Skip to main content

Andy Burnham becomes UK’s next prime minister after meeting with King Charles III

King Charles III welcomes Andy Burnham, during an audience at Buckingham Palace, London, where he invited the leader of the Labour Party to become Prime Minister and form a new government, on July 20, 2026 in London, England. (Photo by Aaron Chown – Pool/Getty Images)

(LONDON) — Andy Burnham officially became British prime minister on Monday — the country’s seventh leader in 10 years — having already been elected as the leader of the country’s Labour Party last week.

Burnham, who until recently was serving as the mayor of Greater Manchester, succeeded outgoing Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

Speaking outside the prime minister’s official residence — 10 Downing Street — on Monday morning, Starmer said, “Today I am here to offer my resignation and close the book on my time as prime minister. My work is done.”

“I thank the British people for the opportunity to serve. I go with good grace, I go with a smile, and I go proud of everything that we have achieved. Thank you very much,” Starmer added.

Of his successor, the outgoing prime minister said, “I now pass the baton to Andy Burnham, I wish him every success. He has my full support.”

After his address, Starmer traveled the short distance to Buckingham Palace to formally inform King Charles III of his resignation. Burnham then also traveled to palace where the king asked him to form a government.

The new prime minister then traveled to Downing Street to give his first address, telling the assembled press that Britain must show “that we can regain our stability.”

Burnham said his appointment will serve as “a circuit-breaker” for the country, pledging to deliver a new political and economic model and a 10-year plan.

Among the new prime’s commitments were to address cost of living concerns, help young people into work, end homelessness, re-industrialize the country, put “life’s essentials back under public control” and push for more local powers.

Through the rest of Monday, Burnham is expected to begin appointing cabinet ministers from Number 10.

Starmer announced that he would step down in June, following months of domestic political turmoil. Despite leading Labour to a historic majority in parliament in the 2024 general election, Starmer faced persistent external and internal criticism over his perceived failure to deliver rapid change after 14 years of Conservative Party rule in Britain.

Many in Starmer’s party had written to the prime minister asking him to step down following local elections in May, which saw the party lose more than 1,000 seats on local councils, results that were widely interpreted as a repudiation by British voters of Labour’s performance under the prime minister’s leadership.

Starmer long said he intended to see out his full five-year. Announcing his resignation in June, Starmer said, “The question my party is asking now is whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election. I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question, and I accept that answer with good grace.”

Burnham was the only candidate in the subsequent leadership election, ultimately winning nominations from 379 of the 403 Labour members of parliament — of the 650 MPs in total — in the House of Commons.

In accepting the leadership of Labour last week, Burnham said his mission was “to bring back hope” and address decades of economic inequality plus falling living standards.

“We must recognize that this generation of politicians — myself included — have failed to challenge a political culture and an economic model that simply doesn’t work well enough for ordinary people,” he said.

Burnham will become the seventh leader to take the reins of the country in 10 years, a reflection of the political and economic turbulence that has beset the country since the Brexit vote in 2016.

The incoming prime minister said he would also make British politics “less toxic, adding, “I will work to build a new politics. The country is crying out for it.”

Burnham, 56, was born in the Lancashire region of northern England. Burnham started out as a journalist, writing for trade magazines, before transitioning to work as a Labour parliamentary researcher while in his early 20s.

Burnham rose through the party ranks before being elected as the MP for his hometown of Leigh, in Greater Manchester, in 2001. He held that seat for 16 years, during which time he was appointed to several cabinet positions under Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

During Labour’s years in opposition, Burnham bid to become Labour leader twice, but was defeated by — and then served in shadow cabinets of — Labour leaders Ed Miliband and Jeremy Corbyn.

In 2017, Burnham left parliament to become the mayor of Greater Manchester. In his victory speech, Burnham heralded what he called “the dawn of a new era, not just for this city region but for politics in our country. It has been too London-centric for too long. The old political and party structures haven’t delivered for all people and for all places.”

Burnham is associated with the center left of the Labour Party, and has described himself as a socialist. Burnham’s time as Manchester mayor saw him emerge as a major proponent of shifting investment and political power out of London, and earned him the nickname “the King of the North.”

ABC News’ Kevin Shalvey contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2026, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.

A Qing Dynasty vase 200 years ahead of its time

Hong Kong (CNN) — There’s a plucky little Qing Dynasty artifact that at first glance looks out of place among China’s many Forbidden City treasures. Instead of the ornate porcelain and cloisonné enameling often associated with imperial vases, this one is made of blown glass. With its swirling red, white and blue ribbons and emerald green base and mouth, it evokes a spinning barbershop pole; an item which could slot straight into a 1960s living room.Standing at just over eight inches, the curiously contemporary-looking object bears the reign mark of the Qianlong Emperor. Such Chinese characters were inscribed or stamped on most of the hundreds of thousands of works made during the Chinese monarch’s rule in the 18th century.Qianlong, one of history’s greatest and most prolific collectors, had opulent taste and seemingly bottomless funds. “He loved the profusion of colors, and textures, and all kinds of fine things,” said Daisy Wang, Deputy Director and Chief Curator at the Hong Kong Palace Museum, which until this August, exhibited the vase on loan from the Beijing Palace Museum.“He always thought, ‘more is more,’” she added, and under his six-decade rule, art production flourished.The vase, which may appear simple compared to decorative porcelain counterparts (where “little white space would be left”), might have surprised the emperor, said Marco Almeida, a Senior Vice President at Christie’s Asia Pacific and the auction house’s Head of Chinese Ceramics and Works of Art.China at that time had taken the likes of ceramics and lacquerware to the next level, but Europe was still ahead in its glass-making technologies, despite the Chinese making the material since the Western Zhou period more than 2,000 years earlier.Whereas other glass vases were small, plain, and monochromatic, “suddenly, you have this vase with multiple colors, and a style of decoration that was alien,” he said. “I think the emperor must have been quite taken by it and quite pleased.”The object also reveals how cosmopolitan the Qianlong court was, which, like the Mughal court in India, welcomed artisans from all corners of China and the rest of the world, according to Wang.“Putting myself in Qianlong’s shoes, he would consider the vase to be really beautiful, different and novel. That was the value,” she said.It is also incredibly rare. At the Beijing Palace Museum, there are over 300,000 pieces of porcelain in a collection that spans thousands of years of Chinese history, and only a “handful” of glass vases, added Wang.The curator said the vase was likely made either by a European missionary or with technologies and ingredients introduced by missionaries who wound up working in the imperial workshops, or “zaobanchu.” (During the Kangxi emperor’s reign in the Qing Dynasty, German Jesuit missionary Kilian Stumpf began overseeing glass production).The zaobanchu, located in the Forbidden City complex and around the country, had dozens of departments specializing in paintings, textiles, wood carving, materials and more — every minute aspect required to create elaborate pieces.Fashioning the vase, according to the Hong Kong Palace Museum, was akin to pulling candy. Artisans would have pulled hot colored glass into thin tubes, gluing pieces onto the vase’s body, working quickly to roll it as it was heated and cooled again and again as its swirled pattern took shape.Almedia said that while the technique used to make the vase was European, and similar to the “latticino” method used in Venetian glassmaking, the “sensuous” shape was Chinese as of course, was the reign mark. “It’s the perfect, and clear-cut marriage of what is Chinese and what is Western.” The Christie’s specialist said it would be difficult to ascribe its value, but he called the artifact, “borderline priceless.”Wang, who is curating a forthcoming exhibition on imperial workshops at the Hong Kong Palace Museum in September, described Qianlong as a “micromanager in today’s company culture.”He would meticulously document objects, and often gave specific instructions on their design, proportion and size. The zaobanchu during Qianlong’s reign comprised nearly one thousand artisans, who worked out of fear to serve the demands of the insatiable emperor who would sometimes dole out severe punishments, like taking away a year’s salary. “He looked at every step in detail and really dwelt on them as well.”The vase has a “twin brother,” according to Wang, who explained that often objects were created in pairs and in even, lucky numbers. In Beijing Palace Museum’s collection, there’s another one with imperceptible differences — at least to the naked eye, except that it’s a hair taller.And some 5,000 miles away, at Bristol Museum & Art Gallery in the UK, there’s yet another version — this time elongated and olive-shaped, with its threads of color more spaced apart.Kate Newnham, the museum’s Senior Curator of Visual Arts, speculates that the vases were likely created around the same time and scientific analysis “might reveal they are from the glass of similar recipes, perhaps even from the same batch.”She added there’s no evidence, so far, supporting that Qianlong personally commissioned the vase sitting in the Bristol collection. But it’s clear he took a “close interest” in output from the glass atelier. The curator said imperial archives from 1753 include the emperor’s instructions to make a few more “threaded-glass” pitchers after seeing some presented by a French Jesuit craftsman.For such novelty pieces, there would always be more than one version of an object for the emperor to choose from, Almeida explained. “They would want to experiment and see what else they could do with it.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story