Skip to main content

Trump fires U.S. attorney in Washington on heels of court appointment

▶ Watch Video: U.S. attorney who served for less than an hour suing Trump administration over firing

Washington — President Trump on Wednesday fired Roger Rogoff from his post as the top federal prosecutor in Seattle shortly after federal judges in the area installed him in the role.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Rogoff’s firing in a social media post and accused the judges serving on the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, who had appointed Rogoff as U.S. attorney, of failing to consult with the administration before making their selection.

“District court judges can appoint a temporary U.S. Attorney, and POTUS can fire them. WDWA judges abandoned the time-honored process of consultation with the administration so that the selected U.S. Attorney is qualified to serve in the administration,” he wrote on X. “Roger Rogoff has been fired by the President.”

Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington Democrat, criticized Mr. Trump for the firing.

“Roger Rogoff is eminently qualified — throughout his career, he has demonstrated an outstanding commitment to public service, and he was appointed legally by the federal judges in the Western District of Washington,” she said in a statement. “He should have never been fired, but the president wants to appoint an out-of-touch extremist who will put Trump over the rule of law.”

Murray accused the Trump administration of attempting to bypass the Senate’s advice-and-consent role to “install cronies to carry out a corrupt political agenda.”

“The people of Washington state deserve someone in this role who will enforce the law fairly and responsibly — not some Trump administration sock puppet,” she said. 

Blanche’s announcement came soon after judges in the Western District of Washington issued an order appointing Rogoff as U.S. attorney. They highlighted Rogoff’s “deep ties” to the region and said he has “devoted his career to serving its citizens,” including as a local and federal prosecutor, judge on the King County Superior Court and as director of the Washington State Office of Independent Investigation.

The Western District of Washington has not had a Senate-confirmed U.S. attorney since mid-2023, in the Biden administration. After Mr. Trump took office in January 2025, he fired Tessa Gorman as U.S. attorney, who had been serving temporarily before the district judges appointed her to the post in May 2024.

Mr. Trump has not yet announced a nominee to lead the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Seattle. The district court announced in January that it would exercise its authority under a federal law governing U.S. attorney vacancies to appoint one.

The office is currently led by Charles Neil Floyd, the first assistant U.S. attorney. Floyd had been tapped as interim U.S. attorney in October but a 120-day clock on his appointment ended in February.

Rogoff is the latest victim of the Trump administration’s ongoing standoff with federal district courts in several states who have exercised their authority to appoint a U.S. attorney until a vacancy is filled, only for their picks to be fired by the president soon after. 

Federal law allows the attorney general to appoint an interim U.S. attorney, who is subject to a 120-day term. Once that appointment expires, though, the district court can either agree to extend that prosecutor’s tenure or appoint its own U.S. attorney until the Senate confirms a replacement.

Federal judges have exercised this power to install U.S. attorneys in several areas, including in Virginia, New Jersey, New York and Nevada.

In those cases, the Trump administration had tapped key allies as interim U.S. attorneys, including Alina Habba, who was Mr. Trump’s personal lawyer, in New Jersey and John Sarcone in Albany, New York. But the judges in those districts declined to keep them in the roles and instead named their own U.S. attorneys to serve. In response, the president fired those replacements and, in some cases, maneuvered to keep his original picks — like Habba and Sarcone — in place under a different federal law.

But federal judges have said those acting U.S. attorneys put in place by the Trump administration in New York, Nevada, New Jersey and Virginia were unlawfully appointed. At least one federal appeals court has ruled against Mr. Trump and agreed with a lower court that Habba was serving as acting U.S. attorney unlawfully. Several other appeals courts are considering the legality of the appointments of top federal prosecutors in their areas.

In a case involving Lindsey Halligan, who was appointed interim U.S. attorney in the Eastern District of Virginia and had also been a personal defense lawyer for Mr. Trump, a federal judge dismissed criminal charges against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James after concluding that Halligan’s appointment as U.S. attorney was invalid. The Justice Department has appealed that decision. 

Rather than capitulating to the US, Iran toughens its demands over the vital Strait of Hormuz

(CNN) — The list of demands from Iran can’t have surprised the White House.Hardliners have been repeating the mantra on a daily basis: the limited agreement in the works with Oman on the Strait of Hormuz is not the same as reopening the vital waterway in the way Washington wants.For that, they say, “America must correct its behavior.”Tehran has now spelled out what means, laying out a series of conditions that appear to go beyond the memorandum of understanding which was agreed in June but later suspended amid US strikes on Iran, Iranian retaliation across the Middle East and a resurgence of attacks on shipping.On Saturday, Mohammad Bagher Zolghadr, a highly influential figure in the Revolutionary Guards, reeled off a maximalist set of demands.That Iran is issuing such demands underlines the perception that Tehran believes it has the upper hand. CNN has reported on dwindling US munitions - something angrily denied by President Trump - and suggestions that his top general is looking for an “off-ramp” in the conflict.It is also likely that Iran has taken notice of how many times Trump has threatened major strikes before not following through on the threat.Zolghadr demanded the US lift its naval blockade and withdraw its military forces from around Iran.The US must also pay damages caused to Iran by the wars this year and in June last year (which was principally conducted by Israel), he said. And the US must lift sanctions and release, unconditionally, Iranian assets frozen abroad.The implication of Zolghadr’s statement was that these conditions must be fulfilled before or in tandem with concessions on the strait, which would be at odds with the formula set out in the memorandum of understanding.That held that sanctions would be fully removed once a final deal regarding Iran’s nuclear program was reached and envisaged a phased release of assets, in which the two sides “will mutually agree on the procedures related to the release of these funds.”Iran’s apparent new strategy, though, is not without risk.The fresh demands “narrows the options for the Trump administration,” according to the former Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, James Stavridis.“Iran is overplaying its hand and it appears the hardliners are in control. The likelihood of a deal in the immediate term is declining,” Stavridis posted on X Sunday.No US-Iran talks underwayThe Trump administration has not responded to the latest Iranian conditions.“What we’re really working through now is how you can actually set up a traffic scheme so that the ships that pass can pass through safely,” US Vice President JD Vance told Fox News on Saturday.But the current situation smacks of stalemate.Iranian officials, whether perceived as moderates or hardliners, are saying that renewed negotiations with the US are not in prospect.“As long as the United States has not addressed its violations of the memorandum of understanding and remedied those breaches, we see no possibility of restarting negotiations,” Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Sunday.“We currently have no negotiations with America. Yes, there is an exchange of messages through intermediaries,” he added.Araghchi referred to the more limited and temporary arrangement for Hormuz being negotiated with Oman, which borders its southern shoreline.“I can say we are in the final stages, and the old routes that existed will be replaced with new routes,” he said, referring to how the thin traffic traveling through the strait is currently split between Iranian and Omani paths.“This, of course, does not mean the opening of the Strait of Hormuz,” Araghchi told reporters in Tehran, which was “subject to the fulfillment of a series of other conditions.”Other Iranian officials have indicated that an agreement with Oman would continue to give Iran considerable influence in the strait, which it did not enjoy before the war but which has become a red line as important as the nuclear issue for Tehran.Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said last week the arrangement reflects a new strategy for exercising “effective sovereignty” over the strait, while stressing that Iran does not intend to routinely close the waterway in peacetime.Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei cautioned last week that there could be a deal with Oman “provided that certain third parties do not obstruct the process” in a far from cryptic reference to the US.Amidst the uncertainty – and sporadic attacks on ships passing through the Strait – traffic remains very limited. An average of about a dozen vessels a day have transited in the past week, according to shipping data.That’s about one-tenth of the normal pre-war traffic.Already into its sixth month, the conflict between the US and Iran shows no sign of resolution - but has instead evolved into an unpredictable cycle of escalation and pause.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story