Skip to main content

‘You cannot hide from a drone strike’: The terror falling from the sky in Sudan

(CNN) — “You cannot hide from a drone strike,” says Elsadig. For the 27-year-old, that is the terrifying reality of life in Sudan’s besieged city of El-Obeid, where even the simplest routines carry the threat of sudden death.

For much of Sudan’s civil war, which began more than three years ago, civilians feared the fighting on the ground. In El-Obeid, a strategic trade and aid hub that is home to more than half a million people, many now fear what comes from the sky.

In late June, Elsadig was sitting at a water truck station when a drone strike hit the area, severing his left leg.

Nearby, Ahmado, a 42-year-old sewage truck driver, was at work when the same attack struck a group of water trucks. His 9-year-old son, who had come to meet him after school, was killed, along with two of his colleagues.

“My day had started like any other day. There were drones flying over our heads, but I never imagined that my child or I would become a target,” Ahmado told CNN.

His family searched for hours before finding the boy’s body inside the burned-out truck after the fire had died down.

CNN is identifying Elsadig and Ahmado by their first names because they fear for their safety.

“When we hear that there is a drone in the air, we try to take cover under a concrete building,” Elsadig told CNN. “But it comes suddenly — we do not know when or where (it will strike).”

The attack on El-Obeid, a key battleground in the fight between Sudan’s two rival military forces, underscores how drones are reshaping a war that has killed tens of thousands of people, displaced more than 14 million and triggered what the United Nations describes as the world’s worst humanitarian crisis.

The war erupted in April 2023 after former allies Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, head of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), and Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, leader of the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), fell out in a power struggle. Having seized power together after overthrowing the civilian-led government in a 2021 coup, they became rivals in a battle for control of Sudan.

Now, as foreign-made drones pour into Sudan, the United Nations warns the conflict is “on the cusp of entering yet another new, even deadlier phase.” During the first four months of 2026 alone, drone strikes killed at least 880 civilians and accounted for more than 80% of civilian deaths recorded by the UN.

The war’s new weapon

What began as a ground war has evolved into a battle increasingly fought from the air.

Backed by foreign suppliers, both the SAF and RSF have expanded their drone fleets, from modified commercial drones to advanced military systems.

According to Africa Defense Forum (ADF), a military and security magazine published by the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), both sides have shifted “their tactics to airborne weapons and away from ground forces, which have largely reached a stalemate.”

ADF reported that drones supplied by Turkey — including Bayraktar TB2s, which can fly for long periods, carry explosives and are relatively low-cost — helped the SAF push the RSF out of Sudan’s capital, Khartoum, last year.

Turkey has said it supports Sudan’s sovereignty and peace efforts, with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hosting SAF chief al-Burhan in Ankara last month.

The RSF has also expanded its drone operations, using Chinese-made FH-95 drones capable of striking targets at long range. Some of the systems have been linked to suppliers in the United Arab Emirates. Military Africa, a defense publication, also reported that Turkish-made drones have appeared on the RSF side, making it harder “to identify who is responsible for individual strikes on civilians.”

The UAE has faced repeated allegations of arming the RSF, with researchers and rights groups tracing weapons recovered in Darfur, a region largely controlled by the paramilitary group, back to the Gulf nation. The UAE rejects the claims, though a UN Security Council panel deemed them “credible” in 2024.

A battlefield without front lines

Drones have redrawn Sudan’s battlefield, offering a glimpse of the future of proxy warfare, according to Nate Allen, an associate professor of security studies at the Washington, DC-based Africa Center for Strategic Studies.

Allen, who has been tracking the conflict, told CNN that drones are now used to monitor enemy movements, support ground operations, strike supply lines and attack infrastructure. More recently, he said, they have increasingly been used against civilian infrastructure and populated areas.

The technology has also changed the rhythm of the war. In the past, fighting often slowed during Sudan’s rainy season, when flooded roads made it difficult to move troops, heavy weapons and supplies. Drones, however, can keep operating even when ground forces are slowed by the weather.

“Drones don’t depend on roads to navigate, get sick, or get bogged down in the mud,” Allen said. “Both sides are continuing to use drones, especially those with longer range and endurance, to strike one another during the rainy season, when the movement of troops and vehicles might otherwise be limited.”

But as drones have expanded the battlefield, they have also brought the war deeper into civilian life. Distance from the front lines is no longer a guarantee of safety. Homes, markets and critical infrastructure are increasingly within range.

Living under the drones

In El-Obeid and across Sudan, residents say the sound of drones overhead has become part of daily life.

The escalation has been particularly severe in El-Obeid, which has endured what the UN describes as “siege-like conditions” for the past 18 months despite remaining under SAF control.

As the capital of North Kordofan, El-Obeid sits on major routes linking Khartoum with Darfur, the wider Kordofan region and Sudan’s south. That position has made it a strategic target for both the SAF and the RSF. The city is also sheltering at least 100,000 people who fled violence elsewhere in the country.

The UN’s human rights chief, Volker Türk, said that in June alone his office verified 15 drone strikes in and around the city that killed at least 45 civilians, warning that the actual death toll was probably much higher.

Türk said “drones launched by both sides have repeatedly struck markets, schools, fuel stations, water infrastructure and civilian vehicles” across Kordofan, disrupting access to food, clean water, healthcare and other essential services.

The strikes have also made it harder to deliver aid. Earlier this month, a drone struck a truck belonging to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) carrying 50 tons of relief supplies for displaced families — the second such incident involving a UNHCR aid truck this year, according to the agency.

Moses Okello, a senior researcher with the Institute for Security Studies’ Horn of Africa program, told CNN the attacks appear designed to cripple the city’s ability to function rather than simply hit military targets.

“Drones from both the RSF and SAF inflict similar damage on the civilian population,” he said. These “appear to be deliberate attacks on dual-purpose (civilian and military) infrastructure, not as collateral (damage) but as a core military tactic.”

Residents say the effects are felt long after each strike ends.

Rehab, 48, whose home was destroyed in a drone strike at a displacement camp in El-Obeid in June, said the past few weeks had been among the hardest since the war began.

“The attacks have become so frequent that we feel as though the war has started all over again,” she told CNN.

“Throughout the day, drones circle overhead, and we constantly hear their sound. People are now afraid to gather anywhere, even to help one another.”

Aid agencies warn that the worsening attacks are trapping civilians in an increasingly desperate situation.

“Families in El-Obeid are losing their children, their limbs and their homes,” Shashwat Saraf, the Norwegian Refugee Council’s country director in Sudan, told CNN. “Nothing is spared, and those surviving the attacks are going hungry, with nowhere left to go.”

For Elsadig, who said he survived three previous drone attacks before the fourth cost him his leg, every trip outside now carries the fear that it could be his last.

“When you go out, you do not know whether you will come back,” he said. “You may find yourself sitting somewhere, and suddenly, there is a missile beside you. You may live, or you may die. You do not know.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Aunque las tensiones entre México y EE.UU. aumenten, hay algo que parece no cambiar: la cooperación en seguridad

Puede que las relaciones entre México y Estados Unidos estén atravesando un momento de tensiones recurrentes, especialmente luego de que la semana pasada uno de los hijos del expresidente Andrés Manuel López Obrador dijera que le revocaron la visa estadounidense, una decisión cuestionada por la presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum.Pero anuncios recientes por parte de autoridades de ambos países muestran que, más allá de declaraciones políticas, la cooperación bilateral en materia de seguridad, uno de los elementos más importantes del vínculo bilateral, se mantiene firme.El último roce comenzó la noche del jueves, cuando Andrés López Beltrán, hijo de López Obrador y exsecretario de Organización del oficialista partido Morena, anunció en su cuenta de Instagram que Estados Unidos le retiró el visado. En una carta dirigida al presidente Donald Trump, atribuyó la medida al secretario de Estado, Marco Rubio, y al subsecretario Christopher Landau, exembajador en México, a quienes acusó de querer intervenir en otros países.“Como es evidente, esta decisión es de carácter político, más bien politiquero y propagandístico, al estilo hitleriano, pues no existe ninguna razón que justifique tan arrogante proceder”, dijo López Beltrán, quien quiere ser candidato a diputado federal en las elecciones de 2027.Al día siguiente, durante su conferencia de prensa diaria, Sheinbaum consideró que la revocación de la visa a López Beltrán y casos previos representan decisiones arbitrarias de las que buscan sacar provecho las fuerzas políticas de oposición en México. Además de López Beltrán, otros políticos mexicanos a quienes se les ha retirado el visado son la gobernadora del estado de Baja California, Marina del Pilar Ávila, y su exesposo Carlos Torres, entre otros.“Mi opinión es que esta cancelación de visas que han hecho, ellos le llaman a ‘personas políticamente expuestas’, tiene un sentido político, esencialmente porque no es parejo a todos los países, si su sentido fuera relacionado con delincuencia o con alguna prueba de algún tema relacionado con la entrada de un ciudadano a Estados Unidos”, dijo Sheinbaum.Un día después, Estados Unidos dio su contrarréplica, en voz de la Embajada en México y de Landau. En su cuenta de X, la delegación diplomática compartió un video de Rubio —publicado en febrero pasado— junto con un posicionamiento: “Nuestro mensaje es claro y consistente. Estados Unidos cancelará cualquier visa cuando existan razones para hacerlo, sin importar quién sea el titular, dónde viva o cuáles sean sus opiniones políticas. Las visas son un privilegio no un derecho”. De su lado, Landau pidió que este episodio no “distraiga” a la relación bilateral.“Como han reconocido el presidente de EE.UU., Donald Trump, y la presidenta mexicana Claudia Sheinbaum, ambos países prosperan cuando cooperamos en un espíritu de respeto mutuo en temas críticos como la seguridad, la migración y el comercio. No debemos permitir que el ocasional estallido de drama político nos distraiga de este punto fundamental”, dijo en X.En línea con ese mensaje, el embajador de Estados Unidos en México, Ronald Johnson, informó el domingo sobre dos hechos relacionados con la cooperación bilateral en seguridad.Por la mañana, anunció en X que ambos gobiernos firmaron una declaración de intención con la que la Secretaría de la Defensa Nacional de México (Sedena) podrá comprar a Estados Unidos drones y sistemas antidrones para enfrentar a los grupos del narcotráfico.“Esta tecnología fortalecerá nuestra capacidad para combatir a los carteles y hacer frente a nuestros retos compartidos de seguridad”, dijo. La propia Sedena había informado sobre el acuerdo días atrás, cuando se refirió a una visita reciente a México del secretario del Ejército de Estados Unidos, Dan Driscoll.Más tarde, Johnson también dio a conocer que México entregó a Estados Unidos a tres personas sospechosas de diversos delitos: un presunto integrante del Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación, un hombre acusado de cargos con armas de fuego y otra persona sospechosa de fraude. “Nuestra cooperación, impulsada por el presidente Donald Trump y la presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum, envía un mensaje claro a los delincuentes: serán capturados y rendirán cuentas”, señaló.Desde que Trump inició su segundo mandato presidencial en enero de 2025, México ha enviado a Estados Unidos a alrededor de 100 presuntos delincuentes, incluyendo algunos capos del narcotráfico.Aunque las relaciones entre México y Estados Unidos suelen tener tensiones y México rechaza declaraciones de Trump y algunos otros funcionarios sobre que los carteles controlen territorio mexicano, ambos gobiernos continuamente dicen tener disposición para colaborar en seguridad y combate al crimen. En medio de las fricciones por la reciente revocación de la visa al hijo del expresidente López Obrador, el acuerdo para una eventual compra de drones y los nuevos traslados de más sospechosos son una muestra de eso.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story