Skip to main content

Congressman Al Green Helps Deliver $500,000 Federal Investment to Revitalize Hiram Clarke and Fort Bend Communities

By CNN

Click here for updates on this story

    August 10, 2026 (Houston Style Magazine) — Nearly 13 years after Houston created TIRZ 25 to spur reinvestment in Hiram Clarke and Fort Bend Houston, another important chapter is being written in Southwest Houston’s comeback story. The zone was officially created on August 7, 2013—a date that makes the timing of this latest investment almost poetic.

On Thursday, August 6, 2026, community and redevelopment leaders celebrated the presentation of a symbolic $500,000 federal check to the Hiram Clarke/Fort Bend Redevelopment Authority (HCFBRA). Congressman Al Green (TX-09) helped secure the funding through the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Community-Wide Brownfields Assessment Grant Program.

In plain Houston language: before you can build something better, you need to know what is underneath the existing ground.

Brownfields are properties where actual or potential contamination can complicate redevelopment—think former gas stations, dry cleaners or older commercial sites where chemicals may have entered soil or groundwater. The $500,000 award will support property inventories, environmental assessments, redevelopment planning and community engagement.

HCFBRA says it plans to conduct 21 initial assessments, followed by deeper testing on as many as five properties if necessary. Proposed cleanup and reuse plans will also be developed, giving residents a voice as properties are evaluated for new possibilities.

For Congressman Green, the investment goes far beyond environmental testing.

“Every family deserves to live in a community where opportunity is not overshadowed by environmental hazards or years of underinvestment,” Green said.

That statement carries considerable historical weight.

The Hiram Clarke/Fort Bend redevelopment effort grew from years of community advocacy and demands for infrastructure and economic investment. Houston created TIRZ 25 in 2013, and the Hiram Clarke/Fort Bend Redevelopment Authority was formally established in 2015. Today, the zone covers approximately 6,077 acres across two counties, channeling tax-increment growth into roads, sidewalks, drainage, lighting, parks, public facilities and other economic-development improvements.

And this is not theoretical.

In 2023, HCFBRA acquired a long-vacant former gas station at 4802 W. Fuqua Street, a property that had become associated with illegal activity and neighborhood blight. The structure was demolished, contamination was assessed, and plans call for transforming the property into green space connected to Simon Minchen Park and the Sims Bayou Trail.

Now the federal grant provides an opportunity to repeat that playbook on a much larger scale.

“This grant is a chance to do more of the work our community has waited years for,” HCFBRA Executive Director LeRon Wilsonsaid.

And Hiram Clarke/Fort Bend is standing out statewide. EPA awarded more than $9.4 million in 2026 Brownfields grants across Texas, with HCFBRA receiving $500,000. The authority says it is the only greater-Houston recipient of this particular Community-Wide Brownfields Assessment Grant during the current grant cycle.

The potential multiplier is impressive. Since 1995, EPA says its Brownfields Program has provided more than $3 billion in grant funding, helping leverage more than $45 billion in cleanup and redevelopment and supporting more than 228,900 jobs. Through fiscal year 2025, every federal brownfields grant dollar awarded through major programs leveraged an average of $19.47 from public and private sources.

So don’t look at this as simply a $500,000 check.

photo

Look at it as seed money for possibility.

For Hiram Clarke and Fort Bend Houston, this investment represents another tool for converting yesterday’s liabilities into tomorrow’s neighborhood assets—cleaner land, stronger development opportunities, healthier communities and renewed economic confidence.

Congressman Al Green helped bring federal resources home. Now Southwest Houston has another reason to believe that revitalization is not merely being discussed.

It is being assessed, planned—and built.

For more information on the HCFBRA, go to: hiramclarkefortbend.com

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Kierra Lee
KIELEESTYLE@GMAIL.COM
4096658446

Judge dismisses charges against billionaire Adani, but sharply criticizes DOJ

▶ Watch Video: Todd Blanche to be sworn in as attorney general after narrow Senate confirmation A federal judge on Monday dismissed the criminal fraud charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani and several of his co-defendants, after politically appointed leaders in the Justice Department decided to kill the case in May.But in an unusual twist, U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis for the Eastern District of New York refused to dismiss two of the counts against five other co-defendants, saying the Justice Department had failed to provide him with a sufficient reason for doing so.In a scathing 47-page ruling, Garaufis took aim at Trent McCotter, the principal associate deputy attorney general, who he said bears sole responsibility for trying to dismiss the case."The irregularities in the decision to dismiss the indictment are concerning," Garaufis wrote. "On the current record, McCotter appears to have eschewed the professional opinions of innumerable officials from various federal offices and replaced them with his singular judgment. The fact that McCotter came to this decision largely in collaboration with defense counsel, and seemingly without input from the FBI and SEC agents who investigated the alleged misconduct, or the attorneys from the Department, SEC, and U.S. Attorney's Office who brought the case, appears to be highly unusual."The high-profile foreign bribery case against Adani was brought at the tail end of former President Joe Biden's tenure, and it managed to survive even after President Trump ordered the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission to conduct a review into all of their pending foreign bribery cases.But after Adani retained Bob Giuffra and Jamie McDonald of Sullivan & Cromwell, the Justice Department in May moved to dismiss the case entirely.McCotter made the determination after he and other government officials met with McDonald, Giuffra and Andrew DeFilippis of Sullivan & Cromwell, sources previously told CBS News. McDonald has since been nominated by Mr. Trump to serve as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.In one of these meetings at the Justice Department about the Adani case, Giuffra made a presentation that disputed evidence of the alleged bribery scheme, according to sources familiar with the matter and records reviewed by CBS News. One slide touted how one of Adani's companies is "powering India's progress," and another slide said the Trump administration "would not have brought the case."If prosecutors were to drop the charges, Giuffra also said at the meeting, Adani would be willing to invest $10 billion in the American economy, sources told CBS News.Adani is one of the wealthiest people in India, and is widely seen as an ally of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He leads the Adani Group, a massive conglomerate that owns airports, seaports, power plants and other assets.Adani said in a social media post after the charges against him were dismissed: "I welcome the US court's decision with humility and deep respect for the judicial process. Throughout this challenging period, our faith in truth, fairness and the rule of law remained unwavering. My deepest gratitude to those who never lost faith in us, in the system and in India's capacity for justice."CBS News has reached out to Adani's lawyer for comment.A spokesperson for the Justice Department declined to comment beyond the letter McCotter submitted to the court about the case, in which he said he made the decision to dismiss the charges "after conducting numerous meetings with defense counsel" and reviewing "hundreds of pages of materials."Judges have some discretion to review motions to dismiss charges, but it is unusual for them to extensively question the government's rationale for tossing out indictments.The decision to dismiss the Adani case has raised eyebrows and sparked questions from the judge. Two career prosecutors who were involved in the case withdrew from the matter after the motion to dismiss was filed. Additionally, politically appointed officials —  the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York and McCotter—  were the only signatories on the motion to dismiss.McCotter initially pushed back when Garaufis first started raising questions about the motion to dismiss the case, prompting the judge to order Adani last month to provide answers to the court on whether there was any sort of quid pro quo arrangement. Adani ultimately told the judge no such arrangement existed.In his ruling Monday, Garaufis said that Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48(a) requires the government to "set forth the basis for its motion to dismiss," which should include its reasons and underlying factual basis for doing so."It is evident throughout McCotter's musings on 'judicial inquisitions,' the 'separation of powers,' and 'prosecutorial discretion' that he would like the court to have no role in reviewing this motion," Garaufis wrote."However, the rule's legislative history and relevant case law confirm that rule 48(a) was enacted to ensure the court's limited, but key, role in scrutinizing the government's decision to dismiss charges once a grand jury returns an indictment."He criticized McCotter for failing to provide adequate reasons for dismissing the obstruction and foreign bribery counts, noting he was "unpersuaded" by McCotter's "unsworn statements regarding hypothetical concerns of 'diplomatic strife' and 'waste[d] resources,' or his unsubstantiated claim that 'India can better manage its internal systems than can prosecutors in Brooklyn and Washington.'"The judge did accept some of the Justice Department's arguments for dismissing the charges against Adani, saying it was "conceivable that the anti-bribery language used in the financial documents is so generic and vague that it would raise legal risks to the prosecution."But he was angered by McCotter's contention that the case was brought by the Biden-era Justice Department as a name-and-shame exercise."McCotter appears to be accusing officials across four different government offices of bringing a detailed 54-page, 5-count indictment out of spite," he wrote. "However, he has not provided a scintilla of evidence to suggest that the timing of the unsealing of the indictment, or the charging decisions, in this case was politically motivated. McCotter's baseless assertion is unbecoming of his office."He gave the Justice Department an Aug. 31 deadline to advise on its reasons for seeking to dismiss the two counts against the five remaining co-defendants. He also ordered attorneys for the remaining defendants to inform the court that they consent to the dismissal.
Read Next Story

Related Stories

Latest News
Taylor Swift’s music quietly removed from social media posts from Trump campaign, White House accounts
30 minutes ago

Taylor Swift’s music quietly removed from social media posts from Trump campaign, White House accounts

Trump signs order on vaccination recommendations

Mother, 5-month-old die in New York Harbor after boat capsized; captain charged

Powerball jackpot reaches $905M for tonight's drawing as prize surges

Shakira, Maluma, Thalía y otras celebridades envían mensajes de apoyo tras el terremoto en Colombia