Skip to main content

Two American sisters checked into a quaint English B&B. The drama started when the key snapped in the lock

(CNN) — Jill Shropshire turned the key in the lock and immediately felt a snap. She stood for a moment in disbelief: the key had broken off in her hand.

“I wasn’t looking at what I was doing, and I just shoved it in there … I think I put it in upside down and broke it off in the lock,” Jill tells CNN Travel today. “I’m immediately like, ‘Oh no. This is not good.’”

Jill turned around to show the broken key to her sister Jan Shropshire. But Jan had already clambered into one of the twin beds, kicking off her boots.

“I was drunk,” Jan tells CNN Travel. “I was crawling to bed already.”

Jill got Jan’s attention by waving the broken key.

“I’ve just accidentally locked us inside,” she told her sister.

Bleary-eyed, Jan dismissed Jill’s worry, barely looking up.

“Oh, we’ll just call down in the morning. It’ll be fine,” she murmured, pulling the covers over her head.

Jill glanced around the room. The two twentysomething American sisters were staying in a countryside B&B in a converted old house in the Midlands of England.

“There are no phones,” recalls Jill. “This is 1997.”

Not only was there no landline in the room, neither sister owned a cellphone.

None of this boded well. But Jill was also tired and tipsy — both sisters had enjoyed several gin and tonics at the local pub that evening.

So she also climbed into bed.

“We’ll just deal with it in the morning,” she told her younger sister, who’d already closed her eyes.

During the night, Jill woke up every hour or so, remembering the predicament and wondering what they were going to do.

“I was just waking up with stress,” she recalls.

Hazy with gin-fueled tiredness, she’d tell herself there was nothing to be done until the morning.

But a cocktail of jetlag and alcohol led the sisters to sleep in until way past 11 a.m. When they eventually woke, the B&B was silent. They’d been hoping to attract the attention of other guests. Maybe the owner would hear them?

“But everyone had already gone out for the day, so there was no one to help,” recalls Jill.

“We were completely alone,” Jan says.

They had no food in the room — beyond a solitary jar of peanut butter. There was no bathroom. And they were stuck.

The sisters weren’t exactly panicking. Both of them also thought the situation was at least a little bit amusing. But they didn’t want to spend a whole day trapped in a bedroom.

“So, we opened up the window,” recalls Jill. “The front door is right below us. But nobody is walking down the street, no one’s going in and out, whatsoever. I mean, we stood there at the window forever, yelling. We’re banging on the door, we’re hanging our heads out the window.”

No one responded. The sleepy English street seemed entirely empty of activity. The sisters were officially stuck.

A memorable trip to England

Growing up in the American South in the 1980s and 90s, Jill and Jan always dreamed of visiting England. Specifically, they’d dreamed of visiting Shropshire, a county in the West Midlands of England, on the border with Wales.

It’s not usually top of the tourist hitlist, but for Jill and Jan, this wish was personal.

“Our last name is Shropshire, so we wanted to go to Shropshire,” explains Jan.

In 1997, the sisters decided to embark on their first trip together: a backpacking jaunt across the UK, with Shropshire as the main event.

“We ended up in Shrewsbury,” says Jill.

This historic Shropshire town is full of medieval buildings, picturesque streets and a center dating back to the Tudor period. It was the England the sisters had always imagined.

“And we had this really nice little B&B at the end of a cul-de-sac,” recalls Jill. “It was an old house, you walk in and there’s a little desk. Everything’s kind of grandma-looking. I don’t know how many rooms they had downstairs, maybe three or four if that? And then we were on the third floor.”

This top floor had a soundproof glass door at the top of the stairs, and then a hallway leading to two small rooms.

The picturesque B&B was the perfect base for exploring. Jan and Jill enjoyed wandering the cobbled streets, peeking inside the medieval Shrewsbury Castle and embracing English pub culture.

On their second night in the town, they settled down for a long night in one of the pubs.

“We ate,” recalls Jill. “Then more of a crowd came in. We had a few drinks…”

The sisters started off sharing pints with locals, then switched to their shared drink of choice — gin and tonic.

They enjoyed chatting to other pub-goers, explaining how they’d ended up in the town.

“It was wonderful,” recalls Jan of the evening. “Though I was a little disappointed that no one was impressed that our name was Shropshire.”

“Nobody cared,” says Jill, laughing.

“Nobody cared at all,” agrees Jan, shrugging. “We were thinking, ‘Isn’t this special?’ Everyone was like, ‘No…’”

As they stumbled home, Jan and Jill felt euphoric. It was so exciting, traveling together, somewhere totally new for the first time. They’d always wanted to see more of the world. Their Shropshire adventure felt like the beginning of a new chapter.

Getting trapped in the B&B bedroom was not part of their vision for this exciting new era.

A day stuck in a bedroom

When the sisters woke up to that reality, neither could quite believe it, but both were glad they were with the other.

“It would have been much more stressful alone,” says Jan.

“Or with anybody else,” says Jill. “Someone else might really freak out and then that’s more stressful.”

“For us, we’re both like… ‘It’ll resolve somehow,’” agrees Jan. “I mean we’re not going to stay in this room forever. We’ll get out at some point.”

After they’d yelled out the window for a while, to no avail, Jan and Jill decided to change out of their pajamas and at least embrace the day as best they could.

They tucked into the peanut butter for sustenance, but with no cutlery to hand, they had to dig chunks out with a folded-up piece of cardboard.

The lack of bathroom issue was far from ideal, but they came up with a (somewhat) workable workaround.

“There was a freestanding sink…” recalls Jill.

It wasn’t a great solution. But the bigger worry was Jan’s health.

“I’ve been type-1 diabetic my whole life,” she explains. “Back in ‘97 I was using a vial of insulin and syringes — which you don’t use anymore, because we’ve got insulin pens and insulin pumps and stuff. But back then, every place we would go to, I would ask the owner of the B&B if I could keep my insulin in the fridge.”

As Jan was trapped in the room, she couldn’t access her medication.

“So, I’m up there for several hours with no insulin.”

Still, Jan tried not to worry. There was nothing to be done, and she felt relatively stable. And she was confident they’d escape before too long.

“I just sat back in bed and read,” says Jan.

Both sisters had brought stacks of books with them for the two-week backpacking trip. This made hauling their bags on and off trains a chore, but now they were thankful for the distraction they offered.

Hours passed. Occasionally they’d attempt another yell out the window or bang on the door. But the B&B — and the road in general — remained empty.

Escaping the room

It was edging towards evening when the sisters eventually heard movement in the corridor outside. The previous day they’d met a Russian couple who were staying in the room next door, but any attempts at longer conversation had been thwarted by the language barrier. Now they heard muffled voices speaking in the corridor.

Jill and Jan looked at each other. Jan was in shock.

“I couldn’t believe it, because we were in there for so long,” she says.

Jill immediately leapt to her feet. She didn’t want to miss the opportunity. She started shouting and banging on the door.

“I jumped up like, ‘Oh my God, I have to catch them before they go into their room or leave again,’” she recalls. “I think it was a frantic: ‘Help, help!’”

“And I thought, ‘They’re just gonna ignore her, they’re just gonna hear banging and talking and they’re just gonna ignore that,’” says Jan.

But even if their fellow B&B guests couldn’t understand the specifics of what was being said, they recognized the panic in her Jill’s voice. They replied, shouting something in Russian. Then the sisters heard footsteps heading downstairs.

Within moments, they heard the B&B owner expressing muffled apologies.

“She was just on the other side of our door, so we could communicate with her,” says Jill. “She was mortified, but it was completely my fault, because I broke the key off in the door. But she was very apologetic and just freaked out that we’d been up there all day.”

The owner shouted to the sisters she would call a locksmith. More time passed, then there was commotion at the door once again. The locksmith had arrived.

“I think he just took everything off. He took the doorknob apart and got us out,” says Jill.

When the door eventually opened, Jill and Jan couldn’t quite believe they were free.

“We went out right away, because we had been in there for hours,” recalls Jan. “We went out, ate, walked around.”

Shrewsbury seemed even more appealing after a day spent locked in a hotel room. The sisters returned to the pub, in need of a “thank God we’re no longer stuck” drink.

“And they gave us another key. I don’t know if I locked us in that night or not, I might not have,” says Jill.

Decades of adventures

Almost 30 years since their B&B incarceration, Jill and Jan still laugh about the key breaking in the lock and the day trapped in the attic bedroom.

“Those little things, those little mishaps, make it more memorable,” says Jill. “We had a great time backpacking around the UK. Having these little mishaps makes you more resilient. You know you can handle things.”

“And we laugh at ourselves a lot,” adds Jan.

“We do,” says Jill.

Since that memorable first trip, Jan and Jill have traveled together many times. Today, they also work together, running a jewelry business.

The sisters’ outlook in work, travel and life is generally “whatever happens, happens.” They suggest their early-20s-travel-mishaps helped shape that positive mindset.

“We just don’t stress out, unless our lives are in danger,” says Jan.

Jan suggests their outlook probably comes in part from growing up with diabetes.

“When your baseline is like a stone on your back, everything else is fine, and it’s funny,” she says.

“I like to have the attitude that life is good,” agrees Jill. “You just gotta keep looking at the nice things in life and being curious — having a curiosity for the world around you.”

The-CNN-Wire
™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.

‘Going it alone does not work’: America’s first one-party war

(CNN) — As President Donald Trump pleads for tens of billions of dollars to pay for the nation’s war with Iran, Democrats in Congress have offered an unequivocal — and historically unusual — message.No.Trump’s operation in Iran has now become the most partisan war in modern US history, marking the first time that one party is willing to fully reject wartime funding requests from the country’s commander-in-chief.Democrats are, for the first time in at least a century, in lockstep against a war from the start. They are refusing to support more funding. They are voting en masse to demand Trump pull troops out. They are even rejecting a broader Pentagon policy measure in protest — which includes provisions mostly unrelated to this particular war, such as one that would raise troop pay.It’s a seismic political shift from years past, when Democrats would cower from accusations of not supporting troops in the middle of a conflict. But party lawmakers contend that the American public, including Republican voters, are on their side, and that the GOP’s support for the war will be a real dividing line heading into the November election.“They absolutely own it,” a fired-up Rep. Pat Ryan of New York, who served two tours in Iraq, said of Republicans. “We’ve lost multiple additional soldiers. They’ve lied and covered up casualties. Like, what are you doing?”GOP leaders are furious, with Speaker Mike Johnson calling it “shameful” for Democrats to refuse funding for the Pentagon, especially amid concerns about depleted munitions and as the administration has sought nearly $70 billion more in emergency cash to help pay for military operations in Iran.“Democrats don’t want to play along,” Johnson said. “Why? Because they have a problem with the president, and they think they’re going to get a political advantage over this.”Democrats’ opposition is multifold. The party is generally more skeptical now of foreign entanglements and much less sympathetic to Israel, the key US partner in Iran. But the party is even more suspicious of Trump — particularly compared to the last GOP administration in wartime — and are incensed at how he’s handled nearly every part of the war in Iran. And they’re emboldened by the president’s failure to sell the conflict to the public from the beginning, setting the table for a war that is uniquely unpopular just months into the conflict, despite fierce competition for that mantle.‘Going it alone’Led by their ranks of military veterans — like Ryan, who fought in the Middle East wars of the early 2000s — Democrats are now prepared to use their limited powers in the minority to block those funding requests until Trump and congressional Republicans can present a real plan to end the war.And party leaders, like House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, plan to put those veterans at the centerpiece of their messaging going into the midterms, according to multiple sources briefed on those discussions.“We’ve got to be willing to support the troops … but there are also times when we have to say enough is enough,” added Rep. Seth Moulton, a Marine Corps veteran who was deployed four times to Iraq.“Clearly, with Trump and his losing war in Iran, Democratic veterans are saying enough is enough, and a lot of fellow Democrats are following our lead,” Moulton said.As the US has stepped up its bombings in the last two weeks and the broader conflict escalates, the politics of the Iran war have become more perilous at home. Just 29% of Americans support it, according to a recent Washington Post-Ipsos poll, and even some Republicans acknowledge there’s been virtually no attempt to convince the public, or Congress, why the war is necessary.Rep. Don Bacon, a Republican defense hawk who is retiring from politics this year, said Trump is to blame for failing to bring Democrats on board.“I don’t think the president’s done a good job trying to get bipartisan support for this. Going it alone does not work,” warned Bacon, who spent 29 years in the Air Force, including as a commander in Iraq.In the five months since the first US airstrikes killed Iranian leaders, Trump and his Pentagon leaders have said little about their plans abroad, with highly mixed messages about the overall objectives. Even in private briefings, senior lawmakers have been unable to get answers to basic questions about the Pentagon’s funding needs or strategy.“The idea that … ‘we don’t need a single Democrat,’ it’s not smart. Because in the end, we need these guys. We need to have a better defense for our country,” Bacon said.Democrats project campaign confidenceIn another mark of the dramatic political shift from after the last pair of Middle East wars, the House’s most endangered Democrats insist they aren’t worried about a barrage of GOP attacks for not supporting the troops.“I’m sure they’ll campaign that way,” Rep. Henry Cuellar, who represents a competitive district in south Texas and sits on a critical defense spending subcommittee, said of the potential GOP attacks.But, he added: “It’s very unpopular. People are tying it to the high gasoline prices. Part of it, (Trump) campaigned he was going to stop endless wars, and here we are.”Rep. Susie Lee, who represents a swing seat in Nevada, made clear she would not support the GOP’s Iran funding plan — “I’m not voting for it” — and said her biggest priority is getting information for her own active-duty constituents who are under attack overseas.“I’ve supported defense spending. I will continue to support spending and support our troops, but there’s no strategy on how this war is going to end,” she said.For Republicans in difficult races, the issue can be complicated. They’re trying to align themselves with the military but also are fully aware of voter anger about higher prices at the pump.“We have to protect America. We have to protect American troops,” said Sen. Jon Husted, a vulnerable Ohio Republican. “I want the war to end, I want the war to be over, I want gas prices to come down, but I also don’t want to weaken our military.”Sen. Susan Collins, the endangered Maine moderate locked in a tough battle for reelection, was non-committal when asked if she’d back more funds, noting that her Senate Appropriations Committee had just heard testimony from Pentagon leaders about the funding request.“Now the committee will work its will,” she said.A very different Middle East warIn 2007, at the height of the insurgency in the Iraq war, then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi helped to deliver tens of billions of dollars for the Bush administration’s two increasingly unpopular wars in the Middle East.Roughly two decades later, the former wartime speaker is clear that she will not vote to support Trump’s war in Iran in any fashion.“It has not been approved by Congress. And we don’t see a plan, a purpose, an exit strategy. That’s the sloppiest approach to our national security that I’ve ever seen,” Pelosi told CNN.Pelosi, a San Francisco liberal, had voted against authorizing Bush’s war with Iraq back in 2002. But roughly 40% of her fellow House Democrats did support it, as well as more than half of Senate Democrats, including Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and then-Rep. Adam Schiff. That vote came after a furious pressure campaign by the Bush administration to sway lawmakers to back the operations, including public hearings, member briefings and speeches.The push to support troops in warzones at that time was so strong that Democrats repeatedly acquiesced to the Bush administration’s funding requests — even after Pelosi and her party took back the House a year prior with pledges to bring troops home.It wasn’t the first time Democrats had bowed to the pressure.Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, a senior Democrat from Missouri, recalled watching as a child as then-President Richard Nixon spent years trying to sell the public on the war with Vietnam.That sales pitch ultimately failed. But, Cleaver argued, Nixon and right-hand man Henry Kissinger at least would “come across as strategic.” Democrats in Congress continued to fund the war until the very end.With Trump’s operations in Iran, however, there has been no vote to go to war. The president has made no argument to voters or to Congress.‘Nobody likes it’And there’s dwindling support even in Trump’s own party.“I think 95% of everybody in that room in there realizes that this is a mistake, and there’s no way out,” Cleaver said, nodding toward the House chamber, where every Democrat — and a handful of Republicans — had just voted to halt Trump’s war in Iran.On his way to the House chamber that day, Cleaver walked the halls with a Republican member, whom he refused to name but said privately ranted about the war.“He was saying, ‘This is absolutely crazy.’ Nobody likes it. Even the guys who are gonna support the bill don’t want it.’ They realize that this is a quagmire,” Cleaver said.Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky is one of the few Republicans who will say it out loud.“The Iran war has not been a success. I’ve been opposed to the Iran war from the beginning,” Paul said. “I think, by any objective matter, we’re worse off, we’re measurably worse off than we were before the war.”Asked if Republicans would suffer backlash at the polls come November, Paul deadpanned.“Probably,” he said.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story