revealed that he had been privately getting treatment for colon cancer since 2016. People on mass media and social media alike then condemned what they viewed as the body shaming of the beloved star.“The fact that Boseman had been criticized for his weight loss speaks to how superficially most people view others when their sole basis for judgment is the images they see online,” Kelly Coffey, a personal trainer and health coach, told Business Insider at the time.People have been reading ideas about weight and image into Grande throughout her career. In 2013, when she was 19, Grande wrote on Tumblr that while she didn’t “usually like to address rumors,” she “felt like since some of you are worrying about me that I should take the time to write you all a little note to address this whole ‘eating disorder thing’.”The teenager went on: “I lost a bit of weight last year. It’s because I stopped eating junk food and started making healthy choices. I was happy with the way I was before and I’m still happy now! Just healthier! But the lifestyle change I chose to make last August is not and was never about being skinnier. I just wasn’t taking care of myself at all.”Ten years later, she again let her boundaries be known by posting a video on her verified TikTok account.“I think we should be gentler and less comfortable commenting on people’s bodies, no matter what,” she said. “If you think you’re saying something good or well-intentioned, whatever it is, healthy, unhealthy, big, small, this, that, sexy, nonsense…we just should really work towards not doing that as much.”But Grande’s body was still being packaged for the public to look at, as part of her job. There was even more concern in 2025 when she and her “Wicked: For Good” costar Cynthia Erivo became fodder for debate over how thin they both appeared during the promotional tour for the film.Oona Hanson, a parent coach who specializes in eating disorders, said at the time in an interview with CNN that some parents were so concerned about the issues that they had reached out to her.“Regardless of what the actual medical or health status is of these actresses, which we don’t know, the ultra-thin images, I think, are very painful and can be triggering to someone who has, let’s say, seen their child become emaciated from an eating disorder,” Hanson said. “Or they know their child was looking at images that look a lot like these press tour photos.”Grande’s Eternal Sunshine Tour, scheduled to end in London on September 1, and her “Petal” video provided even more images for consideration. “WHAT YOU SEE HERE IS NOT NORMAL,” the eating-disorder recovery advocate Charli Howard wrote on Instagram to accompany stills of the “Petal” video.Howard wrote “I think it’s vital we discuss imagery/videos/content like these and the damage they can — and will — have on women and girls.”“This poor woman is possibly dying right in front of us. This outfit is designed to accentuate the thinness for discourse,” the actress Jameela Jamil wrote in the comments. “Her team are thoroughly irresponsible for not guiding her away from this deeply damaging image for her young fans to see so glamorized.”That “possibly” in Jamil’s comment served as an acknowledgement that no one talking about Grande has access to any underlying truth. The concerns end up pointing in multiple directions at once: at Grande’s own hypothetical vulnerability, at Grande’s responsibility for supposed effects on her fans, at how glamorous the images are, at how appalling the images are.Now, for a while, there will be fewer images to work with. Grande has decided to cancel her planned role in the West End revival of Stephen Sondheim’s “Sunday in the Park with George” and to avoid making other public appearances. The announcement did not mention whether or not she will participate in the upcoming publicity tour for her performance with Ben Stiller in “Focker-in-Law,” releasing in November. CNN has reached out to Universal Studios for comment.The statement from Grande’s representative to People notably avoided saying there was anything wrong with the star herself at all. Her tour, it said, will be ending “healthily and happily.”Instead, the statement said, she was turning away from “endless, ongoing public scrutiny.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story