Skip to main content

‘Decades in Sports’: After a plane crash killed the U.S. figure skating team, Peggy Fleming carried a nation’s hopes

(CNN) — Watch CNN Original Series “Decades in Sports” on the CNN app. Across six episodes, the series explores the defining moments, athletes and cultural shifts that shaped sports over the past six decades, from the television revolution and Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, right up to the impact of social media on today’s biggest sports stars.

Perhaps no athlete had a bigger impact on their sport than Peggy Fleming did for figure skating in the 1960s.

For any athlete, heading into an Olympic Games with the hopes of a nation on their shoulders is a heavy burden to carry. Add to that a devastating tragedy that takes the lives of almost all of their contemporaries, and it’s an entirely different proposition altogether.

This is the burden a 19-year-old Fleming had to carry heading into the 1968 Winter Olympics in Grenoble.

Rewind seven years prior to February 14, 1961, and the US figure skating team was boarding Sabena Flight 548 from New York bound for Brussels, with their final destination being Prague, Czechoslovakia, where the World Figure Skating Championships were being held.

They were looking to defend the world title Carol Heiss had won for a fifth straight time a year prior, but tragically, the team never got the chance, as the Boeing 707 operating the flight crashed on approach to Brussels Airport and killed the entire US figure skating team.

The nation had just lost 18 of its most promising skaters, while 16 others, including family members, officials, judges and coaches – including Fleming’s own coach, Bill Kipp – all perished in the crash.

To this day, it remains one of the greatest tragedies in the nation’s sporting history. US figure skating was decimated overnight, and as USA Today sports columnist Christine Brennan highlights in the series: “All the young women who would have been the stars in ’62, ’63 and ’64 (were) gone.”

All of a sudden, the hopes of a nation lay on Fleming’s young shoulders, and as Brennan explains, “they rush her along quicker because there’s no one else,” adding, “she is the hope for the American future. The pressure was enormous.”

From tragedy to triumph

After the tragedy, attention quickly turns to how US figure skating would rebuild and maintain the dominance it enjoyed throughout the 1950s.

The program already had Fleming as a promising young talent, but many top US coaches – including Kipp – were all gone.

So a new wave of foreign coaches made their way across the Atlantic, most notably, Italian Carlo Fassi, a bronze medalist at the 1953 World Championships in Davos, Switzerland, who was now Fleming’s new coach.

As soon as Fassi came over to the US, Fleming’s “life is changed immeasurably,” says Brennan, who also goes on to highlight that the 1964 Winter Olympics came “way too soon” for Fleming, who competed at just 15.

However, after winning five straight national titles and back-to-back world titles on route to the 1968 Olympics, it was clear that Fleming was now the best figure skater in the world.

But the Games in Grenoble brought an entirely different degree of pressure for the 19 year old, as she was skating for an entire nation yearning to see the US reclaim gold on the world stage.

She was also doing it for the 18 skaters who were killed seven years earlier and never made it there, and for coach Kipp, who never lived to see what she became.

Everything Fleming had worked for since she was 12 had built up to this moment, and as Brennan says, “Peggy has said herself to me, ‘Every tiny muscle on your face is visible on the ice. There’s no helmet, there’s no big uniform, there’s no teammates – it’s you.’”

Despite all this, Fleming delivered on that special night in Grenoble and captured gold with a “grace and serenity that was almost goddess-like,” says Kathrine Switzer, the first official female entrant to the Boston Marathon.

Remarkably, it was the only gold medal the US took home from those Games.

Chartreuse dress dazzled tv screens

In the 1960’s, the advent of television had a massive effect on how people consumed sports. Athletes were no longer figures of our imagination, they could now be seen with our very own eyes.

The 1960 Olympics in Rome was the first to be broadcast widespread on television in the US, but as Brennan explains in the series, “By 1968, more and more Americans were getting color TV, and there were Americans tuning their television to the color of Peggy Fleming’s dress.

“This was a watershed moment in American cultural history,” she says.

Fleming later said that her mother chose the chartreuse dress for her after reading about the history of Grenoble, as she thought it would endear her to the French people. But it did much more, it captured the hearts of millions of people across the world.

US figure skating was on the verge of collapse after the tragic 1961 plane crash that wiped out its entire program – Peggy Fleming was the key figure who helped rebuild it in just seven short years.

Few athletes have been more transformative for their sport than Fleming was for US skating during the 1960s, and as Brennan highlights, “She dropped into American living rooms while literally rising from the ashes of one of the greatest tragedies in American sports history.

“It’s a story linked in tragedy, but it’s also a story of the ultimate triumph in sports.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Russia and Ukraine have stepped up their aerial war. Civilians are paying the price

(CNN) — The front lines of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are largely stagnant. But in the skies, the war is ratcheting up.Each sides’ offensive capabilities now appear to be outstripping their air defenses, analysts say. That means more strikes are hitting their targets, more critical and economic infrastructure is being damaged, and more civilians are killed each week.“We definitely see an increased number of (attack) events, an increased number of casualties as well,” said Olha Polishchuk, the Eastern Europe research manager at ACLED, a global conflict monitor. “There has been an escalation also with regard to the variety of targets that are hit.”Ukraine has long been able to hit areas of Russia that are thousands of miles away from the front line, but the sophistication of its drone technologies has increased rapidly in the last year. In late June, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced a 40-day campaign to ramp up drone strikes deep into Russian territory – a push that his top adviser has said will continue.“That is a significant issue for Russia, because obviously the past 40 days have demonstrated that they have a serious weakness when it comes to interception, and Ukraine has been able to reach their targets quite successfully,” said Natia Seskuria, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, a UK-based security think tank.Rather than occasional long-range strikes on Russian oil refineries, Ukraine is now carrying out frequent attacks on refineries, oil tankers, power substations and broader energy infrastructure, according to ACLED’s Polishchuk. Kyiv has also increased aerial attacks aimed at disrupting Russian military logistics in the occupied eastern areas.The analysts also noted an increase in attacks targeting the Russian economy more broadly, such as strikes on the warehouses of Russia’s largest online retailer, Wildberries. The Ukrainian government has said the facilities are legitimate military targets because the company supplies Russia’s frontline troops.Kyiv also recently broke through Russian defenses in St. Petersburg and has repeatedly hit Moscow.It appears to be an effort to bring the war home to everyday Russian people and to place more pressure on the business elite, who may have some sway with the Kremlin, to push for an end to the full-scale invasion.In addition, Seskuria said, Ukraine’s long-range strike campaign has a “pragmatic aim to slow down Russia’s summer offensive, in terms of stretching Russia’s resources towards intercepting the drone attacks.”Earlier in the conflict, Russia concentrated its air defense systems at the border with Ukraine and along the front line, Ukrainian military sources previously told CNN. But Kyiv’s strategy has been to target many different locations inside occupied areas of eastern Ukraine and Russia, forcing the Russian military to spread its air defense systems into a more threadbare tapestry.Recent attacks have also exposed how Russia’s air defense systems were not designed to combat drones, but rather to shoot down conventional military aircraft and missiles, analysts previously told CNN. Video captured in June showed Russian soldiers scrambling to respond to one attack by firing off man portable air defense systems (MANPADS) on a busy highway.Ukrainian forces have also slammed Russian-occupied Crimea, with ACLED recording a significant uptick in June of strikes targeting the peninsula’s power and transportation infrastructure.But the increase in air strikes goes both ways.“We’ve seen all of those strikes that Ukraine conducts also mirrored in Ukraine,” Polishchuk said. “So, after the attacks on Wildberries, for example, now a lot of warehouses in Ukraine belonging to the Rozetka electronic store have been targeted.”Meanwhile, on the front line, ACLED recorded a decline in armed clashes in recent months. Russia continues to push forward and capture some small settlements, but overall movement “has been very, very slow,” Polishchuk said.Civilian death toll mountingThe escalation in the air war has led to even more civilian casualties.In June, the United Nations recorded the highest number of civilians in Ukraine killed and injured in a single month since 2022. In Ukraine, at least 1,396 civilians were killed and 7,978 wounded in the first half of this year – a 37% increase compared to the same time period in 2025. The vast majority of those civilian casualties occurred in areas of Ukrainian government control, according to the UN, but some were recorded in Russian-occupied areas.The Russian foreign ministry has said that at least 797 Russian civilians have been killed so far this year. CNN and international monitoring groups are unable to independently verify that figure.Russia’s nightly assaults on Ukraine well exceed the number of attacks it is experiencing at home. Last month, Moscow launched a daily average of 172 strikes on Ukraine, compared to 28 on average launched by Kyiv.And for months, Russia has increased the number of drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles it fires in each attack wave, a strategy intended to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses.Those mass aerial attacks are in addition to small drone attacks targeting civilians in cities close to the front line, who have previously described feeling like victims of a “drone safari” carried out by Russian troops. Russia denies targeting civilians.In July, Russia fired 139 ballistic missiles into Ukraine, more than in any other month this year, according to analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Ballistic missiles are particularly difficult to defend against because they move at a speed and altitude that requires US-made Patriot interceptor missiles, which are both expensive and in short supply.Earlier this week, at least 17 people were killed in Kyiv and surrounding areas as Russia fired more than two dozen ballistic missiles and anti-ship missiles – none of which were shot down.Zelensky has repeatedly appealed to allies for more Patriot interceptors, but the war with Iran has complicated that effort, having diminished stockpiles of US-made weapons. Ukrainian hopes were buoyed when US President Donald Trump promised at last month’s NATO summit to allow Ukraine to manufacture Patriot interceptors on its own soil. But Trump later walked that back.Window for diplomacy?Beyond the Patriot interceptors, some observers have noted that both the United States and Ukraine’s allies in Europe could be doing more to bolster the country’s position, and to enable talks that finally end the four-and-a-half-year war.The US had allocated more than $130 billion (115 billion euros) in support to Ukraine before February 2025, according to the Kiel Institute, a think tank based in Germany. But Congress has not passed any new major financial or military aid packages for Ukraine during the second Trump administration.Ukraine does appear to have some momentum right now, and it’s plausible that some negotiation could happen at a time when Kyiv is in a more confident position, Polishchuk said. “But from what we’ve seen so far, it has been so ineffective to try to negotiate with Russia.”She said it’s more likely that Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war calculation would only change based on internal pressure in Russia, which could increase as its economy suffers.RUSI’s Seskuria also said she doesn’t see a strong window for diplomacy right now.“The problem is that (Putin) no longer has the leverage that he had back in the days when he started negotiating with the United States, and the United States back then had a more favorable position towards Russia,” she told CNN, adding that it would currently be hard for the Kremlin to portray an end to the war as any great victory.“I think the other option is escalation, which is probably more likely.”CNN’s Alex Leeds Matthews and Anna Chernova contributed to this report.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story