Skip to main content

A viral rescue is fueling a push to officially recognize California lifeguards as first responders

By CNN

Click here for updates on this story

    SAN DIEGO (KGTV) — Since the beginning of summer, lifeguards in San Diego have responded to more than 4,000 water rescues.

Advocates say lifeguards are the first to arrive, jump into danger, and save lives — and should be officially recognized as first responders.

In San Diego, lifeguards are part of the fire-rescue department, responding as first responders to ocean emergencies, cliff rescues, and medical calls. Some retired lifeguards say that the role deserves formal recognition.

Chris Brewster, a retired San Diego lifeguard chief, said the stakes are real.

“There are a lot of instances in which lifeguards put their safety on the line and were injured in the line of duty, as well as there have been lifeguards that have died in the line of duty in California, so it’s definitely a public safety and a first responder job,” Brewster said.

Brewster said the designation carries meaningful legal weight.

“That legislative recognition means that there are protections in state law for first responders,” Brewster said.

The push gained momentum after a teenage lifeguard’s dramatic rescue of a boy caught in powerful surf in Santa Cruz went viral, drawing the attention of state lawmakers.

State Sen. Catherine Blakespear, who represents District 38 and whose daughter is a lifeguard in San Diego, is a co-author of a new state resolution urging public agencies to give lifeguards the first responder title.

“Watching that video and knowing what my daughter does, which is exactly what you see in that video, it really makes your heart stop a little bit,” Blakespear said.

Blakespear said the recognition would change how lifeguards are positioned at emergency scenes.

“There’s a hierarchy on the scene of an incident, and they would be at the same level,” Blakespear said.

Blakespear said the next step would be the introduction of a bill that would classify the change of status by law.

This story was reported on-air by a journalist and has been converted to this platform with the assistance of AI. KGTV verifies all reporting on all platforms for fairness and accuracy.

Please note: This story was provided to CNN Wire by an affiliate and does not contain original CNN reporting. This content carries a strict local market embargo. If you share the same market as the contributor of this article, you may not use it on any platform.

Trump needs to get tough on China to get tough on Iran’s economy. He’s been reluctant to do that

By CNN
(CNN) — The Trump administration appears to have landed on a fallback strategy in the Iran war after military strikes and negotiations failed to deliver victory: threats of harsh economic sanctions.Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called them the “toughest sanctions in history,” which will “collapse this regime.” He’s even called it an “economic D-Day” for Iran, comparing it to the historic invasion of Nazi-occupied France during World War II.There’s just one problem: Making good on those tough words requires not just getting tough on Iran, but also getting tough on China, which is Tehran’s No. 1 trading partner.And Trump and his administration have proved quite reluctant to do that.When Bessent rolled out the economic strategy Monday, he didn’t name specific countries that would be punished — or lay out timelines — if they don’t cut ties. And the announcement notably did not include secondary sanctions on the large Chinese banks that facilitate Beijing’s purchases from Iran.China buys as much as 90% of Iran’s oil. Economic analysts have told CNN that targeting these banks and Chinese companies would be crucial to exacting a major toll on Iran’s economy.But not for the first time in recent days, Bessent punted on exactly what would be done on that front. He suggested messages were being sent — saying “no one is above the reach of US sanctions” — but didn’t detail what will happen with China.“If they facilitate transactions and are part of the ecosystem that turns Iranian oil into money, into repression, they will be targeted,” Bessent said. “We find that the best way to engage with countries is through quiet diplomacy.”He added: “So when the hammer of US Treasury actions falls upon them, they will have no one to blame but themselves.”But you could be forgiven for thinking this might be lots of sound and fury signifying relatively little.That’s because not only has the administration regularly backed off the threats it’s made in the Iran war, but it has a track record of treading gently around China, whose leader, Xi Jinping, is set to visit the White House next month.While Trump has made a big show about getting tough on China over the years, he backed off his trade war with Beijing in October, agreeing to a one-year truce. That followed shortly after Beijing upped its leverage by restricting access to critical rare-earth minerals and halting purchases of American soybeans.Trump last year also ignored federal law to help save the Chinese-owned video app TikTok, despite his first administration having labeled it a grave national security threat because of its ability to spy on Americans.Fast forward to Trump’s visit to China in May, and rather than pressing Xi publicly on a potential invasion of Taiwan, Trump made some major Taiwan-related rhetorical concessions.He also backed off his previous promises to get China to free Jimmy Lai, a former Hong Kong media tycoon who criticized the Chinese Community Party, as well as to ban Beijing from buying American farmland and to “aggressively” revoke Chinese student visas.By July, Trump delivered a primetime address in which he claimed China effectively interfered in the 2020 US election (which is not what the evidence actually showed). But rather than punish China for this seemingly major purported provocation, Trump downplayed the need for retaliation.The president seemed to prefer to use China to try to substantiate his still-baseless claims of stolen elections, without going to the trouble of holding the alleged thief accountable.And even in the context of the Iran war, Trump has been gentle with China.He has repeatedly shrugged off the idea that Beijing is helping Iran. And on his way back from China in May, he said he was considering lifting sanctions on Chinese companies that buy Iranian oil.Trump at the time was trying to secure a deal with Iran. But it’s telling that he’s been willing to telegraph potential carrots involving China, even as his administration is reluctant to publicly threaten to use the stick against it. In the latter case, it prefers “quiet diplomacy.”Also telling would seem to be Bessent’s comments Monday when CNN asked why the major secondary sanctions he previewed didn’t start immediately.“Well, we are giving everyone the opportunity to remedy bad behavior,” he said. “Why would I want to blow up the global financial system?”The administration appears well aware that getting tough on Iran would entail going after China — a risk that it might decide isn’t worth it.There’s an argument to be made that these topics are best addressed next month, during Xi’s state visit to Washington.But such pomp and circumstance can drain Trump of his resolve to get tough (as seen during his May visit to China) — and that’s if he even wants to get tough on China right now.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story

Related Stories

Latest News
How the spike in global bond yields creates more risk for the stock market
58 minutes ago

How the spike in global bond yields creates more risk for the stock market

Trump necesita a China para su guerra económica contra Irán. Convencer a Xi Jinping será difícil

Veintitrés años después, preparan una secuela de "Cómo perder a un hombre en 10 días"

Big heels, bigger wigs: Dolly Parton’s singular style

Trump consigue una victoria muy necesaria en Carolina del Sur y otros resultados de las elecciones primarias del martes