Skip to main content

Will daylight saving time become permanent after House passes bill?

▶ Watch Video: House passes bill that could make daylight saving time permanent

Lawmakers are one step closer to making daylight saving time permanent after the House passed a bill, with overwhelming support, that would end the twice-a-year time change that many people dread.

It’s now up to the Senate to take up the bill, called the Sunshine Protection Act. But the path forward in the upper chamber is unclear.

Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, who spearheaded prior efforts in the Senate to make daylight saving time permanent, called on Senate Majority Leader John Thune to bring this latest bill to a vote “as soon as possible.”

Thune told reporters Wednesday morning that the main concern is that there’s “optionality for states.”

“We’re looking at it, and, you know, the House had a big vote,” Thune said. “There’s a lot of interest in it from members on our side over here — some for, some against.”

Sen. Tom Cotton has previously expressed opposition to making daylight saving time permanent. According to a senior Capitol Hill aide, the Arkansas Republican’s concerns remain.

The aide said a number of senators on both sides of the aisle have voted against making daylight saving time permanent on the Senate Commerce Committee. That includes Republican Sens. Ted Budd of North Carolina, Deb Fischer of Nebraska, Jerry Moran of Kansas, Tim Sheehy of Montana, Dan Sullivan of Alaska, Roger Wicker of Mississippi, and Todd Young of Indiana.

They’ve been joined by Democratic Sens. Lisa Blunt Rochester of Delaware, Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Gary Peters of Michigan, and Jacky Rosen of Nevada.

Thune has also voted against making daylight saving time permanent, making the likelihood that the legislation is brought up in the upper chamber slim.

“This isn’t really a partisan issue, it’s a geographic issue,” the aide said. Asked Wednesday whether he personally supports the bill, Thune said, “I’m from a northern clime.”

If the Senate were to pass the bill, it would then head to the president’s desk for his signature. President Trump seems to support the measure. He said in a Truth Social post Wednesday morning that the bill’s passage in the House was “Great News for America!” And in May, when the bill advanced out of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, he said he would sign it into law if it makes it to his desk.

Are we on daylight saving time now?

Most of the U.S. is currently observing daylight saving time, which started when the clocks jumped ahead one hour on March 8. It is slated to end this year on Nov. 1, when the clocks will move back one hour and revert to standard time.

By shifting clocks forward an hour, daylight saving time effectively moves an hour of daylight from the morning to the evening.

Supporters of making daylight saving time permanent say it will improve public safety, promote more active lifestyles and end the twice-yearly disruption to children’s sleep schedules. It would allow Americans to have more daylight hours in the evening throughout the year.

Those against it say late sunrises are tough on farmers and early commuters and could have economic consequences. 

Why do we have daylight saving time?

Daylight saving time was first adopted in the U.S. in 1918 in an effort to conserve fuel during World War I, according to the Congressional Research Service. It was used during World War II for the same reason and to “promote national security and defense,” according to the Defense Department.

The annual time change has been in effect consistently since the ’60s, but it hasn’t been found to be a significant source of decreasing energy consumption. In 1974, the Transportation Department found it had minimal benefits when it came to energy conservation, traffic safety and reducing violent crime, according to the Congressional Research Service. 

After daylight saving time’s start date was moved up in 2007, the Energy Department found electricity consumption fell by 0.03%. The time shift has also been associated with some negative health effects.

Only two states don’t observe daylight saving time: Hawaii and Arizona, with the exception of the Navajo Nation in the northeast part of the Grand Canyon State.

The bill, if it becomes law, would allow states to use standard time if an exemption is in effect before the federal law is enacted.

What the death sentence for former Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad tells us about the future of the country

(CNN) — The judge who sentenced Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to death in absentia last week was himself sentenced to death in absentia by the same regime years earlier.Irony in its purest form.Judge Fakhr al-Din al-Aryan defected from the Ministry of Justice in 2013 joining the judicial bodies of the opposition. His reinstatement as judge after Assad was toppled and fled the country for Russia in December 2024 is an illustration of the country’s pursuit of transitional justice.Some Syrians celebrated in the streets after the death sentence handed down to al-Assad and his younger brother, Maher. Words like “historic” and “symbolic” tripped off the tongue.For the first time, after decades of brutal Assad rule – by both Bashar al-Assad and his father, Hafez al-Assad before him - the model of impunity in Syria has been broken, even if the penalty is unlikely to ever be carried out.The Syrian civil war, which started in 2011, killed hundreds of thousands of people, displaced millions more and has ravaged the country’s economy.Ibrahim al-Assil, a senior research fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Middle East Initiative, said the sentences handed down last week are “significant politically and significant emotionally, but at the same time this is only one part of justice that many Syrians have waited for - and are still demanding.”For the United Nations, justice is just one of the “four pillars of transitional justice” with truth, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence carrying equal weight.What does Assad’s sentencing mean for Syria?When Assad fled Syria for exile in Moscow in December 2024, he left behind institutions and a legal system his family had built over six decades.Al-Assil says the sentencing was “the first step to look at the new state, to ask these questions, are new rules and new institutions emerging in Syria that differentiate between justice under Assad and justice post-Assad.”Another question is whether this sentencing met the standards of credible transitional justice.Amnesty International has urged Syria to end trials in absentia and the use of the death penalty, incorporate crimes under international law into domestic legislation and reform the judiciary. The justice ministry rejected the criticism, saying the proceedings complied with Syrian law and included the participation of victims and their representatives.Fadel Abdul Ghany, founder of the Syrian Network for Human Rights which has been documenting victims of the Assad regime since 2011 says: “We need lots of cases, not only one, especially targeting the highest rank, so that the feeling of anger in between the people is reduced, so that Syria can move ahead.”Al-Assil agrees that more localized trials need to follow, bringing as many perpetrators of the former regime’s brutal system to justice as possible. “For many families, they are still looking for those who disappeared, and they want to know where they are, what happened to them…maybe for a family in Homs transitional justice looks very different to a family in Dara’a.”Few believe Russian President Vladimir Putin would ever extradite Assad from his self-imposed exile in Moscow. The death sentence complicates any extradition under Russian law, but a decision not to hand over a former close ally to face justice would be far more political than legal, experts say.What is going right in SyriaThe legalities of transitional justice may be complex, but this verdict is still seen as a landmark moment for justice.When asked what else gives him hope for Syria’s future, Abdul Ghany says; “I think what’s working is freedom of speech, freedom of criticism… Syrians can speak freely and criticize the government, authority, even the high-ranking.” He added that he frequently criticizes the new government without repercussions.Ahmed al-Sharaa, the former rebel commander who has served as Syria’s President since 2025, has been outward looking since taking power.After Assad’s ouster, Syria has bolstered ties with the United States which has lifted most of its crippling sanctions on the country. It has renewed relations with its Arab neighbors who cut ties with Damascus during Assad’s crackdown on protests and welcomed French President Emanuel Macron to Syria in July, the first Western leader to visit since 2024.Al Sharaa reached an agreement with Moscow just days ago over two key Russian outposts in Syria; the Mediterranean coastal bases will be transferred to Syrian control.Entrenched challenges remain, however, in the quest for national unity in Syria. Tensions between the Syrian Army and the Druze minority in southern Syria continue to spark deadly encounters. Al-Assil says he sees no breakthrough on the horizon yet. “The government still seems to deal with the issue as only security and military issue while it’s also a social issue.”There is also persistent friction between Arab and Kurdish communities in the northeast of the country, and the government has had to respond to pockets of violence against the religious Alawite minority along Syria’s coast.Al-Assil also insists that Syria still needs a national dialogue process “to talk about all those divisions between ethnicities and minorities but also to talk about what Syria is and what they want Syria to be and that process is still not there.”The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story