Skip to main content

US nonprofits sue Trump administration over ICC sanctions that ‘muzzle Palestine advocacy’

(CNN) — Two US nonprofits have sued the Trump administration over sanctions targeting the International Criminal Court (ICC) — penalties that they say “violate Americans’ constitutional right to engage in Palestine-related” human rights advocacy.

Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), an organization that promotes democracy and human rights in the Middle East and North Africa, and the Taxpayers Alliance Against Genocide (TAAG) filed a lawsuit Wednesday in a Manhattan federal court seeking to bar the Trump administration from using an executive order “to prevent US citizens from supporting investigations into US and Israeli abuses,” according to a statement released by the two organizations. Those measures “muzzle Palestine advocacy,” the statement added.

An executive order issued by US President Donald Trump in February 2025 authorizes punitive measures against ICC staffers, such as sanctions and bans on entering the United States, because of what the administration described as “illegitimate and baseless actions targeting America and our close ally Israel.”

Several other challenges to the ICC sanctions have been filed to date, but this lawsuit is the first that aims to stop Trump-appointed officials from using sanctions law to “bar Americans from supporting the ICC’s investigations into US and Israeli atrocity crimes, or from working with (UN special human rights envoy Francesca Albanese) and the sanctioned Palestinian NGOs,” the organizations’ statement said.

Those sanctions “unconstitutionally restrict Americans from seeking justice on Palestine at the ICC and working with human rights defenders designated solely for calling on the ICC to investigate Israeli and American nationals,” the statement added.

CNN has reached out to the US State Department and the White House for comment. The United States is not a member of the court. While the US signed the treaty that established the court in 2000, it did not ratify it.

Over the past 18 months, the Trump administration has issued a series of sanctions that have penalized organizations and individuals who say they are seeking accountability for Israeli actions in Gaza — including under the jurisdiction of the Netherlands-based court. That campaign escalated on Monday when Secretary of State Marco Rubio vowed to use “all the tools at our government’s disposal” to “dismantle the ICC, brick by brick, if necessary.”

In September, the State Department imposed sanctions on three Palestinian human rights groups — al-Haq, the al-Mezan Center for Human Rights and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights (PCHR) — that had asked the ICC to investigate and arrest Israeli leaders following accusations of war crimes in Gaza.

The US also leveled sanctions last year against Albanese, an Italian human rights expert who has served as UN special rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories since 2022, as well as ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan and four other judges.

In his first term, Trump targeted the ICC for seeking to investigate alleged war crimes by US forces in Afghanistan.

Earlier this week, Omar Shakir, executive director of DAWN, told CNN that the Trump administration’s efforts to scrutinize the ICC and other bodies seeking accountability underscore how such “efforts go far beyond trying to undermine the (ICC) and undermine the very constitutional rights of Americans to advocate for justice.”

Speaking about the lawsuit, Shakir drew parallels between the Trump administration’s foreign and domestic policies, warning that the impact of the ICC sanctions also “weakens the ability of Americans to petition their own government.”

“This executive order I think also underscores the Trump administration’s broader disdain and distrust for civil society, human rights organizations, journalists, those seeking truth,” Shakir said Tuesday.

“Our hope is that this lawsuit will embolden human rights groups in the United States to resume their critical work calling for justice and to engage with the human rights activists on the ground that risk their lives every single day,” he added.

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

Target se disculpa por disfraz de payaso para niños de Halloween tras la polémica

Target se disculpó el lunes y anunció que había retirado de la venta un disfraz de Halloween que representaba a un payaso de circo que, según los críticos, evocaba la práctica de pintarse la cara de negro y los espectáculos de juglares.El producto, vendido como el “Disfraz de payaso de circo para niños que brilla bajo luz negra” para Halloween, provocó una fuerte reacción en las redes sociales, y algunos consumidores afirmaron que se parecía a una caricatura racista.“Como empresa, sabemos que nos equivocamos y lo lamentamos profundamente”, declaró Target en un comunicado. “El disfraz es ofensivo y nunca debió haber formado parte de nuestro catálogo. Ya no está a la venta”.Este es el último quebradero de cabeza para la imagen pública de la cadena minorista estadounidense, que intenta enderezar el rumbo tras un periodo de bajas ventas.La compañía también ha recibido críticas por la gestión de los productos de su Colección Orgullo 2023 y por los cambios en sus iniciativas de diversidad, equidad e inclusión tras el regreso del presidente Donald Trump a la Casa Blanca.Target declinó hacer comentarios sobre quién diseñó el producto —que se vendió bajo las marcas de temporada Hyde y EEK Boutique— o sobre el proceso por el cual se aprobó su venta.En su comunicado, Target afirmó que estaba “analizando detenidamente cómo ocurrió esto y qué cambios son necesarios”.Algunos compradores afroamericanos, que se sintieron marginados tras los retrocesos en materia de diversidad, equidad e inclusión (DEI) de Target en 2025, expresaron su decepción el lunes.Sheletta Brundidge, empresaria del área de Minneapolis, considera que el disfraz es una consecuencia indirecta de la decisión sobre DEI. “Redujeron la diversidad”, indicó, “así que, ¿quién está ahora para decir: “Esto está mal”?”.En su comunicado, Target reconoció que el disfraz era “especialmente hiriente para nuestros clientes, miembros del equipo y socios negros”.Aunque Hyde y EEK son marcas propiedad de Target, sus productos se han revendido en sitios web de minoristas como Walmart y Amazon, así como en la plataforma Etsy. Reuters no encontró el artículo en cuestión en dichos sitios.Una portavoz de Walmart declaró desconocer que se estuviera vendiendo. Amazon y Etsy no respondieron de inmediato a las solicitudes de comentarios.Target, que ha encadenado dos trimestres consecutivos con excelentes resultados, está empezando a ver los frutos de sus esfuerzos por bajar los precios y renovar su mercancía, y su nuevo director ejecutivo, Michael Fiddelke, ya ha recibido elogios de Wall Street.Pero la compañía, que no puede competir con Walmart y Costco en precio, tiene poco margen de error en lo que respecta a fallos de gestión o de imagen, declaró Brett Husslein, analista de Morningstar.“Ahora que Target empieza a recuperar terreno en la recuperación de su reputación de marca, este es precisamente el tipo de cosas que quieren evitar”, comentó, y añadió que cualquier obstáculo, ya sea de índole visual, administrativa o macroeconómica, “podría provocar mayores pérdidas de cuota de mercado”.Las acciones de Target subieron un 2,7 % en la sesión de la tarde.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story