Skip to main content

Abbott Rallies Behind Paxton — But Talarico Has Turned Texas Into a Toss-Up

Click here for updates on this story

    August 24, 2026 (Houston Style Magazine) — HOUSTON — Texas Gov. Greg Abbott may be telling Republicans not to panic about Attorney General Ken Paxton’s increasingly competitive race for the U.S. Senate, but there is one inconvenient little detail staring both campaigns squarely in the face:
James Talarico has made Texas competitive.

Appearing Sunday on ABC News’ This Week, Abbott confidently predicted that once Texans take a closer look at Democratic nominee Talarico, they will be “rushing to vote for Ken Paxton.” Abbott blamed Paxton’s sluggish general-election start partly on the costly Republican runoff against outgoing U.S. Sen. John Cornyn.

But if Democrats were nowhere close to winning Texas, Republicans probably would not need the governor of Texas spending national television time explaining why they eventually will.

That is the political plot twist of 2026.

Talarico, the 37-year-old state representative and former public-school teacher, has transformed himself from an ambitious young Texas Democrat into a nationally watched Senate contender. His campaign has leaned heavily into a kitchen-table argument: Texans are working hard, yet housing, groceries, health care and raising a family increasingly feel beyond reach.

And voters appear to be listening.

An August 9–10 Emerson College Polling/Nexstar survey of 1,000 likely Texas voters showed Paxton at 47% and Talarico at 46%, with the difference well inside the poll’s three-point credibility interval. Talarico held a commanding advantage among voters under 50, 53% to 38%, while Hispanic voters favored him by 19 points.

Another July poll from Texas Public Opinion Research had Talarico ahead 45% to 40%. Individual polls differ, but the unmistakable storyline is competitiveness.

Then came perhaps the biggest flashing political billboard yet.

On August 20, the respected Cook Political Report moved the Texas Senate race from “Lean Republican” to “Toss-Up,” citing public and private polling showing a race too competitive to continue treating Texas as reliably Republican.

That is no small accomplishment in a state where Democrats have not won a U.S. Senate election since 1988.

Talarico Is Talking — and Texans Are Hearing Him
Money is helping him carry that message.

Federal filings show Talarico had raised approximately $68.6 million through June, dwarfing Paxton’s roughly $9.2 million. Even more striking is the television battlefield: according to AdImpact data reported by The Texas Tribune, Talarico has spent more than $25 million advertising since the general election began, while Paxton’s campaign had spent only about $119,000—a greater than 200-to-1 difference.

Texans have seen Talarico talking about grocery prices, faith, family and affordability. Hispanic Texans have also seen a Spanish-language campaign message designed to meet voters where they are—not simply during election season, but culturally and conversationally.

Republicans are responding. A Ted Cruz-aligned super PAC recently launched a $1.7 million advertising campaign supporting Paxton, including television placements in Houston, while President Donald Trump is scheduled to appear in Houston August 27 as Republican fundraising efforts intensify.

Translation: Texas is getting expensive because Texas is getting competitive.

Houston Could Help Write the Ending
For Talarico, the road to history runs straight through Houston and Harris County.

His Pasadena outreach to Hispanic families, appeal to younger voters, emphasis on public education and working-class economics, and deliberate effort to court Republicans uneasy with Paxton form the outline of an ambitious coalition.

No Democrat can win Texas on enthusiasm alone. Talarico will need enormous turnout in Harris County, Dallas County, Bexar County and the state’s other urban centers—while improving Democratic performance in suburbs and persuading independents and some Republicans that this election should be about more than the letter beside a candidate’s name.

That is difficult.

But “difficult” and “impossible” are no longer synonyms in the 2026 Texas Senate race.

Abbott may be confident Paxton will ultimately prevail. Paxton’s supporters have every right to make their case. Talarico has the same opportunity.

And that is exactly how democracy is supposed to work.
Texas voters—not governors, billionaires, political consultants or party establishments—get the final word.

When early voting begins Monday, October 19, followed by Election Day Tuesday, November 3, Texans will decide whether nearly four decades of Republican U.S. Senate victories continue—or whether James Talarico turns a summer toss-up into a November political earthquake.

For the first time in a long time, Texas Democrats have more than hope. They have a race.

photo

Here’s the official Texas Secretary of State online voter portal:
Texas My Voter Portal — Check Registration

You can use it to check voter-registration status, find your VUID, and view voting/polling information.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Kierra Lee
KIELEESTYLE@GMAIL.COM
3465287733

Supreme Court backs Trump’s order to curb mail ballots

(CNN) — The Supreme Court on Monday said that President Donald Trump could begin carrying out parts of an executive order intended to restrict mail voting, but additional legal challenges could hinder implementation of his plan before the November midterm election.The ruling injects new uncertainty about the voting rules for the midterms by keeping alive the possibility that Trump will impose policies outlined in the March order that gave the US Postal Service and the Department of Homeland Security unprecedented roles in the running of elections.The high court’s ruling, handed down in an unsigned order over the dissent of the court’s three liberals, means that the Trump administration may move forward with a proposal for DHS to compile state-specific lists of people it believes are eligible to vote in the Democratic-led states that had challenged the plan in court.Another part of Trump’s executive order instructs the Postal Service to impose new mandates on states that want to send ballots through the mail, requiring that they submit their own lists of eligible voters to the agency and include information on ballot envelopes to allow those ballots to be tracked. The justices gave USPS the green light to implement that aspect of Trump’s plan, but a lower court blocked that effort nationwide in a separate case. That means more court action will likely be needed before the USPS can move forward.The Supreme Court’s decision did not address the legality of Trump’s order, only the timing of the challenge to it. Trump for years has made baseless claims about widespread voter fraud while specifically attempting to undermine confidence in mail voting.“The court’s disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the government to implement the order will necessarily be lawful,” the court wrote. “On that score, time will tell. But the order itself does not harm the states, so the District Court lacked jurisdiction to bar the govern­ment from trying to implement it. And for the reasons dis­cussed, that injunction is likely to irreparably harm the government if it remains in place while the appellate pro­cess runs its course.”And it represents a loss for the Democratic states, who warned they will need to immediately begin diverting time and resources away from preparing for this year’s elections, which are fewer than three months away.Election cases have become particularly contentious this year at the Supreme Court, drawing sharp writing from members of both the conservative and liberal wings. In the highest profile case, the court’s 6-3 conservative majority gutted the Voting Rights Act in a significant ruling in late April dealing with Louisiana’s congressional districts.“The ruling is a win for Trump for the moment, but it doesn’t fully clear the way for his effort to limit mail-in ballots to go into effect. There’s already a separate injunction against the executive order that’s not directly affected by today’s ruling, and as soon as tomorrow, a Massachusetts district court may block the underlying USPS rule at issue—which is the real thing to watch heading into November.”This story is breaking and will be updated.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story