Skip to main content

Transcript: Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy on ‘Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan,’ July 26, 2026

▶ Watch Video: Sen. John Kennedy says U.S. should “stay the course” in Iran

The following is the transcript of an interview with Louisiana Sen. John Kennedy, a Republican, that aired on “Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan” on July 26, 2026.


MARGARET BRENNAN: We turn now to Republican Senator John Kennedy, who joins us this morning from Madisonville, Louisiana. Senator, it’s good to have you on the program. I’ve- I’ve got a lot to– 

SEN. JOHN KENNEDY: — Good to be with you, Margaret.– 

MARGARET BRENNAN: — get to with you. Let me just button up where I left it with Ambassador Waltz, if I could, because that Saudi civil nuclear deal he was just discussing-it’s got to go to you. It’s got to go to Congress for approval. Are you comfortable with it?

SEN. KENNEDY: No. Maybe some someday, but not right now. We’re bombing a country to keep them from getting a nuclear weapon, but we’re signing a deal with another country, I know it’s a commercial agreement, but that the world perceives as possibly someday leading to a nuclear weapon. The world’s on a hair trigger. The world looks at what’s going on in- in Ukraine, the Middle East. The world looks at America’s relationship now with Europe. People are scared. That’s why I say hair trigger. And if you’re running Japan, or South Korea, or Australia, or Brazil, or some countries in Europe, you’re at least thinking about the need to acquire a nuclear weapon, and then you see this deal with Saudi Arabia, and it’s just not good timing. I think someday it might be. I don’t think it’s going to happen anyway because the president’s conditioned it on Iran- on Saudi Arabia recognizing Israel, and they’re not- they’re not going to do that.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, the Saudis said they’d be willing to, but they want a pathway for the Palestinians. The Israeli politics of the moment don’t make that sound– 

SEN. KENNEDY: — I know. And- and the president’s going to say- the president’s going to point out correctly that we’ve got 26 of these one-two-three agreements with other countries.

MARGARET BRENNAN: — Yes– 

SEN. KENNEDY: — but the timing’s- the timing’s not good.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Understood. It got a lot of attention this week. You were pretty sharp in your questioning there of the Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth when he asked for $67 billion in funding for the Iran War. You said, just like our poll shows, you need more information. Did you get an agreement that you will be provided the classified, detailed briefing that you say is necessary?

SEN. KENNEDY: I’m having breakfast next Wednesday with General Caine. I’ve seen the poll. It looks about right. I support the president in Iran. We all need to do a better job messaging. I may end up with a sombrero on my head by saying this, but we all know the president. He- he exists loudly. He- he grows anxious when he has an unexpressed thought. He’s not always disciplined in his messaging. I’m not saying he should stop talking. He’s the president and I’m not. But I would put Rubio and Caine and Ratcliffe and Hegseth out there, either in a speech or in a long press conference, to explain what’s going on in Iran. Why we went in? Why we’re still there? Now the Democrats- I listened to Bernie. Bernie wants to just come home. He wants to turn out the lights, make sure the cat’s inside, and go to bed. That would be a huge, huge mistake.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, it’s interesting because 67% of Americans want the war to end now, and during that questioning, you floated the idea to General Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, that the U.S. could stop in Iran, end the blockade, and bring troops home. He didn’t lay out for you the potential consequences. But why did you ask that question? Are you- you’re not advocating it. Why are you asking it?

SEN. KENNEDY: Because I wanted to know the answer. Look, here’s what I think we ought to do. I think we ought to tighten the sanctions on the sale of Iranian oil. I think we ought to continue the blockade and starve them out. I think we ought to bomb Pickaxe Mountain and try to reach what’s underneath it. I don’t know about- I don’t have enough information to know about continuing the attacks. The president likes the daily attacks. He believes that sometimes you have to kill a few chickens to- to scare the monkeys. That’s not- I don’t think that’s going to work with- with the Iranian leadership. These people are more than mildly insane. It’s like dealing with son of Sam or Charles Manson. But I don’t think we ought to just cut and run. If we can stand the pain of the rising cost of energy, we need to stay the course, at least for a few more months. I also don’t think we need to send in troops. That’s my opinion, for what it’s worth.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Lindsey Graham is going to be laid to rest this week in memorial service. One of the things that he wanted up until his death was financial restrictions on the biggest buyers of Russian oil. There are 62 signatories to that bill, filibuster-proof majority. Will it get voted on before the Senate breaks for summer?

SEN. KENNEDY: Don’t know. And let me say, look, with respect to the Senate, doing nothing is hard because you never know when you’re finished. We need to put the- the House budget resolution on the floor. It’s the only chance we have to get money to defense, the farmers, and to take another crack at the SAVE Act. We need to add Iran to the- to the Graham Russian sanctions bill and vote on it. We need to put- put the cryptocurrency market structure bill on the floor and vote on it. I love John Thune– 

MARGARET BRENNAN: — All in two weeks?– 

SEN. KENNEDY: — and- and maybe take a few extra days. Look, I mean no disrespect. I love John Thune. He’s my leader. He’s got a big brain. He’s- he’s better looking than me, but I think he’s just being too cautious. He wants to spend the rest of our time talking with- with Senator Schumer about shutting down government, and the Graham Platner wing of the party is, his party, is not going to let Schumer agree with us. They- they already want to give Schumer a bathrobe, a popsicle, and an early bedtime, and have him retire. I don’t think Chuck can agree with us.

MARGARET BRENNAN: — I just–  I

SEN. KENNEDY: — I think he’s going to shut down government.

MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to go back- you just said you wanted to move forward on what the House just started the process on. 

SEN. KENNEDY: Yes ma’am. 

MARGARET BRENNAN: That would be a party line- that would be a party line vote. That would be Republicans jamming this thing through, and the SAVE Act, as you know, or even some version of it, is highly partisan, highly controversial. Bigger picture, isn’t it going to hurt faith in our election process if a Republican-only policy to change how elections are run is ramped through 100 days- you know, less than 100 days out from the election? 

SEN. KENNEDY: No, in my opinion, for both sides to have credibility in the elections- in our elections, we need to do two things and only two things. Number one, you have to prove you are who you say you are in order to register to vote and to vote. And number two, however you decide to vote, that’s up to the states, we need to go back to having an election day, not an election month. We’ve got to know the results of election that night or shortly thereafter if it’s close. That to me is what the SAVE Act is all about, and I think we can pass it, and I think we can craft it in a way to survive a Byrd bath.

MARGARET BRENNAN: Grants, in other words–  

SEN. KENNEDY: –But we’re not going to- to know if we don’t try. 

MARGARET BRENNAN: Grants in other words, to states. To incentivize, not requirements for states to take action. That’s your version?

SEN. KENNEDY: Yeah, but that’s not the only thing. I’ve- I’ve been contacted by some really smart people about a way to do it in addition to the grants. I’m not saying it’ll work, but you’re not going to know unless you try. 

MARGARET BRENNAN: All right, Senator- Senator Kennedy, a lot of business to get to. I’m going to have to leave it there, though. Thank you so much for joining us today. Appreciate your time. 

SEN. KENNEDY: Thank you, Margaret. 

MARGARET BRENNAN: We’ll be right back.

A tropical depression could soon form in the Atlantic — but can it survive El Niño’s hostile conditions?

(CNN) — El Niño has been hitting the snooze button on Atlantic hurricane season for weeks, largely preventing the basin from waking up and churning up storms, but at least one potential tropical troublemaker has a chance to shake the season out of its slumber.The National Hurricane Center is outlooking an area in the tropical Atlantic that has about a 70% or “high” chance of becoming at least a tropical depression late this week. There’s also another area in the northern Atlantic that has a much lower chance to develop, and only in the next day or two.The next tropical storm that forms anywhere in the basin will be named Cristobal.🌤️ Get your local forecast in the CNN Weather appMid-August is typically when the tropics enters its busiest stretch, but any upcoming contenders for tropical development are going to be fighting an uphill battle to form and stay alive against El Niño’s influence.Toe-to-toe with El NiñoThe main challenge these systems face is El Niño’s abundant storm-killing wind shear. It’s a force that’s more likely to stick around as El Niño grows into a potentially record-breaking Super El Niño in the coming months.Wind shear is a change in wind speed or direction at different levels in the atmosphere that can prevent storms from forming in the first place, keep them from strengthening or tear them apart completely. It’s now firmly in place over what should be the most active parts of the Atlantic.This is the exact setup that prompted numerous predictions for a below-average season in the first place. Hurricane season has certainly been living up to those expectations so far: It’s been the least active start to the season since 2009.Arthur and Bertha have been the only tropical storms to date. Both came alive right along the Gulf Coast and were battered by wind shear every step of the way, which prevented them from strengthening significantly and limited their impacts overall.Development chancesThe upcoming tropical chances may face a similar story, just in different locations.The area outlooked with the high chance in the eastern Atlantic marks the first time all season a system could actually form somewhere other than near the United States’ coastline.This area of the Atlantic — called the main development region — should be getting very active at this point in a typical season as wind shear relaxes and ocean temperatures soar, providing tropical systems with ample fuel.But thanks to El Niño, that wind shear remains stubbornly in place and has recently become record strong, according to Phil Klotzbach, a hurricane expert with Colorado State University.There could be a window after Wednesday for the potential system with a high chance of development to get enough of a boost of energy to overcome some of the shear.It could become a tropical depression as soon as Thursday as it tracks west across the tropical Atlantic. But it’s unclear how much stronger it could become.Computer forecast models are also still uncertain exactly where the system could track from there. Some take it toward the eastern Caribbean late this weekend, where it would face more wind shear. Others curve the system northeast of the region, where it could eventually escape the worst shear and head toward the open Atlantic if it survives that long.The other potential development area has a slimmer time frame to spin to life before conditions get more hostile around midweek.Season to dateA normal Atlantic hurricane season typically has at least three tropical storms by August 3 and four by August 15. Bertha — the season’s second storm and the last to roam anywhere in the basin — impacted the US Gulf Coast in late July.The season is also behind on hurricanes: The first hurricane of the season typically forms around August 11. Hurricane Erin formed just a few days after that threshold in 2025 and 2024 had already seen two hurricanes by that point.Mid-August to mid-October is when most tropical storms and hurricanes form, so there’s still plenty of time for tropical systems to make an attempt. However, multiple groups including the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Colorado State University are growing increasingly confident in their forecasts for a muted season overall.NOAA released a forecast update last week that upped their chances of a below-average season from 55% to 75%. That forecast also notably dropped its range for the overall number of major hurricanes — Category 3 or greater — from one to three to zero to two.If the 2026 season ends without a major hurricane, it would be the first time without such a powerful storm since 2013.The-CNN-Wire™ & © 2026 Cable News Network, Inc., a Warner Bros. Discovery Company. All rights reserved.
Read Next Story