Skip to main content

Democrats intensify scrutiny of David Ellison amid Paramount–WBD legal battle

(CNN) — As Paramount pushes to settle the state antitrust lawsuit that has stymied its deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, Democratic lawmakers continue to rally opposition to the deal.

On Wednesday, Rep. Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, sent a new letter to Paramount CEO David Ellison accusing him of “colluding” with President Trump and urging him to answer questions.

A Paramount spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The letter highlights Democrats’ concerns about Paramount taking control of Warner-owned CNN. It comes the same week that Paramount chief legal officer Makan Delrahim said of CNN that Ellison “wants to bring it back to news,” a comment that raised eyebrows given that the network has been a global news brand for 46 years.

The letter, which was obtained first by CNN, also suggests that Paramount’s dealings with the Trump administration — a relationship Raskin has called “corrupt” — will be a priority for the Judiciary Committee if Democrats regain the House majority in the midterm elections.

Raskin opened the missive by acknowledging that Paramount has not responded to his four previous inquiries in the past 12 months.

But “now that you have vowed to break your long silence,” he wrote, citing Ellison’s op-ed in The New York Times last week, “I invite you to a transcribed interview to tell Congress and America your story and answer the Committee’s questions about your Donald Trump-enabled shopping spree to consolidate news organizations, movie studios, cable channels, and streaming services.”

With Republicans in control of the House, Democrats like Raskin can’t compel Ellison to testify, so the interview demand is a way to amplify his concerns about the deal.

The new letter cites reports of “political interference” at Paramount-owned CBS News, which the news division has disputed.

“CBS’s own reporters have shared how, under your leadership, the newsroom has catered to President Trump’s political whims and dictates under the watchful eye of a MAGA minder,” Raskin wrote, apparently referring to the accounts of fired “60 Minutes” correspondents.

Ellison wrote in the Times op-ed, “Great news organizations like CNN and CBS News are here to tell it straight down the middle. That requires newsrooms that reflect the whole world, not one side of it. And it requires independence. Our journalists will continue to answer to the facts and to all the people they serve — not to any party or cause.”

Ellison’s op-ed made no mention of Trump, who has been a pivotal figure throughout the nearly year-long battle for control of Warner Bros. Discovery.

Paramount sought a close relationship with Trump and his administration while seeking federal approval of the WBD merger.

Ellison’s father Larry, the billionaire Oracle co-founder, has been a close ally of Trump’s for years. Trump has praised both father and son, calling them his “supporters” and expressing confidence in their plans for CBS. Trump has also been outspoken about his desire for CNN to come under new ownership, calling it “imperative.”

Raskin’s letter cites an anonymously sourced report from the Wall Street Journal that “David Ellison offered assurances to Trump administration officials that if he bought Warner, he’d make sweeping changes to CNN.”

Raskin wrote to Ellison, “You have eagerly shown the president that you are going to deliver on both counts as if you are controlling organs of state media.”

The letter also indicated that a Democrat-led Judiciary Committee would probe the Justice Department’s mid-June approval of the Paramount merger, which many critics linked to Trump’s personal interest in the deal.

Raskin said the committee would scrutinize whether federal agencies “are successfully promoting free competition and innovation—or whether they are using their governmental powers to distort the market and undermine freedom of speech and freedom of the press, in violation of the First Amendment.”

Other Democratic lawmakers have also foreshadowed public hearings and probes about the matter and have supported the state attorneys general lawsuit seeking to stop Paramount’s expansion plan.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in a social media post on Tuesday, “The Paramount–WBD merger isn’t about creating better entertainment. It’s about cutting costs & squeezing workers. Writers, actors, and crew will have fewer employers to work for, which means less bargaining power & lower wages. State AGs are stepping in to fight back.”

Paramount has consistently said the deal is pro-competitive, pointing to the regulatory approvals from the Justice Department and other authorities around the world.

But the deal is frozen in place due to the state antitrust lawsuit and a parallel lawsuit from the Writers Guild of America.

Facing an uphill battle in court, Paramount agreed not to complete the merger until a trial is held or until June 1, 2027. A trial is slated to be held in March, though a settlement is possible before then.

Speaking at a Politico conference on Tuesday, Delrahim said “we would be delighted to engage” in settlement talks “in order to repair the industry, create more jobs, bring more jobs and production back.”

California Attorney General Rob Bonta said at the same conference that “we will be open to any proposals,” but “right now, we’re focused on litigation and going to trial.”

Both men also addressed a report by Puck’s Matt Belloni that Ellison told Paramount’s leadership team that he intends to move the company out of California if the antitrust case isn’t settled by October 1. Ellison has notably not made this threat in public, and Paramount has declined to comment on the report.

Delrahim said Paramount doesn’t want to leave the state, but the company has to ”look at the business environment” and “ultimately, you know, go to a place where you’re wanted.”

Bonta, speaking earlier in the day, said the leave-California threat “is an attempt to blackmail the regulators who are daring to enforce the law fairly and firmly.”

Delrahim said it is not a blackmail attempt, and argued that “this merger is actually going to be good — not only for California — it’ll be good for America.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Dr. Erica Schwartz appears before Senate committee for confirmation hearing as next CDC director

President Donald Trump has nominated Dr. Erica Schwartz, to be the Director of the CDC, April 16, 2026. (Department of Health and Human Services)(WASHINGTON) -- A confirmation hearing began on Wednesday for Dr. Erica Schwartz to be the next director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).Schwartz, a formal deputy surgeon general, was nominated by President Donald Trump in April. Trump made the announcement in a post on Truth Social, describing Schwartz as "incredibly talented."Schwartz is the fourth person named or nominated as head of the CDC since last summer. If confirmed by the Senate, Schwartz will replace Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, director of the National Institutes of Health, who took over as acting CDC director in February.Schwartz earned a medical degree from Brown University and served in the U.S. Navy until 2005.She served in the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, as the Coast Guard Chief Medical Officer and as Deputy Surgeon General from 2019 to early 2021, during the first Trump administration."I was very pleased to see Dr. Schwartz nominated to be the next director of the CDC," Dr. Richard Besser, former acting director of the CDC during the Obama administration, told ABC News. "What struck me is how refreshing it felt to see someone nominated for this job who actually has deep experience in public health and has the credentials necessary to lead a complex public health organization."Besser expressed concern about whether Schwartz, if confirmed, will have the independence from Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to make public health recommendations, referencing a previous CDC director: Susan Monarez.Monarez was confirmed as CDC director in July 2025, but she held the post for less than a month. Monarez was fired by Kennedy for reportedly not rubber-stamping the health secretary's vaccine agenda or firing high-ranking CDC leaders whom he opposed.The turmoil led to both Kennedy and Monarez appearing in front of Senate committees to address the ousting.At a Senate hearing, Kennedy denied telling Monarez to accept vaccine recommendations without scientific evidence and claimed she was fired in part because she told him she was untrustworthy.Besser said he expects that Schwartz will be asked by members of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) about her perspectives on vaccinations, the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the rise of measles in the U.S."Those are some of the critical areas I think she'll be asked about. There are so many other areas that are of concern to those who have relied on the CDC to prevent illness and promote health," he said.Sean Kaufman is also appearing before the Senate HELP Committee for his confirmation hearing on Wednesday. Kaufman was nominated to lead the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, which was recently absorbed under CDC as part of an HHS reorganization in 2025.Kaufman has claimed without evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine caused "excessive death and injury ... in the United States and globally." Health officials have said COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective following clinical trials that involved tens of thousands of people and have since helped save millions of lives."What concerns me about Mr. Kaufman is that he has expressed very strong anti-vaccine views, and the ASPR is responsible for the strategic national stockpile," Besser said. "So, I hope that the committee asks him questions to fully understand the approach that he would take in that role."Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story