Skip to main content

‘Cyber privateers’: Trump issues order allowing US companies to hack overseas groups under certain conditions

(CNN) — The Trump administration is enlisting private companies to conduct cyberattacks on foreign cybercriminals in a major policy shift that experts say could come with legal risk for the companies.

The move gives vetted companies a prominent role in hacking operations that have historically been the dominion of US law enforcement, spy and military agencies.

Companies can use cyber tools to surveil foreign criminals and disrupt their networks under the “control and oversight” of the new federal program, according to a memo issued Wednesday by President Donald Trump.

The program’s goal is to punish foreign criminal groups that cause Americans billions of dollars in annual losses. The program’s remit is foreign criminal groups, not governments.

“American businesses’ innovative capabilities have historically been underutilized in efforts to identify and disrupt criminal networks operating in cyberspace,” the memo says.

The US government is already doing a lot of hacking on foreign targets. The new program risks having too many cooks in the kitchen, some former officials said.

“The real risk is that you end up with a bunch of cyber privateers running around without any clear coordination or direction at the federal level,” said Andrew Schoka, a former Army officer at US Cyber Command.

Deconflicting in cyber operations “is already a major challenge for federal agencies, but now you’re adding in the complexity of private sector firms with a lot more capability and speed,” Schoka told CNN.

The new program could free up US government resources. Chinese government-backed hackers outnumber FBI cyber personnel 50-to-1, according to former FBI director Christopher Wray.

“Having private sector help to counter cyber criminals allows the US to disrupt more groups and frees up agencies like FBI and Cyber Command to focus more on countering nation states like China,” said Cynthia Kaiser, a former senior FBI cyber official.

“But the devil is in the details,” Kaiser told CNN. “Before they sign up, companies will need more explicit information about liability protections, types of government oversight, and foreign criminal use of US infrastructure, among other concerns.”

An explosion of scams targeting every type of American in recent years has prompted some private citizens to hack back and compromise the networks of the scammers.

Chris “Weld Pond” Wysopal, co-founder of cybersecurity firm Veracode, said the new federal program would be a more organized way of dealing with the problem. But he also worried about the potential consequences of a government-sanctioned hacking operation carried out by a private firm that goes awry. Hacking a data center in a foreign country to target scammers could, for example, inadvertently affect a hospital, he said.

Foreign governments may also see employees of companies participating in the new hacking program who travel abroad as legitimate targets for detention or questioning, Wysopal said.

Officials from the departments of Justice and Homeland Security will oversee the new hacking group. Any program activity “directed at a United States person” must undergo extra legal scrutiny, including from the Justice Department, the memo says.

But Jason Kikta, a former Cyber Command official, said the new memo didn’t lay out a clear process for ensuring cyber operations uphold the civil liberties of American citizens.

“There is no clear oversight or review process on the determinations that will be made by unnamed political appointees,” Kikta said. “Defenders (of the memo) will say that it still requires activity to be constrained by DOJ and DHS authorities. But this order pushes liability on to the companies.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Luigi Mangione in discussions about possible guilty plea, sources say

▶ Watch Video: Luigi Mangione in discussions about possible federal plea deal, sources say Luigi Mangione, accused in the 2024 killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, is in discussions about a possible plea deal on federal charges ahead of a court appearance Friday in New York City, sources familiar with the matter told CBS News.Mangione, 28, is set to appear at an 11 a.m. conference in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. That meeting is taking place after prosecutors and the defense team sent a letter to federal court Tuesday requesting Friday's conference. CBS News New York's Alice Gainer will be inside the courtroom Friday with the latest developments. Plea discussions between federal prosecutors and defense attorneys have been ongoing and it's unclear if an agreement has been reached, sources told CBS News."I expect plea negotiations to happen in every case, or certainly most cases," legal expert Richard Schoenstein said. Attorneys for Mangione have not responded to CBS News New York's request for comment. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York also declined to comment. Mangione faces both federal and state charges in connection with Thompson's death. He has pleaded not guilty in both trials.The federal charges carry a potential maximum life sentence, which Mangione could still face even if a federal plea deal is reached. "In the federal system, you don't agree to a sentence as part of a plea deal. You agree to a plea and the crime, and then it has to go to a sentencing hearing in front of the judge," Schoenstein said.   If a plea deal is reached, it could have an impact on his state trial, which is set to begin next month. That's because of potential double jeopardy concerns. Double jeopardy refers to a law which says "a person may not be twice prosecuted for the same offense," although a number of exceptions are listed. "I would expect the defense to make some sort of motion to preclude further prosecution of the state case on the grounds that it is double jeopardy," Schoenstein said. "I think the question of whether or not it would be double jeopardy is open and complicated and subject to debate." That's because the federal charges have to do with stalking and interstate charges, whereas the state charges are for second degree murder, a weapons charge, and a forged instrument charge."So the weapons and forged instrument charges would not be resolved by the federal plea, and arguably the intentional killing charge would not be resolved. I do think there's a serious question as to whether this would be double jeopardy," Schoenstein said. Schoenstein said a federal plea deal would "put some pressure on state prosecutors to reach a deal of their own, or to become part of the deal that is being negotiated between the feds and the defendant, and therefore it could resolve the case on a negotiated level." Schoenstein said it could also impact the defense strategy if the state case does go forward, "because if it does go forward he no longer has to worry about a federal trial down the road." The start of his federal trial, if it moves forward, is set for January.This is a developing story. Check back soon for more information. 
Read Next Story